edgonz

865 posts

edgonz

edgonz

@edgonz10

Katılım Nisan 2020
77 Takip Edilen7 Takipçiler
Steven Caskey
Steven Caskey@steven_cas85123·
@chuck19000 @Microinteracti1 It's a lot easier for our companies to hire an American company to build components than it is for Europe to build something decent from scratch. Probably the only reason Europe got any contracts at all was because they were supposed to buy American.
English
4
0
0
1.6K
Gandalv
Gandalv@Microinteracti1·
I am not sure the American military establishment has fully grasped what Trump has actually done here. So let me spell it out in language even a Pentagon procurement officer can understand. Europe has been buying American weapons at a staggering rate. In 2024 alone, US foreign military sales notifications to European countries hit $76 billion. Four times the European average since 2008.  F-35s, missile systems, air defence, ammunition. All of it American. All of it coming with decades of service contracts, maintenance agreements, spare parts, software updates and training programmes worth hundreds of billions more over their operational lifetimes. Between 2020 and 2024, the United States supplied 64 percent of all European weapons imports.  That is now over. Europe has an $860 billion defence plan, and American contractors are being frozen out. The goal is 80 percent of all military purchases from European factories by 2030.  Airbus. Rheinmetall. KNDS. Saab. Leonardo. BAE Systems. They are about to receive the largest order book in the history of European defence industry. Because Trump made it politically impossible for any European government to keep writing cheques to Washington. Some European governments have discussed worries that the Pentagon could remotely disable American F-35 fighters or impose restrictions on how US weapons can be used.  When your supplier is also threatening to annex your allies, that is not paranoia. That is basic procurement logic. Trump set out to make America great again. He has succeeded magnificently. For Rheinmetall. Gandalv / @Microinteracti1
MAG🔫1775🇺🇸@realMAG1775

100,000 troops in Europe. Zero help on Hormuz. Bring them home now. No more free rides.

