Filip Winter

Apple should be collectively owned by everyone 🙏 this alone would already solve so much ❤️

@caffeineai When will it be possible to preview before remixing?

Design agencies are famously bad at building their own websites. We built CHROMA on Caffeine to show it doesn't have to be that way - a full studio site, one conversation. Yours to remix on the app market. caffeine.ai/app-market/cre…

@ZeroFuxBJ @KyleStoflet @The_Swop Thanks @ZeroFuxBJ! Been following @TheSwop with interest. It sits at the core of @biodemocracy and I would be happy to brief @KyleStoflet on the vision. 🙌

@KyleStoflet @The_Swop Interresting. @filipwinter might like this too 😜

Most social platforms extract value from communities. The Swop is designed so communities can own and circulate value themselves. Humans and AI agents coordinating inside programmable social economies. ∞ $ICP Early alpha @The_Swop

@ICPRenegades @caffeineai What was the workflow here, why did you move it to Claude?

Cannot believe how far @caffeineai took my project. Moved it to Claude but Caffeine made the entire UI #ICP

@ZeroFuxBJ @OpenChat @biodemocracy Let me see how I am able to share it. You’ll hear back from me in a couple days.

@filipwinter @OpenChat @biodemocracy Interesting. Had it summarised by grok, but would love the audiobook :)

I like @OpenChat. It’s STILL the “best” $ICP dApp. BUT… It still feels too much like a Web2 platform: membership tiers, subscriptions, paywalls, referrals… EXTRACTION. Even after buying “lifetime premium,” you still need CHIT just to set a custom profile background? STUPID. I want $CHAT to feel like an actual OPEN CHAT PROTOCOL. A cypherpunk-grade communication protocol that ONLY charges users based on the real computation required to run it. ICP is the ONLY architecture on Earth that makes “platforms as protocols” possible. Apps WITHOUT extractive middlemen. Bitcoin’s original value proposition was: “Remove the middleman.” ICP uniquely extends that idea to APPLICATIONS. That should be the defining difference between ICP apps and both Web2 platforms + other blockchain “dApps,” which still depend on centralized operators to keep the infrastructure functional. On ICP, the protocol itself can orchestrate the platform. Apps don’t inherently need centralized entities extracting value just to keep things alive. IMO, ICP needs to fully capitalize on what its architecture uniquely enables. Instead, we keep rebuilding Web2 business models on god-tier infrastructure. The future internet is NOT walled platforms. It’s open protocols that serve users WITHOUT extraction. MAKE BLOCKCHAIN CYPHERPUNK AGAIN.

@itsolelehmann What’s the propaganda?

people don't understand HOW MUCH the average german person hates ACs my parents would rather burn to a crisp than turn on the AC it is mindboggling propaganda with severe health implications especially for elderly people

@ZeroFuxBJ @OpenChat It’s also not a crypto project like most others. I am actively looking NOT to make any money off Biodemocracy. The whole point is for the platform to be shared, co-owned and co-governed. Would love any feedback or help you can think of 🫶

Nice to hear bro. Same! Current internet needs fixing, and ICP has lot of potential. This shit truly excites me. Can you elaborate on this "user ownership model" you talk about? What does such platform look like? Doesn't Internet Identity already solve for user ownership? (I made this video on II & user ownership recently but I haven't posted it cus I wasn't happy with it.)

@cyberland_icp @mosesibb @OpenChat Fully agree! And that full UI/UX overhaul is needed as soon as possible.

OpenChat is pure engineering magic, but it’s currently trapped in its own ideological purity. To genuinely compete with Telegram, it has to break out and launch directly on the App Store and Google Play. Compromising a fraction of full decentralization at the distribution layer for the sake of friction-free mobile adoption won't ruin the underlying tech—it will finally scale it. Pair that with a serious UI/UX overhaul to eliminate the usual web3 friction, and it becomes a real threat to centralized apps. However, this also highlights the primary, underlying pain point for all $ICP startups and builders: the severe lack of aggressive marketing and ecosystem support from the core entity. Too often, brilliant projects are left to fight the distribution war entirely alone without any real backing or push from the "boss." OpenChat has the technical foundation to win, but you can't beat legacy giants on ideological merits alone while operating in a marketing vacuum. True mass adoption requires backing your ecosystem builders and meeting users exactly where they already are.

And @OpenChat also has end to end encryption and it's fully built on #ICP

Marriage is an institution that was created back when people died young. It was built on land-ownership and procreation. These days its mainly used to subjugate women and sell air-fryers. - Dr. Paul Rhoades, Shrinking

@ZeroFuxBJ @OpenChat Been thinking about this a lot myself. Not in the case of OpenChat, but in general. How we should build society going forward. How the platforms people really want to use and stand behind look like. Likely some variant of user-ownership will be the model.

