fdd64

@JonhernandezIA Excellent. So can this illiterate learn to read so Claude Code doesn't suck anymore?

📁 Boris Cherny, creator of Claude Code, says coding is about to stop being a profession. It’s becoming basic literacy. Like the printing press, code shifts from elite power to a universal language. But here’s the tension: when anyone can build, the bottleneck is no longer software. It’s understanding the world well enough not to break it.

@altillionaire @jeffreyleefunk Oh no they got less expensive. So Qwen3.6 is infinitely less cheaper than ChatGPT4o, but the question is 'Are you willing to pay for 4o performance in 2026 and onwards where ChatGPT5.5 is the standard?'. I doubt you will and just like that you'll spend as much as they want.

@jeffreyleefunk One of these will get rapidly less expensive while the other continue to get more expensive.

Economics of AI coding tools are crumbling. Cost per developer has doubled because cost of Claude code and microsoft copilot are rising even as bugs remain a problem, all consistent with Nvidia's statement that AI is more expensive than humans. futurism.com/artificial-int…

@usnkusut Well, there is that trick for your bathroom. After you've taken a dump, you should light a match to quickly get rid of the smell.

can someone explain what the objective is?

@realBigBrainAI "We believe". No actual facts, statistics etc. Just we believe.

Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google: "The AI revolution is underhyped. None of us is prepared for the implications of this." He opens with a warning: "The arrival of this new intelligence will profoundly change our country and the world in ways we cannot fully understand." He explains what's happening right now in the industry: "We're very very quickly developing AI programmers. And these AI programmers will replace traditional software programmers. We're building in the next year AI mathematicians that are as good as the top level graduate students in math. This is happening very quickly." Schmidt argues most people fundamentally misunderstand what AI has become: "Today you think of AI as ChatGPT, but what it really is is a reasoning and planning system that we've never seen before." The implications, he warns, extend far beyond software. These new systems demand resources at an industrial scale we've never encountered. "They're going to need a lot more computation than we've ever had. They're going to need a lot more energy." To illustrate the scale of the energy crisis ahead, Schmidt offers a sobering comparison: "People are planning 10 gigawatt data centers. Now just to do the translation, an average nuclear power plant in the United States is 1 gigawatt. How many nuclear power plants can we make in one year where we're planning this 10 gigawatt data center? Gives you a sense of how big this crisis is." @ericschmidt shares an estimate he finds most likely: "Data centers will require an additional 29 gigawatts of power by 2027 and 67 more gigawatts by 2030. These things are industrial at a scale I have never seen in my life." Schmidt says the industry needs high skills immigration, light touch regulation around cyber and bio threats, and most critically, energy in all forms. He's personally investing in fusion, but acknowledges it won't arrive in time. He closes with the stakes: "When you build these systems, you have intelligence in the computer and then eventually human level intelligence. Some people think it's within 3 to four years. Then after that, you have something called super intelligence, the intelligence that's higher than of humans. We believe as an industry that this could occur within a decade. It is crucial that America get there first."

@jaimandal_ @ThePrimeagen Doubt it. Unless, you are bad at your job, then yes, your productivity shoots up highly.

@fdd64175571 @ThePrimeagen Probably will at some point just for fun, but productivity shoots up highly with AI

I really just like to program Hands on keyboard, music, deeply thinking and enjoying the process

@dansemperepico Please, list all the possible new jobs. I'm waiting. Besides 'proompter', since that is not a job, there isn't much possibilities.

AI is going to take all the jobs. That's what I thought. I was wrong. AI unlocks an entirely new paradigm of possibilities that will create millions more jobs than it destroys. Just like every other technological revolution. But the type of work humans do will change.

@StealthQE4 You monetize it by making believe everyone will be left behind if they are paying for your technology. Ohh, small note, you need to own the infra to run those models at scale and have the government give you tax exemptions etc for electricity.

Observation: AI hype seems to be fading. How long until it’s just another technology? I still don’t understand how you effectively monetize it to the point where you make money.

@jaimandal_ @ThePrimeagen Or you could just stop using AI.

@ThePrimeagen Spending hours trying to fix a bug -> giving up and going to bed -> dreaming of a fix -> waking up and trying it -> actually fixed the bug Different type of happiness! AI is unfortunately taking that away.

@BichonRedux Don't compare fiber with AI. Fiber had an ROI for many years to come. Meanwhile, this technology is a backhole for cash and the more you scale it, the more it burns, while providing no NET benefit to every citizen.

