Mememrmr

156 posts

Mememrmr

Mememrmr

@etcetera_etc_

✋Joyful purveyor and information and disinformation. You 🫵 get the pleasure of discerning them.

Buenos Aires, Argentina Katılım Mayıs 2024
81 Takip Edilen5 Takipçiler
Mememrmr
Mememrmr@etcetera_etc_·
@numbertalker @feelsdesperate Two things: 1. New York is a lot bigger than Manhattan. 2. A 25-year old two years out of college (who this posting is targeting) will almost certainly have roommates.
English
0
0
0
33
Coddled Affluent Professional
This is a good example of what radicalizes Mamdani’s base: Ostensibly the type of person who takes this job is going to be sort of smart and well educated (credentialed) but they’re only going to be comfortable financially and lifestyle-wise in NYC if they have a trust fund or it’s a second-income vanity career. You can get off a plane from wherever and barely speak English and make this much driving an Uber. Nurses in NYC can easily make $150k a year. The dynamics of our economy that funnel people into these sort-of-high-status/ mediocre-salary jobs make them insane and then they become Leftists who want to burn everything down.
emily rahhal she/her@RahhalEmily

👀@NYCMayor is searching for a new speechwriter

English
58
95
1.5K
225.6K
Mememrmr retweetledi
Denzel Rust
Denzel Rust@AdemLuz·
Everyone is always rooting for you. Your parents want you to be a great son. Wife wants you to be a great husband. Your boss wants you to be a slam dunk hire. Every first date you’ve ever been on they’ve been rooting for you to get laid. Every time you started to tell a joke people hoped it would have a hilarious punch line. Your proximity to anyone is a reflection of themself, meaning the deck is never stacked against you, and your failures are completely your own
Bambulu@Bqmbulu

What’s the harshest truth every young man must eventually learn?

English
606
5.6K
84.1K
5M
Mememrmr
Mememrmr@etcetera_etc_·
@ChristianHeiens Kids today study modern languages and biology and computer science instead of Latin translation. That’s a good thing.
English
0
0
3
837
Mememrmr
Mememrmr@etcetera_etc_·
@mailboxdove @kevinbaum013 (In fact, being surrounded by such a wealth of opportunity is probably the strongest argument in favor of them.)
English
0
0
0
20
Mememrmr
Mememrmr@etcetera_etc_·
@mailboxdove @kevinbaum013 I didn’t claim the students were wealthy, but I do absolutely think it matters how rich the city is. CUNY students are surrounded by an abundance of opportunity of a caliber that exists nowhere else on Earth. This isn’t a knock on the schools! I’m actually a huge supporter.
English
1
0
0
43
Kevin Baum
Kevin Baum@kevinbaum013·
Here's your periodic reminder that the CUNY system has propelled almost six times as many low-income students into the middle class and beyond as all eight Ivy League campuses, plus Duke, M.I.T., Stanford and Chicago, combined. nytimes.com/2017/01/18/opi…
Ihtesham Ali@ihtesham2005

A four-year degree at the University of Chicago costs $386,000. They just made it free for almost every family in America. Starting Fall 2027, any household earning under $250,000 a year pays zero tuition. Under $125,000, the school also covers the dorm, the meal plan, and every fee. The most expensive university in the Midwest just became one of the cheapest options in the country for almost anyone who can get in. To understand how absurd this is, look at what you used to have to pay. UChicago undergraduate tuition for 2025 to 2026 is $73,266. Full cost of attendance with room, board, fees, books, and living expenses is roughly $93,000 a year. Across four years, the full price tag runs close to $386,000. That is the cost of a house in most American states. For a single college degree. The school had a previous free tuition threshold sitting at $125,000 of household income. They just doubled it overnight. The first thing nobody is saying out loud is what the $250,000 number actually means. The median household income in the United States is roughly $80,000. Households earning $250,000 sit in the top 5% of the entire country. UChicago is now telling 95% of American families that the sticker price does not apply to them. The most selective private university in the Midwest, the school that produced more Nobel laureates per capita than almost any institution on Earth, just stopped charging tuition to almost everyone who could realistically get in. The second thing nobody is saying is what happens to the families just under $125,000. They are not getting a discount. They are getting a fully paid four-year residential education at one of the top ten universities in the world. Tuition, dorm, meal plan, fees, all of it. Zero. A family making $120,000 a year is sending their kid to a school whose advertised cost is $93,000 a year and writing checks for nothing. The third thing is the part that should be making every other elite university nervous. UChicago is not the first to do this. MIT moved to $200,000 last year. Harvard moved to $200,000. Stanford moved to $150,000 with free room and board under $100,000. Princeton has had a version of this for years. Penn just announced a similar policy. The number is climbing every cycle and the trigger for each new announcement is the previous announcement. Every school watching this is now under pressure to match or get embarrassed in the next admissions cycle. UChicago just set the new ceiling at $250,000. Somebody is going to push it to $300,000 within twelve months. The reason the ceiling keeps moving is not generosity. It is competition for the same 3,000 students. The top 20 universities in America are fighting for the same applicant pool every year. When MIT made tuition free under $200,000, every kid in that bracket who got into both MIT and a school still charging full price stopped weighing the decision. The free school wins. The sticker price has stopped being a price for the people the universities want most. It has become a posted number that only the rich actually pay, and the rich do not need a discount to attend. The endowments are what make this possible. UChicago is sitting on $10.4 billion. Harvard is at $53 billion. MIT is at $25 billion. Stanford is at $36 billion. These are not schools running on tuition revenue. They are hedge funds with classrooms attached, and the tuition line on their balance sheet is a rounding error compared to investment returns and donor giving. Free tuition under $250,000 costs them almost nothing relative to what they earn each year on the endowment alone. The cruel reality is that the schools that can afford to make this announcement are exactly the schools that did not need to. The state university charging $30,000 a year cannot copy this. The small private liberal arts college running on a $400 million endowment cannot copy this. The cost of college in America is not going down. It is bifurcating. The top of the pyramid is now functionally free for almost everyone who gets admitted. Everything below it is getting more expensive every year. The student loan debt in America just crossed $1.8 trillion. The average graduate owes around $37,000. Forty-three million Americans are carrying education debt right now. And the schools that produce the smallest percentage of that debt are the ones that just made themselves free. There is a generation of kids growing up right now whose parents earn $200,000 a year and quietly assumed UChicago, Harvard, MIT, and Stanford were out of reach. They were wrong. The schools they thought they could not afford are the only ones they actually can. The hardest part of attending the University of Chicago in 2027 is no longer paying for it. It is getting in.

