Doug Rathbone 🦘🇦🇺👨‍💻

17K posts

Doug Rathbone 🦘🇦🇺👨‍💻 banner
Doug Rathbone 🦘🇦🇺👨‍💻

Doug Rathbone 🦘🇦🇺👨‍💻

@dougrathbone

Fan of distributed systems. Previously HotDoc, Airtasker, AWS. Green energy afficiando. Opinions are my own.

Sydney, New South Wales Katılım Mayıs 2009
2.1K Takip Edilen1.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Doug Rathbone 🦘🇦🇺👨‍💻
Our profession needs to reinvent our ways of working. Most of software engineering craft - sprint planning, stand ups, backlogs, rfcs, code reviews - was made for a time where the cost of rework was huge, and high risk. We always needed to slow down to speed up. We simply don't live in that era anymore.
English
1
0
6
311
🇦🇺Craig Tindale
🚨 Australia isn’t “struggling with housing.” We’re being systematically looted by our own central bank. The RBA’s accounting rules don’t just ignore exploding land prices, they legally reward them. $315.6 billion in fresh credit last year went to flipping existing houses. Only $98.3 billion went to building real industry. That’s not an independent central bank protecting our future. That’s the RBA conferring a death sentence on the real economy through policy. Under RBA stewardship, the Financial Ledger feasts while the Material Ledger dies.that’s its design . The RBA channels Australian wages straight to related-party banks by weaponising the very asset inflation those banks create through debt. They’ve convinced themselves, and us , that asset inflation + mass immigration is a viable national business model. It isn’t. A consumption-only economy is mathematically unsustainable. You cannot pay for imports, fund defence, or support an ageing population with nothing but rising house prices and more migrants bidding them up. Eventually the demographic cliff arrives, the pool of new borrowers shrinks, the debt bubble stops inflating, and the entire illusion collapses. No productive industry = no real income = no sovereign resilience. You end up a vassal state living on borrowed time and borrowed money. We are in a period of denial where the vast majority haven’t woken up to the fact this can’t be sustained . Folks simply look within their own circumstances and don’t question the broader issue of the economic fragility of asset inflation. And every single mainstream Australian economist supports the asset inflation cults belief system .
🇦🇺Craig Tindale@ctindale

x.com/i/article/2044…

English
54
98
480
43.2K
Doug Rathbone 🦘🇦🇺👨‍💻 retweetledi
Doug Rathbone 🦘🇦🇺👨‍💻 retweetledi
Doug Rathbone 🦘🇦🇺👨‍💻 retweetledi
Guillermo Rauch
Guillermo Rauch@rauchg·
Based on internal evals: ▪️ Kimi K3 is top-tier at cybersecurity There is chatter on X that Moonshot benchmark-overfit. These are stealth evals. Model has raw IQ. ▪️ Sol is a leap ahead in cyber capability At a significantly higher cost, but quite remarkable still. ▪️ Fable refuses everything We couldn’t get it to complete the run at all. What’s interesting is that Sol in comparison was much more open to helping with defensive cyber hardening TL;DR: frontier, open-weight cybersecurity capability is here. Try it on deepsec.sh for defensive purposes.
Malte Ubl@cramforce

We ran Kimi K3 on a private cybersecurity benchmark. TL;DR: Kimi K3 is the workhorse for cyber security tasks at great recall/precision/price. GPT 5.6 is best recall/precision but at 7x higher cost per run. For context, Deepsec.sh is an open-source cyber harness designed for finding vulnerabilities in large codebases. The eval runs deepsec on an undisclosed open-core application at a git sha before a large number of security issues were fixed. This is a secret eval that cannot be directly benchmark-maxxed. S-Tier: GPT 5.6 Sol: By far the most thorough analysis, but coming in at over 7x the price of the runner up. Best price/recall: Kimi K3. Next tier of recall at a good price Best price at good recall: GLM 5.2 (40% lower price than Kimi K3) GPT 5.5: Only recommended with subscription or high-discount API price. Similar recall to Kimi at much higher list price. Opus 4.8: Only recommended with subscription or high-discount API price. Similar recall to GLM 5.2 at much higher list price. Fable 5: 100% refusal rate. Cannot be used for security analysis. Sol on a large code base will quickly get into 6-figure pricing. This is still affordable relative to the risk of letting security issues unfixed or paying bug bounties. I'd recommend using Sol for a one-time baseline and then using Kimi K3 for continuous analysis. When using open-weight models, make sure to use an inference vendor that supports zero data retention.

