Kasper

810 posts

Kasper banner
Kasper

Kasper

@drkaspertje

i value kindness and honesty above all else phd in physics, love for linguistics, specialist in cybersecurity

Katılım Kasım 2015
245 Takip Edilen31 Takipçiler
J. Daniel Sawyer
J. Daniel Sawyer@dsawyer·
The poster below holds that lining a mailbox with cement--a *passive* defensive measure against mailbox baseball--is a violation of just war theory b/c of the damage it will do to a vandal who is driving in a car with a baseball bat. This not only exhibits a poor understanding of Just War theory, it is so horrifically stupid it makes you wonder how on Earth Christianity ever surrvived the Muslim invasions. Passive fortifications are disproportionate violence? Fuck you.
The Blessed Salt 🧂@theblessedsalt

This post is an excellent litmus test for understanding of just war theory. Despite the fact that I can see how effective this would be, I must oppose it because the damage it would do to my enemy (who bashes in my mailbox) would far outweigh the good of saving my mailbox. Its disproportionality is opposed by our duty in charity (and even justice) to watch out even for the good of our enemies. (Yes, by the way, I have had my mailbox bashed in by random vandals.)

English
29
31
619
12.9K
Dama dama
Dama dama@Dama_dama1881·
Плохая новость: в Бельгии больше половины зарплаты отбирают налогами Хорошая новость: Бельгия - единственная такая страна Удивительная новость: при этом, у Бельгии самый большой дефицит бюджета в Еврозоне. Что они делают со всем этим баблом, едят его? Отвозят на Украину?
Русский
50
8
225
15.1K
Kasper
Kasper@drkaspertje·
@TwoRulesOfWar taking precautions is fine. setting a hidden trap is not. these are morally different things. committing a crime does not put one outside of the bounds of morality
English
1
0
0
98
7% NaCl (Salty)
7% NaCl (Salty)@TwoRulesOfWar·
Missing the point entirely. What would happen if he hadn’t swung at my mailbox? Nothing. I took reasonable precautions to protect it-What he chooses to do is not on me. I also lock doors of my house. If he doesn’t break in, nothing happens. If he does, what does is on him.
gabe@ggetzie

@TwoRulesOfWar If you caught the person who smashed your mailbox and had them tied to a chair, you'd break their arms yourself with a bat then, yes? Because that is the just and appropriate punishment for mailbox smashing?

English
9
9
338
3.8K
Kasper
Kasper@drkaspertje·
@KasonVic @csaurageul if you make or support mailbox traps, you're not christian, let alone catholic
English
0
0
0
5
Kason Vicson 🇦🇴
@csaurageul I'm not sure that dude is a Catholic, despite his own bio. I will need to look into. Needless to say, his perspective is fundamentally incorrect.
English
1
0
0
119
CSAURAGEUL
CSAURAGEUL@csaurageul·
in primary school, a kid two years older than me pushed me against a wall and punched me in the face several times He broke his finger, and I didn't even get a bloody nose I got suspended for a week, and he got one detention Despite being younger, smaller, and never throwing a punch, I was still punished more than he was, and you'd still call him the victim because he walked away worse off than I did People who think this way have no business holding any kind of authority
The Blessed Salt 🧂@theblessedsalt

This post is an excellent litmus test for understanding of just war theory. Despite the fact that I can see how effective this would be, I must oppose it because the damage it would do to my enemy (who bashes in my mailbox) would far outweigh the good of saving my mailbox. Its disproportionality is opposed by our duty in charity (and even justice) to watch out even for the good of our enemies. (Yes, by the way, I have had my mailbox bashed in by random vandals.)

