finlitoc
7.4K posts


@mysteryb0t If you think any telescope can pick up an object 26 ft long and 16 ft wide, from over 200,000 mi away, with no external lighting,
You are literally retarded.
Conspiracy? No. It is a blatant lack of understanding reality.
English

@GrammarJedi01 @WhiteBabyFac Then you're ok with having an identical work arrangement with 1950
English

Can we be serious here? The workforce has never been “all male.”
My mom was orphaned at 18 right after high school (early 1950s — she was born in 1937). What was she supposed to do — starve? She worked and supported herself.
My adopted grandma stayed single into her 40s and only married an older widower later. What about all the widows throughout history? They had to eat too.
Married women have always contributed economically — through farm work, family businesses, taking in boarders, and especially cottage industries (sewing, laundry, piecework, etc.). They weren't employed “on paper,” but they kept roofs over heads when one man’s income wasn’t enough. That was true in every era.
The polished “1950s dad works, mom stays home with perfect kids” image was a short-lived, mostly middle-class slice of life, not some eternal standard.
If you want a primarily-male workforce, then that's one thing. But let's not base policy on a fairytale from TV sitcoms, okay?
English

There are a lot of social advantages that would come from having an all male workforce, with all women being dedicated to taking care of their homes and families.
Young children would all be raised by their mothers instead of having to go to daycare.
Grandmothers would be much more available to help with the grandkids because they'd have no job/career obligations taking up their time and attention.
The risk of infidelity would be much lower because men would always be surrounded by other men while at work, and housewives would be surrounded by other women in their neighborhood while the men are away at work.
Businesses would likely run much more efficiently because men are more geared towards competition, meritocracy, and accepting blunt criticism.
There'd be much less need for HR departments - men wouldn't have to worry about getting accused of sexual harassment by coworkers or tiptoeing around women's feelings.
With an all male workforce nobody would be able to get promoted based on their sex appeal or by "sleeping their way to the top".
With the labor force being reduced in size (since women all left the workforce) men's wages/salaries would be higher and it would be much easier for families to live off of one income.
Instead of meeting romantic partners through college or work, you'd likely be introduced through family members.
Fathers would have good relationships with other men through work, and could introduce good potential husbands to their daughters.
Mothers would have good relationships with other housewives and would know their children well, and could introduce good young women to their sons.
This would help young women avoid relationships with irresponsible men, and would help young men avoid relationships with women who aren't good wife material.

English

@KobeissiLetter How many were illegals, government and DEI jobs?
English

@CoFoBidPro @latestinspace Half the planet turned off the street lights for this picture
English

@clashreport The post cites CENTCOM's direct denial that any F-15E crashed in Iran, labeling the story fog-of-war propaganda intended to boost the Iranian regime during Operation Epic Fury.
English

@DuaneAustinK @AntonioSabatoJr At this point, you're the conspiracy theorist
English

@AntonioSabatoJr They used a remote control camera, which they left behind on the moon, to catch the lunar lander heading back to earth. Stop being a conspiracy theorist. It was some good footage too.
GIF
English

The U.S. Department of Defense has given President Trump a plan to seize nearly 1,000lbs of highly-enriched uranium from at least one nuclear site in Iran, that would involve flying in excavation equipment and building a runway for cargo planes to take the radioactive material out, according to two people familiar with the matter who spoke to the Washington Post.

English

@clintoptions Dumbest hot take ever and yes I am above your little threshold
English

I have a secret to share
After your first $2–$3 million, a paid off home and a good car, there is no difference in quality of life between you and Jeff Bezos. Both of you have limited amount of time on earth; you have twice if not more than Jeff, so you are richer than him. A cheeseburger is a cheeseburger whether a billionaire eats or you do.
Money is nothing but a piece of paper or a number in your app. Real life is outdoors.
Become financially independent; that’s usually 2–3mil. Have good food. Enjoy the relations. Workout. Sleep well. Call your parents. That’s all there is to life. Greed has no end.
Repeat after me: Time is the currency of life. Money is not.
Sooner you figure this out, happier you will be.
English






