The AI bubble will collapse. Here’s the cascade and what survives. (Claude wrote this for me based on my thoughts) OpenAI burns $9B cash on $13B revenue. Their own projections show $143B in cumulative losses before profitability. They’re selling dollars for 70 cents at scale. The more they sell, the more they lose. The collapse sequence is simple: frontier labs fail → GPU cloud middlemen (who borrowed billions at peak prices) get crushed → hyperscalers cut capex → NVIDIA cycles down. Each step accelerates the next. The people who lived through 2001 see it. But being early is indistinguishable from being wrong — for years. The last skeptic will capitulate right before the crash. That’s how every bubble ends. Here’s what’s different: the technology is real. Fiber was real in 2000 too. It just needed a decade of bankruptcies before the economics worked. So what survives? Local models. Delivered by Apple. Their playbook never changes — let the industry burn capital on half-baked implementations, then arrive late with something so integrated it makes everything before it look like a prototype. The entire AI industry is currently doing Apple’s R&D for them. At $143B in projected losses. With no compensation. The M5 already runs 70B parameter models locally. DeepSeek V4 dropped this week — open source, near-frontier performance, no NVIDIA hardware required. The gap between local and cloud closes from both directions simultaneously. The killer move: your iPhone tunnels home to your Mac over an encrypted connection. Your Mac becomes your personal AI server. Your data never touches a corporate server. Ever. Apple doesn’t compete with OpenAI. They make them irrelevant. Jensen knows this. He just can’t say it.

@SuzieD755164 I totally agree with these systems because most people are horrible drivers that shouldn't have ever the opportunity to own a car. I want fines on top of fines if you look at your phone while driving, I want to see you in jail if you ever decide to answer your phone while driving

⚠️ WARNING: FACIAL SCANNING MANDATORY IN ALL EU VEHICLES They say it is just "for your safety" (just like age verification is just to "keep the kids safe online") but did you know as of July 7, 2024, all newly registered cars in the EU must be fitted with specific driver-monitoring systems. By 2026 and 2027, this will apply to every single new vehicle sold on the European market (heavy trucks). If you buy a new car it will have a camera looking at your face, but it is (FOR NOW) legally barred from "recognising" you or saving that video. It is there to beep at you if you fall asleep or look at your phone. Except it isn't... as it looks like they can use this data in court against you (see below). The EU's General Safety Regulation (GSR2) mandates two specific systems: DDAW (Driver Drowsiness and Attention Warning): Monitors your "fatigue level" by analysing how you steer or by using cameras to watch for yawning and long eye-closures. ADDW (Advanced Driver Distraction Warning): This is the more "advanced" part for 2026/2027. It uses cameras to track your gaze. If you look away from the road (at a phone or a passenger) for more than 6 seconds (at low speeds) or 3.5 seconds (at high speeds), the car alerts you (who will it alert in the future though? What legal punishment will you be subjected to? What penalties will you recieve? Will you be able to even start your vehicle if you break rules? EU law (GDPR) supposedly governs how these "face-scanning" cameras work to ensure they don't become surveillance tools but do we REALLY believe we are not headed into a centralised system of global governance and mass surveillance (digital ID for "your convenience" is being rolled out across many countries as is facial recognition tech - it is in your supermarkets at the self service checkouts for example). They claim that laws already in place (laws can be changed in the future...remember "emergency legislation" that restricted your freedom of movement?) forbids using this technology for biometric identification (facial recognition). The car "sees" a human face to track eye movement, but it is not allowed to "know" who you are (supposedly). It is claimed a closed-loop System means your data must stay inside the car (but can be used in court remember!). The camera’s "vision" is processed in real-time by a local chip and then "immediately overwritten" (supposedly). EU cars are "generally" prohibited from sending your video or "distraction logs" to the cloud, manufacturers, or insurance companies (supposedly). The EU does not CURRENTLY mandate a "breathalyzer" or "kill switch for everyone" (kill switch will knock off your car and prevent you starting or driving it). Instead, they mandate that all new cars must have a standardised interface that makes it easy for authorities to install an alcohol interlock device. So yes, authorities CAN interfere with your vehicle and movements. Since July 2024, all new EU cars must also have an Event Data Recorder (a black box recorder). Why? If your data is yours and isn't going to be shared? They say this is purely for recording technical data (speed, braking, steering) in the seconds before a crash. This can and will be used as evidence against you. They claim these systems are anonymous and cannot be used to identify the driver or owner; its "only legal purpose" is to help investigators understand why an accident happened (will this always be the case though?) Now if you have read all of and think it is necessary then you are welcoming a lockstep loss of your privacy and rights. You are accepting being treated as a criminal before you ever have even committed a crime. You are accepting pre-emtive evidence gathering before you have ever committed a crime, and remember a crime could be anything in their eyes. They make the rules, and those who swap liberty for "security" and a surveillance state [by accepting that] will regret it. But by then it will be too late. By Susanne Delaney

@TRESMITH322 @Shivam25mishra Doubt it. They are just or even more unreliable as a human with the same tools and the compute costs sky-rocket once you scale it up. Besides generating code, performing web searches and some other menial tasks, I don't see use cases that actually provide a ROI.

