Driplomat

679 posts

Driplomat banner
Driplomat

Driplomat

@Driplomat

Outrage is the new Colosseum

Montana, USA Katılım Ağustos 2018
678 Takip Edilen150 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Driplomat
Driplomat@Driplomat·
Liberty is not for the uncommitted.
Driplomat tweet media
English
0
1
3
803
Kwame Rose
Kwame Rose@kwamerose·
America hates Black people.
English
866
116
563
24.8K
Fuhgeddaboudit News
Fuhgeddaboudit News@FuhgedNews·
They carry on like demons have taken hold of them.
English
986
263
2.1K
148.3K
Driplomat retweetledi
Silenced Saxon
Silenced Saxon@SilencedSaxon·
The World would be such a better place right now if Hitler had won the war. It’s not even debatable.
English
47
208
1.8K
10.5K
Driplomat
Driplomat@Driplomat·
(Cat)erpillar
GIF
IS
0
0
2
15
The Paranormal Chris
The Paranormal Chris@LegacyProgramVP·
You can’t be serious with this post? “Hey everyone! Victory lap because the warrant doesn’t say Dalton said anything racist!” - it doesn’t say anything was said by either party except there was a verbal altercation. How do you honestly post that it somehow means he never said anything? You can’t be a serious practicing attorney with this kind of logic.
English
70
3
163
11.9K
Andrew Branca Show
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow·
WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY! TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached). This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you. FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE. NOT. ONE. WORD. That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest. But it gets even BETTER for Dalton. SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.) Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever. I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads: "... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse." This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course). "During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..." There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance." "... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket." Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket." "Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued." Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation." Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation. This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him. The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times." There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table. Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls." Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness. Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly. I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness. Not a single element. Not a word of it. If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action. Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever. At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint." If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits. HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H). lawofselfdefense.com/FREEBOOK @AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman
Andrew Branca Show tweet media
English
317
459
2.9K
555.6K
Driplomat
Driplomat@Driplomat·
@AmiriKing Like a Moth to the Flame, they really cannot help themselves.
English
0
0
4
446
Amiri King
Amiri King@AmiriKing·
I got a chef from my local holiday inn threatening my life. ✊🏿
Amiri King tweet mediaAmiri King tweet media
English
319
153
2K
95.2K
Here's Gavin
Here's Gavin@Gavinator220·
@AmiriKing Thought you were tuff old man. Roast the nig you scared or something? Probably going to snitch on him to the feds or his company. Scary ass.
English
20
0
5
2K
Driplomat
Driplomat@Driplomat·
@LegacyProgramVP They still won’t accept you, no matter how hard you simp for the chimp. Griftfag.
English
3
0
0
207
The Paranormal Chris
The Paranormal Chris@LegacyProgramVP·
BREAKING: Arrest Warrant Affidavit for Dalton Eatherly aka ChudtheBuilder states that Dalton “reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket…during a verbal altercation” after “turning his body to a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox”. A “physical altercation ensued” after. Apparently there were “several innocent bystanders in the area…surveillance video of the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls”. I obtained a copy of the warrant through request to the County Clerk’s office. As far as I know, this is the first time anyone is actually seeing it with the actual description of what occurred during the May 13, 2026 incident in Clarksville, TN.
The Paranormal Chris tweet media
The Paranormal Chris@LegacyProgramVP

Dalton Eatherly aka ChudtheBuilder is looking at anywhere between 15-42 years if convicted of all charges and they run consecutively. The breakdown: - Attempted Murder: 5-15 years - Firearm Enhancement: 6 years (mandatory) - Aggravated Assault: 3-15 years - Reckless Endangerment w/ deadly weapon: 1-6 years The last charge would most likely be maximum penalty considering video evidence shows (according to reports) that bullets struck nearby buildings in an inhabited dwelling, with people walking around outside as well. If anything, he will most likely be found guilty of this charge at a bare minimum. Also, it appears that a “Laylani Campbell” has been subpoenaed to potentially testify. It is my understanding after being sent information from a Facebook post that she currently works for the Montgomery County Sheriff’s office. Let’s not forget, Joshua Fox still hasn’t been charged at all. If he was seen as the aggressor or instigated, then he would have been charged as well, especially given his criminal background. My early prediction: - (most likely) Bond will stay at $1.25 million with stipulations that Dalton cannot use his donation account as it was setup with the intention to help his family, not his legal fees. **I wouldn’t be surprised if the judge decides that he won’t have a bond after hearing the evidence tomorrow** - Dalton will be found guilty and be sentenced to 15-20 years in prison, likely able to be released earlier on good behavior…if he doesn’t continue practicing his first amendment rights schtick in prison.

English
213
256
1.9K
530.6K
✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️
✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️@Serenitee_Sam·
There was a time, not too long ago, when a simple reminder from an adult at a local park was enough to get a group of kids to quickly correct their behavior. There was an unspoken rule of respect for elders, community spaces, and the presence of younger children. ​Fast forward to today, and the dynamic has completely shifted. Instead of basic courtesy, a simple request to watch their language is met with defiance, hostility, and weaponized arguments about "rights." It highlights a growing, concerning trend where boundaries are ignored and disrespect is treated as a badge of honor. ​When a family afternoon at a neighborhood park routinely turns into a police call just to manage rowdy teenagers, it becomes clear why community spaces are increasingly forced to implement strict age restrictions. If common courtesy can no longer be expected, then rules and boundaries become the only way to protect spaces meant for young children. ​Are we looking at a widespread failure in teaching basic respect, or is this just a symptom of a completely different era of parenting?
English
245
108
2.4K
121.2K
Kov
Kov@Kovnyn7·
@Driplomat @glassysquirrel @Serenitee_Sam To you, anotorious ratebaiter, simply responding to you in a fairly calm manner is “chimping out” to you. Wow. Sad, you think this way. Hope you recover from your poor condition. You bore me and I'm done here. Have a pleasant day, my guy.
English
1
0
1
20