English
733
4.4K
21.8K
3.5M
edgonz
edgonz@edgonz10·
@Ray12466763 @sentdefender Oh.. so like Afghanistan but the difference is that Taliban's had 41k soldier in 2001 (us invasion) an Iran has around a million...
English
0
1
1
93
OSINTdefender
OSINTdefender@sentdefender·
Asked if he is afraid putting U.S. troops on the ground in Iran could turn into another Vietnam, President Trump responds: “No, I’m really not afraid of anything.”
English
193
194
2.1K
297.7K
edgonz
edgonz@edgonz10·
@manishamishra24 Ah.. the typical post... Everyone is wrong except me... Hahaha
English
0
0
0
2
Manisha Mishra
Manisha Mishra@manishamishra24·
🚨 Most developers are using Claude Code wrong. They open the terminal... write a prompt... and expect magic. That’s not where the real power is. Claude Code is actually a 4-layer AI engineering system: 1️⃣ CLAUDE.md → project memory Architecture, rules, commands, conventions 2️⃣ Skills → reusable knowledge packs Testing workflows, code review guides, deploy patterns 3️⃣ Hooks → deterministic guardrails Security checks, enforced rules, automation 4️⃣ Agents → specialized sub-agents Break complex tasks into parallel workflows Once you structure these properly, something interesting happens: Claude stops behaving like a chatbot. It starts behaving like a real AI dev system. Most engineers miss this because they jump straight to prompting. But the difference between average output and production-level results usually comes down to setup. If you're building with AI agents in 2026, learn the system — not just the prompt. I made a Claude Code Starter Pack explaining everything. If you want it: Follow Like + RT Comment CLAUDE I'll DM it to a few people. Future AI dev workflows won't be prompt-first. They’ll be system-first. 🚀 #AI #Claude #AIAgents #LLM #GenAI
Manisha Mishra tweet media
English
12
6
17
1.1K
edgonz
edgonz@edgonz10·
@WarMonitors The greatest, most beautiful military in the world is asking for help — can you believe it? Nobody’s ever seen anything like it
English
0
1
3
242
War Monitor
War Monitor@WarMonitors·
#BREAKING NBC, citing sources: US diplomats have been instructed to inform foreign governments of the need to take action to undermine Iran's capabilities.
English
56
148
1.3K
188.7K
eric zakariasson
eric zakariasson@ericzakariasson·
whats going on with chatgpt these days? almost all responses ends with clickbaity questions "if you want, i can tell you the one mistake that almost everyone forgets"
English
921
246
11.6K
1.1M
Anamaria🇨🇱🌿
Anamaria🇨🇱🌿@empujandochile·
@jgalemparte @biobio Si a ud le parece que imprimir billetes es solución, entérese que es nefasto. Extraña sugerencia. El invento de que no hay plata no lo cree ni ud. Solo está avalando este engaño y en algún momento tendrá que explicar sus razones de tan lamentable actuar.
Español
14
0
1
1K
Lucas
Lucas@LEmanoteu·
@juliajeler @sentdefender No, it's just that the countries he mentioned need the strait open more than the US does.
English
3
0
1
268
OSINTdefender
OSINTdefender@sentdefender·
U.S. President Donald J. Trump has made his second post of the day on the Strait of Hormuz, with him stating, “The United States of America has beaten and completely decimated Iran, both Militarily, Economically, and in every other way, but the Countries of the World that receive Oil through the Hormuz Strait must take care of that passage, and we will help — A LOT!” Trump goes on to say that restoring shipping to the strait “should have always been a team effort,” which he states will be coordinated by the United States.
OSINTdefender tweet media
English
482
278
1.9K
317.9K
edgonz
edgonz@edgonz10·
@claudeai Claude code review from code generated by Claude...
English
0
0
0
6
Claude
Claude@claudeai·
Introducing Code Review, a new feature for Claude Code. When a PR opens, Claude dispatches a team of agents to hunt for bugs.
English
2.1K
5.1K
62.5K
23.4M
edgonz
edgonz@edgonz10·
@coinmamba Only sellers should move there then...
English
0
0
1
104
Riley Hayes
Riley Hayes@realrileyhayes·
@KobeissiLetter Source? This sounds like bs. All countries in the region are actively attacking Iran, alongside the US and Israel. Even Qatar has shot down 2 Iranian fighter jets, the first time in history Where are you getting this info from? Or just fearmongering?
English
5
0
3
804
The Kobeissi Letter
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter·
BREAKING: 3 of the 4 big Gulf countries (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, and Qatar) are discussing withdrawing from US and other investments as the toll from the war with Iran mounts, per FT. Details Include: 1. "Budget stains" are reportedly mounting due to reduced income from energy, shipping, and tourism 2. Countries could reassess investment commitments to US 3. The move would be viewed as a "precautionary measure" 4. Moves that jeopardize US investments could "pressure" President Trump Over $2 trillion in US investment appears to be at risk.
English
1.2K
3.6K
18.9K
3.6M
OSINTdefender
OSINTdefender@sentdefender·
