Scott McDonald

1.8K posts

Scott McDonald

Scott McDonald

@don21570

Katılım Mart 2025
280 Takip Edilen73 Takipçiler
Scott McDonald
Scott McDonald@don21570·
@C2Antiquity Gee, good thing the Protestant Reformation paved the way for the secular nation state, thus preventing him from going through with such a thing!
English
0
0
0
3
CleavetoAntiquity
CleavetoAntiquity@C2Antiquity·
Lutheran Corey Mahler is openly calling for the killing of Orthodox Christians. Some apologists aren’t just afraid of Orthodoxy. They want you dead.
CleavetoAntiquity tweet mediaCleavetoAntiquity tweet media
English
85
56
429
28.3K
IMPERATOR
IMPERATOR@IMPERATORAUS·
Writing on a book should be a punishable offense. Write your notes somewhere else.
IMPERATOR tweet media
English
27
3
96
4.5K
needGod.net
needGod.net@needGod_net·
Christians: "Trust in Jesus in what he has DONE for you." Catholics: "Trust in Jesus in what he tells YOU to do." Which one is relying on themselves to save them?
English
87
4
58
13K
bannedpastor
bannedpastor@bannedpastor·
Trent Horn lies and says, "Trust in Jesus" is not in the Bible.
English
14
12
89
5.5K
Scott McDonald
Scott McDonald@don21570·
@JayDyer "I don't get why I have to wear this stupid uniform when I'm working from home anyway"
English
0
0
0
37
Jay Dyer
Jay Dyer@JayDyer·
contemplating doing the entire David Wood debate in Soviet KGB uniform
English
93
33
827
16.6K
Operation St Cyprian
Operation St Cyprian@OpStCyprian·
My takeaway from the Tucker Dyer interview. If you believe like Jay Dyer that a monarchy is central to the shape of church governance, the fall of the Byzantine Empire is a judgement against Orthodoxy by God.
English
34
13
222
8.3K
Scott McDonald retweetledi
vlad ☦︎
vlad ☦︎@vladorthodoxy·
Theosis: the true purpose and meaning of life ☦️
English
4
44
284
4.3K
Ancient Philosophy🦉
Every interaction with a Jay Dyer fan ends in either them saying "cope" or "Debate him," and then blocking you. A community of scholars and intellectuals.
English
56
7
227
7.2K
Scott McDonald
Scott McDonald@don21570·
@craiginite If you aren't strapping a 10-foot statue of your grandma to the roof of your car to show your affection, do you even really love her?
English
0
0
0
4
Mercy Craiginite
Mercy Craiginite@craiginite·
@don21570 No and I don't fashion a 10 foot graven imagine of her and drive it around in the car. Good grief.
English
1
0
0
7
Scott McDonald
Scott McDonald@don21570·
Look at this absolute theological illiteracy. Hey genius, learn the difference between worship (latria) and veneration (hyperdulia). Honoring Christ's mother isn't idolatry. Do you worship the framed photo of your grandma on your desk? No? Then shut up.
Mercy Craiginite@craiginite

@Protestia But it's not an idol or anything.

English
1
0
0
29
Scott McDonald retweetledi
ᅠ ᅠ
ᅠ ᅠ@greenvibe·
so cute
English
21
702
3.4K
54.1K
AndyAsh
AndyAsh@Andy_Ashenden·
If Dyer really means "nominalism came from Protestantism" it's strange to invoke Oberman. Nothing in the book says this. But even if Dyer means the opposite (i.e. that Protestantism came from nominalism), it's still not what Oberman is saying. The implication is that nominalism is the bad root of the Protestant reformation. For that thesis and implication, Harvest is possibly the worst book he could cite because Oberman's closing chapter is dedicated to refuting that narrative. Oberman lines up the "nominalism is uncatholic/corrupt" scholars (e.g. Denifle, Lortz's "the occamistic system is radically uncatholic"), de Wulf, van de Pol, and above all Bouyer's "the utter corruption of Christian thought as represented by nominalist theology"), and then he rejects them. Oberman also says that he will defer the nominalism-to-Reformation question to a later study: "In a subsequent study, we hope to investigate the relation of nominalistic theology to the beginnings of Reformation theology" (p. 428). The thesis that Dyer puts forward is not Oberman's. In fact, the focus of Harvest is Ockham and mostly Biel. There is not much of an analysis of Luther's own thought in this book. Where the analysis of Luther does occur, many times in the footnotes, they always lean toward contrasting them, not comparing their nominalism (e.g. Oberman says this about Weijenborg's error on p. 176 : "Since according to Luther grace transforms the human will while for Biel grace exists alongside the free will, merely assisting it, Weijenborg has misunderstood both to such an extent that he has had them reverse positions." This pits Luther against Biel when it comes to an inner change that grace provides). Oh, and Oberman is in the Reformed/Calvinist tradition. He isn't a Lutheran scholar.
English
10
9
40
7.1K