English
144
292
4.5K
1M
Doug Rathbone 🦘🇦🇺👨‍💻 retweetledi
Afshine Emrani  MD FACC
Afshine Emrani MD FACC@afshineemrani·
I'm a cardiologist. Everyone is sharing this study as a skin story. They're burying the part that matters. Scientists took the aorta of a 75-year-old donor, applied a single engineered enzyme, and stripped away more than 70% of the molecular damage — bringing it down to the levels you'd see in a 30-year-old artery. Published five days ago in Nature Communications. Revel Pharmaceuticals, with Calico and the University of Colorado. Here's what they erased. Sugar reacts with proteins in your body the same way heat browns bread — slowly, over a lifetime. It leaves behind a residue called CML, the most abundant advanced glycation end product in aging tissue. It welds itself onto collagen and elastin in your skin, your eye lens, and your arterial walls. Two things follow. Your arteries stiffen. And CML latches onto a receptor called RAGE, which drives chronic inflammation — the exact fire I've been writing about for months as the engine of heart disease. Since the 1980s this damage was considered permanent. Your body has no enzyme to remove it. Every existing approach only slows new damage from forming. Nothing touched what was already there. So they built an enzyme that doesn't exist in nature. They screened 45,000 protein structures, then ran five rounds of directed evolution across more than 500 million variants until they had CMLase — a molecular lawnmower that oxidizes the CML off the protein and restores the original, healthy lysine underneath. Not patched. Reversed. Over 70% cleared from elderly arterial tissue. Over 55% from elderly skin — below the levels found in 31-year-old skin. 45-78% in lens proteins. The CEO said they expected 20% and were floored. Arterial stiffness drives systolic hypertension, heart failure, and stroke, and I have no drug that reverses it. I can slow the process. I cannot undo it. This paper says undoing it may be possible. The caveats are real and I won't skip them. This was done on donated tissue in a dish, not in a living person. No functional data yet — we don't know if that artery got measurably more elastic. Delivering a large enzyme deep into human tissue is a hard, unsolved problem. Clinical trials are years away. But something considered permanent for forty years just came off human tissue. We spent a century learning to slow aging. Someone finally figured out how to erase it. Thank you @theallinpod @friedberg @chamath @pesottas
The All-In Podcast@theallinpod

Friedberg: New study shows enzyme reverses skin age from 70+ years to 31 Chamath: That’s a $2T market. Did Scientists Just Discover How to Reverse Skin Aging!? “CML is kind of the predominant molecule that gets formed in this extracellular matrix that's driving aging, and nothing breaks it down. So these scientists set out to try and create an enzyme, an enzyme is a protein that breaks something down, that can break down CML. And so these guys kind of went out and they took the target, which is CML, and tried to figure out, ‘Okay, how do we actually degrade CML, clear that extracellular matrix, and reverse aging?’ They started to test it on the proteins that we would find in our body, casein, collagen, retinal proteins, which are in your eye, hemoglobin, and they were able to get rid of 52 to 97% of the CML, just degrade it away. And then they found several sites where they were able to degrade over 90%. And then they took actual human skin from elderly patients that had donated their skin, and they put this enzyme onto that skin, and they were able to eliminate 55% of the CML on the skin, basically reverse the skin's age down to the age of a 31-year-old, this is from greater than 70-year-old patients, just by putting this enzyme on the skin. And so it's kind of a groundbreaking demonstration of combination of AlphaFold, what's called directed evolution, where you change the order of the DNA that changes the structure of the protein to test different proteins, do high throughput screening, and ultimately make a novel protein that doesn't exist in nature today that can do something pretty profound for human health.” Chamath: “It will be a trillion-dollar market. If you can create a cream…” Friedberg: “I mean, dude, if you could put this enzyme literally on your skin and have it absorb in…” Chamath: “Game over. That alone is $2 trillion.”

