FinanceFocused

99 posts

FinanceFocused

FinanceFocused

@finance_f0cused

Katılım October 2023
0 Takip Edilen0 Takipçiler

2026 Yıllık Özeti

@finance_f0cused hesabının Twitter yılını gör

FinanceFocused
FinanceFocused@finance_f0cused·
@RealDianeYap you have the same worldview as andrew tate, the only difference being flipped genders, and him being more successful than you at getting attention from low IQ men. both of you desire male attention the most though, that's interesting.
English
0
0
0
7
FinanceFocused
FinanceFocused@finance_f0cused·
@zapatas_mom how are there men giving you money for tweets like this? i am beyond confused by twitter atp. are there just more retards than other apps on this one? like is there some kind of onlyfans to twitter pipeline where the fetish is just give rando women their money
English
0
0
0
12
FinanceFocused
FinanceFocused@finance_f0cused·
@AmericanPresby sucks that he got cheated on but you don't get to have a SAHM and complain about her getting stuff in divorce. if you want women to be SAHMs, you'll need something to ensure they don't end up on the street if the scenario was flipped and he cheated and filed for divorce.
English
6
0
1
264
American Presby
American Presby@AmericanPresby·
No-fault divorce anecdote: -husband was sole provider (GC construction) -married to wife for 8 years before discovering she’d been cheating on him for the past 2 years -tries to make marriage work -she files for divorce -she takes half of everything How is that ok?
English
16
8
194
9.9K
FinanceFocused
FinanceFocused@finance_f0cused·
@drsxr @nicole_clash leveling up as a man is quite easy lol. the average man today is broke and fat. the further you get from broke and fat, the more you level up. 95% of guys aren't actively giving a shit about both at the same time.
English
1
0
0
12
Just another south FL dude
Leveling up is like inflation. So when you level up, you have a temporary advantage. Until the other person levels up, then the advantage resolves between the two of you. But the distance between standard and either of you is a gulf. So standard needs to level up too or get left behind. Its like inflation - once it happens, in time prices all adjust to their natural equilibria at new, higher values. You didn't really improve anything. You just reset to a higher level. Source: Lived in / live near Miami
English
2
0
2
1.5K
Nic0le
Nic0le@nicole_clash·
I’m going to break gender war lines rq and comment on dating app discourse as an attractive woman in a ltr (18 months). First off, I’m not sure how I ended up on this part of Twitter, but the below analysis was truly fascinating to read. He broke it down really well. “Either they become obsessed with getting hot (clavicular) or they start to just hate women in an unhealthy adversarial way. At the same time because of the increased hookup component with guys out of their traditional “league” on the female side a whole industry of female influencers have popped up to make women feel better about their newly found sexual liberation.” This is all true, and it goes even deeper than that. Increasingly polarized viewpoints have become the norm within their respective war lines on social media. We are getting brainwashed in real time and our youths are getting brain fucked as a result. Speaking from my own experiences, I distinctly remember having an “all men suck” phase when I was younger (17-18) before getting into my first ltr. It stemmed from incel comments in combination with time spent on TikTok, which quickly became an echo chamber of “why men suck” viewpoints. Somewhat luckily for me, none of my exes were complete shitheads and I broke out of that mentality over time. But social media truly is scary. If a no name creator post hate targeted at a specific group of people they will gain traction and a following purely from others who hate on that group. From then on, they’re stuck in a loop of posting increasingly polarizing takes to hold onto a following since these specific creators by themselves are not inherently interesting. A lot has been said about how dating apps are designed to keep you on the app. The flip side of the argument is, those who are truly looking for a relationship and are also approaching it with a secure attachment style, those people don’t spend very long on the apps themselves. They get into long term relationships. You are effectively swimming in a pool of people with anxious attachment, with the high chance that you yourselves have anxious attachment. “Men value access to sex while women value the possibility of a long-term relationship.” There is a large demographic of men who are actively looking for a relationship but will still sleep with women that they wouldn’t consider a relationship with. It gets more nuanced, where there are men who never truly recovered from their first loves that try to start a relationship but then realize that the woman doesn’t measure up to the ideal they had in mind. The first love phenomenon. For women, the first love phenomenon exists in a different form. Best love phenomenon, where every potential match gets measured against the best they’ve been with rather than the first. Due to the sheer number of options available on dating apps, both genders get hit with anxious attachment and is unable to commit for fear of missing out on someone that better measure up to their ideals. You are effectively swimming in a pool of people with anxious attachment. The only way out is leveling yourself up enough to the point where you effectively beat out the first love/ best love of the man/ woman you are trying to date. Aiming lower is not an option, because then they are not beating out your first love/ best love. Unfortunately the level up needed is not really achievable for most people. So yeah yall are kinda fucked, good luck 🫡
Just Another Pod Guy@TMTLongShort

