Chief of Stuff

8K posts

Chief of Stuff

Chief of Stuff

@dui7_

I like building stuff | tech-optimist | doer | believer in common sense | the future is bright | family, god and memes

United States Katılım Şubat 2022
3.3K Takip Edilen288 Takipçiler
Chief of Stuff retweetledi
Garry Tan
Garry Tan@garrytan·
Prop D is a smoke screen by dishonest people who claim to want to hurt overpaid CEOs but in actuality are going to get retail closed in SF while passing an 800% gross receipts tax that will be paid by the middle and working class
Blueprint@SFBlueprint_

Supervisor @bilalmahmood pitches Prop D as a Medi-Cal and CalFresh lifeline. Read the measure. Zero binding language requiring a dollar go to health programs. It all lands in the General Fund. That means pay raises, pet projects, whatever politicians want.

English
14
20
140
12.6K
Chief of Stuff retweetledi
Beff (e/acc)
Beff (e/acc)@beffjezos·
Very bad idea. Administrations of the future will force labs to imbue the biases of their side into the models in order to get sign off. This will also reduce the number of labs who can ship models, having to deal with compliance. I cannot advise against this strongly enough.
Andrew Curran@AndrewCurran_

The Trump administration has informed Anthropic, Google and OpenAI that they are discussing the creation of new AI oversight procedures that would potentially require new AI models to pass a safety review before being cleared for release. Mythos has changed things.