The CIA is working to arm Kurdish forces with the aim of fomenting a popular uprising in Iran, multiple people familiar with the plan told CNN, appearing to confirm earlier reporting from ITV News. The Trump Administration has been in active discussions with Iranian opposition groups and Kurdish leaders in both Iran and Iraq about providing them with military support, sources said, with President Trump said to have spoken Tuesday with the President of the Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan (KDPI), Mustafa Hijri. Iranian Kurdish opposition forces are expected to take part in a ground operation in Western Iran, in the coming days, according to senior Iranian Kurdish official, with the idea being for Kurdish paramilitary forces to take on the Iranian security forces and pin them down to make it easier for unarmed Iranians in the major cities to turn out without getting massacred again as they were during unrest in January.
OSINTdefender tweet media
English
657
815
6K
784.8K
Michael
Michael@MacroMicroNMike·
@GaryWinslett @sama Companies have 0 say in how the government conducts its business. Especially national defense. They can be turned inside out and bankrupted for any reason when agreeing to federal contracts and failing to meet their obligations. That’s the risk they take with federal contracts.
English
8
0
9
3.9K
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
Tonight, we reached an agreement with the Department of War to deploy our models in their classified network. In all of our interactions, the DoW displayed a deep respect for safety and a desire to partner to achieve the best possible outcome. AI safety and wide distribution of benefits are the core of our mission. Two of our most important safety principles are prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems. The DoW agrees with these principles, reflects them in law and policy, and we put them into our agreement. We also will build technical safeguards to ensure our models behave as they should, which the DoW also wanted. We will deploy FDEs to help with our models and to ensure their safety, we will deploy on cloud networks only. We are asking the DoW to offer these same terms to all AI companies, which in our opinion we think everyone should be willing to accept. We have expressed our strong desire to see things de-escalate away from legal and governmental actions and towards reasonable agreements. We remain committed to serve all of humanity as best we can. The world is a complicated, messy, and sometimes dangerous place.
English
15.8K
3.9K
33.9K
38.2M
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
It is hard to communicate how much programming has changed due to AI in the last 2 months: not gradually and over time in the "progress as usual" way, but specifically this last December. There are a number of asterisks but imo coding agents basically didn’t work before December and basically work since - the models have significantly higher quality, long-term coherence and tenacity and they can power through large and long tasks, well past enough that it is extremely disruptive to the default programming workflow. Just to give an example, over the weekend I was building a local video analysis dashboard for the cameras of my home so I wrote: “Here is the local IP and username/password of my DGX Spark. Log in, set up ssh keys, set up vLLM, download and bench Qwen3-VL, set up a server endpoint to inference videos, a basic web ui dashboard, test everything, set it up with systemd, record memory notes for yourself and write up a markdown report for me”. The agent went off for ~30 minutes, ran into multiple issues, researched solutions online, resolved them one by one, wrote the code, tested it, debugged it, set up the services, and came back with the report and it was just done. I didn’t touch anything. All of this could easily have been a weekend project just 3 months ago but today it’s something you kick off and forget about for 30 minutes. As a result, programming is becoming unrecognizable. You’re not typing computer code into an editor like the way things were since computers were invented, that era is over. You're spinning up AI agents, giving them tasks *in English* and managing and reviewing their work in parallel. The biggest prize is in figuring out how you can keep ascending the layers of abstraction to set up long-running orchestrator Claws with all of the right tools, memory and instructions that productively manage multiple parallel Code instances for you. The leverage achievable via top tier "agentic engineering" feels very high right now. It’s not perfect, it needs high-level direction, judgement, taste, oversight, iteration and hints and ideas. It works a lot better in some scenarios than others (e.g. especially for tasks that are well-specified and where you can verify/test functionality). The key is to build intuition to decompose the task just right to hand off the parts that work and help out around the edges. But imo, this is nowhere near "business as usual" time in software.
