Favour D Dreamer

954 posts

Favour D Dreamer

Favour D Dreamer

@favourDdreamer

Katılım Kasım 2024
59 Takip Edilen23 Takipçiler
Favour D Dreamer retweetledi
CrAzD
CrAzD@TheRealCrAzD·
Forgiveness helps you heal from the event, bitterness, resentment, and other negative nancies. The problem is most Christians think that's all their is to it. The thing is when you forgive you open the door to reconciliation. However, now the other person has to be accountable for their behavior, and have true repentance for any reconciliation to take place. But it does heal you regardless, you're no longer stuck in the event you're now able to move on. One last thing, you aren't meant to be yoked to unrepentant serial abusers/offenders/sinners. I was taught the wrong way of forgiveness growing up and all it was was those people constantly abusing me and saying I had to forgive them because that's what's in the Bible. Anyways hopefully that morning rambling is coherent.
English
1
1
3
54
Scuderia Ferrari HP
Scuderia Ferrari HP@ScuderiaFerrari·
Not the ending we wanted after a solid race
Scuderia Ferrari HP tweet media
English
1.3K
1.1K
15.4K
533.4K
As wise as a wolf 🌞
@favourDdreamer @6inchgrandee Yes they were. But we are talking about Jay Z here. I didn’t say it was illegal. But it speaks about jay z and his predatory behavior mingling with a barely legal young woman while hes fucking 30. Get a fuckkng grip bxtch
English
1
0
0
22
niya ᥫ᭡
niya ᥫ᭡@6inchgrandee·
michael jackson, tina turner, prince, aretha franklin, mariah carey, whitney houston all love/loved her and praised her talent but i’m supposed to gaf about what bums on twitter think?
English
17
332
2.4K
34.3K
Olamide .
Olamide .@olamide_adee·
He’s not a politician. He’s not elected. But he’s tied to some of the biggest decisions shaping Nigeria’s economy today. Gilbert Chagoury 🧵
Olamide . tweet media
English
65
1.1K
2.1K
28.8K
Favour D Dreamer
Favour D Dreamer@favourDdreamer·
@wisewolf_ @6inchgrandee At least say the truth. Trump, Prince William and Harry were friends with Diddy too. 19 is a legal age for dating/marriage according to the law worldwide.🤷
English
1
0
0
78
As wise as a wolf 🌞
@favourDdreamer @6inchgrandee I am wise but i don’t need your validation for that. Jay z has been besties w p.diddy and the n*ggg was 30 yo when started dating 19 yo Beyonce. If thats not a red flag yall are brainwashed af🤣
English
1
0
0
25
Favour D Dreamer
Favour D Dreamer@favourDdreamer·
@Ihunanya_chi The spirit of man is the candle of God, searching all the inward part of the belly-Proverbs 20:27. What a profound explanation 👏
English
0
0
1
22
Ihunanya Chi ❤️
Ihunanya Chi ❤️@Ihunanya_chi·
Understanding Spirit, Soul, and Body In Christianity, human beings are made up of three parts: spirit, soul, and body. Each part has a different role, yet they all work together to form a complete person. The spirit is the deepest part of man. It is the part that connects with God. Through the spirit, a person can sense God, pray, and have spiritual awareness. When a person is close to God, it is their spirit that becomes alive and responsive to Him. The soul is the center of personality. It includes the mind, emotions, and will. This is where thinking, feeling, and decision-making take place. The soul is where a person struggles with choices, desires, and thoughts every day. The body is the physical part of man. It allows us to live and function in the physical world. Through the body, we speak, walk, work, and interact with everything around us. God designed these three parts to work in harmony. The spirit should lead by being connected to God, the soul should agree by being renewed in truth, and the body should obey by carrying out right actions. When these three are in disorder, a person experiences inner conflict. But when they are aligned under God’s guidance, a person lives with purpose, peace, and balance. In summary: • Spirit → hears God • Soul → makes decisions • Body → carries out actions You may think about praying (soul), feel led (spirit), but your body is the one that actually kneels and speaks the prayer. And sometimes all three don’t agree: • Spirit: “Don’t do this” • Soul: “I feel like doing it” • Body: “Let’s go and do it” That inner conflict is what many of us experience as temptation or struggle.
Ihunanya Chi ❤️ tweet media
English
48
83
283
9.3K
Favour D Dreamer retweetledi
PaulsCorner-VerseQuest
PaulsCorner-VerseQuest@TNTJohn1717·
How Can I Break Free From People-Pleasing as a Christian? Introduction One of the most subtle chains a Christian can wear is the chain of people-pleasing. It does not always look like open rebellion, gross sin, or worldly compromise at first glance. In fact, it often disguises itself as kindness, humility, tact, patience, diplomacy, being “easy to get along with,” or wanting to keep peace. But underneath all of that, people-pleasing is often a deeper problem of misplaced fear, misplaced identity, and misplaced loyalty. It is the habit of letting other people’s approval, reaction, comfort, or opinion govern your speech, choices, boundaries, and obedience more than the Lord does. A man can look very nice while being ruled by this thing. He can seem agreeable, gentle, and easygoing, while inwardly being driven by anxiety over what others think of him. That is not freedom. That is bondage with a smile on its face. The Bible does not speak lightly about the fear of man. Proverbs 29:25 says, “The fear of man bringeth a snare.” That is strong language. A snare is not a harmless inconvenience. It is a trap. It catches, restrains, and chokes movement. And that is exactly what people-pleasing does. It traps a believer into silence when he should speak, compromise when he should stand, overcommitment when he should say no, false guilt when he should walk free, and constant inward unrest because he is trying to manage reactions that only God can govern. The people-pleaser often lives with a restless soul because he is always measuring the room, adjusting himself, bracing for disapproval, and trying to keep everyone calm, happy, impressed, or unoffended. That is exhausting, and it is spiritually dangerous. This matters because people-pleasing is not a small personality quirk. It affects doctrine, courage, leadership, prayer, witness, service, marriage, ministry, and conscience. It can keep a preacher from preaching plainly, a husband from leading, a wife from setting righteous boundaries, a young believer from standing for truth, and a wounded saint from escaping manipulation. It can make a Christian look useful while silently draining his strength and distorting his obedience. The answer is not