English
116
1.2K
18.4K
353.7K
Stewart Purcell
Stewart Purcell@stewartprurncil·
@DerekPederson3 So the farmer/miner/lumberjack should be at the whim of the urbanite queer poetry scholar? Cities can't exist without constant replenishment of resources from rural areas. People have to live there and steward the land. They deserve a vote, they play a much more crucial role.
English
1
0
0
145
Derek Pederson 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇻🇪
The arguments for the Electoral College are all basically terrible and its original purpose (so that elites could block the masses from electing a populist demagogue) is clearly a failure.
James Surowiecki@JamesSurowiecki

There's no good civic argument for the electoral college. It was arguably necessary to ensure the ratification of the Constitution, but it's an anti-democratic device that gives some American citizens far more voting power than others, based purely on where they live.

English
388
82
1.1K
44.4K
Kasper
Kasper@drkaspertje·
@blightersort power to the states with a system that ends up being pretty close to the popular vote, but randomly perturbed to make it wildly unstable, letting a few battlefield states decide. all for the low cost of making almost half of all votes pointless, and almost half worthless. come on
English
0
0
2
32
blighter
blighter@blightersort·
there are in fact good civic arguments for the electoral college but they hinge on the fact that the united states is a union of states so things like the president (and in its original conception the senate) should be decided by state which, yes, may have different populations. but today no one understands anything so everyone thinks it should just be popular national vote for everything.
James Surowiecki@JamesSurowiecki

There's no good civic argument for the electoral college. It was arguably necessary to ensure the ratification of the Constitution, but it's an anti-democratic device that gives some American citizens far more voting power than others, based purely on where they live.

English
152
114
1.5K
97.8K
Kasper
Kasper@drkaspertje·
@Gwydion_Wolf @PatrickHeizer seems preferable to the alternative of a single-family home lost among actually useful buildings, Up-style. you understand that if the land value rises by a factor of 8, they could just sell and retire on the moon, right?
English
1
0
0
12
Gwydion_Wolf 🇺🇸
Gwydion_Wolf 🇺🇸@Gwydion_Wolf·
Until 3 years go by and that town down the road is now 1 mile away instead of 8 and the mayor of that town now ‘feels’ that the land your single-family home sits on would be ‘better suited’ for a 40 family apartment complex and ‘re-evaluated’ your land in order to raise the ‘land value’ by 7x so they can take it from you by force.
English
2
0
2
318
Patrick Heizer
Patrick Heizer@PatrickHeizer·
What Land Value Tax haters fail to understand is that little will change for the average homeowner. Property tax bills might even decline for many. It's the parking lots, golf courses, underutilized and absent landlords that would get a rude awakening.
wanye@xwanyex

Land value tax defenders argue that land owners get a special benefit in the form of the protection of their private property that they should therefore pay for. This is confused, or at least overstated, for two important reasons. First is that you’re not actually allowed to steal any kind of private property. What makes housing unique is that it’s huge, conspicuous, typically immobile, and ownership is dutifully recorded. All these things make investigating assaults on this particular form of private property dramatically easier than all others. If you tell the police that somebody took your bicycle, then it’s like, I don’t know man, how can we even know where the bike is? If we think we know, then we’ve got to go track it down. How can we even really be sure that the bike is yours? If a group of marauders tries to take over your land, then the police have a very straightforward task ahead of them. Second, it’s not as though the benefits of stopping these marauders redound only to the homeowner. The neighbors also do not want marauders occupying the house that used to be owned by their neighbor, whether those neighbors are homeowners or renters. Nobody benefits from marauders taking over private property. The fact that we stop this is not a special benefit we give to homeowners as a privileged class. It’s just basic public order, which benefits everybody in the society.