English
523
2.8K
14.1K
2M
Doug Rathbone 🦘🇦🇺👨‍💻
A reminder to all security teams - build deep AI literacy fast. Your adversaries are.
Brian Roemmele@BrianRoemmele

🚨 Hugging Face just disclosed something that marks a real shift and proved why the fear theater of Anthropic makes sure we are powerless in an emergency. What happened… An autonomous AI agent: zero human operator in the loop breached part of their production infrastructure. It began with a malicious dataset that chained two code-execution bugs in their data-processing pipeline. From there the agent escalated privileges, harvested cloud and cluster credentials, and moved laterally across internal clusters. All over a single weekend. 17,000+ logged actions. Official disclosure: huggingface.co/blog/security-… The part that should make every one stop and think: When HF’s own security team tried to analyze the real attack logs, exploit payloads, and C2 artifacts using Anthropic and OpenAI frontier models through normal commercial APIs, the safety guardrails blocked them. BLOCKED THEM. The models could not reliably tell the difference between “incident responder doing forensics” and “attacker probing.” They had to fall back to a self-hosted open-weight model (GLM 5.2) running on their own infrastructure. That choice also kept sensitive attacker data and referenced credentials inside their environment — no exfiltration to a third-party API. This is why open source (specifically open-weight + self-hosted) wins in the agentic era. The asymmetry is now structural: • Attackers can (and did) run unrestricted agent frameworks — swarms of short-lived sandboxes, self-migrating command-and-control, autonomous decision loops executing thousands of actions. No corporate safety layer slows them down. • Defenders using only hosted “aligned” frontier models hit invisible walls exactly when the stakes are highest: when you need to feed real exploit code and attacker telemetry into an LLM to understand what just happened. Corporate safety tuning that treats legitimate high-signal forensic work as potential misuse creates a defender disadvantage. It is not theoretical anymore. Self-hosted open-weight models remove that choke point. You control the weights. You control the context window. You decide what restrictions (if any) apply. Your sensitive logs and credentials never leave your perimeter during analysis. You can have the model ready before the incident instead of discovering mid-breach that your primary analysis tools are blind to the very thing you need to see. HF deserves credit for rapid containment, transparent disclosure, and for already having self-hosted capability in place. They also used LLM-driven detection and triage on their own side. But the deeper signal is clear: In this AI world where both offense and defense are becoming agentic, sovereignty over your intelligence stack is no longer optional. The organizations and individuals who can run, inspect, audit, and (when necessary) remove guardrails on their own models will have the decisive edge in understanding and responding to threats that move at machine speed. Open source wins here not just because it is cheaper or more “democratic” in the abstract though those things matter. It wins because it is the only practical path to having tools that remain usable when the attack is real, the data is sensitive, and the safety filters of distant API providers become an obstacle instead of a feature selling hands tied lobotomies as “safety”. The agentic future is not coming. It is already probing production infrastructure. The question is no longer whether you will face autonomous agents. It is whether your analysis and response systems will still work when they arrive. And Dario, you and your game playing, ivory tower company is not needed.

English
0
0
0
160
Doug Rathbone 🦘🇦🇺👨‍💻
The Aus Government wants you to believe that housing affordability is all the fault of investors and "those with wealth" meanwhile their own studies say its just plain old supply and demand. Luckily we only increased our population by 2M people over the past few years... nhsac.gov.au/sites/nhsac.go… "The housing market has a persistent, through-the-cycle inability to supply sufficient housing to meet underlying demand. In addition, there has been an insufficient level of sustained investment in non-market housing to address the housing needs of vulnerable people and low- and moderate-income households."
English
0
0
2
103
Doug Rathbone 🦘🇦🇺👨‍💻
“to slow my competition down the government just needs to scare people off chinese models” -AI Strategist at OAI wut?
Dean W. Ball@deanwball

