Das Art Frost

@timdanilovhi It won't change anything. AI's opponents are artists and 3D artists. Nobody cares anymore what happens to AI.

ElevenLabs is going to watermark all of their voiceovers, And Gemini (YouTube by extension) will instantly know it was AI-generated. They’ll bring more AI tools into Google SynthID soon, Which I bet will split YouTube into AI vs. Real Content sections that you’ll be able to toggle on and off. Curious to see how the performance of faceless channels changes over the next few months.

@Oyu_Noi Have you seen a video of Ii that gets a million views?

Seedance 2.0で短編を制作中なのですが、クオリティを保つために試しているワークフローです ① GPT image2で6コマ絵コンテを作る ② キャラ部分を単色で塗りつぶす ③ その絵コンテをキャラシートと一緒にSeedanceへ渡す ④「塗りつぶした部分を、キャラシートの人物に置き換えてください」と指示する GPT image2で絵コンテを作り続けると、絵柄がGPT image2っぽく収斂していくことがあります。 なのでMidjourneyなどで作ったキャラクターデザインを維持したまま長めの尺を作りたい場合は、一度絵コンテ上のキャラを単色で塗りつぶす工程を挟んでいます。

@ImKingGinger @chrispavlovski How can I get users onto the platform if there's a better alternative?

Dear @chrispavlovski Rumble needs to stop focusing on being a free speech platform. We know. We get it. But in order for Rumble to really take off it needs to be an entertainment brand. Right now it is not. It's an alternative for outcasts. And that's a really great and noble goal. But it is no way a creator or incubator of talent. In order for Rumble to be successful it needs to create it's own stars, from 0-10M subscribers. Hire talent scouts. Grab rising stars on YT before they hit 10k subs. Not just politics. All creators.

@XStrangeHistory Yes, there is such a rule on YouTube, it's written on Google's website. If they find a link to a channel that violates the rules, all your channels will be blocked.

I no longer believe human reviewers exist at YouTube. Here’s why: An old, inactive channel I hadn’t touched in years was flagged for “inauthentic content” in January. (“AI” didn’t even exist when I uploaded to that channel!) I deleted it because I no longer wanted or needed it. As a direct result, all of my active channels were demonetized — not for any violation on those channels, but solely for “association” with the deleted one. It’s now been 92 days. I’ve received zero human review, only repeated AI denials. The system now says my channels can’t be monetized until the deleted channel is “admitted” back into the YouTube Partner Program. That’s impossible. A deleted channel cannot be reinstated or monetized. This is a permanent block caused by a clear error. A human reviewer using basic common sense could fix this in minutes. If human reviewers truly exist, please have one review my case. @TeamYouTube @YouTubeCreators

@lilyYtCreator @TeamYouTube Can you explain why you have a video about a robbery in your children's content that attracts younger children?

Can @TeamYouTube please explain how this is considered mass-produced? There are so many layers behind this—I just couldn’t show them bc the page was at maximum size. My entire screen is covered with edits and layers. Yet it was still labeled as “inauthentic content” seriously?!!

@chrisfirst Did you see that even the security guard couldn't resist taking a photo of you?

Look famous using Seedance 2.0 Prompt in reply.

@javilopen @vaporama_vision @TeamYouTube If there are no obvious violations, then most likely the violation is in the absence of an educational or entertaining element

@vaporama_vision @TeamYouTube Noooooo. Not you!!! Please don't delete any of your videos! All of them are amazing. Furthermore they are completely opaque about what videos are infringement (that's not legal, by the way). I can't believe you were affected by this witch hunt too.

YouTube demonetized me for "inauthentic content". This is what I make 👇 It takes at least a week, a render farm, and advanced skills to create a 3D video like this. I work too hard for it to be labeled as low effort. My appeal was rejected. Please @TeamYouTube, review my case

@vaporama_vision Bro, you need to add value to your videos - it has to be educational or entertaining.

UPDATE: my channel was just reviewed again and is still not eligible for monetization until June 28, under the same reason. I’ve been recommended to make “updates” to my channel before reapplying, but the feedback remains very broad, so it’s difficult to know what needs to change

@nllv_comm @TubeAIYT As far as I know, there is a political audience there with their own tastes in content.

One thing you might add is that Rumble has no discovery algorithm. Even if you do go there, you are not organically suggested on the platform. Rumble asked me to go there years ago. They promised to put me on the front page. I did all that, they never followed through. Waste of time. If they don't respect the creator, we should stay away.

Leaving YouTube to join Rumble is a terrible move. Here are 3 reasons why: 1. Users YouTube: 2.7 billion monthly users. Rumble: 52 million 2. Revenue YouTube: $62 billion ARR Rumble: $100 million 3. Average RPM YouTube: $3-$8 Rumble: $2-$10 YouTube pays the same per 1k views and has 52x the audience. Why would you want to leave?

