h
11.5K posts


EXCLUSIVE: Cuba has acquired more than 300 military drones and recently began discussing plans to use them to attack U.S assets, according to classified intelligence shared with Axios. The intelligence could become a pretext for U.S. military action. axios.com/2026/05/17/us-…


@RabbiMivasair @IndJewishVoices @jvpliveNY @jvplive @IfNotNowOrg What was the “Nakba” prior to 1948? Jews legally immigrating and settling the land? If that’s a Nakba then all mass immigration is a Nakba.



Think I’ve reached the limit to seeing footage of horrific settler violence in the West Bank. Pregnant women attacked, children shot, beaten with clubs, a chained up dog belonging to a Palestinian family being horrifically clubbed to death by an Israeli settler. When does it end?

@nxt888 The moral basis that the claim "This is Muslim land" carried no weight in the 20th Century and Jews were under no obligation to remain second-class citizens in alleged "Muslim" lands any more.

Pro-Israel groups are spending big to sink Thomas Massie in the most expensive House primary in history dlvr.it/TSZsXh

Ending that sentence with “since the ceasefire” is actually insane.

@nxt888 The Palestinians did not want partition They rejected it They wanted it all - all the land from the River to the Saa That is the reason for all the blood letting for the past 78 years.


On what moral basis were Palestinians "obligated" to accept partition? They weren’t obligated to like it. They were not obligated to see it as fair. They were entitled to reject it politically. But rejection is not the same as a right to launch or support a war to prevent any Jewish state from existing. By 1947 there were two peoples on the land with competing national claims. Jews were not a random foreign lobby with no connection to the place; they were a people with ancient ties, continuous presence, mass displacement, and a real need for sovereignty after centuries of persecution. Partition was morally imperfect because reality was morally impossible: two peoples claimed the same land, and neither was going to disappear. The moral basis was not that Palestinians owed Jews a debt. It was that Jews also had a right to self-determination, and partition was the proposed compromise between two conflicting claims. The tragedy is that compromise was rejected in favour of war by the Arabs. Palestinian suffering which is historically brought upon by themselves is real but it does not erase Jewish legitimacy and it does not turn rejection of any Jewish sovereignty into moral innocence.