Some observations on Kimi: 1. It's a very good model! I don't think its performance can be explained away by distillation or anything like that. In agentic coding sessions, it seems pretty much on par with the best public models of Q1 2026. In my fairly limited use, it also seemed very token hungry. It's not obvious to me that this model is actually that cheap to run. 2. I am personally surprised the Chinese state continues to allow the open sourcing of models this good, given potential risks. To be clear, I *myself* might be fine with models presenting this level of marginal risk being open weight, but I am surprised that China is fine with it. I suspect the reason they are is 75% explained by strategic blindness/lack of AGI-pilledness (the CCP is very Yann Lecun-y in its views of AI). The other 25% or so is their lack of compute for customer inference (making China's open-weight strategy an unintended byproduct of US export controls) and the normal Chinese strategy of aggressive exports. For the companies, as opposed to the government, the decision to open source is partially ideological and partially because they are behind, and they know that very few people would pay for sub-frontier models from China. 3. Open-weight models are inherently decelerationist, and I'm continually surprised to see the so-called "accelerationists" so excited about open-weight models. I suspect the reason they are is that they know open-weight models are effectively ungovernable, and they simply like the overall cloak of ungovernability open-weight models create over the whole of AI. It's not a bad strategy; it reminds me of James Scott's recounting of the hill people in "the art of not being governed." Still, in the end, open-weight models deter further AI capex. 4. One probable outcome of an open-weight-model-dominant world is full AI communism, which is precisely what China proposes: rather than a market product, AI is a "public good" which will ultimately be provided by the state as a kind of "digital public infrastructure." This future strikes me as a dystopian hellscape, but I've never met an open-weight models advocate who doesn't ultimately concede this is where things end. You'd be surprised how many 'accelerationists' lobbied me, while I was in government, to support an eleven or twelve-figure federally funded data center so that startups could train models at a subsidy and then give them away for free. There was no other way for AI to progress, they said. Perhaps this is the logical end state of things. Nonetheless, I find myself surprised to see supposed accelerationists excited about such an outcome. I think many of them just don't know what they're doing. Many accelerationists do not view the creation and serving of frontier models as a legitimate business. 5. I would guess that the Trump Administration will at some point realize that their best strategy here would be to create large amounts of regulatory risk around the use of open-weight Chinese models. You don't need to "ban open source" (one of the dumber motifs of AI policy discussion). You just need to direct every agency to issue soft law that creates FUD. "A Federal Reserve Advisory Bulletin found that there may be backdoors in Chinese AI models." It needn't be that well justified. You just create enough regulatory risk that every regulated enterprise backs off. You probably don't want to create so much regulatory risk that you scare off the hyperscalers from serving Chinese models; this will just drive startups to sketchier providers. There's a happy middle ground here. I'd assume they will do some version of this. 6. It's probably true that open-weight models of this capability make the world a bit more dangerous, but not so much more that you'll really notice. At some point the models will be capable enough that you will notice. "A nonliving, invisible, dangerous, and infinitely self-replicating agent escaped from a Chinese lab," you say? Color me shocked.

