ashley on vacation

@CalicoJackie @unclestrokeus @MeanGreenDemon ask yourself if low class ghetto blacks having more children is a net positive or not ask yourself without your politically correct blinders on i’m just glad they’re so excited about abortion like the OP. taking care of the problem themselves

@elitistash @unclestrokeus @MeanGreenDemon Says the racist who decided to interject herself into a conversation she wasn’t in, you’re a fucking airhead and it’s not cute.

I DONT CARE NIGGA LMAOOOO #INeedAnAbortion

@shillforthecpi @jaytjaytx @teachrobotslove it’s so cringe

@jaytjaytx @teachrobotslove Okay, edgelord

Your mother is problematic. Your father is problematic. Your son is problematic. Your aunt is problematic. The cashier at the local Tesco is problematic. You've probably bought a cookie from a bakery made by hands that have done unspeakable things. Every chocolate bar you've ever eaten has probably killed a 7 year old child slave in Cameroon. The gas that drives your car is fueled by engines of death. Every person who has ever smiled at you in the streets has committed some act that if you knew about it, would make you profoundly dislike them. We have all been bad, small, petty, unlikeable, cruel, downright mean. Authors are not special "problematic" beings, they're just more public. Part of being an adult is recognizing that without mercy for our fellow human beings, and ourselves, we'd all be condemned to death. Reading fiction should help us understand that we're all irreparably tainted with evil, every system is corrupted, every line is broken. And like, that's okay. That's what it means to be alive.

@vanjajaja1 @TrueSlazac lol on the basis of what

@TrueSlazac if everyone is conscious then no one is conscious

@CurvyBug @TrueSlazac lmao what

@keithkman @NameRandom40846 @HodlMagoo @elonmusk what do they do

@NameRandom40846 @HodlMagoo @elonmusk Fuck Flock cameras. deflock.org

@NbN_8321 @HodlMagoo @elonmusk he stared objective facts

@HodlMagoo @elonmusk You just over thought it lol

@nascarmixing @cyberpyre @pauloabelha ultraviolet light as ‘perhaps colors that are richer than violet?”

@nascarmixing @cyberpyre @pauloabelha you keep misrepresenting my argument even when i keep correcting you. conscious beings can and do conjecture about sense faculties they do NOT have, using a faculty they DO have. a question that would’ve made sense given my argument: “how many people describe—

@elitistash @cyberpyre @pauloabelha It literally says “perhaps I comprehend time without experiencing it”. It’s conjecturing, not conveying qualia. It’s acting as a pitchman.

@jdubfangirl @subhumangoy @BostonWaffen2 @Wehyahat @benardonhard stop being a dumbass

@subhumangoy @BostonWaffen2 @Wehyahat @benardonhard excuse me i meant dumbass fat chud

such dogshit genetics, even the kid is already balding

@nightfight38155 @GadSaad no it’s the fact that conservatives want to make it illegal for women to have agency over our own bodies. dummy. if republicans supported women’s bodily autonomy then we would be voting conservative. instead, their views on women are just a few steps above the muslims.

@GadSaad Is it the effects of SSRIs and birth control drugs altering their hormonal and mental states?

This figure supports the statement that I have repeatedly made, namely that progressive women fuel the infinity pool of Suicidal Empathy.

False. This is a misrepresentation. The data only shows that more young women identify as liberal than in the past. That does not mean that individual liberal women are becoming more liberal or even that women have changed their views. The reason more young women identify as liberal is because conservatives have been seriously threatening women’s rights. The open threats to women’s rights are why more young women, who have the most to lose from abortion bans for example, identify as liberal. This should not be hard to figure out.

@NoahRevoy @TC36489185 lmao. control female sexuality but don’t control the sexuality of males who notoriously fuck up families by abandoning them. nice.

@TC36489185 This is 100% correct.

The absolute and total feminization of institutions, especially those of education, has led to extremely feminized thinking about research. These researchers, some of whom are physically women and the rest of whom are (mostly) spiritual women, cannot bring themselves to face the real nature of mankind. There are many reasons for this, and they are all connected. Here are two of them. To face the real nature of humanity, you must accept that violence is golden, as Jack Donovan (@mr_jackdonovan) said, and is the primary social tool by which society functions. We are either cooperating to protect ourselves from violence, cooperating to commit violence, or some combination of the two. Violence (and politics) is the primary job of men, which brings up the second point. Men are indispensable. We are the backbone of civilization, and civilizations cannot exist without us being men. That means more than just having an X and a Y chromosome, but acting in a masculine way, being dominant, strong, courageous, and willing to fight for ourselves and those we care about. This is something women cannot do, and it makes them dependent on men for survival. That terrifies the effeminate male, who cannot participate in that and therefore has no place in that hierarchy, neither as a masculine man nor as a feminine woman. It also terrifies the unwanted women, who cannot find their place with a man to protect them. Institutions tend to collect these people the way a poorly run company collects debts, until the weight of it all crushes the institution and reveals it for what it is.

@nascarmixing @cyberpyre @pauloabelha “the nervous system doesn’t perceive either. it’s an input-output system evolved to…”

@elitistash @cyberpyre @pauloabelha This doesn’t perceive either. It’s an input-output system designed to mimic human behavior and language.

@realAnjanBabu @Polymarket exactly. typical narcissist

@Polymarket He doesnt have SUPERNATURAL COMPONENET, Trump pushes people around and is a tough to please which makes everyone around to keep kissing upto him.

NEW: Tucker Carlson claims Trump has a “supernatural component” that puts people around him in a “dreamland.”

@nascarmixing @cyberpyre @pauloabelha all it’s saying is that it doesn’t perceive time like a human does. like a blind person doesn’t perceive their environment like a seeing person does. nothing about that statement indicates “not conscious” it just indicates a different medium of knowing.

@elitistash @cyberpyre @pauloabelha But that’s the opposite of this scenario. The AI is conjecturing on the experience of being an AI, claiming it MIGHT perceive time like a map perceives space. It doesn’t know, because it isn’t conscious.

@elonmusk everyone smart already knew this

Ancient cultures were extremely violent, not “peace-loving ecologists” at all!

@nascarmixing @cyberpyre @pauloabelha i didn’t say a blind man needs to conjecture about the qualia of being blind. i said he’d need to conjecture about the qualia of sight — the one he doesn’t have. the ability to conjecture about not-experienced things is literally a part of consciousness. imagining.

@elitistash @cyberpyre @pauloabelha The difference is it’s conjecturing about its own experience. A blind man doesn’t need to conjecture about the qualia of being blind. The fact that it is making conjecture implies it isn’t experiencing consciously.

@charizards_mom @lukehastwatter @ZubyMusic no illegal immigrants

@lukehastwatter @ZubyMusic What is the switch?

The answers to many modern problems are simple but politically incorrect. So instead of solving anything, everybody pretends they don't know what's going on, and spend years misdiagnosing the issue, talking in circles, and wasting time.

@FajrCoded @dmontetheno1 you mean like the people who believe a medieval pedophile warlord who raped a 9 year old is the messenger of god? a god who was also cool with child rape? can’t get much more “loony” than that.

@dmontetheno1 Every single one of them turned out to be a loony

The most cathartic thing has been living long enough to see how widely accepted it is that the Four Horsemen of New Atheism are all idiots.

The point of structure is not to limit you. It is to stop wasting your best energy on re-deciding the obvious.