to become rude, selfish, and insensitive. The answer is to get so settled under the smile of God that you stop living for the applause, approval, and emotional management of men. That is what Scripture presses us toward, and that is the freedom this study must pursue. Chapter 1: People-Pleasing Is Really a Form of the Fear of Man The first thing that has to be exposed is what people-pleasing really is. At its root, it is usually a form of the fear of man. It is not just being thoughtful. It is not just being polite. It is not just caring about how your actions affect others. Those things can be right and necessary. People-pleasing becomes sinful when other people’s approval begins to function like a controlling force over your obedience to God. That is why Proverbs 29:25 is so direct: “The fear of man bringeth a snare: but whoso putteth his trust in the LORD shall be safe.” The issue is fear. You are afraid of displeasing them, afraid of being misunderstood, afraid of losing approval, afraid of rejection, afraid of conflict, afraid of looking harsh, afraid of letting somebody down, afraid of no longer being liked. That fear becomes a chain. This is why so many people-pleasers stay confused. They tell themselves they are just loving others, but in truth they are often protecting themselves from discomfort. They do not want the tension, the frown, the criticism, the awkwardness, the relational chill, or the possibility of being painted as the bad guy. So they yield where they should stand. They over-explain. They apologize for things that are not sins. They give answers they do not mean. They say yes when the truthful answer is no. They let manipulative people sit in the driver’s seat because they are frightened of what happens when the other
PaulsCorner-VerseQuest tweet media
English
2
13
33
1.1K
Favour D Dreamer retweetledi
Fr. Daniel☦️
Fr. Daniel☦️@Fragbaza·
In the city of Axum in northern Ethiopia there is a small chapel called the Church of Our Lady Mary of Zion. Inside that chapel — according to the Ethiopian Orthodox Church — is the Ark of the Covenant. The actual Ark. The gold covered chest that Moses built in the wilderness. The one that carried the stone tablets of the Ten Commandments. The one that caused walls to fall at Jericho. The one that killed a man named Uzzah when he reached out to steady it. The one that disappeared from history and was never found. The Ethiopian church says they have it. And they have said so for over 1,600 years. Their account traces the Ark's journey to Ethiopia through the son of King Solomon and the Queen of Sheba — a son named Menelik I — who brought it to Ethiopia around 950 BC. The Book of Kings records that Solomon gave the Queen of Sheba everything she asked for when she visited Jerusalem. The Ark has been guarded in Axum ever since by a single guardian monk — a man chosen for life who is never allowed to leave the chapel grounds again once appointed. He eats, sleeps and lives within sight of what the Ethiopian church believes to be the holiest object in human history. When the current guardian dies a new one is appointed. And the cycle continues. No outsider has ever been permitted to see inside the chapel. No government. No archaeologist. No church official from Rome or Constantinople. Just one monk. Alone. For the rest of his life. Whether it is truly the Ark or not — the devotion required to guard a secret like that for 1,600 years is extraordinary in itself. "There was nothing in the ark except the two stone tablets that Moses had placed in it at Horeb." — 1 Kings 8:9
Fr. Daniel☦️ tweet media
English
3
23
111
3.6K
Atemunscripted
Atemunscripted@AtemMacOj·
@HolyFireLuna @JonnyRoot_ Candace is NOT saved and is NOT a christian nor is she Catholic! She is simply using the catholic faith to GRIFT some more. I know because of her ROTTEN heart and fruits! Sorry christianity is not a lucky game. It is EXCLUSIVE!!
English
3
0
2
26
Jon Root
Jon Root@JonnyRoot_·
1. Baptism is NOT salvific. We are saved by grace through faith 2. Candace Owens doesn’t share the truth of The Gospel on her platform 3. She is literally a force of evil 4. The fact the Roman Catholic Church would confirm this vile woman, shows how much discernment they lack
Jon Root tweet media
English
419
222
1.7K
58.4K
Favour D Dreamer retweetledi
Father Spyridon Bailey
Father Spyridon Bailey@Fatherspyridon·
"A humble man who lives a spiritual life, when he reads the Holy Scriptures, will relate all things to himself & not to others." - St. Mark the Ascetic
English
9
61
684
7.4K
Favour D Dreamer retweetledi
Fr. Daniel☦️
Fr. Daniel☦️@Fragbaza·
Overcoming Temptation Many argue that self-gratification is a necessary way for single people to relieve tension. However, we should look to the experience of the monastic tradition, where such “tension” eventually fades away through spiritual discipline. The Church’s approach to fighting this sin is based on the principle of “opposite action.” The primary danger is that the more one indulges, the more the desire grows. To combat this, the Church recommends fasting—specifically reducing rich foods—and physical labour or worship as a healthy outlet for physical energy. Most importantly, one must “cut off” thoughts rather than arguing with them. When seductive images appear, it is necessary to immediately switch your focus to other productive desires. Furthermore, let us remember that the word “sin” (hamartia-ἁμαρτία) literally means “to miss the mark.” Why is choosing self-gratification considered a mistake? Because it is a choice to accept an incomplete life. Such a person is not a monk, as they have not taken monastic vows, yet they are not building a full marital relationship either. This middle ground is tragic because marital intimacy is meant to be more than just physical; it is a deep, internal union of two souls. When a person limits themselves to the mere stimulation of their own body, their soul is deprived of the profound connection it was created to receive through a full and healthy sexual union. This is why the Church has always maintained that perverting the natural order of intimacy is a damaging and limiting practice. It is not out of a desire to deprive people of pleasure, but out of a desire to turn their gaze toward a “fullness of life.” The Holy Fathers spoke of this error as a “mistake” because it keeps a person from reaching their true potential. Therefore, those struggling with these habits should consider what they are trying to replace with this “surrogate” pleasure. Instead of wasting energy on a worthless practice, they should direct that energy toward building a truly fulfilling life, including within the realm of healthy human relationships.