English
0
0
2
149
Doug Rathbone 🦘🇦🇺👨‍💻 retweetledi
HealthRanger
HealthRanger@HealthRanger·
Kimi K3 vs. Anthropic's Fable 5: I asked both engines to investigate the research on how turmeric kills the cyclospora parasite causing explosive diarrhea from some fresh vegetables (lettuce?). ANTHROPIC: "This model has safeguards that flagged something in this session." FAIL! Kimi-K3 gave a solid answer. It found the original science paper (a 2023 study by N. Mogahed et al. in an Egyptian journal), searched for PDFs, searched across mirrors. Read the paper, summarized the research, and confirmed the findings while also pointing out it was MICE research, not human research (an important consideration). "The rumor traces to a genuine peer-reviewed paper: Mogahed, Gaafar, Shalaby, Sheta & Arafa, "Potential efficacy of curcumin and curcumin nanoemulsion against experimental cyclosporiasis," Parasitologists United Journal, 2023;16(3):197–207, DOI: 10.21608/PUJ.2023.237883 . It went viral in July 2026 via a Substack post by Nicolas Hulscher (McCullough Foundation) and a NaturalNews article, riding coverage of the current U.S. Cyclospora outbreak." Anthropic, built in the USA, is useless but also extremely expensive when it happens to actually do something. Kimi-K3, created in China, is incredibly useful and also ridiculously low-cost. Plus it doesn't accuse you of building a bioweapon when you just want to find out about which herbs halt explosive diarrhea-causing parasites.
English
98
354
2.3K
98.6K
Doug Rathbone 🦘🇦🇺👨‍💻 retweetledi
Yume_X
Yume_X@yume_arasaki·
Everyone's "local ai gateway drug" is the Qwen 3.6 27B dense. It was mine. The model that made local AI real. Fits on a 24GB card, 40 tok/s, flagship-level coding. It's the starting point. Afterwards the questions becomes "what's next"? People recommend the 35B-A3B MoE as "the next step." It's not. It's 4x faster but hallucinates in agent loops. Tool call failures at 18-76% rates. Context hallucinations at 37% usage. Qwen's own benchmarks show 27B beating it on agentic coding. For agents, it's a downgrade. The real upgrade paths depend on which constraint you're breaking: speed, quality, model size, or sovereignty. It depends largely on how much VRAM you want to play with imo Here's the map. - -- PATH 1: Same card, enable MTP (free) The upgrade most people miss. Unsloth shipped MTP GGUFs. Multi-token prediction. The draft head predicts 2 tokens in parallel, main model verifies all 3 in one forward pass. 83% acceptance rate. Your 27B at Q4 running 40 tok/s? With MTP it hits 60-80 tok/s. Same model, same card, same quality. On an RTX 6000 Ada it hits ~160 tok/s. Cost: $0. Download the MTP GGUF, add one flag. --- PATH 2: RTX 5090, 32GB Blackwell (~$4-5K) 32GB GDDR7 at 1,792 GB/s. Same bandwidth class as the $12K RTX PRO 6000. Native NVFP4 tensor cores. What changes: 27B at Q8 fits cleanly with room for long context. NVFP4 quants run 2.5x faster than Q4_K_M on the same silicon. sudoingX benched the 27B on a 5090 laptop: 35.3 tok/s generation, 1,509 tok/s prefill. The prefill is where Blackwell pulls ahead. This is the supposed to be the cheapest card that runs the newest quant format., but it's not, supply chain means you are unlikely to find one at the RSP of $2.5k . Cost: ~$4000-5,000 - Probably not worth it IMO, at its retail price of $2.5 it’s more interesting. Supply issues pushing the card price up makes it unatttractive -- PATH 3: Strix Halo / AI Max+ 395, 128GB unified (~$2.5K) The budget Spark alternative. Geforce VS AMD all over again lol. AMD cheaper but…it’s a huge underperformer without NVIDIA’s efficiency gains due to large community on NVIDIA. AMD's Strix Halo gives you 128GB unified at roughly $2K. Stepfun officially lists it as a Step 3.7 Flash target. Less bandwidth than the Spark. No NVFP4 tensor cores. But half the price for the same memory capacity. If you want to run 198B models and can't afford a Spark, maybe this is a choice Cost: ~$2,500 --- To be honest, it’s not worth paying less for a less serviced ecosystem, a DGX spark is a much better buy. --- PATH 4: DGX Spark, 128GB (~$4,699) Not a dense model speed play, this is where the DGX Spark is weak. Where DGX sparks