@Shivam25mishra but if you use it right it'll do the work of many more. it's smarter if you look at valuable output instead of headcount not saying it's always worth it... but it can be if you use it right

Hot take : AI can cost more than human workers now.

@SullyOmarr Mmodels get cheap. If I got that as an AI lab, why would I sell you access to it at a lower price? I'll just keep the same price or hike it, especially after the population got dumber and addicted to these models, unable to think for more than a minute without assitance.

the average person wont be able to afford ai tools very soon unless there's a breakthrough, the models are not gonna get cheaper they'll say "youre getting more intelligence per dollar" all while you pay 1k,5k+/mo to use the best models permanent underclass is kinda real

@JamiesAct Boy, you do like eating dick don't you?

I am just going to keep my PlayStation hooked up to the internet, like a normal human being. And not pretend like I am some fucking spy who needs to game in an internet-free sandbox. 🤣

@nicrypto Right, so the CEO, one getting paid in stock is calling it 'dumb' because it hits their FY bonus directly.

The Netherlands is introducing a 36% tax on unrealised investment gains - stocks, bonds and crypto. You owe 36% on paper profits even if you haven't sold. But that's not the worst part... You will still owe taxes on those assets EVEN IF they had fallen in value before the tax bill arrived. The Shopify CEO called it "the dumbest thing any government on planet earth is pursuing right now." He's not wrong.

@Layton_Gott You...you can't do architecrure if you don't know how to build. You don't know how to build if you don't do it by hand. Do you see how asinine is your advice?

“Learn how to manually code” That’s TERRIBLE advice in 2026... I’ll admit it: senior devs who learned that way have the biggest advantage today. But if you try to follow that same path now, you fall way behind. You don’t need to write everything yourself. You need to understand architecture, structure, and how systems work. Then let AI handle the rest.

@satyanadella Another reason why Outlook Classic is better than this joke you call 'New Outlook'.

Agent Mode is here in Outlook! Copilot can now help run your inbox and calendar, triaging emails, rescheduling meetings, and helping you stay on top of what matters most.

@ishanxtwt Steal it and call it my own code. What? You think only AI companies can steal?

Interviewer: What is your backup plan if Artificial Intelligence writes better code than you in next 2 years?

@NoLimitGains Another flop from the slop company.

🚨 OpenAI is reportedly building a phone designed to replace the iPhone. And it’s further along than anyone realized. Analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, the same man who predicted every major Apple product cycle for 20 years, just dropped this. Important details: 1: OpenAI is partnering with Qualcomm AND MediaTek to develop custom smartphone processors, not one chip partner, but two competing giants simultaneously 2: Luxshare has been named the exclusive system co-design and manufacturing partner, the same company that assembles Apple products 3: Mass production is targeted for 2028, the hardware roadmap is already in motion 4: The phone will run OpenAI’s own OS, replacing traditional apps entirely with AI agents that complete tasks autonomously, without you ever opening a single app 5: The processor is being designed around on-device AI performance, with complex tasks offloaded to OpenAI’s cloud infrastructure for seamless integration 6: OpenAI’s core thesis: users don’t want apps, they want results. The phone will continuously understand context, habits, and preferences in real time This isn’t a gadget. It’s a direct attempt to replace the operating system layer that Apple and Google have owned for 20 years. I’m doing more research, and what I’m about to post will blow your mind. You’ll wish you followed me sooner, trust me.

@S_N_SH_E_ Productivity means doing more with the same or less amount of resources, in general. You can decide for yourself the answer to your question and why almost everyone on X praises LLMs as productivity boosters.

genuine question if AI makes you “10x faster” why are people still working the same 8–10 hours ? faster coding faster debugging faster research so where is the time going ? are we actually faster or just doing more work for the same pay ?

@marcba Yes, you need Cursor, Codex and ChatGPT, too. And why on Ceasor's Holy Ghost is Cursor taking 29GB of memory?