Fr. Daniel☦️ tweet media
English
7
81
377
11.3K
Favour D Dreamer
Favour D Dreamer@favourDdreamer·
@Beylulu2 The paragon of perfection to which all the other female artists is compared to.
English
0
0
0
152
Favour D Dreamer retweetledi
Scott Roberts
Scott Roberts@ScottRoberts·
Biblical masculinity is not loud, aggressive, or self-centered. It is a humble, repentant man quietly taking responsibility before God when no one is watching.
English
15
43
228
5.1K
Sheila of the Most High
Sheila of the Most High@sheilatebra·
Even the Bible says, move on. if you don't like where you are, move. if your environment drains you, change it. if what influences you isn't good for you, walk away. there's nothing wrong with leaving what harms you
English
10
73
314
5.9K
Unathi
Unathi@au_badela·
I pray you don’t lose focus on God when He begins to release your blessings 🙏🏾. May what you have prayed for never become the reason you drift away from the One who gave it!
English
17
100
757
7.4K
Lekan Olayinka
Lekan Olayinka@lekan_olayinka1·
Biggest Mack @Big_Mck, I will respond to you again. You mentioned three things that are factually incorrect about the role of the Bible in slavery: 1. You said the Bible is not divine because humans compiled it. 2. You said Europeans who misused the Bible were the ones who compiled it. 3. You suggest Christianity is inherently imperial to Africa. Let me start with the third point. Christianity may have been born in the Middle East, but it grew up in Africa. That’s right. The intellectual framework that forms the doctrinal epistemology of Christianity was largely developed in these three African regions: Alexandria in Egypt Hippo in Algeria Carthage in Tunisia Biggest Mack, do you know the major milestones in Christianity that emerged from these African centers? The Greek Old Testament, the Septuagint, was translated by 70 scholars in Alexandria. Church fathers like Origen and Clement systematized Christian theology there as well. The first person to write a sustained theological framework that shaped later Trinitarian language was Tertullian of Carthage (Tunisia). Even more crucially, Augustine of Hippo (modern-day Algeria) is one of the most influential figures in Western Christianity. His writings on grace, sin, the church, and salvation underpin much of Catholic and Protestant theology. To be blunt, if you remove Augustine, a significant portion of Western Christian theological structure collapses. His influence is not peripheral; it is foundational. And he was from Algeria. Did you also know that councils that shaped the early biblical canon were held in Hippo and Carthage, modern-day Algeria and Tunisia? The idea that Christianity simply “came to Africa” is a display of historical ignorance. Now to the moral question of slavery. How can Christianity be accused of being the root of slavery when Scripture directly undermines its moral justification? Paul writes on the ethical treatment of slaves, which was strange in a Roman world that legally considered them property: “Masters, give unto your servants that which is just and equal; knowing that ye also have a Master in heaven.” — Colossians 4:1 “And, ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening: knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with him.” — Ephesians 6:9 Paul also directly reframes the master–slave relationship in Christ, calling slaves brethren with their masters: “Let as many servants as are under the yoke count their own masters worthy of all honour.. And they that have believing masters, let them not despise them, because they are brethren...'— 1 Timothy 6:1–2 That last line is crucial: “because they are brethren.” The implication is that even within a socially unequal system, the gospel redefines the moral relationship entirely. Paul also explicitly condemns slave trading: “The law is made… for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, for fornicators, for SLAVE TRADERS, for liars, for perjurers, and for whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine.” — 1 Timothy 1:9–10 The term here is explicitly rendered as “slave traders.” That places slave trading in the same moral category as murder and sexual immorality. This is not the moral framework of endorsement; it is moral condemnation. This theological framework later informed abolitionist Christianity in Europe, the same intellectual tradition that fueled movements against slavery. Christian thought introduced a universal moral vision of human worth. Before this, moral status was largely tied to geography, gender, genealogy, or social status. As a result, slaves, women, and the disabled were often treated as having diminished or no intrinsic moral worth. Christianity introduced the idea of universal moral equality, which later influenced modern human rights discourse, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. So why accuse the Bible of perpetuating a system it provided one of the earliest moral critiques against? Furthermore, slavery predates Christianity entirely. Humans were among the earliest commodities humans traded. There was no industrial economy; much of ancient production depended on forced labor. In parts of the Roman Empire, slaves made up more than 50% of the population. Slaveholding was widespread across civilizations. Historical records also show African participation in slave trading, including the sale of captives to Arab traders. But it was Christian abolitionist movements that eventually pushed for the dismantling of slavery as an institution. For example, Britain spent approximately £20 million compensating slave owners in 1833 (equivalent to billions today). This debt was only fully repaid in 2015. The British Royal Navy also lost thousands of sailors enforcing anti–slave trade patrols. They even used military force against local rulers such as King Kosoko in Lagos when treaties to abolish the trade were resisted. Slavery was ended in a world where it was globally normalized. Finally, you argue that the Bible is not divine because humans compiled it. Why must it be either/or? Divine origin does not exclude human transmission. The fact that humans compiled the canon does not negate divine inspiration; it reflects the means of transmission, not the source. The Bible is understood as divinely inspired yet written and compiled through human authors guided by God. That is your argument addressed point by point. I would encourage you to study the subjects you are engaging with more deeply. Lest you veil intellectual ignorance under the guise of activism.
Biggest Mack@Big_Mck

