对象

@kyuusyuha_001 十年前？你别历史虚无主义了 十年前的电动车都还没发展起来 当时的日本汽车在中国是需要加价 排队的，而且价格很贵 销量也很好。这也说明了为什么日本车会从中国大退败，傲慢 减配给了中国电车很好的机会。

「トヨタはオワコン！！中国のEV車に抜かれて世界シェアから追い出される！！」ってポスト流れてきたけど10年前にも同じような主張見たなぁと懐かしい気持ちになった

@tagame 你拿现金 店员也会收的 只是移动支付成为了主流 不代表现金无法使用 而且在国内 不收取现金是违法的。因为移动支付方便 所以大家都比较喜欢而已 这是自然的选择 不是强制要求

中国人のYouTube見てたら言ってました。 「もう中国ではほんっとうに現金を使わない。全部電子決済だから誰も財布持ってない。 もし現金で払うと『今どき現金？おつりなんかありませんよ』って断られる」 へー。 「現金はお年玉であげる時だけ使う」 …？ そのお年玉どこで使えるの？

@Lunas_Fan_1 @magataotao 你怎么不让东京独立出来和中国贸易，怎么不让堪培拉独立 不让纽约独立？ 我觉得最简单的方式还是让台湾并入大陆，然后派精神科医生去你家看看你脑子里面装的是什么东西 跟你聊天简直降低智商。

@duixiang1 @magataotao I mean, China can give independence to the richest cities so that they can trade with HK, Taiwan, and the US freely and reproduce the same dynamic with the poorest regions. But today, you are losing markets globally.

You Westerners who visit China for a holiday, to study, or to work — you really think you can lecture me on what China is actually like? What a joke. Unless you’re a Chinese citizen living here as an ordinary person, your outsider perspective doesn’t count. The Chinese government is simply using you as convenient propaganda tools to sell a fake, polished image of the country. Half the Chinese population still earns only about RMB 1,000 a month — roughly AUD $200. Rural villagers’ retirement pension is just RMB 200, or around AUD $40 a month. This is the reality of “socialism with Chinese characteristics” under the Chinese Communist Party. The only people who are truly rich and powerful are Xi Jinping and his inner circle.

@Lunas_Fan_1 @magataotao 哈哈哈哈哈 已经没有和你讨论的意义了，我破防了！纯纯弱智玩意儿 跟你聊天我感觉智商都降低了 你是怎么从成年人的脑子里说出痴呆一样的这句话的？ 建议让你父母去查查是不是近亲结婚。你妈怎么会生出你的，当时你爸就应该把你抹在墙上 或者包在卫生纸里放垃圾桶里，你说出这段话的时候又没有动脑子？

@Lunas_Fan_1 @magataotao 中国相当于印度更成功 很大原因是得到苏联的重工业转移 建立了完善的重工业体系。因为中国在朝鲜战争中打出来的战略价值，帮助苏联保住了朝鲜，而重工业是所有工业的基础，再依靠社会主义制度 不断的优化和升级重工业基础，而不是短期的利润 而印度在刚独立时甚至比中国还要发达，现在却发展成了这样

@magataotao Only two countries have a population over 1 billion. You can't deny that China has achieved a certain level of welfare. While India's GDP is around $4 trillion, China's is roughly $20 trillion. Yes, China might perform better if it abandoned socialism, but it is what it is.

@Lunas_Fan_1 @magataotao 这和制度没有原因，是因为台湾和香港的地缘位置和冷战格局导致的。台湾发展核心时期可不是民主制度，是国民党统治下的一党制 以对抗中国获得了美国的技术和产业转移。类似的还有韩国和日本也是这样 为了对抗朝鲜和苏联。承接了订单和产业转移 市场准入，而香港则是直接作为中国大陆面相欧美的洗衣房

@duixiang1 @magataotao Hong Kong and Taiwan do a good job without communism, don't they?

@CT_RSTA @real_insight_1 这你得问问菲律宾了 中国确实也不明白 他们自豪感去哪儿了

@real_insight_1 Would it kill them to clean up their community? Wheres the pride?

@beegaw @real_insight_1 因为这tm是菲律宾

@real_insight_1 40 years ago maybe! Have you been in china lately!

@Sake_Meat_Tesla 没法在日本上市 因为座舱用了华为鸿蒙技术 华为在日本被制裁了

Xiaomi YU7と東風日産 N7見てきた👀 N7の希望小売価格が240万〜300万円でこのクオリティとかヤバすぎる バッテリーもLFPで73kWhのモデルもあって航続距離も安心 アームレストが冷蔵庫になってるのもいい 日本でもこれ売ったほうがいいよマジで 明治産業さん三洋貿易さんありがとうございました😊

@nytchinese 一边屠杀中东的穆斯林 一边保护中国的穆斯林？

《纽约时报》根据玩偶标签和包装上的信息追踪到这16只含有新疆棉的Labubu，它们均来自中国东南部的三家工厂，这些工厂由第三方承包商运营。 其中一家工厂位于江西省的一个工业园区。“中国劳工观察”发布的报告记录了其所称的多种违反劳动法的行为。 cn.nytimes.com/business/20260…

@Trystanto2 照你这么说 那美国一定是爱好和平的国家。你上面说的这些 我们持续了30年没有部署过 结果你们怎么说 中国是软弱的，中国的武器是垃圾，美国 日本 印度都可以把中国灭掉 现在换了做法 就开始叫嚣威胁

China has: 1. Carried out aggressive moves in West Philippine Sea 2. Deployed offensive missiles on reclamated islands in WPS 3. Exported lethal weapons 4. Raised military spending for 30+ years 5. Refused to rule out use of force against Taiwan Is China a "peace-loving nation"?

