Jake Steiner

@SStricklandMMA Wrestling is hyper ladyboy level. Effective sure, but doesn't make it any less super gey. Dudes in super tight outfits on the ground, in hard hugs trying to dominate and submit. lol come on bro

Most masculine sports in order from being a man to being a lady boy MMA Kickboxing boxing Wrestling Rugby Hockey Football Baseball<sport sucks though Lacrosse Tennis Soccer Golf Swimming Right or wrong?

For those interested, I have a public case registry. A LOT of people reverse their nearsightedness. endmyopia.org/myopia-improve…

You're 35. Your glasses prescription was −2.00 at 18. It's −5.00 now. You can't see anything without glasses these days at all. You spend 9 hours on screens. You wear your glasses. You just got a stronger pair. You've stopped bringing it up. You don't have a vision problem. You have a signal problem. In 2010, researchers at Queensland University put 28 adults under one hour of hyperopic defocus — the same type of blur your glasses create when you look at a screen. Axial length increased by +8 µm. -> Eyesight is measurably worse, in ONE HOUR. They tried the opposite — myopic defocus. Same 60 minutes. Same subjects. Axial length decreased by −13 µm. -> Vision measurably improves, with eyeball LENGTH reducing. One blur grows your eye. The other shrinks it. p < 0.0001. (Read et al., IOVS 2010) Your optometrist lens subscription seller gives you full correction for distance. You wear that same prescription to look at a phone 30 cm from your face. Your eyes under-accommodate. Research confirms myopes have ~2× the accommodative lag of emmetropes — about 0.6 D of hyperopic defocus at near. (PMC9544228) That's the same signal that made the +8 µm happen. Every screen session. Every year. In 2023, a JAMA Pediatrics RCT (n=263) found that naked-eye 3D vision training — creating myopic defocus — reduced axial elongation by 24%. With high adherence, 40%. (Xie et al., JAMA Pediatr 2024) A 2025 study (n=208) showed visual training dropped axial elongation from 0.38 mm/year to 0.23 mm/year — 39.5% reduction. And it was additive — it worked on top of orthokeratology, atropine, and defocus lenses with no statistically significant difference between combinations. (Xu et al., Clin Optom 2025) In 2025, a preprint documented full reversal of −6.00 D myopia in an adult in 5 months — using only myopic defocus and consciously triggered accommodation. n=1, not peer-reviewed. But the trajectory is suggestive. (Martinez-Saito, OSF 2025) The industry has known since 2002 that passive undercorrection backfires. The Chung study showed giving kids −0.75 D blur with no training made things worse. Critics cite this endlessly. They ignore that it tested passive blur — not differential lenses + active focus. Apples and hand grenades. The endmyopia approach is different: Wear differential lenses (1.5–2.0 D weaker aka "computer glasses") for close work — eliminates the hyperopic defocus stimulus entirely Wear normalized lenses (slightly weaker) for distance — creates mild myopic defocus Active focus — consciously clear the blur, retraining the ciliary muscle Two roads. One is a lifetime lens subscription sold by retail optometry, the other is you taking back control. Keep feeding your eyes the signal that says "grow longer, clearer" — 8 hours a day, every day. Or fix the signal. Nobody is coming to tell you this. They make 150 billion dollars a year counting on you not figuring it out.

@justinkarlin I have over 400 published case reports: endmyopia.org/myopia-improve…

@endmyopia There is limited evidence that your strategy would work in adults.

370k people saw my last post. A lot of you asked: "Okay, so what do I actually do?" Here's what I used: start.endmyopia.org It asks your prescription, screen time, and eye habits. In 5 minutes, it tells you exactly how much hyperopic defocus you're getting every day. How to fix it. A little warning though: It is a rabbit hole. No supplements, nothing to buy. Tool is 100% free.

Since so many asked — here's the same tool I used to find out what signal my eyes are getting: start.endmyopia.org 2 minutes. Free. Tells you your daily hyperopic defocus load. Heads up: It's a rabbit hole. That number is what my last post was about.

@MIGO_Offiziell Too bad you're a decade too late for it to matter.

