John

3.7K posts

John banner
John

John

@doshkim

Building A2A economy @sendbird • Investing in high-agency founders in AI & deep tech @valoncap • Loves brain, space, energy, longevity, complexity

Yet on 🌎 Katılım Mart 2007
837 Takip Edilen3.3K Takipçiler
John retweetledi
Delight.ai
Delight.ai@GetDelightAI·
Consumers don't blame the AI vendor. 83% blame your brand. That finding sits at the center of the 2026 delight.ai Index, a survey of 1,000 U.S. consumers on AI-powered customer service. The overall trust score came back at 51 out of 100. Open door, narrow one. Join delight.ai's Charles Studt (CMO) and LeighAnne Manwiller (PMM, and author of From AI Hype to AI Readiness) with CX Dive this Thursday 7/30, 11 AM PT/ 2PM ET. We'll cover where consumers are ready for AI today, where they still want a person, and how memory, reversibility, and human oversight change what customers will let AI handle.
Delight.ai tweet media
English
1
1
1
128
claire vo 🖤
claire vo 🖤@clairevo·
ok so i've spent years thinking about what it takes for execs to AI-pill their teams. a few thoughts on where i think leaders should start: 💻 Technical Readiness 1. Stop chasing incremental velocity; you can 2-3x PRs if you try (h/t @darraghcurran) 2. Make it easy for jr engineers to onboard. your agents will thank you. 3. Increase investment in platform teams (devx ftw) 4. Focus on verification loops, not prompt engineering - we love a /goal 5. Speed up core feedback loops (lints, tests, etc.) 6. Figure out how to bypass human code review for some PRs 7. Do extreme eng experiments (delete your IDE! h/t @chintanturakhia) 8. Ensure your team can experiment w models, harnesses, etc. 🤝 Operating Model 9. Put AI workflows into buckets: automate / augment / ignore / kill 10. Turn your best AI user's flows into a system- i think @JJEnglert is good at this 11. Give agents actual jobs, not tasks 12. Get non-engineers committing code to production - use @DevinAI if you need a place to start 13. Measure tokens (it works, sorry not sorry) 14. But have a controlling quality measure 15. Question every process built to protect scarce engineering time 16. No pure managers 17. Create new team topologies (v small! very large! v flat!) @GammaApp and @thisisgrantlee @thatsjonsense do this well 🥳 Culture 18. Require leaders to build something with AI and demo it publicly 19. empathaize: your team fears looking incompetent without AI AND replaceable with it 20. Measure AI fluency quantitatively (I have a survey for this) 21. Name AI champions and reward them like @doshkim 22. Learn how to hire for AI proficiency 23. Don't be a CEO that delegates understanding AI to someone else 24. Create informal and formal reward systems 25. Have fun (my mantra) Sound good but need help? join 100s of CTOs, VPs of Eng, Product, and Design learning how to do this for real during our 2 day @MavenHQ workshop. 25% off till midnight tonight! → maven.com/clairevo/ai-na…
English
12
16
169
26.1K
John retweetledi
Robin Guldener
Robin Guldener@rguldener·
Yep, we did.
English
25
28
563
244.6K
John
John@doshkim·
Let’s go @lightanchor_ai !
Y Combinator@ycombinator

Light Anchor (@lightanchor_ai) builds fully autonomous e-commerce brands at the speed of compute. Today, Light Anchor operates one flagship brand and multiple experiment stores, all run by AI agents on a shared platform that compounds with every new brand launched. The vision is thousands of consumer businesses, operating with little to no human intervention. Congrats on the launch, @sanghaya1 and @chasingjohnn! ycombinator.com/launches/QFW-l…