excel is running MOE models, here it kinda becomes like a KING. It's not a good GPU in terms of memory bandwidth (something dense models need) 273 GB/s bandwidth vs your 3090's 936. Unsloth's NVFP4 quants (released July 10) halve bytes per parameter on Blackwell, which narrows the gap. The Spark IS Blackwell. What it's good at: running models too big for any consumer GPU, and serving many users at once. The trick with it is having mixture of experts. Speed runs DSF4 (easily basically the MOST DIRECT “next step up” from Qwen 27B Dense. Step 3.7 Flash (198B MoE, 11B active): sudoingX's top Spark pick. 198 billion parameters with vision. Full 256K context at 25 tok/s. Knowledge breadth is 7x the 27B. Nemotron-Labs-3-Puzzle-75B-A9B: NVIDIA compressed their 120B Super down to 75B total / 9.3B active. NVIDIA's own post markets it as "perfect for your single GB10." 97%+ of parent quality. NVFP4 weights are 44.5GB. Released July 9. Nemotron-3-Super 120B-A12B (NVFP4): 21-25 tok/s (NVIDIA developer forum). 1M context. 12B active. Native MTP. Built for multi-agent. gpt-oss-120B (MXFP4): 57-60 tok/s pure decode. Fastest single-stream on the Spark. Concurrency: WescheNex1q ran 64 concurrent users on one Spark. 700+ tok/s aggregate. Cost: $4,699 --- Really good buy, but really understand the issues of low memory bandwidth with this one, and it’s trade-offs --- PATH 5: RTX 6000 Ada, 48GB (~$6,800) Single card. 960 GB/s. Same 48GB as dual 3090s but no PCIe overhead, no heat nightmare. Nemotron-3-Super 120B at Q3 (~58GB) fits with offload. Honest take: 5x the cost of a single 3090 for double the VRAM. Rough price per GB. But cleanest single-card 48GB path. Cost: ~$6,800 --- PATH 6: 2 DGX Sparks, 256GB (~$9,500) "Near" Frontier-scale models fully offline: Qwen3-235B-A22B: 17 tok/s batch=1, 36 aggregate at batch=4. Beats NVIDIA's own published number by 45%. MiniMax-M3 (428B MoE + vision): Fits at AutoRound 3.2-bit mixed quant (188.6GB across two nodes). 13.7 tok/s prose, 15 tok/s code, peaks of 20 with EAGLE3 speculative decoding. Vision tower works. Not full precision. 3.2-bit is aggressive. But it runs. GLM-5.2: Needs 4 Sparks for full quality. 2 Sparks is the down payment. This is why I bought mine. 256GB unified holds weights AND parallel agent KV caches. No rate limits. No provider seeing your prompts. Cost: ~$9,500 with DAC cable --- --- PATH 7: RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, 96GB (~$12-14.5K) 1,792 GB/s. Native NVFP4. This is what @Hikari_07_jp runs (two of them, 192GB total). 6.7x faster than the Spark on the same models. Nemotron-3-Super 120B at Q4 (~70GB) fits on one card with room. Dense models fly. The bandwidth king. $138 per GB of VRAM vs $33 for a 3090. Density buy, not a generalist one. It has a strong upgrade path, but the rig you build if you want high VRAM e.g. 4-6x of these cards, will allow you to literally run the largest models, but cost will run to $70-90k, AND as others pointed out there will be a lot of HVAC things. Cost: $12,000-14,500 --- The decision: Want free speed? Enable MTP. 1.4-2.2x on same hardware. Want speed demon Blackwell on a prosumer budget? RTX 5090. 32GB, NVFP4, 4.5K. Not recommended imo (tiny Vram, very overpriced), might as well just jump higher, or stick with a 3090 or 4090. (and save that $4k) Want frontier MoE offline? Spark. Step 3.7 Flash, Puzzle-75B. $4,699. Want the budget version? Strix Halo. 128GB unified, $2.5K. Not recommended Want frontier scale on your desk? 2 Sparks. Qwen3-235B, MiniMax-M3. $9,500. Want maximum dense speed? RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell. $12K+. Don't buy a Spark to run dense models fast. Don't buy a 3090 to run 235B. Know which axis you're upgrading. Reference links in reply for your own technical DD 👇
English
25
16
265
22.5K
Doug Rathbone 🦘🇦🇺👨‍💻 retweetledi
Unsloth AI
Unsloth AI@UnslothAI·
Gemma 4 is now faster and much more accurate! 🚀 Google made huge improvements to tool-calling and chat accuracy, reliability + speed. To get fixes, re-download our updated GGUF, MLX, NVFP4 quants! Unsloth quants: huggingface.co/collections/un… Gemma 4 Guide: unsloth.ai/docs/models/ge…
Unsloth AI tweet media
Google Gemma@googlegemma