Warum fragen sich alle, wo der Rechtsruck herkommt? Fragt doch einfach Leute wie mich? Ich bin bis vor ein paar Jahren noch zwischen SPD, meiner Homebase, Grünen und sogar LINKEN bei Wahlen rumgehüpft. Grundsätzlich war ich vor 10 Jahren noch ein Typ, der den Kopf in den Sand gesteckt hat ... Ich habe vor allem in den letzten Jahren einen merklichen Ruck nach rechts, vor allem in gesellschaftspolitischen Themen, und auch einen (wahrscheinlich noch krasseren) in Richtung liberal gemacht. Das liegt nicht daran, dass Rechts(außen) total verlockende Angebote macht, sondern daran, dass links mittlerweile einfach nur noch am laufenden Band so einen unfassbar schwachsinnigen Unsinn erzählt, sich vor allen „brenzligen“ Themen wegduckt, weil deren Takatukaland ein Paralleluniversum ist, und vor allem daran, dass alles immer autoritärer wird. Meiner Meinung nach ist es kein „Rechtsruck“, sondern ein „Linksabstoßen“ ... Was diese Leute für eine Scheiße erzählen, meine Fresse ...

@DougAMacgregor Rebellion? By today's Germans? 😆😁

If they attempt to implement a draft in Germany now, based on everything I know about the German population.. the nation will see open rebellion. The people want NOTHING to do with it.

@juliofetch It's the mechanism of myopia. Your eyeball elongates, the focal plane is wrong, vision is blurry. Plus I have an allergy to vibes. :)

@endmyopia axial length as a proxy for vision improvement is a wild datapoint to chase, kinda respect the rigor of demanding measurable biology instead of vibes

Apparently you can get your eye axial length measured for free, in Italy. Why does it matter? You can improve your vision. Reduces the length of your eyeball. If you want to go full-nerd, prove that the biology works, this is one way to do it. 🇮🇹

@MartinShkreli Was there ever another dude part of the pharma mafia who actually went to prison? As in .. ever? Martin couldn't even make pharma f*ckery work out for him. L

RIP peptide retards

@shadriarty Homework. Do it.

@endmyopia Lmao what? No, for real. I wasn’t joking

What a grift. His winning fund is named after the memory trade, and the defining name in that trade — Micron — returned roughly 4–5× what his fund did over the past year ($94 → $1,047, a 52-week high). Just buying the single most obvious memory stock beat his memory fund by multiples. Same story in photonics: his +107% sits under names like $AAOI that he himself says tripled. So the +189.7% that looked like a triumph is, against its own benchmark, lagging beta. He rode the right theme and captured less of it than the obvious trade. That's the opposite of alpha. #griftking And the pattern, come on: his two dead funds — Space −30%, Rare Earth/AI Factories −5% — are obviously the themes that didn't run this year. His returns track which theme got hot, not which stocks he picked. Theme rotation luck, not skill.

365 days ago, I decided to go all in on making content about stocks. 150K+ combined followers later... I thought I'd share my 3 best and 3 worst longs so far. And once you read my L's, you're going to realize why I chose this path. 👇Based on the date I dropped a bull thesis (YT, IG, substack mix) Winners: 1) $MU +431% 2) $AAOI +201% 2) $AMD +199% Losers: 1) $ORBS -88% 2) $FIG -76% 3) $AVEX -44% Notice how much more money could've been made on the best stocks versus lost on the worst stocks? That's why we play this game. James Anderson from Bailey Gifford said it best. “The asymmetric payoff structure, you can make far more if you're right about a stock than you can lose if you're wrong, is the fundamental attraction of investing in equity markets". It's been a fun ride so far, and we never know where markets will go next. But massive shoutout to my partner @KawzInvests and new teammates @LanceTeren @calioncap @yvesstocks. Plus the great traders/friends I now talk to almost everyday @BULLOFBRITAIN @CKCapitalxx @OptimusDelta @PhotonBull @charaninvests

@shadriarty I dunno it's some kind of shamanic thing. Or Voodoo? One of the two for sure.

@endmyopia How does it work? How could one improve their vision from knowing their axial length?

@cryptoklotz Getting glasses, same scam. Except you won't get a second opinion not selling you eyesight subscriptions.

-be me -go to new dentist, since my old one retired -new dentist: "you have three cavities" -feel bad vibe, go get a second opinion -"woooah - buddy, you have zero cavities. thank god you came to us. let's just do a cleaning" -send wife to this savior second dentist -"you have six cavities" -wife bails on getting them filled, goes to a different dentist a year later -"woooah gurl, you have zero cavities. thank god you didn't get them filled" why is dentistry like this 😭

Retail optometry, dentistry, you name it ...

Home made. Probably still buggy. Try eeeeit and see? start.endmyopia.org/?utm_source=tw…

The Eyeball Analyzer (v1.04) ✅ Learn why your eyes are blurry. ✅ Get blur data + analysis with your phone. ✅ Learn how to fix the blur. Free. (via link below) No app to download. Works on phone, laptop, install it on your microwave (no, not really that).