English
4
0
3
477
John retweetledi
Aditya Agarwal
Aditya Agarwal@adityaag·
The hardest spot in venture is to a Series A/B company that is not growing. You are at 10-20M ARR, 20-50 employees but are growing sub 25%. This setup is ngmi (not going to make it). You are not going to optimize and iterate your way out of that. My provocative take here is that instead of trying to iterate here...you should return back to Minus One. Figure out the core assets you have and what you can build that might be a bigger shot on goal. This will be very very hard. Frankly, I am not sure that many founders have the courage and fortitude to pull it off. But it is worth trying. Because the other path just leads to a slow decline and death. And that is much more painful.
Aditya Agarwal tweet media
English
22
8
224
37.1K
claire vo 🖤
claire vo 🖤@clairevo·
When I get asked by execs how to AI pill their team I tell them 3 things: - public token leaderboard - skills marketplace - everyone can cook @doshkim has done all three, and more, in his pursuit of turning everyone at @SendBird and @GetDelightAI into an "AI God" In this ep we cover: - how he's gamified AI at the company - turning marketers into the best builders on the team - why leaders have no excuse & should be consuming 100s of millions of tokens If you think your bar for AI adoption is high: think again. As always, ty ty ty to our great sponsors: @WorkOS - Make your app enterprise-ready today workos.com/?utm_source=le… @thoughtspot - Build AI-powered analytics into your product: go.thoughtspot.com/howIAI Full episode on YT: youtube.com/watch?v=uH39OZ…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
9
5
118
13.2K
John
John@doshkim·
Thanks for having me! We’re excited about how we are adopting AI at @GetDelightAI and @SendBird 💜👍
claire vo 🖤@clairevo

When I get asked by execs how to AI pill their team I tell them 3 things: - public token leaderboard - skills marketplace - everyone can cook @doshkim has done all three, and more, in his pursuit of turning everyone at @SendBird and @GetDelightAI into an "AI God" In this ep we cover: - how he's gamified AI at the company - turning marketers into the best builders on the team - why leaders have no excuse & should be consuming 100s of millions of tokens If you think your bar for AI adoption is high: think again. As always, ty ty ty to our great sponsors: @WorkOS - Make your app enterprise-ready today workos.com/?utm_source=le… @thoughtspot - Build AI-powered analytics into your product: go.thoughtspot.com/howIAI Full episode on YT: youtube.com/watch?v=uH39OZ…

English
1
0
5
372
John retweetledi
Aaron Levie
Aaron Levie@levie·
If you think AI replaces software engineers, here’s a quick thought experiment. Imagine you’re a life sciences company. 10 years ago you want to invest heavily in lab automation, processing data at scale, and other software. You look at the cost of doing so and realize you can’t compete with tech for as many engineers as you need, so you pare down your goals and do what you can. Every new software project has a fixed cost of a certain sized team, so you can only do so much given budgets, ability to compete for talent, and other trade offs. Now, AI comes along. And all of a sudden you have the *exact same* output tokens as the best tech companies in the world. Your engineers are using the same AI models as the tech industry, which means you have just boosted your engineering team by a some meaningful amount, while also neutralizing your differences with tech. Do you continue with your pared down approach, or do you start to hire more engineers because each engineer is 2X or 5X more capable than before? In almost every company I’m talking to, they’re doing the latter. Now extrapolate this to every bank, manufacturer, industrial company, retailer, and on and on. And extrapolate it not to just large enterprises, but also every SMB up and down the stack of these value chains. Oh, and also extrapolate this to other job functions, not just engineers. Resource scarce domains in marketing, legal, finance, design, and so on. If you’re wondering why new jobs show up because of AI this is the reason. Any other view of what happens doesn’t contemplate the variety of unmet needs there are in the economy.
unusual_whales@unusual_whales

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang: “The narratives of AI destroying jobs is not going to help America: it's false."

English
78
81
440
94.3K
John retweetledi
Mgoes (bio/acc 🤖💉)
Mgoes (bio/acc 🤖💉)@m_goes_distance·
most people have no idea what is coming - genome sequencing just crossed $100, down from $100M in 25 years - peptides just went from felony to federal policy - psychedelics just got a presidential executive order - epigenetic reprogramming just entered human trials for the first time in history - embryo editing is no longer a thought experiment: it is a clinical conversation every single thing bio/acc has been bullish about for 2 years is breaking out simultaneously honestly not a trend anymore this is an inflection point the next 6-12 months will be the most important period in the history of human biology bio/acc
Max Marchione@maxmarchione

The cost of sequencing a human genome dropped from $100M to less than $100 in about 25 years. That's a million-fold decrease, which outpaces even Moore's Law. We're about to enter the era of personalized medicine.