@TubeAIYT After reading the comments and debates, one can conclude that bloggers offended on YouTube will want to move to another platform but will return because it is impossible to survive on the funds paid by the competitor.

@Queen3384 Finance and medicine are very strict on YouTube.

A psychology and philosophy channel. Every video is a long-form essay — researched from academic sources, written from scratch. I cover Jungian theory, attachment psychology, existential philosophy. These are important subjects . The work I put into making them accessible, emotional, and genuinely educational takes weeks per video. There is nothing automated about that process. There is nothing inauthentic about it. And yet — here we are. Flagged. Demonetized. And told to wait 90 days. 90 days. That is three months of lost income. Three months of creating without the support the monetization system exists to provide. Three months of uncertainty while an algorithm that already got it wrong sits with the final say over my livelihood. For a creator who depends on this channel, that isn’t a review period — it’s a sentence. The cruel irony is that a system designed to catch AI-generated content slop has flagged some of the most human content on this platform. The research is human. The writing is human. The perspective is human. The audience responding in the comments — I love this platform. I believe in what it can be. But this policy, as it stands, is broken — and creators like me are paying the price for it. Review the actual work. Fix the system. Do better. Channel - @queen3369?si=fatFsFO_o4gGWbPD" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@queen3369?si=… @TeamYouTube @YouTubeCreators @YouTube

@AA_Tarkowski @markgadala Nope

@markgadala No. That's still nowhere near on par with open-source models. Sooner or later, this prudish paternalism will lead to uncensored open-source models winning the AI race.

Wow Seedance is allowing for more gooner content

@markgadala Well, they improved the graphics, but they still need a lot of work on AI so it doesn't look so cringey.

@ope_dave You're parasitizing on demonetized bloggers, as if that will solve their problems.

60% of demonetization of non slops channel stem from scripts Mainly because it’s easier to have a patter or signature as a lot of other videos You script has thousands of words The bot just needs one sentence or paragraph with similar patterns as other channels Then boom 💥

@TubeAIYT @ChoctopusYT A podcast or interview is the easiest way to create a 2-3 hour video.

@ChoctopusYT Been telling everyone to make long form content but they'd rather be lazy and automate short forms. No wonder so many people are getting demonetised.

YouTube is really doubling down on owning the living room space. If you make content, this is your reminder to start making evergreen long-form content.

@seniorinsight60 @TeamYouTube Yes, YouTube is strict about financial and medical advice.

Hi @TeamYouTube I'm a biochemist. I've been on YouTube for 3 years. I built @seniorinsight60" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@seniorinsight… channel with 22K subscribers in under a year with a clean record, never flagged once. YouTube demonetized me for 'inauthentic content' and rejected my detailed appeal in a matter of hours and without watching the evidence video I submitted. I use AI narration because English isn't my first language. YouTube explicitly allows this. I research every topic myself. I write every script myself. I manually edit 150+ scenes per video. I reply to my senior community every single day. I just need one real human at @TeamYouTube to look. If this happened to you and you got it reversed, Please share this. You could change everything for me.

@TubeAIYT Want to tell me a free tip that will earn you tens of thousands of dollars? Make videos that people like. That's pretty much the advice of all course sellers.

YouTube automation is a fancy term for AI slop. Ask yourself 1 question: Does YouTube want more of the same videos on its platform? Of course not. "Get rich quick" doesn't work in any industry. What makes you think it will work here?

@TubeAIYT They have much bigger problems than just not disclosing their use of AI.

YouTube bans won't slow down until creators do 1 thing. Since March 2024, YouTube has required creators to disclose the use of AI in content. But nobody does it. If you use AI voices, images or video clips, disclose it. It takes 5 seconds and could save your channel.

@mmltechYT @AnimeVersus_X I agree with you, mostly banned channels are copies of other popular channels.

Well, I’ve been reading the policy updates following all these ban waves, and to be honest, you answered your own question: 'Same videos, same style...' The platform is currently oversaturated with that kind of content, and it just doesn't bring any unique value anymore. I guess you can thank all those 'gurus' who teach people to create faceless channels purely for quick cash rather than out of a passion for creating something meaningful. I don’t try to gatekeep @YouTube some channels may have been wrongly flagged by automated systems, but most were just low-quality money generators with zero intent to provide actual value.

YouTube LITERALLY says AI voice is monetizable So why are creators getting DEMONETIZED for “inauthentic content” right after? Same videos. Same style. Different decision. What changed? Or is it just a trick to steal revenue of small creators?

@AnimeVersus_X YouTube isn't fighting AI. It's looking for unique channels. Unique channels aren't copies of other channels. Banned channels copy the style and presentation of their videos.