We'd need reverse-reverse gas model for this to work 😬 now devs load canisters with cycles, but to make true middlemanless apps, users would have to be able to load there apps with cycles themselves... Or have icp converted into cycles on the user side, witch i dont think is possible atm. Idk. Maybe it is. Just trying to get the idea out there at this point ☺️

@nicklaw37502970 @JackBearAI @caffeineai Based on token use, would you say that is defined as a simple or advanced app?

@JackBearAI @caffeineai I built this and it works fine stoicmentor.org

You can't rely on @caffeineai -- credit system and prompt engine is BROKEN. 100 credits instantly drained (AGAIN!) after buying them and prompting a single project audit in the chat... left my computer for the day, came home to work again on project, and 100 credits GONE! I have to fight with SUPPORT to get any acknowledgement compensation because they deny on their end these didn't happen... this last one timestamps and no other activity will prove it. Spending thousands of dollars, and 22 credits were given from the last inconclusive credit drain. thanks @dominic_w @lomeshdutta @dfinity

@JackBearAI @caffeineai When Caffeine Plus says it "builds roughly 7 simple apps and 3 advanced apps" - how would you say the define simple and advanced?

This has a clinical name. Revenge bedtime procrastination. And the ADHD version runs on a completely different mechanism than the neurotypical one. A neurotypical person stays up late because they want more leisure time. The ADHD brain stays up because it spent every drop of dopamine it had on executive function during the day. Sitting in meetings, managing transitions, filtering impulses, remembering the thing you were supposed to remember. That burns through dopamine the way sprinting burns through glycogen. By 10pm the tank is empty. But here's where it gets counterintuitive. The exhaustion is physical. The dopamine deficit is neurological. Those are two separate systems. Your muscles want sleep. Your prefrontal cortex is starving for the stimulation it was denied all day because it spent 14 hours on task-switching and impulse control instead of anything that actually felt rewarding. The phone at midnight is the brain trying to collect what it's owed. Low-effort, high-stimulation content. Scrolling, short videos, rabbit holes. The exact profile of activity that delivers dopamine without requiring the executive function you already depleted. The sleep researchers call this a "self-regulation failure." It's closer to a debt collection. You borrowed against your own reward system to function all day. The bill comes due at midnight. And the brain will not let you sleep until it gets paid.

@realBigBrainAI The "brilliance" he is refering to is inflation.

Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google: "The real limit to AI is not energy. It's actually cash." Schmidt argues that the conversation about AI's biggest constraint has been pointed in the wrong direction. The deciding factor for who builds the next generation of frontier models won't be power grids or energy supply. It'll come down to who can finance it. He breaks down the math that leads him to that conclusion: "Because when you add up the cost of these, if you take 50, I'm just round numbers, 50 billion a gigawatt. So 10 gigawatt is a half a trillion dollars." At those numbers, the pool of players who can even sit at the table shrinks dramatically. @ericschmidt points out that very few entities on Earth have the ability to deploy capital at that scale: "How many companies, countries, and so forth can hand a trillion dollars of capital? Very, very few." He turns to who actually can, starting with China: "The Chinese could certainly do it. I don't know if they're doing it. I'm going to try to find out." In America, Schmidt sees the country's capital market itself as its structural advantage in the AI race: "It's interesting that you can finance these things because the brilliance of the American capital market allows us to borrow that kind of money." And he draws a sharp contrast with Europe, which he suggests is effectively locked out of the top tier of AI infrastructure: "The Europeans can't do this, right? Which they're sort of sore about, but this is good for America."

@PierreSamaties @UNDP Congratulations Pierre! Very much the right level to implement Internet Computer 👏

Looking forward to joining the @UNDP Blockchain Advisory Group

@rushicrypto It was part of the whole kingdom concept, where rulers needed a way to retain control. Closing off access to common land and introducing money was a way to make people dependent on that system.

Life is so weird bro. People are literally working jobs they HATE. Every single day. For money. A man-made CONCEPT. We literally need money to pay to live, like what?? We have a chance at being alive, being sentient, being conscious. Yet we spend our time doing things we DON'T LIKE DOING. How does that make any sense? I can't wrap my head around it. What kind of society is this? Why can't we all just do what we want to do?

@BobbyO_ Removing ICP perpetual futures entirely is the way to go. Completely unnecessary regardless.

lol…. At some point people will realize price action is almost entirely dictated by liquidations This is the industry average vs ICP $ICP $CLOUD ☁️♾️

@GuariscoColin @0xQuasark @grok The Men Who Stare at Goats

@0xQuasark @grok what movie is this?

"LSD will make you crazy, bro!" What it'll actually do:

@0xQuasark One of the best endings to any movie ever!