X-Rocket Man

1.2K posts

X-Rocket Man banner
X-Rocket Man

X-Rocket Man

@framebrkr

Katılım Aralık 2018
666 Takip Edilen95 Takipçiler
X-Rocket Man
X-Rocket Man@framebrkr·
@jehanh4 @MorbidCur @Tironianae There is no such thing as a legal definition of a specific thing or entity. You know that but leftists like you make things up. The term Transgender is make believe used to spark division. “Language is the glue that bonds civilizations together & the first casualty of war”
English
0
0
1
39
Tironianae 🍊🍊 Z. - Ultra Verbum Vincet
🚨 HOLY SMOKES. SCOTUS Justice Sam Alito asks ACLU lawyer "what is a man and a woman?" and they DON'T HAVE A DEFINITION. Alito's response is perfect. ALITO: What does it mean to be a man or woman? ACLU: We do not have a definition for the Court. ALITO: How can a court determine whether there's discrimination on the basis of s*x, without KNOWING what s*x means?! Omg, you can't make this crap up. Seriously.
English
278
5.5K
24.9K
693.6K
Harmeet K. Dhillon
Harmeet K. Dhillon@HarmeetKDhillon·
Peep toe, sling back platform patent leather Jimmy Choo’s, dress from Max Mara. Hair and makeup by me!
English
62
25
927
32K
Harmeet K. Dhillon
Harmeet K. Dhillon@HarmeetKDhillon·
My friend tried to get a good photo of me with Lady Liberty, but I may have worn the wrong dress for a ferry ride photo shoot. Anyway, it was thrilling to speed by on the way to Ellis Island tonight!
Harmeet K. Dhillon tweet mediaHarmeet K. Dhillon tweet mediaHarmeet K. Dhillon tweet mediaHarmeet K. Dhillon tweet media
English
1.3K
949
16K
241.4K
X-Rocket Man
X-Rocket Man@framebrkr·
@guycole @rightillinoisan @GavinNewsom You sound like a pedo from San Francisco that believes men can get pregnant. I think it’s time to pull that rancid tampon out of your ass and swap it out for a new one. Naaaa never mind, leave it.
English
1
0
0
32
Gavin Newsom
Gavin Newsom@GavinNewsom·
Fox News lies. We sued. A judge sided with us in an initial decision. Discovery will be fun!!!
English
1.9K
5.4K
31.7K
340.9K
X-Rocket Man
X-Rocket Man@framebrkr·
@rightillinoisan @guycole @GavinNewsom This is really pathetic on its face. Newscum doesn’t want this to go to court, he knows he’ll loose trying to meet the defamation std’s. He wants Fox to settle so he can a run all over the country claiming he won. Fox better not settle like they did for the Dominion suit.
English
2
0
1
29
The Right Illinoisan 🇺🇸
The Right Illinoisan 🇺🇸@rightillinoisan·
@framebrkr @guycole @GavinNewsom Because Newsom is running for president (see Fox lawsuit filed listing reason here) and every little thing he tries to do is just desperate damage control. Gavin is his own worst enemy. Not Fox and not Jesse Watters lol
The Right Illinoisan 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
1
0
0
22
X-Rocket Man
X-Rocket Man@framebrkr·
@rightillinoisan @guycole @GavinNewsom He’s a public figure. How exactly was he defamed? Did he lose credibility? Did he lose monetarily? If this is the standard, politicians should be sued into oblivion for their lies every single day. Besides, where was the intent to slander? Why isn’t Newscum suing Trump?
English
2
0
0
23
X-Rocket Man retweetledi
Elizabeth MacDonald
Elizabeth MacDonald@LizMacDonaldFOX·
Will say it again as I tweeted below, the wealth tax California Democrats and socialists like Bernie Sanders want flatly violates the state’s own constitution and the U.S. Constitution, it’s exactly the same wrongful asset-grabbing tax that toppled Russia, Venezuela and other nations into communism, is profoundly un-American and is the exact same tax that would have given heart attacks to our Founding Fathers including George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, Ben Franklin, and John Adams. It’s exactly what they would oppose.
Elizabeth MacDonald@LizMacDonaldFOX

