doge
4.5K posts


1. Willfully ignoring the pedo protection,
2. Victimising and prosecuting veterans.
3. Ignoring and denying grooming gangs
4. War against the elderly with fuel allowance scrappage.
5.Calling everyone that doesn't agree with immigration as racist and far right.
6. Absolutely pathetic response to Southport stabbings.
The list goes on and on.
English

@MatthewStadlen He’s an obvious dud better to replace him asap most of the country for some reason think he’s evil
English

It’s not difficult to see how this plays out if the Prime Minister is forced to resign. First, Labour infighting played out in public. Then the new PM greeted with frenzied calls for a General Election by Reform MPs and their cheerleaders, egged on by those in the media who have been helping to stir the movement against Starmer. Madness.
English


@RachelTaylorMP Listen to Preet Kaur Gill, she appears to be far more sensible than those like you in the minority, "Calm down, unite, and get on with the job".
English

@Gavin2339989492 @Peston Weak labour as usual he’s a dud get rid of him asap
English

My unscientific weekend poll of Labour MPs and government ministers is that Keir Starmer will be replaced as their leader and the country’s prime minister “by the end of the year”.
They also say that an immediate defenestration and snap leadership election should be avoided if possible, for two reasons.
First, the party needs to have a debate about its future direction and what could be a “big story of hope for Britain” they could coalesce around and sell to voters
Second, the leadership change should be orderly, respectful and likely to yield a stable outcome.
This means, they say, that the process needs to be long enough to allow Andy Burnham the opportunity to resign as mayor of Greater Manchester and contest a by-election.
Which is not to say they all want Burnham as Britain’s next prime minister. Some do. Some don’t.
What it means is they fear he and his supporters would never cease to lobby to be Labour leader, and therefore no new leader would be secure, unless Burnham was given the opportunity to win a leadership contest or crash and burn.
“If Andy feels he is blocked again, any new leader will be toast before the next election,” one senior MP said to me.
And to give Burnham the rope he wants, the leadership contest has to be delayed till the autumn, say his friends and foes.
I have two other pieces of intelligence, or perhaps more properly unintelligence.
No MP or and minister is able to explain to me how this “orderly” transition to a new leader would actually transpire, if the PM were to dig in and refuse to leave - which right now Starmer shows every sign of doing.
There is a chance that the cabinet would unite against him and collectively make him an offer, to go with dignity on a set timetable, that he could not refuse. Ministers are as we speak talking to each other about just such a scenario.
But that would be to believe they are capable of sublimating their individual personal ambitions and enjoyment of high office for what they will see as a nebulous greater good.
Most of us don’t need to consult an AI superbrain to attach the appropriate probability to ministerial turkeys voting for Christmas.
So tomorrow’s 49th relaunch speech by the PM is both profoundly important and trivially unimportant.
If it is an absolute car crash then the consensus of MPs and ministers that Starmer can stay a few more weeks and months will evaporate, and the accidental rebel Catherine West would secure her 81 nominations to be the stalking horse challenger.
Starmer would be fighting for his political life.
But I have been briefed to expect a speech that shows contrition, that Starmer “gets it”, but that it is too soon for him to come up with a bold and unifying new vision for the country, not least because he avowedly hates doing “the vision thing”.
In other words, the speech will probably be a bit of a “meh”, neither one thing or another, neither hastening his exit or cancelling it.
Which, possibly, for Starmer, in his current dire straits, would be a win.
English

@Yorkiebadger1 @TaliFraser Not a national party anymore need a deal with reform
English

@TaliFraser You are being too negative. Last year we won, what, something like 35 percent of the seats we were defending? This year, 60 percent? Upward momentum.
English

I’ve tried to make a bit of sense of the Tories + these local results so far …
🧨Even w London wins — which were necessary for a positive story — there is concern in LOTO about how Reform could weaponise it …
👀BUT it leaves hopes for the mayoralty (read for names LOTO have floated), inc a TV star
My latest | @ConHome ⬇️
conservativehome.com/2026/05/08/the…
English

@Heccles94 Reform will make gains, spend 3 years engaged in corruption, fraud and incompetence.
Reform dissolved before the general election and Farage jailed for taking a £5m bribe.
English

@MrsFoxtrotwhisk @ZackPolanski I think they could under Miliband/Burnham.
English

@Sargon_of_Akkad @RusGarbageHuman @kingkhieu Rupert is just an 80s slop Tory millionaire he ain’t got the minerals
English

@RusGarbageHuman @kingkhieu Please do, I bet his response is hilarious.
English


@YuteSpod @northernsoulftm You’re very naive if you think stopping immigration will solve all our problems. What reform policies do you like except for immigration?
English

@GBPolitcs @Moreincommon_ birmingham's social services are already stretched thin
not sure how they'd cope with reduced benefits and potentially more demand for council services
English

🚨NEW: A bombshell poll has projected Reform UK to win +47 seats in Birmingham city council tomorrow
[@Moreincommon_]

English




