@zaobaosg 被美国认定强迫劳动的国家媒体 报道另一个国家的产品被美国认定强制劳动。这属于斯德哥尔摩犯了

风靡全球的中国潮玩品牌泡泡玛特旗下代表性玩偶Labubu，近期被曝部分玩偶服饰含有来自中国新疆的棉花，这意味着泡泡玛特可能面临处罚，甚至可能被美国列入禁止进口黑名单，导致旗下所有产品被禁入美国市场。 #Echobox=1777123380" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">zaobao.com.sg/news/china/sto…

@SeminoleDoug @thecyrusjanssen 你是少数民族？你知道少数民族不想出去？少数名族就该永远生活在那片贫困的土地上？发展权是基本的人权，每个人都应该享有自由发展的权利 。出去和回来都是自由 他留在当地还是去全国都是他的自由，可以说自己的语言 也可以说普通话和全国人对话 这难道不好吗？ 你这个美国垃圾

@thecyrusjanssen Many, or even most, of those minorities in those regions controlled by the CCP don’t WANT to go to other regions in China. They want to stay in their region and speak their language and make decisions for themselves rather than have the CCP dictate to them what’s “best” for them.

Wow this is absolutely disgusting propaganda from the Economist. Literally the only truthful thing said in this video is that China is home to 56 ethnicities. Everything else is a pathetic attempt to smear China in the most negative way possible. But let's break down the facts of what's really happening in China👇 Most people don't know that China is home to over 300 different languages. You've probably heard of Mandarin and Cantonese as these are the two most spoken languages in China, but there are literally hundreds of other languages spoken by different groups of people depending on the region. In Shanghai, locals speak Shanghainese, in Chongqing the speak a local Chongqing dialect, travel throughout the country and local languages are EVERYWHERE. But in order to move forward as one nation, China absolutely needs to have a national language that all people speak. That language is Mandarin and it's what is taught at all Chinese schools. Children in Xinjiang, Tibet, and Inner Mongolia ALL speak their local languages, but if you grow up speaking ONLY your local language you become a minority in your own country. You can not move to another region or city in China because you simply can not communicate. This is something Americans have no concept of. In the United States we only have English and you can travel to all 50 states and the English language is practically identical. Sure certain words and phrases are used in different regions, but 99.9% of the English words are the same. This is why so many Americans/Westerns fail to understand China, they simply can't comprehend how diverse and unique China is as a country. Travel to Xinjiang and the Uighur language is EVERYWHERE. It's printed on billboards, signs, heard on the radio, TV, and everywhere in the streets. The same can be said for Tibet and Inner Mongolia. China is not "squashing" 55 ethnicities. They are embracing them and wanting every Chinese person to be included in the development of the country's future. Consider this, throughout the entire "one child policy" period (1980-2015). Ethnic minorities were ALWAYS exempt from this rule and allowed to have as many children as they wanted. If China's government really wanted to "squash" all minorities , why would the government allow them to produce as many babies as possible for 35+ years. Once again, you can tell this is lazy journalism from the Economist whose writers have not spent enough time on the ground in China to truly understand how the country works. But don't take my word for it, nor take this report from the Economist as truth. Simply book a ticket to China and go see it for yourself. China is now on track to become the world's biggest tourism economy in 2026 and reports like this from the Economist will simply fall on deaf ears as hundreds of thousands of foreigners continue to pour into China and see the truth financialpost.com/news/economy/c…

@Travellingtooks @zriboua 我都不用看你的评论 我都知道你是共和党的铁票仓，就你还提问？你那智商能把地球是圆的还是平的理解到 就已经算很优秀了。

@zriboua I wonder what China would be like if they had a free economy?

China now faces a stagnant economy, with GDP per capita less than the global average and less than 20 percent of the US level. As throughout China’s long history, any semblance of social welfare rests in the hands of local governments. But high debt levels and diminishing income from land sales and taxes after the bursting of the real estate bubble imperil their finances. Local governments rely on transfers from Beijing to meet their budgets, and local authorities are responsible for more than 90 percent of the costs of social services while receiving only about half of the country’s tax revenues. According to the Rhodium Group, more than half of Chinese cities have trouble servicing their debt, and many face interest payments that take up more than a third of annual revenues. This severely constrains their ability to finance existing social safety net obligations, let alone improve the system. hudson.org/economics/how-…

@badiucao 你把你全家的工资+起来x5都达不到我的收入 你搁这儿叫啥？耗材

@duixiang1 你出五百万 还是捐躯？

我澳和日本签署70亿美元军售大单子，买爆战舰。 中国啥时候破防，怎么还没抗议澳大利亚，警告中国国民不要来澳洲？

@xian78168 @chengduxiaoshou @GordonGChang 把眼睛闭上 中国马上就能消失

@chengduxiaoshou @GordonGChang where is the stronger？

China has just about reached the limits of what it can accomplish in its now-rigid political system. Its economic model is exhausted, and Chinese society is falling apart. The regime now is especially dangerous as Xi Jinping, who must be seeing a closing window of opportunity to achieve his grand ambitions, can lash out.

@DalasMuller @GordonGChang 哈哈哈哈

@GordonGChang Well done Chang, you have blinded the westerns for decades,you will get the outstanding national medal from China soon

@GordonGChang 哦 预言中国崩溃30年都错误的人 刚刚又重新预测了中国即将崩溃，我猜你应该是中国的间谍 故意提供相反的情报，如果你是真的这么想 希望你下了地狱以后继续预测 我猜你的书应该会在地狱畅销

@Write4Republic 你说的没错 你美国爸爸已经在18年-21年尝试过了 你问我结果是什么？就是特朗普总统现在已经不愿再提起这件事了

The free world has no choice but to confront and defeat communist China on an economic level.