English
21
605
5.8K
275.5K
Mememrmr retweetledi
Mitchell Hashimoto
Mitchell Hashimoto@mitchellh·
I strongly believe there are entire companies right now under heavy AI psychosis and its impossible to have rational conversations about it with them. I can't name any specific people because they include personal friends I deeply respect, but I worry about how this plays out. I lived through the great MTBF vs MTTR (mean-time-between-failure vs. mean-time-to-recovery) reckoning of infrastructure during the transition to cloud and cloud automation. All those arguments are rearing their ugly heads again but now its... the whole software development industry (maybe the whole world, really). It's frightening, because the psychosis folks operate under an almost absolute "MTTR is all you need" mentality: "its fine to ship bugs because the agents will fix them so quickly and at a scale humans can't do!" We learned in infrastructure that MTTR is great but you can't yeet resilient systems entirely. The main issue is I don't even know how to bring this up to people I know personally, because bringing this topic up leads to immediately dismissals like "no no, it has full test coverage" or "bug reports are going down" or something, which just don't paint the whole picture. We already learned this lesson once in infrastructure: you can automate yourself into a very resilient catastrophe machine. Systems can appear healthy by local metrics while globally becoming incomprehensible. Bug reports can go down while latent risk explodes. Test coverage can rise while semantic understanding falls. Changes happens so fast that nobody notices the underlying architecture decaying. I worry.
English
514
1.9K
15.3K
1.6M
Mememrmr retweetledi
gopfan
gopfan@r_gopfan·
spotted a simple inefficiency in the Euro 2004 market. 13% sitting there for free if you add up the top 7 favorites: France, Italy, Portugal, Spain, England, Netherlands and Germany: they cover only about 88% of total probability buy 100k shares in each → spend $88k total → collect 100k$ when any of them wins $12k profit, that's 12% return before July 4 the other teams split just 12% between them. mathematically possible, but realistically not happening DYOR, i will give it a try! market: youtube.com/watch?v=WRdjFY…
YouTube video
YouTube
gopfan tweet media
Spivach@0xSpivach

spotted a simple inefficiency in the World Cup market. 13% sitting there for free if you add up the top 14 favorites: France, Spain, England, Argentina, Brazil, Portugal, Germany, Netherlands and 6 more: they cover only 88% of total probability buy 100k shares in each → spend $88k total → collect 100k$ when any of them wins $12k profit, that's 12% return before July 20 the other 20+ teams split just 12% between them. mathematically possible, but realistically not happening DYOR, i will give it a try! market: polymarket.com/event/2026-fif…