English
72
86
645
36.6K
Chief of Stuff retweetledi
Mike Netter
Mike Netter@nettermike·
The so-called “Billionaire Tax” gives politicians power to expand the tax to your home equity, savings and even retirement accounts. It’s not a billionaire tax. It’s an everyone tax.
Mike Netter tweet media
English
45
431
597
7.5K
Chief of Stuff retweetledi
Desiree Fixler
Desiree Fixler@desireefixler·
Whenever I hear “capitalism is bad,” here’s where I stand: People don’t risk their lives jumping barbed wire to escape capitalism. They risk their lives to reach it.
Desiree Fixler tweet media
English
181
2K
9.1K
93.7K
Chief of Stuff retweetledi
Garry Tan
Garry Tan@garrytan·
Oakland has highest taxes per capita among similar cities while services are among the worst. 44% of Measure E revenue goes to pre-approved union raises. The pattern: wrap dysfunction in moral language, attack anyone who asks where the money went oaklandreport.org/p/oakland-poli…
Garry Tan tweet media
English
32
69
489
18.5K
Chief of Stuff retweetledi
Yogi
Yogi@Houseofyogi·
Spirit Airlines died tonight at the hands of the socialist crusader, Elizabeth Warren She must be so proud to add another casket to her achievements. Tonight at 3am, Spirit turns off the lights. 14,000 jobs gone. 30+ smaller airports lose service. JetBlue offered $3.8 BILLION in cash to buy Spirit in 2022. Shareholders, flight attendants union, literally everyone voted yes. The combined company would have held 9% of the US market against a Big 4 that already owned 80%. For anyone who understands numbers: 9% isn’t a monopoly against 80%. Warren said no. She wrote letters. She pressured Buttigieg. Biden’s DOJ sued. A federal judge killed the deal in January 2024. Her argument: the merger would cost consumers $1 billion a year. Now look at her collateral damage she dusts under the rug. 510 pilots gone in the months after. 1,800 flight attendants furloughed in December. 14,000 jobs in 2023. 7,500 last week. Zero tonight. And that’s just the people in Spirit uniforms. Catering goes. Fuel guys go. Baggage crews, gate agents, airport coffee shops, hotels and rental cars in 70 cities Spirit flew to. Every airline job carries 3 more on its back. 40,000 people out of work because of one woman’s moronic crusade against the market. And the math ain’t mathing. Spirit abandoned 90 routes during the death spiral. Fares on those routes are up 14% on average. Oakland to Newark: $135 to $288. Fort Myers to San Juan: $92 to $219. Kansas City to Newark up 66%. That’s reality. Not some BS number from a “study.” So @SenWarren tell me how this saves the consumer money? Cheap carriers in a market drop fares 21% across the board. Southwest did this in the 90s and saved Americans $68 BILLION over 20 years. Warren killed it. That’s what moronic politicians led by socialism do. Then with her own blind arrogance, she tweeted Spirit’s collapse is “a Biden win for flyers.” A win. 14,000 people are reading termination letters tonight. And she’s taking credit. This is socialism in 2026. A senator who’s never made payroll thinks she knows how to run a market better than the people who own and work in the company. She saved you a billion on imaginary paper. She cost you ten times that in real life. She didn’t protect consumers from anything. 14,000+ will go from working to welfare. She will make sure to blame billionaires, hardworking tax payers, AI, capitalism and whatever monster they will make up tomorrow hiding under your bed. Higher taxes. Fewer jobs. More expensive everything. She called it a win. I hope you enjoy winning.
English
5.9K
33.5K
124.4K
6.5M
Chief of Stuff retweetledi
Garry Tan
Garry Tan@garrytan·
In the future everyone will have a personal AI This is why I'm open sourcing the code and skills for mine semafor.com/article/04/24/…
English
55
30
513
36.4K
Chief of Stuff retweetledi
Chief of Stuff retweetledi
Chief of Stuff retweetledi
Garry Tan
Garry Tan@garrytan·
Saikat Chakrabarti participated in the creation of tech wealth by being early at Stripe. Now he wants to pull up the ladder on the whole industry. It’s craven. It’s selfish. It is entirely driven by wanting power over us. He is unfit for any public service. Tell your friends.
Garry Tan tweet media
English
48
58
884
23.1K
Chief of Stuff retweetledi
Brivael Le Pogam
Brivael Le Pogam@brivael·
Hello Julia, sans aucune ironie, c'est top que tu prennes le temps de te renseigner. Mais le problème quand on lit Marx aujourd'hui, c'est qu'on prend pour acquis sa prémisse de départ, alors qu'elle a été démontée scientifiquement il y a plus de 150 ans. Toute la pensée de Marx repose sur la théorie de la valeur-travail. L'idée que la valeur d'un bien vient de la quantité de travail nécessaire pour le produire. Si tu acceptes cette prémisse, alors oui, tout son raisonnement tient. Le capitaliste "vole" la plus-value du travailleur, l'exploitation est mathématique, la révolution est inévitable. Sauf qu'en 1871, trois économistes (Menger en Autriche, Jevons en Angleterre, Walras en Suisse) découvrent indépendamment la même chose : la valeur n'est pas objective, elle est subjective et marginale. Un verre d'eau dans le désert vaut une fortune. Le même verre à côté d'une rivière ne vaut rien. Le travail incorporé est identique. Donc le travail ne détermine pas la valeur. C'est le consommateur qui valorise un bien selon son utilité marginale dans un contexte donné. Exemple concret : tu peux passer 1000 heures à tricoter un pull moche que personne ne veut. Selon Marx, ce pull a énormément de valeur (beaucoup de travail incorporé). Selon la réalité, il ne vaut rien. Parce que personne n'en veut. À l'inverse, Bernard Arnault crée des milliards de valeur non pas parce qu'il "exploite" mais parce qu'il a su anticiper et organiser des désirs humains à grande échelle. La valeur est créée par la coordination, pas extraite par le vol. Cette découverte (la révolution marginaliste) a invalidé tout l'édifice marxiste. Pas pour des raisons idéologiques, pour des raisons scientifiques. C'est pour ça que plus aucun département d'économie sérieux au monde n'enseigne Marx comme un cadre d'analyse valide. On l'enseigne en histoire de la pensée. Maintenant, le truc important. Si ton intention en lisant Marx c'est d'aider les pauvres (c'est une intention noble), alors tu vas être surprise par ce qui suit. Regarde les chiffres de la Banque mondiale. En 1820, 90% de l'humanité vivait dans l'extrême pauvreté. Aujourd'hui, moins de 9%. Cette chute historique ne s'est PAS produite dans les pays qui ont appliqué Marx. Elle s'est produite dans les pays qui ont libéralisé leur économie. Chine post-1978, Vietnam post-1986, Inde post-1991, Pologne post-1989. À chaque fois qu'un pays libéralise, des centaines de millions de gens sortent de la pauvreté en une génération. À chaque fois qu'un pays applique Marx (URSS, Cambodge, Corée du Nord, Venezuela), c'est la famine et les goulags. Ce n'est pas une opinion, c'est l'expérience la plus massive jamais menée en sciences sociales. Plusieurs milliards de cobayes humains, sur un siècle. Donc paradoxalement, si tu aimes vraiment les pauvres, la position la plus cohérente n'est pas d'être marxiste. C'est d'être pour la liberté économique. Parce que c'est empiriquement la seule chose qui a jamais sorti massivement les gens de la misère. Pour creuser, je te recommande trois lectures qui vont changer ta vision : "La Loi" de Frédéric Bastiat (court, lumineux, gratuit en ligne) "La Route de la Servitude" de Hayek "Économie en une leçon" de Henry Hazlitt Bonne lecture, et vraiment chapeau de chercher à comprendre plutôt que de rester dans tes certitudes. C'est rare.
Julia ひ@lifeimitatlife

Depuis tout à l'heure je me renseigne sur les idées de Karl Marx sincèrement je n'arrive pas à comprendre comment on peut être pour le capitalisme et même plus généralement être de droite

