Dav_Darki

@Valeria16540168 @TelDiTen Sì ma NowTV ha solo Wimbledon in esclusiva ormai. 3 su 4 si vedono altrove

@TelDiTen sei sicuro? perchè mi pare che con tennis tv non puoi vedere gli salm... almeno cosi mi hanno detto chi ce l'ha

promemoria di pubblica utilità

@SushiCatKing @1CantBeNamed @Thorin G2 beat BFX, TES, GenG and T1 this year alone. They got annihilated today but 4 series is not a fluke

@1CantBeNamed @Thorin After this series, proves that series was a fluke and nothing more. 2 BO5 wins against T1 in 8 years. T1 won 3 world championships in that time.

LYON made top three at MSI only beating: FURIA (CBLoL 1st seed) TSW (LCP 1st seed) G2 (LEC 1st seed)

@dermotmanager_ @DeugemoTwo Il miracolo sportivo è battere Furia e Team Secret Whales per fare top4? L'unico risultato impressionante è il 3-0 ai G2

@DeugemoTwo Parlando seriamente, Inspired ha portato questo team nella top 3 mondiale in un evento internazionale; per me questo lo classifica come il miglior jungler europeo di sempre. È un autentico miracolo sportivo.

Io faccio davvero fatica a capire come sia possibile un risultato del genere. Inspired rimane in ogni caso la criptonite dei team EU.

@DeugemoTwo Inspired ha perso ai mondiali l'anno scorso dai G2, e anche quando era negli EG veniva asfaltato. Qui è stato un everything gap, è facile giocare jungle quando hai 3 winning lanes

@masanovic2015 @Olly_Tennis_ Sinner has played 4 out of 5 matches in the day

@Olly_Tennis_ Sinner doesn't play in the heat of the day

🤔👇 Now THIS is a very weird decision Zverev vs Fery will be the FIRST SF on Friday, 1:30pm start Djokovic vs Sinner will follow This is despite Jannik and Novak having around 18-24 hours more rest 🤔 Banking on TV viewership? #Wimbledon

@8RE_HA8 @fiago7 @Espeo11 Didn't know football started 20 years ago

@fiago7 @Espeo11 Spain is way more successful in the past 20 years... It's not even close.

Even with its 2 biggest nations 🇩🇪🇮🇹 having a downfall rn + a weak Netherlands & Portugal, Europe still dominates world football. 6/8 quarter finalists. I don‘t want to see any 🇪🇺 disrespect on my timeline no more 🦅💶🏰

@KanyeIlGoat @Brizz1994 Passi la miracle run dei DRX (dove comunque Zeka e Kingen hanno trascinato tutti) ma nel 2020 ha giocato con Showmaker Canyon prime

@Brizz1994 Beryl è l'unico giocatore ad aver vinto due mondiali senza giocare con Faker; facendolo umiliando Keria in finale nel suo prime.

Basta dire che odio cr7. Non mi tilta lui e per me rimarrà uno dei più grandi giocatori di sempre. Mi tiltano le persone che provano in ogni modo a esaltarlo come GOAT quando, palesemente, non lo è. Se su LoL esiste Keria ( Messi ) se vuoi provare a convincere qualcuno che Beryl, Mata o chi vi pare sia più forte, risultate solamente cringe e fastidiosi.

@ChrisUniverse1 @FakerfanSkt @Sheep_Esports Bullshit tweets deserve bullshit replies

@davDarki @FakerfanSkt @Sheep_Esports There’s no way you took that showmatch seriously 😭😭😭 Im crying son

HANWHA LIFE ESPORTS 🇰🇷 SWEEP G2 ESPORTS 🇪🇺 IN MSI ROUND 2! The series lasted just 82 minutes ⏱️ Game 1 — 33 minutes Game 2 — 24 minutes Game 3 — 25 minutes They will face the winner of BLG vs LYON in the Winner Bracket final!

@FakerfanSkt @Sheep_Esports DK can't even beat C9 lmao

@Sheep_Esports I think Kt, Dk are better than G2.

@TTPDEndedBillie @zajef77 Yeah but not by a huge amount. C6 qiqi still the best option until C6 Alyosha

C6 Alyosha is so strong that Wriothesley's strongest team uses him, even if it costs you his charged attack entirely because he's a healer...

@KingOfHellMain How big of an upgrade is C2 Cyno?

V1 Cyno-Odette SC team is balling With Odette enabling Cyno buffs by herself, he can finally use Nicole last slot wich opens Fjords back 160k is in a preety good spot, will do a more detailed post another day, specially about Alyosia But for once i can say Cyno is cooking

@POW3R_GC @sonounatroi @Giunghi99 Ma cosa c'entra la console, si sta parlando del gioco...