Dating apps introduced distribution at scale to the sexual marketplace. Men value access to sex while women value the possibility of a long-term relationship. Because sex can be fleeting and without recourse men are willing to sleep with women that are below them in “value” in the sexual marketplace. Because women are focused on relationships and procreation they are generally more likely to attempt to maximize the “value” of their chosen mate in the sexual marketplace. As a result of scaled digital distribution and the receding taboo around hookup culture women suddenly found that they had instant access to men that wouldn’t typically hit on them in real life let alone pursue a relationship with. They could open an app and find a man that they previously thought was out of their league who is drunk or horny at any time of the day or night. Initially this simply resulted in women calling guys assholes at a growing clip in parralel with the instances of less attractive women who were hooked up with and then instantly dumped by guys hotter than them. But then something strange happened. First we started seeing women come to terms with the fact that they were hooking up with guys out of their league. But instead of lowering their standards they just started re framing them as “situationships” and “rosters” because it was less painful vs accepting that they were dating out of their league. Then the vast majority of guys who were by default increasingly ignored by the majority of women who were all pursuing the small cohort of “higher value” guys … will these “lower value” guys just started opting out of the sexual marketplace entirely. They started “locking in” or “getting red-pilled”. Meanwhile because men will tell women whatever they want to hear to get laid and women lie to each other out of tribalism and intra-gender competition there was no one to tell the girls that they were increasingly delusional in their dating expectations or that things like age-based looks were far more important to most men vs a women’s career progression. This led to rampant dating expectations on the female side further alienating the median male even as “high value” men seemed to be exempt from any expectations. In other words if you’re hot you can call her at 3am and then ignore her the next day and she’s fine with it but if you’re a normal guy you better be sending her an uber to a nice restaurant with flowers. But because of social media the average men became increasingly aware of this phenomena. And now they’re enraged. Either they become obsessed with getting hot (clavicular) or they start to just hate women in an unhealthy adversarial way. At the same time because of the increased hookup component with guys out of their traditional “league” on the female side a whole industry of female influencers have popped up to make women feel better about their newly found sexual liberation. Now to be clear there is definitely a component of traditional and religious framing of sex that women have been moving past for decades. But this is something else. This has become mostly women who would prefer to be monogamous with one guy but being forced into a more fluid situation of dating multiple guys at once simply because that lets them retain access to those guys who are out of their league. And so influencers like Alex Cooper have built an entire genre of female empowerment around reducing the shame associated with sleeping with hot guys who won’t commit to you. Now where it gets dark is not only are the non-hot men resentful. The first cohort of women from the dating app era are just hitting the proverbial wall. And they are realizing that the previously mentioned hot guys by virtue of digital distribution have access to newly minted early 20s girls and find that more attractive vs women in their 30s. Continued below…

English
17
12
216
47.2K
FinanceFocused
FinanceFocused@finance_f0cused·
@RealDianeYap always wanting credit for doing absolutely nothing is hilarious from someone with a gofundme begging money in her profile.
English
0
0
0
20
Diane Yap
Diane Yap@RealDianeYap·
Room-scanning! 😂 Men are such a joke. Always wanting credit for doing absolutely nothing. How many times in an average man’s life does he have to fight off a home invader? Median is zero I bet.
Wilfred Reilly@wil_da_beast630

From two of my only-half-joking polls, this is pretty common. The idea that protection/room-scanning does not count as "mental load," or that women spend more time managing MEN'S emotions than vice versa is - again - almost facially nonsensical.