English
96
74
3.2K
944.1K
Mememrmr
Mememrmr@etcetera_etc_·
@ProspectsUsmnt I think it could be damaging to his mentality to give him too many minutes too soon. Such a hyped player (and one who seems at risk of egotism, frankly) needs to be forced to truly earn his minutes, else he get too cocky or complacent instead of putting his nose to the grindstone
English
0
0
0
114
USMNTProspects
USMNTProspects@ProspectsUsmnt·
I have watched about 90% of Cavan Sullivan’s 945 first team minutes over the last few years, here’s my overall assessment: I think the overall picture has to be separated into two buckets: Compared to anyone: I constantly see people go on and on about how he’s amazing every single game and is in need of more minutes. As a fan of the player (see below), I’m really not seeing some of this. I think the kid has an argument for more minutes. The team is bad. I don’t think veteran journeymen who play poorly are necessarily a better solution than him. However, he also has one goal contribution for the first team that isn’t against a team called Defence Force. He’s not exactly banging down the door for minutes. I also think it’s true that he’s smaller and his defensive knowledge lacks compared to some others. Being smaller might be corrected over time, but I don’t think there’s any denying that it’s part of the equation with him against top division athletes. He’s the youngest player in MLS. Physically that’s always going to be a challenge. He is very willing defensively and fearless into duels, but I don’t think that’s all there is to defending and it’s probably true that these older veteran journeyman try hard with low talent probably stick to a tactical game plan for a team that is not very good offensively and needs to defend well to have a chance to win games. His attacking output shows moments that most players on the team don’t possess. He’s also starting to refine his attacking decision-making, which I thought was an issue last season for the first team. Long story short: he has a case for more playing time. I think it benefits everyone that he plays more, but I also don’t think his play is so overwhelmingly good that a coach focused entirely on winning has him as a rotational player as opposed to a locked in starter is wronging him. He needs to play better to earn more. Could/should it be given to him anyway? That’s a different story. Compared to players his age: I think this picture is different from the one above. You could be slightly pessimistic from the one above that he doesn’t look super amazing in MLS. That it’s a work in progress for him. If you were expecting a Lamine Yamal impact at that age, maybe you just don’t have a good picture of his overall projection. You could also be pessimistic and say Adri Mehmeti has been the more impactful ‘09 this season, but he plays for a better team, he plays for a coach who is essentially building the tactical setup around him, and maybe we have to consider that Mehmeti has improved and how we looked at his projection previously needs to be recalculated to a higher caliber. I think it’s fair to belittle the performances against Defence Force a little when you’re assessing for who should play what minutes in MLS games, but when you’re assessing has this player who has been 14-16 years old been successful providing 2G,2A in 945 first team minutes (a solid rate regardless of age), I think you can cut the kid a little slack that so far his biggest contributions have been against a pub team. Someone has to play well in those games. It’s not bad that he did. Overall, he’s probably not meeting expectations if you expected him to be the next Lamine Yamal. However, I have never thought that was realistic. I think being the next Christian Pulisic is more realistic. Maybe a little more than that. Next Phil Foden? If you’re gonna say “But he’s the most hyped American since Adu, more hyped than Pulisic was.” - I’m not disagreeing with that. Maybe Pulisic was under hyped. Didn’t come through a big academy in the US. Was the pioneer of an era in American soccer where excitement was lower. Did not have an older brother on the senior team. In the inverse, Sullivan came through the top academy in the country. He’s benefiting off the “Golden era” of American soccer. There are few, if any, prospects that generate more buzz due to their last name. TL;DR: Sullivan is on course.
English
16
4
81
19.6K
Mememrmr retweetledi
Kitson
Kitson@Kitson67·
Change football to 2 halves of 30 minutes Clock stops when the ball isn’t in play. It’s the most obvious change for football and it baffles me why we aren’t introducing it. Would kill time wasting, arguments about time added on etc.
Atletico Universe@atletiuniverse

‼️ Out of the 5 minutes and 33 seconds that were given last night in Arsenal vs Atlético Madrid, only 1 minute and 37 seconds were actually played. [via @MrAsubio]

English
414
92
2.5K
1.2M
Mememrmr
Mememrmr@etcetera_etc_·
@DominikTornow @JustDeezGuy It does seem like Jane Street is working hard to make it competitive with the best-in-class sun each of these areas though, which is exciting.
English
0
0
2
63
Mememrmr
Mememrmr@etcetera_etc_·
@DominikTornow @JustDeezGuy I think, while great at everything, it’s not the best at anything. For performance, Rust/C++ outdo it, it can’t beat Python’s ecosystem for data and ML, and it doesn’t have quite the FP nerd clout of, say, a Haskell. (Still, I think it’s a contender for best all-rounder.)
English
1
0
3
223
Dominik Tornow
Dominik Tornow@DominikTornow·
Looking at OCaml, I’m always surprised the language isn’t insanely popular
English
48
18
276
57.1K
Mememrmr
Mememrmr@etcetera_etc_·
@relizarov Huh? Having bugs and being deterministic are completely perpendicular features.
English
0
0
15
1.4K
Roman Elizarov
Roman Elizarov@relizarov·
It is so funny to watch non-compiler engineers suddenly discovering that many modern compilers are actually non-deterministic. Sweet summer children! Can’t wait them discovering how many known bugs a typical compiler has.
English
90
47
1.5K
128.5K