
You guys should go ask an actual academic economist what they think of Tyler Cowen, who is ostensibly supposed to be an economist. The answer might surprise you.
Ben Harrell 🌐
16.4K posts

@elben
Asst Prof of Economics @Trinity_U | health insurance, health policy, & health disparities. Abundance bro. Past: @vanderbiltecon @LGBTPolicyLabVU and @aysps

You guys should go ask an actual academic economist what they think of Tyler Cowen, who is ostensibly supposed to be an economist. The answer might surprise you.

🚨EXCLUSIVE: A broad coalition of pro-family groups is organizing to overturn Obergefell. The campaign declares that children are "Greater Than" so-called "Equality." Marriage and family law should prioritize the needs of children, not the predilections of adults. Here's the powerful video with @albertmohler, @LilaGraceRose, @Advo_Katy, @conservmillen, @JBStonestreet, @michaeljknowles, @FocusFamily's Jim Daly, @DelanoSquires, @tperkins, & @josh_hammer. The coalition includes: @AmericanFamAssc, @ColsonCenter, @FRCdc, Focus on the Family, @ThemBeforeUs, @CatholicVote, @LiveAction, @AbbyJohnson, @SteveDeaceShow, @RuthInstitute, @RonColeman, @CBMWorg, @sgruber91, @CCVPolicy, @AKFamilyCouncil, @indianafamily, @theFAMiLYLEADER, @MarylandFamily, @MAFamilyInst, @ncfamilypolicy, @txvalues & more dailysignal.com/2026/01/28/exc…


Ignore academic publishing, and imagine the implications of everyone having access to a Raj Chetty-quality lab through AI Newspaper articles could routinely come with credible identification designs. We could spin up a simulation for every federal, state, local proposed policy


This piece is justly being shared around. All I will add is this: if you want to understand the venom behind DOGE, the attacks on academia, and the grants being cut across the government... this is the thing to read, really. This is the main reason that all is happening.











"There is no such thing as a normal period of history. Normality is a fiction of economic textbooks." -Joan Robinson

@Noahpinion So what led to reduced crime then?




This is from an AEJ paper (2025). To model decision-makers (i.e. people), they assume that: 1.Everyone maximizes their utility 2.Utility = consumption How do they know people actually do that? They don’t and they don’t care about reality. (Other shots are from Romer2016)



In my experience, most “heterodox economists” who criticise Economics for being "too mathematical" don’t understand the mathematics that economists use or why we use it. Some had difficulties with Math and decided to criticise a methodology that they still didn’t understand.



These results suggest that getting a PhD causally worsens mental health, or at least receiving psychiatric medicines. The reversal post PhD degree is particularly convincing. But the up trend among the control group is intriguing. The highly educated are in distress.

So what’s everyone’s most controversial economics take?