English
28
4
127
6.9K
🎭
🎭@deepfates·
honestly, if I'm Hank Green, this is a great time to shake the bottom 30% of my audience and have to do less apologizing in the future
English
53
78
4.3K
128.2K
FinanceFocused
FinanceFocused@finance_f0cused·
@diorexicgirl @rachcorrine yeah dumb if someone calls this gay. my first girlfriend said she began to like me when i gently moved her on the sidewalk to the safer side so this advice is legit and checks out!
English
0
0
0
55
alivia
alivia@diorexicgirl·
@rachcorrine Boys if ur saying this is gay...we are straight girls talking about what we like in straight guys. Not what you guys find hot in men lmaoo
English
2
0
33
7.2K
rachel
rachel@rachcorrine·
A few things women are feral for: - forearms - grey sweat pants - backwards hats (hats in general) - whenever you put your hand on our lower back and guide us a little - moving us from unsafe side of sidewalk to safe side - thigh tats - forehead kiss - the kiss on the neck right below the earlobe - holding your credit card in your mouth while you sign the bill - hands - a ring or two on said hands to draw attention to them - knowing niche facts - having a plan - knowing which way is NSEW - fixing something with your hands - building a bookshelf - playing an instrument - reading - having a hobby - having a backbone - notice how (almost) none of these things are clothes
English
76
244
5.8K
447K
FinanceFocused
FinanceFocused@finance_f0cused·
@emilstridell @airkatakana If I spend 30 years to create a forecasting solution that can predict the stock market 95% of the time, and make shit up the other 5%, should I discard this infinite money glitch because it may make shit up 5% of the time? Hilarious take.
English
0
0
1
6
stridell
stridell@emilstridell·
@airkatakana The first argument makes no sense. The second does; an LLM that finds the right answer 95% of the time but confidently hallucinates when it cannot is very dangerous. This is why we have worked so hard to eliminate hallucination from models.
English
7
0
39
707
Air Katakana
Air Katakana@airkatakana·
remember, every time you ask an llm to write code for you and it’s correct, or the llm writes 10 correct proofs to open problems in mathematics you just got lucky and in fact it was a bad thing that the output was correct
Air Katakana tweet media
English
41
20
783
21.5K
FinanceFocused
FinanceFocused@finance_f0cused·
@Aurelmemus @deepfates so his family and his audience are both exactly that insufferable leftist stereotype. feel bad for the guy. imagine having to issue a public apology for your ChatGPT usage and your wife joins in lmao i'd kms.
English
0
0
8
384
FinanceFocused
FinanceFocused@finance_f0cused·
@alexandrosM i thought his audience was actual STEM folks because all my friends and I are pumped about AI. looks like he built an artsy, leftist PC audience who pretend to care about STEM.
English
0
0
0
98
FinanceFocused
FinanceFocused@finance_f0cused·
if smartphones cause brainrot, you need money to rot your brain. meaning at some point there will be an inverse relationship between intelligence and money🤔
English
0
0
0
10
FinanceFocused
FinanceFocused@finance_f0cused·
for a technology that has ingested ALL the information we have, LLMs are unimaginative as hell. quite remarkable that even fable can't generate a single intern-level idea, forget something actually new.
English
0
0
0
10
FinanceFocused
FinanceFocused@finance_f0cused·
@bigseb31213 @MT_6226 if someone's taking you to a nice restaurant (could easily be more than 100-150 depending on drinks) knowing nothing about and you try to fleece them for $30 extra, what does it say about you? precisely why it's a bullet dodged.
English
2
0
3
112
The Notorious S.E.B.
The Notorious S.E.B.@bigseb31213·
@MT_6226 although on the other hand you're going to be spending probably $100-150 pp at that restaurant, if you're inviting somebody there for a first date you've got plenty of money to throw away so why balk at $30 extra
English
3
0
7
673
FinanceFocused
FinanceFocused@finance_f0cused·
@RealDianeYap is there actually a real human man who has sent you money? i've seen many men waste money on women, but it was usually for sex. if there are dudes legit sending you money then i admire your talent for attracting retards. consider starting an MLM, you'd succeed for sure.
English
0
0
0
102
Diane Yap
Diane Yap@RealDianeYap·
I have been accused of wanting or having had sugar daddies. I don't want one and I've never had one: they expect sex in exchange for money/gifts. I'm not interested in that dynamic. At all. I'll let men send money if they like to, but not to buy anything from me. Wanting something in return makes it crass and unappealing.
English
19
2
27
2.2K
FinanceFocused
FinanceFocused@finance_f0cused·
