Vadim Graboys (deap state bot)

6.7K posts

Vadim Graboys (deap state bot) banner
Vadim Graboys (deap state bot)

Vadim Graboys (deap state bot)

@deapthoughts

@[email protected]

NYC Katılım Nisan 2009
612 Takip Edilen4.8K Takipçiler
cold 🥑
cold 🥑@coldhealing·
Sometimes I feel sad about my life but then I remember that 46 year olds and 16 year olds alike would kill for one night drinking natural wine in Brooklyn
English
6
3
248
7.5K
kang
kang@jaycaspiankang·
Bluesky really is the weirdest social media site ever created. It’s like the most toxic liberals built themselves a prison and then locked themselves up in it and now have 10 riots a day. Why would you do that lol.
English
281
1.3K
18.6K
450.6K
QC
QC@QiaochuYuan·
ok i've figured it out. AI will never be conscious because if it ever happened, standard anthropic arguments imply you should overwhelmingly locate yourself as an AI in a future where conscious AI instances vastly outnumber baseline humans. checkmate atheists
English
15
0
51
19.4K
Derek Thompson
Derek Thompson@DKThomp·
Wow. The AI supply crunch is real. Frontier labs are desperate for compute. Musk has compute capacity but a meh model, and Anthropic has a fantastic model with weak capacity. Now I wonder if Elon continues to refer to his new business partner as “woke AI,” “Misanthropic,” etc.
Claude@claudeai

We’ve agreed to a partnership with @SpaceX that will substantially increase our compute capacity. This, along with our other recent compute deals, means that we’ve been able to increase our usage limits for Claude Code and the Claude API.

English
60
79
1.5K
187.5K
Vadim Graboys (deap state bot) retweetledi
Pedantic Killjoy
Pedantic Killjoy@PedanticKilljoy·
The line "do you know how much you have to abuse an animal to make it not want to have children" is dumb as shit. Animals have babies because when they fuck, it makes a baby. Humans can choose not to have babies because we have tech that makes having babies a lifestyle choice instead of the inevitable biological consequence of our primal urges. All child-free discourse is a fascinating intellectual exercise, much like theodicy, where the speaker is putting in an astounding amount of work to avoid making the obvious 1-to-1 connection that is sitting right in front of their face because they don't like the implications of that obvious 1-to-1 connection.
English
15
0
35
2.7K
wanye
wanye@xwanyex·
I’m sorry, I know this bums a lot of you out, because you’ve built your personality on being to pro-market, pro-technology guy, but technology is just very clearly making us less happy
English
218
322
4.2K
1.1M
can
can@can·
incredible that they’ve squeezed in an entire soho in north 6th in williamsburg
English
7
21
893
34.9K
Vadim Graboys (deap state bot)
@stanfordNYC Yea but that's because it's a thin strip of park surrounded by 6 lanes of traffic. No one wants to hang out in that! Whereas THIS park will be an even thinner strip surrounded by only FOUR lanes of traffic. Much better!
English
0
0
2
124
Bernard Stanford ✡︎
Bernard Stanford ✡︎@stanfordNYC·
Boston already has this and it basically sucks. It sits cold and empty for a whole half of the year, and even in fair weather is among the worst-utilized land in downtown. A swathe of prime land not used for living, working, commerce, transportation or infrastructure.
Bernard Stanford ✡︎ tweet media
NYC DOT@NYC_DOT

What if Park Avenue felt more like a park? New renderings showcase options to transform E 46 St to E 57 St with wider medians, greenery, seating, pedestrian enhancements, and more. Get involved and help shape the future at a public workshop. ⬇️