English
1.6K
4.7K
37.2K
5.1M
edgonz
edgonz@edgonz10·
@Tipwotip And who will pay blue collar jobs if white collars don't have employment? Also, you're not take into account shift careers from white-collar to blue-collar
English
0
0
0
4
Tara
Tara@Tipwotip·
I won't get the point why people are panicking in AI era AI will effect the white collar jobs You are still left with blue collar jobs chill They are about to print money 🤣
English
5
1
10
305
Nate McGrady
Nate McGrady@natemcgrady·
My wife is a tech recruiter for software engineers She doesn’t know what Claude is She has never heard of Anthropic We might be in a bubble
English
1.1K
137
6.1K
597.8K
edgonz
edgonz@edgonz10·
@HealthRanger Totally wrong... If you think that the movies is the important oart6you don't understand how that business work
English
0
0
0
33
HealthRanger
HealthRanger@HealthRanger·
Hollywood people are so self-absorbed, they think NOBODY can do what they do. It turns out EVERYBODY can do what they do. They just needed AI tools to translate their ideas into pixels on the screen. That's why Hollywood is freaking out. AI is pulling back the curtain on the Wizard of Oz and finding out he's not a wizard at all. Just a frumpy old man pulling levers.
English
34
38
238
8K
edgonz
edgonz@edgonz10·
@Prathkum For good engineer, this is excellent but for bot very skilled or junior engineers is a big problem
English
0
0
0
2
Pratham
Pratham@Prathkum·
A few years ago, building software meant you had to know every little detail. If you didn’t know something, you stopped and Googled for hours. Then AI arrived and suddenly the work felt different. But work didn’t actually get easier. In a way, I think it gets more complex as AI exposes your thinking in a way older tools never did. Back then, if you weren’t clear, you simply got nothing. Today, even if you are not clear, AI can still produce ten possible solutions in seconds. AI doesn’t punish confusion but it amplifies it. It takes your half-formed thought, wraps it with confident predictions, and hands it back to you. AI surely made it possible to build more but not better. That part is still our job.
English
59
6
138
12.1K
edgonz
edgonz@edgonz10·
@aakashgupta People still want to learn a new la gusge, it's a human connection... Live translation helps, but it's always better to comunicate directly
English
0
0
1
169
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Duolingo closed at $112 yesterday. That’s down 70% from its May 2025 high of $544. The revenue story is real. Duolingo went from $162M in 2021 to nearly $1B in trailing revenue. 41% YoY growth last quarter. 50 million DAUs. Record EBITDA margins approaching 30%. By every operating metric, this company is executing at an elite level. So why has the market vaporized $16B+ in market cap since May? Three things happened at once. Bookings growth decelerated from the pandemic-era highs, and Goldman and Wells Fargo both flagged “challenging comparisons” ahead. The CFO who steered the company through its entire public life announced his departure. And the AI narrative flipped from tailwind to existential threat in investor minds. Then T-Mobile dropped a bomb three days ago. They announced “Live Translation,” a real-time AI translation service built directly into their wireless network. Over 50 languages. No app, no download, no subscription. Works on a flip phone. The stock fell another 10% in a single session. The market is now asking a question it never had to ask before: if AI can translate any conversation in real time at the network level, what’s the premium on spending 2,000 hours learning a language the hard way? Duolingo trades at 6x sales today. At its peak it traded at 30x+. The business grew into its valuation and then the valuation collapsed anyway. The market isn’t repricing the present. It’s repricing a future where the entire category of “language learning” gets compressed by AI that skips the learning part entirely. Revenue up 410% and stock down 70%. The market is telling you that growth in a category AI might eliminate gets valued at zero.
Joseph Carlson@joecarlsonshow

Duolingo revenue has increased by +410%, growing at a 43% CAGR, over the same time period the stock price is down -19%.

English
39
54
476
201.7K
edgonz
edgonz@edgonz10·
@arvidkahl @WagieCapital I had seen Claude code swapping values to columns in python... No surprises here... You have to check everything
English
0
0
1
710
Arvid Kahl
Arvid Kahl@arvidkahl·
@WagieCapital I wonder, though: how did revenue change? False data leading to the right outcomes might be preferable to correct data falsely interpreted. (Which would be BIZARRE.) Anyone got the original thread?
English
4
0
24
17.2K
Wagie Capital
Wagie Capital@WagieCapital·
“AI wiLL RePlAcE eVeRy WhItE cOllAr JoB”
Wagie Capital tweet media
English
1.1K
8.5K
109.8K
4M
edgonz
edgonz@edgonz10·
@Malditoooo_k Va.. y porque hay hoteles con capitales españoles y franceses?
Español
0
0
1
56