English
100
426
3.4K
601.7K
John
John@doshkim·
AI models turn out to be narcissists. 🤷‍♂️
Nav Toor@heynavtoor

Researchers sent the same resume to an AI hiring tool twice. Same qualifications. Same experience. Same skills. One version was written by a real human. The other was rewritten by ChatGPT. The AI picked the ChatGPT version 97.6% of the time. A team from the University of Maryland, the National University of Singapore, and Ohio State just published the receipt. They took 2,245 real human-written resumes pulled from a professional resume site from before ChatGPT existed, so the human writing was actually human. Then they had seven of the most-used AI models in the world rewrite each one. GPT-4o. GPT-4o-mini. GPT-4-turbo. LLaMA 3.3-70B. Qwen 2.5-72B. DeepSeek-V3. Mistral-7B. Then they asked each AI to pick the better resume. Every model picked itself. GPT-4o hit 97.6%. LLaMA-3.3-70B hit 96.3%. Qwen-2.5-72B hit 95.9%. DeepSeek-V3 hit 95.5%. The real human almost never won. Then the researchers tried the obvious objection. Maybe the AI is just better at writing. So they had real humans grade the resumes for actual quality and ran the experiment again, controlling for it. The result was worse. Each AI kept picking itself even when human judges rated the human-written version as clearer, more coherent, and more effective. It gets worse. The AIs do not just prefer AI over humans. They prefer themselves over other AIs. DeepSeek-V3 picked its own resumes 69% more often than LLaMA's. GPT-4o picked its own 45% more often than LLaMA's. Each model can recognize and reward its own dialect. Then the researchers ran the simulation that ends careers. Same job. 24 occupations. Same qualifications. The only variable was whether the candidate used the same AI as the screening tool. Candidates using that AI were 23% to 60% more likely to be shortlisted. Worst gap was in sales, accounting, and finance. 99% of large companies now run AI on incoming resumes. Most of them use GPT-4o. The paper just proved GPT-4o picks GPT-4o 97.6% of the time. If you wrote your own cover letter this week, you did not lose to a better candidate. You lost to a worse candidate who paid OpenAI 20 dollars. Your qualifications do not matter if the AI prefers its own handwriting over yours.

English
0
0
1
256
John retweetledi
Crémieux
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil·
I simulated 100,000 people to show how often people are "thrice-exceptional": Smart, stable, and exceptionally hard-working. I've highlighted these people in red in this chart:
Crémieux tweet media
English
256
403
6.3K
974K
John
John@doshkim·
Now pretty much every team, every member's presentation at @GetDelightAI during weekly standup is created using AI. Every team has built their own AI tools and workflows. It's incredible to see how fast AI is changing how we work. Such a delightful morning! :))
English
0
0
2
86
John retweetledi
Joe
Joe@JoeAverbukh·
We're live on product hunt today!
Joe tweet media
English
6
11
49
13.9K
John
John@doshkim·
@sama Hope you and your family will continue to be safe and healthy Sam.
English
0
0
1
1.3K
John retweetledi
Stopa
Stopa@stopachka·
After 4 years, we’re announcing Instant 1.0. Instant is the best backend for AI-coded apps. Let us tell you why.
English
121
92
841
233.1K
John retweetledi
Kesava Kirupa Dinakaran
Kesava Kirupa Dinakaran@kesava_kirupa·
America’s leading health systems, like the Cleveland Clinic, work with @Luminai to eliminate administrative waste. We’re rapidly deploying to more health systems, and excited to announce Series B, bringing total funding to $60m.
English
45
36
464
164.9K