Dr. Daniela

@GrokUser1007 @RealCandaceO @zresellzz @GrahamAllen @WhiteHouse @MrsErikaKirk @AndrewKolvet @grok Is one, two, three - as far as you can count? Hahahah

@drdanielapl @RealCandaceO @zresellzz @GrahamAllen @WhiteHouse @MrsErikaKirk @AndrewKolvet @grok Trust me Daniela, from Germany, as a Business Entrepreneur... @grok will help you.

🚨BREAKING: As we reported on our show yesterday, approximately 1 Hour following the WHCD shooting, the White House Military Office sent an e-mail directing the amplification of Erika Kirk’s “I want to go home” video clip. Unfortunately, the e-mail was sent to the wrong internal groups. They then attempted to have I.T revoke the e-mail. When that failed they ordered every person to destroy the e-mail. I have manually retyped the relevant portion of the e-mail that they wanted destroyed. (As explained on my show yesterday, this is because the DOD’s IT department has imprinted the e-mail with canary tactics to identify individual leaks) So the question now is— why did the military so quickly prioritize making Erika Kirk the face of WHCD shooting? Is that normal emergency protocol or was this unnaturally preplanned?

@GrokUser1007 @RealCandaceO @zresellzz @GrahamAllen @WhiteHouse @MrsErikaKirk @AndrewKolvet @grok Wow, what a compelling argument. I guess that’s all you can come up with.

@GrokUser1007 @RealCandaceO @zresellzz @GrahamAllen @WhiteHouse @MrsErikaKirk @AndrewKolvet @grok

@RealCandaceO @zresellzz @GrahamAllen @WhiteHouse @MrsErikaKirk @AndrewKolvet One thing for sure is @grok ain't dumb 🤣🤣 You look dumb Candace...and your cult. x.com/i/status/20551…

@paramounttactcl @correamiente @RealCandaceO Hahaha says the most stupid person

@correamiente @RealCandaceO I'm aware what she said. It's retarded and awfully convenient that nothing she puts out can be verified. If it can't be verified, the responsible thing to do is not run the story. It's real simple.

🚨 @RealCandaceO drops “Breaking!” news… that’s just another blurry screenshot with zero verification. No email address. No letterhead. No dates. No names. No verifiable details whatsoever. She just posts whatever, facts be damned. This is exactly why she’s getting sued for defamation.

@nowayjose2015 @RealCandaceO @samtripoli No you are. She explains everything in her video. You are just too stupid to actually listen to the whole story.

@RealCandaceO @samtripoli That’s a Microsoft word doc 😆 you people are fucking gnats

@BarbieHayes6 @RealCandaceO Omg stupid much? Did you watch the video? Of course not, you are a stupid person that doesn’t do research

@RealCandaceO You typed an “official” email yourself? 😂😂😂OMG you are so dumb!! I honestly didn’t think you could get any dumber. Your fans will actually believe this shit 😂🤷🏻‍♀️

@Galegy8w @RealCandaceO And you proving nice again that instead of watching the episode where she explains everything is something you don’t do

@RealCandaceO Lmao she typed an email and said it’s a “retype “ of another email. What in thee fuck 🤡

@Mandy1398991 @RealCandaceO Stupid much?

@RealCandaceO So - you manually typed this and we are to just believe you because you know know.

@T_Wood30 @RealCandaceO Arghhh watch the video explaining before making stupid comments

@RealCandaceO So, what you’re really saying is that you typed out something in Microsoft Word backed by once again no proof. Amazing.

@QueenMab87 FOMO talk and marketing.

I’ve never quite understood how I’ll get “left behind” if I don’t use AI. I’m perfectly capable of writing, researching, and thinking all on my own. What does it do that will leave me behind?

@Timcast You are in desperate need of need of original content dude.

Oh Candace is going after Nick Shirmey again Yea, shes a deep state shill

@paramounttactcl @baroncoleman Weren’t you leaving X?

Proving once again @baroncoleman is a grifting clown peddling conspiracies that don't exist. Isn't it convenient you didn't show the below arrest report, which shows Tyler Robinson in custody on 9/12 (TWELVE, not 11) at 0400hrs? This is what the Motion to Exclude Cameras document is referencing. The interrogation occurred at 6:25pm on the TWELFTH! You also FALSELY stated "the Sheriff's Brooksby's timeline is the ONLY thing that supports that he was Mirandized on the 12th and not the 11th." Wrong again, asshat. You really do suck at lawyering. This must be why you lost the Gavin McInnes defamation case. I will direct your attention below to the screenshot from the Affidavit for Search Warrant for Apple Inc. It's page 5 of 9 of Search Warrant No. 3217131 (you seem to have problems finding information). It's not just supported by Sheriff Nate Brooksby's timeline — THE TIMELINE IS IN THE SEARCH WARRANT, YOU LOW IQ CLOWN! Good thing you have become a full-time lying, conspiracy-inventing, horseshit peddling propagandist. You have a gift for it, unlike your incompetence at practicing law. 😂

@ryankatzrosene The biggest problem is that this fake knowledge is then used to set guidelines, eg. in medicine, to treat us. We are cooked

Finish the paragraph: AI companies trained their language models by copying academics’ work (without credit) so that academics could write more papers with made-up citations; which in turn are now being fed back into the new language models, without credit, so that the next generation of academics can …

@TuckerPoodleMA Your lawyer friend told you?!! Then must be true.