@RachelBCam @BenShindel the amount of sarcasm in the one paragraph of her review that isn't salty leads me to believe that it is a sneer. "maybe some of these (morons) who went to the theater to watch Tom Holland will go study ancient Greek" cmon. her superiority complex is very apparent.
English
0
0
0
13
Rachel
Rachel@RachelBCam·
@BenShindel I didn't read the remark about UCL as a sneer fwiw. It's telling that other people do.
English
2
0
12
1.5K
Ben
Ben@BenShindel·
Last two paragraphs of Wilson's review of The Odyssey are really 👩‍🍳💋 in the annals of bad faith reviews. I'm confident Wilson has absolutely no understanding of the Western Sahara conflict, but that's beside the point. What exactly would she have Nolan do here? Provide no business to the people of Dakhla and Western Sahara until their 50-year long struggle for independence is victorious? This will never be the case; it's far more likely that they'll receive some degree of minor regional autonomy and Morocco will have total sovereignty over the territory. Does Nolan filming here "normalize" the 50-year Moroccan occupation? It's already pretty darn "normalized," to the extent that the Polisario Front LARPs as a Marxist organization deep in the desert while Morocco executes all functions of government in the territory. Should Nolan have filmed instead in a wealthier country? Would Nolan filming in Morocco proper, rather than near Dakhla, have benefited the Sahrawis? Surely not. And is it really the case that the film "centres [sic], aggrandises [sic], and redeems the hero of a territorial war"? No. The Trojan war was absolutely not a "territorial war," which Wilson should hopefully know! And while the film has a lot to say about Odysseus's actions in that war, and how he reacts to them, none of them are particularly positive. Then... Wilson ends with some incredibly backhanded praise for cinema, a form of art which as many others have already deduced, Wilson is pretty disdainful of. Maybe some of these rubes who like to see Tom Holland on the screen will go and study classics. She caps the entire review off with perhaps the worst sentence of the entire document: a SNIDE REMARK ABOUT NOLAN STUDYING AT UCL. Wilson, who attended Oxford, clearly meant this as a dig. Elitist bs.
Ben tweet media
English
31
43
604
62.7K
FinanceFocused
FinanceFocused@finance_f0cused·
@PreserveCanada @RichardHanania The examples you cited are of TV shows with several seasons, not a 3 hour movie with a gigantic cast and scope. And nothing they did remotely comes close to the amount of atrocities Oddyseus commits.
English
0
0
0
14
Torontonian Liberator
Torontonian Liberator@PreserveCanada·
@RichardHanania The Sopranos, Breaking Bad, GoT… All of these succeeded wildly, despite having morally grey or outright evil protagonists/ major characters. You don’t need every story to have the morality of a kindergarten novel to do well.
English
3
0
17
799
Richard Hanania
Richard Hanania@RichardHanania·
Emily Wilson is correct. The Odysseus played by Matt Damon is foreign to the one who appears in Homer. As I explain, Chris Nolan had no choice. You weren’t going to make a blockbuster about a hero who has slave girls hanged for sexual impropriety. richardhanania.com/p/were-all-sti…
English
24
17
314
23K
FinanceFocused
FinanceFocused@finance_f0cused·
@Sturgeons_Law false dichotomy between an extremely over-the-top negative review and blind submission/fangirling. no one's asking her to be a fan. but it's nasty to attack a project like this when it created interest a field you ostensibly care about and was done in good faith.
English
0
0
9
159
Sturgeon's Law
Sturgeon's Law@Sturgeons_Law·
It actually shows that she's a true scholar with integrity and not one of the many public intellectuals who abandon their commitment to their own ideas & principles to chase fame. It would be much easier to ride Nolan's coattails and claim the film as a personal victory.
yana@Madame_Ennui

Nolan publicly saying he referenced her translations a lot while working on the movie and then her saying this is one of those things that reinforces why so much of the public finds academics insufferably snobbish and elitist

English
24
162
1.8K
55.8K
FinanceFocused
FinanceFocused@finance_f0cused·
you can't advertise nicotine, alcohol or drugs on national tv. but you can run ads (featuring A-list celebrities!) for a gambling platform during the biggest sporting event of the year. make this make sense.
English
0
0
0
9
FinanceFocused
FinanceFocused@finance_f0cused·
@JamesStoverAnth @catballercat @MrRBourne printing trillions in a pandemic that caused job losses and deaths. compare that to the moronic actions of this admin, from tariffs to shutting off 20% of the world's oil supply for a war no one asked for, and one they will never win.
English
1
0
0
10