Français
1.5K
11.1K
48.8K
3.2M
Chief of Stuff retweetledi
Garry Tan
Garry Tan@garrytan·
Front row at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner last night, as a guest of WHCA President Weijia Jiang. A night celebrating the First Amendment turned surreal when Secret Service scrambled to evacuate POTUS, the VP, and cabinet members, overturning chairs in front of 2,000 reporters just moments after I snapped this photo. Through it all, Weijia led with grace. Proud to call her a friend. Moments like these remind us how our country must heal. We need to come together in community and re-embrace what actually unites us: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Garry Tan tweet media
English
35
17
458
31.7K
Chief of Stuff retweetledi
Chamath Palihapitiya
Chamath Palihapitiya@chamath·
On page twenty-six of “The Billionaire Tax” proposal in California, it explains how the state legislature can convert from a Billionaire Tax to an Everyone Tax without voter approval. They can also adjust the tax to be a yearly tax, not just one time…again, without your approval. Intelligence test for you: if this was meant to just target Billionaires, why did they write this in?
Chamath Palihapitiya@chamath

The Billionaire Tax is actually an Everyone Tax. The Billionaire Tax is a new tax proposal written by four professors who don't believe in the American dream. Some of them aren’t even American…go figure. Despite its name, it applies to every California resident who currently has assets or ever will. The creators named it the Billionaire Tax so you would get into a froth andwouldn't look closely at what it actually does to you. On page twenty-six, it explains how the government can convert to an Everyone Tax without voter approval. They can also adjust the tax to be a yearly tax, not just one time…again, without your approval. Here's how the tax would work: As a voter, you're being asked to approve a tax that would require you to: 1. list all your assets and the value of each, then submit them to the California Franchise Tax Board. 2. authorize the tax board to appraise your assets and confirm the value of each. 3. pay a penalty of up to forty percent of your tax bill if the board determines your reported value was too low in their opinion. 4. allow the tax board to subpoena your financial records from every one of your financial institutions for auditing. This Everyone Tax runs 34 pages of shifty language describing how the government plans to take your assets. Read the fine print and decide for yourself. If this were truly a billionaire tax, it would be 3 pages. It’s 34 pages so that it can create the mechanisms to steal from all of you.

English
1.2K
9.9K
36K
4.3M
MERICA MEMED
MERICA MEMED@Mericamemed·
“It’s because that’s why” 😂
English
78
548
4.6K
352K
Chief of Stuff retweetledi
Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki
Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki@MatthewWielicki·
Everyone’s told plastic pollution is a “global” problem… But the data say something very different. Roughly 90–95% of ocean plastic comes from a handful of rivers... mostly in Asia and Africa. The Yangtze. Ganges. Mekong. Nile. Niger. Not your grocery bag in Colorado. Not your straw in D.C. A small number of poorly managed waste systems are doing the overwhelming majority of the damage. The UN isn’t structuring this like a solvable engineering problem... it’s structuring it like a permanent global revenue stream. Because if you solve it quickly and directly… there’s no need for decades of committees, funding mechanisms, and “frameworks.”
Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki tweet media
United Nations Geneva@UNGeneva

Our oceans are becoming a trash heap, overwhelmed by plastic pollution. It’s time to break the habit of single-use plastics. #ActNow to #BeatPlasticPollution!

English
874
14.7K
36.1K
1.1M
Chief of Stuff retweetledi
Chief of Stuff retweetledi
Chamath Palihapitiya
Chamath Palihapitiya@chamath·
The Billionaire Tax is actually an Everyone Tax. The Billionaire Tax is a new tax proposal written by four professors who don't believe in the American dream. Some of them aren’t even American…go figure. Despite its name, it applies to every California resident who currently has assets or ever will. The creators named it the Billionaire Tax so you would get into a froth andwouldn't look closely at what it actually does to you. On page twenty-six, it explains how the government can convert to an Everyone Tax without voter approval. They can also adjust the tax to be a yearly tax, not just one time…again, without your approval. Here's how the tax would work: As a voter, you're being asked to approve a tax that would require you to: 1. list all your assets and the value of each, then submit them to the California Franchise Tax Board. 2. authorize the tax board to appraise your assets and confirm the value of each. 3. pay a penalty of up to forty percent of your tax bill if the board determines your reported value was too low in their opinion. 4. allow the tax board to subpoena your financial records from every one of your financial institutions for auditing. This Everyone Tax runs 34 pages of shifty language describing how the government plans to take your assets. Read the fine print and decide for yourself. If this were truly a billionaire tax, it would be 3 pages. It’s 34 pages so that it can create the mechanisms to steal from all of you.
English
819
4K
14.9K
2.8M