@sonounatroi @Giunghi99 perché funziona ancora la ps1 pensa se ti si rompeva sony non te la sistema mica

dal 2016 sono su PC e non possiedo un singolo disco

@_joshuaperry @ItzzZain10 A tester is never "late". They can test whenever they want, even outside the time window the player gives, provided they find them. If they do, you can never refuse a test

@davDarki @ItzzZain10 She refused bec the tester was late. She still had the test few days after and it's negative. 4 years is outrageous when some other players who really tested positive even if the excuse of contamination gets only 3 months.

A player fails two separate drug tests after an unexpected increase in performance level = 3 month ban. A player, consistently injured, misses a drug test = 4 year ban. Tennis is setting a dangerous precedent.

@Diegodoy91 @jon_wertheim If the tester doesn't find you outside the testing window, you're cool. If they find you, even outside the window, you can't refuse.

@jon_wertheim Why do they even ask the player to give the 1-hour testing window if they can be tested at any time? Utterly pointless and contradictory

No way this survives the (inevitable) appeal….there had to be *some* penalty here. But when actual positive tests get a fraction of the penalty of a test refusal, justice has foot-faulted …

@Toby_1979 @gamesetsketch @richie_sim77330 @Djoko_UTD There was doubt hence why both ITIA and WADA conducted an investigation lasting for months before arriving to a conclusion

@gamesetsketch @richie_sim77330 @Djoko_UTD She's considered guilty yet there was no doubt about Sinners guilt. Double standards.

Doping Rules in Tennis : Refused Test once Tested Positive 4 years 3 months 🤣

@TunedIntoTennis When you test positive you're able to explain yourself and get that 4 years reduced or even nullified. If you refuse you just subject yourself to the maximum penalty without explanations

I think it’s weird optically that just 2 years ago two world number 1 players actually tested positive for banned substances and combined their suspensions didn’t even touch 6 months. Yet you have someone who didn’t take a test essentially receive a career ending suspension

@JeremyD7 @TunedIntoTennis She didn't miss a test, she refused one

@TunedIntoTennis Am I crazy or aren’t players allowed to miss like 3 tests in a year period?? 🤔

@MariaB79444595 @pavyg 4 years are automatic for a positive test, they only get reduced if you offer ITIA explanations after testing positive. But if you refuse in the first place you can't give any explanations, that's it.

@pavyg Sinner and Światek didnt avoid testing. Missed test is equal to doping. But 4 years are crazy. She is not the first player that receive punishment for avoiding tests. I just wonder why she is not gathering stringer evidence like hair tests etc. Why she was not ready that day?

3 Grand Slam champs and Top 10 players in Tennis all in their 20s have all been charged with doping offences in the last 18 months. Jannik Sinner aged 24. Iga Swiatek aged 24. Marketa Voundrousova aged 26. Voundrousova gets a 4 year ban but Sinner and Swiatek next to nothing.

@Neno___None @marramirem5 @jmgmoron Ingested* not injected. She took vitamins

@Neno___None @marramirem5 @jmgmoron Maia has been suspended by ITIA and not WADA plus the degree of negligence can vary. She injected stuff on her own willingly, she didn't get contaminated by a third party. Completely different cases.

¿Por qué a Vondrousova le han caído CUATRO AÑOS por no hacerse un test antidoping? Sí, de primeras resulta chocante ver esta sanción por no hacerse un test, cuando hay positivos cuyas sanciones no alcanzan ni el año. Hay una explicación. Esta sanción no nace de un positivo, sino de una negativa a hacerse un test. Las reglas antidoping son claras: si un tenista se niega a hacerse un test se expone a un máximo de cuatro años de sanción. Lo que finalmente ha recibido la checa. Básicamente, la ITIA entiende que si te niegas a hacerte un test, puedes esconder algo, de ahí la gravedad de la sanción. Vondrousova se negó a hacerse un test el 3 de diciembre de 2025, cuando una persona acudió a donde se encontraba la checa. Para justificarlo dio dos versiones, una en diciembre y otra en abril de este año. Ese cambio de versiones puede haber supuesto la máxima sanción. Al principio dijo que la inspectora acudió una hora después del límite fijado para aparecer, cuando realmente no hay hora límite, ya que pueden aparecer a la hora que sea, y en abril cambió su versión diciendo que le entró miedo ya que sufría de estrés, problemas de salud mental y había recibido amenazas. El tribunal no le ha comprado el cambio de versión y no se creyó los problemas de salud mental. Queda a criterio de cada uno que lee lo ocurrido, pero las reglas son las que son y le han impuesto la sanción máxima.