English
174
24
995
416.7K
Vadim Graboys (deap state bot) retweetledi
Sukrit Ganesh 🇺🇸 🥑 🚲🛩️
Your daily reminder that: - The correct inclusionary zoning percentage is 0 - The correct amount of impact fees $0 - The correct utility hookup fee is $0 - The correct transfer tax rate is 0% Boom, I've just shaved 20% or more off development costs with the stroke of a pen.
English
11
29
415
7.2K
Vadim Graboys (deap state bot)
@blackopsposter @2024dion No it wouldn't, it would keep rents the same. Even if it did make it cheaper somehow and it wasn't ruled unconstitutional, it wouldn't give people dishwashers or in-unit washer/dryers. Only way for most people have "luxuries" like a dishwasher is to build lots of luxury housing
English
1
0
0
20
_
_@blackopsposter·
@deapthoughts @2024dion Everyone’s rent would be cheaper if the universal rent control I want would pass.
English
1
0
0
16
Vadim Graboys (deap state bot) retweetledi
Dion
Dion@2024dion·
New York is the greatest wealth generation engine ever created by man and yet New York housing stock is so low quality that they’re doing ‘which basic household appliances are REALLY necessary’ discourse
𝖓𝖎𝖓𝖊 🕯@atlanticesque

YOU 🫵 must pick one of four studio apartments to live in with the following sets of amenities. (Each has a sink, and if no bathroom, six units share one on the floor) 1. Oven, Fridge, Bathroom 2. Fridge, Bathroom, W/D 3. Oven, Fridge, Dishwasher 4. Fridge, Dishwasher, Bathroom

English
5
11
164
15.5K
_
_@blackopsposter·
@deapthoughts @2024dion He could have a gold plated bidet that gives him a hand job while washing his ass and he’d still be in Kansas City.
English
1
0
1
28
_
_@blackopsposter·
@2024dion You live in Kansas City.
English
2
0
1
237
Steven Liss
Steven Liss@This_Liss·
Had a Jane Street phone interview in 2016. "Price a 6-month forward on carrots." There's no carrot futures market, so I build one from scratch: seasonal harvest cycles, USDA demand elasticity, cold storage decay rates. One trader stops me. "Your storage cost function– you're modeling the carrot as dead inventory. Like grain in a silo." He asks me the metabolic respiration rate of a post-harvest carrot at 2°C. I estimate. "Your forward is overpriced by exactly that shrinkage. The underlying is consuming its own sugars. It's alive." Good correction. I adjust the model. I think I've recovered. Rejection email comes the next morning. Subject: "Ethical Review." My framework, they write, "relied on the severance of the root organism from its growth medium." The question about respiration was a test. The carrot was still alive and I'd built an entire derivatives structure on top of its death without questioning whether harvest was an acceptable act. I pull up the recruiter's original email. It doesn't say Jane Street. It says Jain Street– a non-violent quantitative commodities fund. The carrot was never supposed to be priced. It was supposed to be refused. I later learn the only candidate who passed that round was a former monk from Gujarat who sat in silence for eleven minutes and said, "I cannot put a price on life." He's now a partner.
Deedy@deedydas

Jane Street made ~$40B in 2025 with 3,500 employees, a ~2x from the year before. At ~65-70% profit margin, that's $8M profit / employee, the highest for a 1000+ ppl company. High-frequency trading continues to be the most efficient money making engine. I want to share an old story about my Jane Street interview in 2014. Jane Street was known for hiring a lot of math, physics and CS olympiad winners from top universities and putting them through many rounds - including, for trading roles, a gauntlet of mental math. It was my 6th interview and my final round and I recall being asked "What is the next day after today in DD/MM/YYYY where all the digits are unique?" They'd toy with you and say "You can use a pencil and paper, if you want" but you knew that was an instant no. Painstakingly and as quickly as I could, I came to an answer. "How confident are you that this is correct on a 0-1 probability scale?" the interviewer said. "0.95", I blurted out, not fully knowing how to answer that. "Are you sure?" After thinking harder for a few more seconds, I realized I could've flipped the digits around to get a closer date. I gave the interviewer my answer. It was correct. "0.95 huh?" he chuckled. That's when I knew I failed. Note: fwiw, other companies that come close in efficiency are - Tether ($90M+ profit/emp) - Hyperliquid ($80M+ profit/emp) and on revenue: - Valve ($50M/emp) - OnlyFans ($37M/emp) - Craigslist ($14M/emp) - Anthropic ($12M/emp, run rate) - OpenAI ($8M/emp, run rate) For comparison, Nvidia is very efficient at scale and is $4.4M/emp.

English
151
617
9.7K
1M
Vadim Graboys (deap state bot)
Developer profits are merely capitalism's expression of how much future residents want to live somewhere.
English
0
0
0
87