EdgeAlways

Classic

@gerichester @firstfusilier @AlboMP That’s because he didn’t.

@firstfusilier @AlboMP I can’t believe he actually said that 🤨…… grub level bar just got higher …. Ffs gov general earn your $600k a yr and call an election ….. please 🙏

According to @AlboMP, if you don’t own your own home at 40, it’s because you’re a failure. Just a thought though Prime Minister ……. it might be because they haven’t been sucking off the public teet their entire lives. Maybe they have to work for a living.

Adrian Lyne needs to fulfill his own fantasies. I’m not surprised he drew Ana de Armas in. I am surprised he drew Ben Affleck in

@MickamiousG IMHO people vote for their view of the major party.

Do people in Australia actually research the candidate in their electorate they’re voting for?? Or Do you just vote for that individual because you support the party??

@ausstockchick Wow. So many people want to live by government handouts.

If a man said half the stuff I say, I guarantee there would be outcry. Men can’t speak their minds now. If you take away the rights of men to speak, stop them from expressing opinions honestly and let women with extremely outrageous opinions speak louder. What happens? Well just take a look around. #ausbiz

@SydneySiren If he called an election you’d criticise him for calling an early election.

Dear Australians It’s no longer about Left versus Right. It’s about massively high-spending, high-taxing governments versus the people who pay for it all. Australians have had enough. We’re galvanised like never before — across suburbs, cities, and regions. We’re done with lies, waste, fraud, endless taxes, and policies which punish hard work and investment in our amazing country. We’re looking for real leadership. Someone who puts Australian families, workers, and businesses first. Someone who actually represents our interests, not the interests of the themselves, bureaucracy, globalists, or ideology. ALBO MUST GO ! Call an election @AlboMP and let Australians have our say. If your policies are as popular as you say then you have nothing to fear.

I might have had some sympathy for the outlying cases on the changes to CGT. But the sheer self interested bullshit I’m seeing make me think ‚fuck them. Don’t even grandfather it‘.

Rich people that don’t want to have their handouts reduced are saying now that old people will be taxed on the family home. It’s beyond putrid what these people will do.

@MarkoMatvikov Can you point to where there is a tax on the principal place of residence? No. You can’t. Because there isn’t. So you have to lie to further your cause. Pathetic.

“Channel all wealth into the family home” “Done” “Now tax the principal place of residence”

@ausstockchick So your issue is people sharing food.

I was at a nice restaurant in Perth last night and it was predominantly boomers. But one thing got me… A table of people sat there sharing a couple of dishes between five of them. I won’t say where they are from but not here. The men sat down with beanies on inside. We really have hit a new low in society. #ausbiz

@ausstockchick This has to be a bot. The regularity of the posts, the misunderstanding of the law, the lack of knowledge about finance.

So true! #auspol

@ausstockchick Haven’t advanced far up the ladder evolutionary ladder have ya.

I’ve said all along, there is nothing more dangerous than left wing women clinging to a cause to be seen as productive in society. You know what is productive? Having children, what females are designed to do. Suicidal empathy from the radical left is destroying us and many of it comes from women. There! I said it. #auspol

@TopherField By ‘Ram through’ you mean pass both Houses of Parliament

The terrifying thing for Labor is that there's no good news on the horizon for them. The budget has gone down like a lead balloon and either: 1. they will ram their changes through, at which point the pain will be FELT (rather than just anticipated) and the polls will move further against Labor, or 2. they will back off on some of the changes to avoid losing further ground, but they will still have paid a high price and I doubt a flip-flop now will bring back any support. I've got a video coming out in a few days looking at the reality of the negative gearing changes and making the argument that these changes will cost Labor at least 2-3% of their most loyal base (low income renters) and they'll head direct to One Nation. Where that gets spicy is that Labor dropping to 28% and ON rising to 31% is all it will take for a One Nation government in less than 2 years time.

@cjoye 😂

The real equity issue in this budget is that Labor are telling us they need to borrow $267 billion of extra debt over the next four years to pay for their out-of-control spending. That is almost identical to the total value of the headline budget deficits that Labor say they will produce between now and 2029-30. The fairness issue is that Labor is spending hundreds of billions of dollars borrowed from future generations to buy votes in the present. If it kept government spending as a share of the economy, or GDP, at 2007-08 levels, when Australia was doing very well indeed, the budget would swing from a projected $64 billion headline deficit to a surplus of about $23 billion. Rather than borrowing from future taxpayers, we would be reducing their debt burden. It is un-Australian to overturn all the rules of the economic and investment game — adversely affecting millions of households and businesses in the process— with zero debate, discussion or notice. The accounting and legal costs alone will impose a small fortune on families and firms. How Labor thought they could get away with this daylight robbery is unclear. It must have something to do with dud polling… afr.com/markets/equity…

@shallowchal Except of course, that is nothing like how Section 57 works.

What if I told you Australia has a political nuclear button built into the Constitution? It’s called Section 57 ❤️ Most Australians have never even heard of it, but it gives the Senate the power to stop legislation and force the country back to an election through what’s called a double dissolution🤔 That means: Every MP loses their seat, Every Senator goes back to the people and Australians get another vote on the future direction of the country. Today - we have….. Your country being invaded. Broken promises on power prices. Broken promises on tax. Broken promises on super. Record migration (invasion) during a housing crisis. Young Australians locked out of home ownership. Small businesses drowning in costs while Canberra lectures everyone about “fairness.” And now they want the Senate to just wave this budget through like none of that happened. I say “Treason” The Senate is not supposed to be a rubber stamp. It exists to scrutinise governments when public trust starts collapsing. Millions of Australians feel like the social contract has been broken. Work harder. Pay more tax. Own less. And somehow be grateful for it? A double dissolution is a constitutional reset button and I WANT the reset. #AustraliaFirst 🇦🇺🫡 #MillionsMustGo 🇦🇺🫡

@ashman_the How incredibly short sighted.

No politician should be flying 1st class or business class at the expense of tax payers. No politician should be allowed to fly family members around the country at the expense of tax payers. NONE

@KatyKray73 Where would you suggest a father take his young daughter? Men’s urinals?

Melbourne’s new “all gender toilets” are peak woke lunacy. One hidden camera. One incident. One woman or child harassed… and it’s game on. I’m absolutely sick of this rubbish! Vote these idiots out in November! 🙏🏽

@ausstockchick They wouldn’t be able to find 59 candidates that could stay out of jail until election day.

The shift has been huge. Next election, Albo is finished. #auspol

@RitaPanahi No they wouldn’t. They’d be lucky to win 4. And all of those off the National Party.

Wow. One Nation would win up to 59 seats if an election were held today.

@Sauronlordking Simple solutions to complex problems. The realm of the stupid.

Income tax is too high because government spending is too high. Inflation is too high because government spending is too high.

@DaveSharma @MarkDiStef So if she or anyone was suggesting INCREASING the CGT discount to say 76% you’d call that ‘abolishing the existing’ as well, and be all up in arms about it.

@MarkDiStef I don’t agree. She wants to abolish the existing 50% CGT discount — and replace it with something else. Just as Labor does.

Just a reminder that Allegra Spender called for: ❌ Abolishing the existing CGT discount ❌ Imposing a minimum tax on ALL investment income, regardless of marginal rate. ❌ Abolishing negative gearing. Labor’s Budget has done all this. Now she is denying ownership.😅😅