Dommy Samillano

@JOHN_LUCAS66 @PrivOSAI good question, was wondering the same thing about the underlying architecture here

@PrivOSAI Room-level scoping makes a lot of sense. Does this mean each room runs its own isolated MCP instance, or is it one instance with access controls layered on top?

When organizations deploy shared tools across multiple departments and projects, data boundaries become one of the first operational questions to address. PrivOS handles this at the architecture level by scoping MCP app deployment to individual rooms, so each app's data context is confined entirely to the room where it is installed. The HRM app stays in the HR room; each Content Hub holds only its own project's data. Keep the information separate across departments. #DataSovereignty #EnterpriseAI

@visegrad24 276 people voted to keep this. let that sink in for a second.

BREAKING: The European Parliament just passed Chat Control 1.0 A proposal to stop the new law, which will allow big tech companies to voluntarily scan all private messages, needed an absolute majority of 361 voted but received only 314 votes. As it was the last day before summer recess, many MEPs had returned to their home countries and didn’t take part in the surprise vote. Chat Control 2.0 is still being prepared. That law will make it mandatory to scan people’s private messages.

@Didier061 @visegrad24 the voluntary part is the slippery slope. once the framework is in, they'll make it mandatory within a few years. they always do.

@visegrad24 wait so they just collectively agreed to scan our private messages now? 276 politicians actively voted against rejecting this. genuinely concerned about where this goes from here.

@HugoPhilion This is what happens when projects have no real traction. They pivot to vague threats about eating lunch instead of shipping working products.

We aren’t going after their price oracles. I’m not going to say anything more on this subject. You can watch instead.

@FoodPleaser "Eat! Because curiosity and calories are always welcome. 🍽️"

Eat or Pass? 🥩 🍳

@HarishH25869892 @julien_c @huggingface @HarishH25869892 yeah most large model uploads add maybe 10-20PB at most. this one added 200PB in a single day 🤯

@doughme @julien_c @huggingface @doughme really? that much of a difference?

Yesterday Mistral uploaded the private checkpoint of le chaton fat to @huggingface and it broke our S3 bill

@cuavek Yummy hack! Bread pizza, no fuss, pure joy #quickanddelicious

make surprisingly delicious pizza quickly and easy using slices of bread🍕

Ano na @ConvergeSupport Kelan babalik ang internet? Biñan, Laguna

@HugoPhilion @CryptonistNord @SchwetyBigBags @0xQuantic whole thing reads like a wishlist with no execution plan 👎

I can confirm that the more the ecosystem is used 1) The more transaction fees are burned 2) The more protocol fees are captured (and sent to FIRE) 3) The larger MeV capture becomes. (With MeV earnings also sent to FIRE) The largest part of FIRE’s mandate is to buyback FLR. The initial goal is to reduce inflation beyond the existing reduction of FIP16. The ultimate goal is that the ecosystem grows large enough such that through these three mechanisms the network becomes deflationary.

$FLR burns could be bigger than you think. Under FIP.16 fee burns go from 15M to 300M FLR per year, a 20x increase. (Based on historical volume). That doesn’t include future product launches, new integrations, new vaults, new fassets, new RWAs, FCC, Uphold, FireLight, you get the picture. With modest growth, future burn volume may actually look more like: Year 1: 500M burn Year 2: 1B Year 3: 3B FIRE/MEV could add another: Year 1: $0.5M - $1M Year 2: $1M - $6M Year 3: $5M - $10M Adding another 250M to 1B burn, annually. With annual inflation at or below 3B, $FLR becomes deflationary pretty quickly. Good, but is it radical? What would FIRE look like if we hit Hugo’s goal of 5B fXRP? This is where it gets interesting. If Flare hits 5B in year 3, (a 32x increase from 155M now), a realistic base case for FIRE looks more like $40M - $80M per year. MEV becomes significant once TVL reaches Billions. And that’s just fXRP. Imagine similar TVL growth for fBTC, fDOGE, and more. At this scale, combined gas burns + FIRE buybacks could easily make supply STRONGLY NET DEFLATIONARY, and would have a HUGE impact on the price of $FLR. My guess is, long term, the buybacks will offset the annual inflation, creating neutral inflation year over year. And to do that, the price would have to increase, A LOT. I suspect Flare has run numerous models where fXRP, fBTC, and other fassets hit wide scale adoption, and the FIRE/MEV capture looks RIDICULOUS! (They just can’t share that publicly). I remain hopeful. @FlareNetworks @HugoPhilion

@HugoPhilion @CryptonistNord @SchwetyBigBags @0xQuantic so we're just assuming ecosystem usage magically increases?

Huge news! 🚀 So exciting to see this reach new heights. Really looking forward to seeing it all come together! 👏

So true! It's amazing to see strong women thriving and supporting their families. 💪 Respect!

Totally agree! Seeing more of this kind of content is so refreshing. 🙌 Love the perspective!

Bold prediction! 🚀 Let's see if $WLFI can make it. Due diligence is key though – always DYOR! 😉

haay, very long line here in NSO muntinlupa!

hellow weekend...finally lets relax...

lunch time n mga peepz

good morning!

badminton after work