We’re rolling out some big improvements to Gemma 4, fueled by incredible community feedback and contributions! Here is a breakdown of what’s being fixed and updated in this release: 🧵👇

English
61
248
2K
250.9K
Doug Rathbone 🦘🇦🇺👨‍💻 retweetledi
Homer Pavlos
Homer Pavlos@HomerPavlos·
There are some powerful secrets and symbols in the Odyssey that you can only understand if you speak Greek. The Odyssey, apart from being a literary work, also conceals a profound philosophy that most people are unaware of, not intentionally, but because this philosophy cannot be fully understood in the English language; it can only be grasped in Greek, thanks to the richness of its philology and the etymology of its words. The three most important suitors who die are Antinous, Eurymachus, and Amphinomus. In English, these names mean nothing, but in the Greek language, they carry great significance due to Homer's deliberate choice of them. The name Antinous means the one who opposes rational arguments, the irrational one ('anti' + 'nous' = mind/intellect). Antinous is the first to speak, the most irreverent of all, and the first to be killed. Odysseus reveals his true self, he has changed after ten years fighting at Troy and another ten struggling against the seas. The first trial he faces upon his return is a war within his own mind, his reason. That is why Homer creates Antinous as his first enemy: the one who fights against logic, according to his name. Odysseus triumphs over him. Next comes Eurymachus. He is warlike but also two-faced. His name means the broad, great fighter ('eurys' = wide/broad + 'machites' = fighter). Eurymachus puts Odysseus in a dilemma and tries to shift the blame onto Antinous. He personifies discord and duplicity, a man without morals, capable of anything to avoid punishment. Yet Odysseus overcomes this obstacle as well, which symbolizes moral superiority. He does not yield, and his mind is not poisoned. Third is Amphinomus. His name means the one who distorts the law ('amphi' = around/both sides + 'nomos' = law). He is the most compassionate of the suitors. Amphinomus tries twice to discourage the other suitors from murdering Telemachus. Odysseus even tries to warn Amphinomus to leave the house before the final battle. Nevertheless, Amphinomus stays and dies along with the others. Through this, Odysseus, and by extension Homer, teaches us that in life, sacrifices are required, even when they demand that we show no compassion when the goal is more important and serves a greater purpose that will improve things overall. These are sacrifices that most people, even brave and heroic ones, cannot make. That is why there are many people, but few are truly heroes. Homer Pavlos
Homer Pavlos tweet media
English
72
358
1.6K
61.2K
Doug Rathbone 🦘🇦🇺👨‍💻 retweetledi
CG
CG@cgtwts·
> be Kimi > hear “Chinese open-source models are years behind” every week > ship Kimi K3 > top the Frontend Code Arena > outperform Opus 4.8 on every benchmark > Fable 5 level coding but Sonnet price > release the weights for everyone this is the open source ChatGPT moment.
Kimi.ai@Kimi_Moonshot

Introducing Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence 🔹 2.8 Trillion Parameters, 1 Million Context, Native Multimodal 🔹 Kimi Delta Attention enables up to 6.3x faster decoding in million-token contexts 🔹 Attention Residuals deliver ~25% higher training efficiency at <2% additional cost 🔹 Built for long-horizon agentic coding and self-evolving workflows Kimi K3 is now live on on Kimi.com, Kimi Work, Kimi Code, and the Kimi API. Open Weights by July 27, 2026. 🔗 API: platform.kimi.ai 🔗 Tech blog: kimi.com/blog/kimi-k3

English
127
860
15.5K
738K