ehak

2.7K posts

ehak

ehak

@ehak1

Katılım Nisan 2012
444 Takip Edilen25 Takipçiler
Joe
Joe@CupoJoeBlow·
@ehak1 @ryankatzrosene Here's what ~1.3C warming over 170 years during an interglacial really looks like. Calm down.
Joe tweet media
English
28
0
17
265.2K
Joe
Joe@CupoJoeBlow·
@ryankatzrosene Climate alarmists: You’re full of it.
Joe tweet media
English
8
0
7
11.2K
Prof. Ryan Katz-Rosene
Prof. Ryan Katz-Rosene@ryankatzrosene·
I mean, I’m all for putting things into perspective, but when it comes to global warming, zooming out a couple thousand years is not exactly reassuring.
Prof. Ryan Katz-Rosene tweet media
John Dunton-Downer@doubledee3

@hausfath Zoom out your graph to include just a few thousand little years. And…. Breathe. Happy weekend!

English
243
1.4K
23.3K
745.8K
Good Old Shamu
Good Old Shamu@KevinSmith93690·
@ryankatzrosene Instead of measuring the net change alone, you should also have graphs where the temperature is measured from zero on both Celsius and Fahrenheit.
English
1
0
1
1K
John Dunton-Downer
John Dunton-Downer@doubledee3·
@ejwwest @hausfath Dodgy graphs of all three items methinks. The hockey stick illusion is a brilliant book on the subject and debunks this stuff with authority.
English
85
0
7
55K
Zeke Hausfather
Zeke Hausfather@hausfath·
The world has warmed by around 1.4C since 1850. It took 148 years for the first half of that warming to occur, and just 27 years for the second half!
Zeke Hausfather tweet media
English
155
576
2K
134.3K
ehak
ehak@ehak1·
@BStarr96522 You are correct. I do not understand how our 235 ppm just disappeared from the carbon cycle. That applies to you as well. You have not explained that. Just apply Henry's law and validate with observations from your CO2 emitting warm ocean. Carbon is absorbed there too.
English
1
0
0
5
Bart Starr
Bart Starr@BStarr96522·
Dr. Murry Salby nailed it over a decade ago - the rate of change of atmospheric CO2 concentration is proportional to temperature anomaly. That puts the arrow of causation firmly in the direction of temperature driving atmospheric CO2, and not the reverse.
Bart Starr tweet media
English
36
29
85
34.5K
ehak
ehak@ehak1·
@BStarr96522 You judge yourself harshly. Do you have a revised theory explaining where our 235 ppm ended up? Your graph showing correlation between CO2 and temperature have failed.
English
1
0
0
8
ehak
ehak@ehak1·
@BStarr96522 It doesn't go anywhere to disprove measurements of ocean chemistry with a graph showing correlation between CO2 and temperature The warm waters are where we expect to observe your ocean to air CO2 transfer. We don't. We observe the opposite.
English
1
0
0
4
Bart Starr
Bart Starr@BStarr96522·
@ehak1 I've explained and explained. It doesn't go anywhere. You don't have the necessary background. I see little point going forward.
English
1
0
0
5