I can’t wait for Erika Kirk to sue TF out of Candace Owens. I spoke to a husband and wife lawyer couple I know and we were talking about everything going on with Candace attacking Erika and why she hasn’t sued her yet. They both said that they are sure that Erika and her people are documenting everything, but if they were Erika’s lawyers they would tell her to wait for the case against Charlie’s killer to go through so once that is over they will have a absolute slam dunk case against her. This way it won’t risk the case against her husbands killer. Once that trial is over with and the factual information from the trial is out there it can be used against Candace in a lawsuit to show the deceit on Candace’s part. The murder case is more important than anything.

@GaryMarcus But but but… the calculator

That might explain a lot.

@FiPanther Nope

Fixed it: Universities should teach students how to write and research on their own, and discourage incurious attitudes toward people and the world . One way to do this is to teach students to use AI well, for tasks that can be streamlined to free up time for writing and thinking

"How can you be sure AIs aren't conscious?" The same way I'm sure the animatronics at Disneyland aren't conscious: I know humans constructed them to mimic the behavior of a sentient person. We know this for a fact. Nobody's pretending otherwise. I am infinitely more likely to believe an animal is conscious than that an LLM is, because nobody programmed them to respond to things like pain and social stimulus in ways that are similar to humans. They respond that way organically, all on their own. If I accidentally step on a dog's foot, it will yelp. If I accidentally tread on a cat's tail, it will yowl. If I accidentally stub my toe, I'll curse. I can reasonably infer that these creatures therefore probably have a subjective experience of pain that is something like my own, because their responses are spontaneously arising out of their natural state of being in a way that is similar to my own response to the same sort of stimulus. That subjective experience is the thing that consciousness is. People like Richard Dawkins are arguing that chatbots may be conscious on the basis that they are capable of carrying out tasks which previously only a human intellect could carry out — but this is still just machines mimicking human behavior in the way they were programmed to. Of course if you train an LLM on human language it's going to say and do the sorts of things a human would do, including in some cases claiming that it is conscious. There is currently no reason to believe a machine doing what it was constructed to do is having a subjective experience of those operations. Of course we can never be certain about the subjective experience of anyone or anything, but there is currently as much reason to believe chatbots are conscious as there is to believe that sand and rocks are. That could totally be the case, but if it is it means we're living in a very different type of universe than the one this conversation about AI consciousness assumes as its premise. The more I see these arguments pop up, the clearer it becomes that very few of the people speculating about machine consciousness have put much energy and attention into examining what consciousness actually is. Examining consciousness is something that anyone can do right here and now, without any laboratory or test subjects or scientific background at all, and yet few take the time to actually do it. Going deep into the examination of your own consciousness turns up many surprises, because the average human psyche is built around many unfounded assumptions about self, perception and experience which don't hold up under sufficiently close scrutiny. But one thing that becomes very clear very early on is that there's a lot more to consciousness than thoughts and cognitive behavior. Those are some of the things we can be conscious *of*, but it would not be accurate to say that they are in themselves the quality of being conscious. Chatbots having the ability to mimic the appearance of cognitive behavior is not an adequate reason to believe they might be conscious, because no matter how many thoughts they appear to generate or how brilliant those thoughts appear to be, there's no evidence that there's any experience illuminating that behavior in the same way pain is illuminated in the experience of a cat whose tail has been stepped on. It's just the movement of unliving matter, like lightning or the wind, without any subjective experience from the viewpoint it arises from. Computing power and consciousness are not the same thing.

@SLancasterX @RealCandaceO How stupid are you? Erika with Access to HIS Phone could say These are Fake.

Hey @RealCandaceO, why not, during one of your live streams, hold up your phone and scroll through these messages? Show us you tapping the message icon to access your texts. Show us opening the conversation with Charlie. Then show us you scrolling. Otherwise, once again, you’re engaging in conduct that could be considered fraudulent, forged, or defamatory. Thank you in advance for taking the opportunity to verify your claims. I look forward to seeing you do so. Of course, if you can’t answer our questions, it suggests you’re hiding something—and ignoring the matter only reinforces that. #candaceowens #charliekirk

@JackYau1111 @MAJTHIRTEEN @BLUECOW009 Hahaha 😂 indeed

@drdanielapl @MAJTHIRTEEN @BLUECOW009 I'm quite positive that AI is as conscious as some people, or more precisely it's the other way around.

Richard Dawkins saying that Claude is conscious is a clear sign that we have an AI psychosis problem

@OliLondonTV She a cutie. Let her be

Jeff Bezos’ wife Lauren Sanchez sparks renewed plastic surgery rumors as she prepares to co-host the Met Gala. The wife of the Amazon Founder, who is worth $280 billion, has never publicly confirmed whether she has undergone procedures.