“Rejecting the Bible because Europeans misused” Misused it? Really? Let’s start with what the Bible that you read today actually is. It’s literally a collection of books. A library. Not some divine decree. Guess who put them together? The same people you claim only misused it. Well, if you must know, it was put together for the purpose of misusing it. Btw, a piece of advice. You need to really define what ideology you stand for, because playing Christianity defender and African defender at the same time will never work. You will keep embarrassing yourself. You must think the brand of Christianity you practice today means the same thing to you as it does to those who invented it.

English
29
106
308
11.2K
Favour D Dreamer retweetledi
Lumen
Lumen@LumenX_·
MY DEEPEST PRAYER IS THAT EVERYONE FINDS THE LORD BEFORE THEIR TIME ON EARTH ENDS, BECAUSE NOTHING ELSE MATTERS AT ALL.
English
133
2.4K
15.2K
133.9K
Favour D Dreamer retweetledi
Trevor Sheatz
Trevor Sheatz@TrevorSheatz·
Don't look with lust. Don't let your mind wander into filth. Kill the tempting thought before it turns into sin. "Flee from sexual immorality" (1 Cor. 6:18). Keep your path far from the door of the temptress (Prov. 5:8).
English
19
160
1.4K
13.8K
Global Box Office
Global Box Office@GlobalBoxOffice·
MICHAEL has crossed the $300M mark at the global box office, the fastest live-action film to hit that milestone this year.
Global Box Office tweet mediaGlobal Box Office tweet media
English
166
2.8K
18K
352.4K