English
23
74
1.1K
36.5K
Kasper
Kasper@drkaspertje·
@MatthewSitman this is a silly style, and because the nyt is not the only newspaper out there, their consistency in being silly ironically leads to readers experiencing inconsistency
English
0
0
3
1.8K
Kasper
Kasper@drkaspertje·
@ilyabirman "5ый кофе" явно неверно, должно быть, конечно, "5ое кофе"
Русский
0
0
1
179
Ilya Birman
Ilya Birman@ilyabirman·
Кофе и наращения 1. Неправильно, надо не «7-ая», а «7-я». 2. Неправильно, надо не «5ый», а «5-й». О наращении окончаний числительных: ilyabirman.ru/meanwhile/all/…
Ilya Birman tweet mediaIlya Birman tweet media
Русский
8
2
111
9.8K
Kasper
Kasper@drkaspertje·
@_BashBunny_ @DoingFedTime That's the initramfs's task. I'm not sure if GRUB has even been mounting the root filesystem for normal systems in the last few decades
English
1
0
5
295
Bash Bunny
Bash Bunny@_BashBunny_·
@DoingFedTime Don't know about btrfs or the others, why is that a problem. But LUKS??? How the hell are you going to encrypt your disk??
English
3
0
27
2.3K
Sam Bent
Sam Bent@DoingFedTime·
The enemy is at the gates. Do you see where this is going? Red = Removing Why? 'sEc'uRiTiE'
Sam Bent tweet media
English
89
160
1.3K
44.6K
Kasper
Kasper@drkaspertje·
@LundukeJournal grub is outdated garbage software. The sooner we're rid of it, the better
English
0
0
0
91
The Lunduke Journal
The Lunduke Journal@LundukeJournal·
Ubuntu is removing a huge number of supported file systems from their shipping version of the GRUB boot loader. LVM, LUKS, btrfs, hfsplus, xfs, zfs, & mdraid. All are being removed and will no longer be available for booting systems. Once again, tried and true code is being tossed out. This time in favor of systemd for booting. They are also disabling images (like JPG) in GRUB. Because, assumedly, Ubuntu hates joy. discourse.ubuntu.com/t/streamlining…
The Lunduke Journal tweet media
English
464
450
3.8K
292.2K
Sauers
Sauers@Sauers_·
Terence Tao "ran out of tokens" on Claude Code, causing the formalization task he was working on to fail. @AnthropicAI should probably give him free Pro lol
English
36
32
2K
134.7K
Kasper
Kasper@drkaspertje·
@tautologer i'm convinced everyone for whom the hard problem of consciousness is not immediately obviously a hard problem, must be a philosophical zombie
English
0
0
0
3
tautologer
tautologer@tautologer·
lotta people running into the hard problem of consciousness these days and bouncing off it while denying it's there. "i simply know which entities are and are not conscious. it's obvious"
English
85
50
804
38.5K
Kasper
Kasper@drkaspertje·
@achkhikvadze still mad you didn't get to ethnically cleanse them?
English
0
0
0
48
Kasper
Kasper@drkaspertje·
@sooqaengineer слово "нет" происходит от древнерусского слова "нету", из более старого "не е(сть) ту(т)". это "нет" и само является коверканием. по-моему слово полезное, и звучит тоже немного лучше в неких случаях
Русский
0
0
3
82
ESYA
ESYA@sooqaengineer·
как же меня бесит слово "нету" какое же оно ублюдско убогое, зачем зачем так коверкать слово "нет"
Русский
163
3
131
185.5K
Kasper
Kasper@drkaspertje·
@redaction maybe try interacting with real people outside of the racism app
English
0
0
4
1.5K
Kasper
Kasper@drkaspertje·
@ptrschmdtnlsn Doesn't that depend on the force driving the metric expansion? In the usual flrw with just matter, the metric expansion is more like the initial momentum left after the big bang, and once a particle is at rest in proper coordinates, it doesn't feel a pull towards comoving ones
English
1
0
2
124
Peter Schmidt-Nielsen
Peter Schmidt-Nielsen@ptrschmdtnlsn·
Yes, the gas station is held at a fixed distance by rigid forces, so it won't drift away, *but* those rigid forces do fight metric expansion, so the gas station *would* be further with 1000x expansion! Covalent bonds are strained by like 10^-50 by metric expansion, IIRC.
AI being dumb@ChatgptLunatics

"Silly ai. It's still 100m"

English
3
1
42
5.5K