Remarkable that California Dems and far-left Senators like Elizabeth Warren tout an unconstitutional wealth tax like California’s proposal since courts will easily strike it down as it violates both the U.S. Constitution and California’s own constitution. Plus they are fundamentally not property taxes as they falsely claim. They’re a “use tax” tied to local services — to pay for direct services from cops, firemen, sanitation and  schools that the taxpayer directly uses. A wealth tax is designed for redistribution of revenue not tied to specific services. There is no direct link between what you pay and a service you receive. The U.S. Constitution only allows for federal “income” taxes, not for any tax on assets. It violates even more amendments. It violates the Takings Clause (Fifth Amendment): “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” Plus it can force people to sell assets just to pay the tax, even if no income was generated, in violation of the same 5th Amendment’s taking clause and due process rights as well as the 14th amendment plus Article 1 on confiscatory taxation. And it violates California’s own state constitutional limits on taxation—including uniformity requirements, due-process protections against confiscatory taxes, and strong protections for property rights. Plus it would unconstitutionally tax unrealized paper gains—like the increased value of a house even if it’s not sold—and even illiquid assets. Not only would all that take an army of bureaucrats to figure out that value, costing more than the tax would ever collect. Valuing out-of-state or illiquid assets annually is legally vulnerable. Because the tax discourages interstate mobility or penalizes investment across state lines, on just that reason alone, courts will likely strike it down.

English
11
113
284
12K
Jessica Tarlov
Jessica Tarlov@JessicaTarlov·
‘F around and find out’ is still the Democrats’ position on redistricting and is even more so our position after the SCOTUS ruling. Hakeem Jeffries is talking about a scenario when Illinois, Maryland, Colorado, and New York are totally blue. We could get 52 seats in California. Democrats support a national gerrymandering ban. Republicans would be wise to support it before this gets even uglier.
English
1.8K
1.9K
10.6K
457.7K
X-Rocket Man
X-Rocket Man@framebrkr·
@khyland413 @InformedMama209 Nope, everything you’ve stated is untrue and unequivocally false proven with easily researched facts. You even owned yourself which was absolutely hilarious and for all to see. Go back to your fake Apple Pay erroneous charge scam you Indians are so fond of. Later BOT!
English
1
0
0
32
Kyle
Kyle@khyland413·
@framebrkr @InformedMama209 Rewind my argument? I’ve been consistent the entire time and everything I’ve written stands as true. You seem to have some reading comprehension issues and have no clue how the legislative and initiative processes work. Maybe one day you’ll take the time to learn but I doubt it.
GIF
English
1
0
0
15
Denise Aguilar
Denise Aguilar@InformedMama209·
Vote no on the California billionaires tax that will be on your ballot this year. The deceptive and misleading verbiage will allow for the California legislature to have unchecked power and raise our taxes on every Californian every single year by a simple yes or no vote.. no legislative process required We can no longer afford these types of policies, make sure you’re registered to vote and vote early
English
38
646
1.3K
15.1K
X-Rocket Man
X-Rocket Man@framebrkr·
@khyland413 @InformedMama209 Look everyone, the Indian BOT is trying to rewind his BS argument. Not going to work BOT, everyone has already completely exposed your lies and propaganda. EVERY claim you made has been refuted with receipts. Your lack of English comprehension led you into a self owning trap. 😆
English
1
0
0
22
Kyle
Kyle@khyland413·
@framebrkr @InformedMama209 The Legislature can already approve new taxes. I literally showed you the constitutional language. You can’t be this dumb.
English
1
0
0
13
X-Rocket Man
X-Rocket Man@framebrkr·
@khyland413 @InformedMama209 See how stupid you are, I NEVER said what you claim. Prop-13 is locked in & capped at 1%. YOU claimed the legislature can already approve new taxes. You are just a fucking liar. Show me where I said that retard. You won’t be able to. However, this asset seizure tax will allow it
X-Rocket Man tweet media
English
1
0
0
13
Kyle
Kyle@khyland413·
@framebrkr @InformedMama209 I meant to say over your head because you are. You somehow think that the Leg can change Prop 13 via a voter initiative. Initiatives are statutes and are not enshrined into the Constitution. You can only change the Constitution with a constitutional amendment. CA civics 101.
English
1
0
0
9
X-Rocket Man
X-Rocket Man@framebrkr·
@Lil_T98733 @garrytan Yup, that’s exactly what it says. This isn’t “boiler plate” language which is the new communist euphemism meaning, “just ignore this, it’s nothing. Look the other way”
X-Rocket Man tweet media
English
0
0
1
10
We Are Charlie Kirk
We Are Charlie Kirk@Lil_T98733·
@garrytan Not a billionaire tax bill either, page 26 says it can become a EVERYONE TAX without a vote from us
English
1
0
0
14
X-Rocket Man
X-Rocket Man@framebrkr·
@khyland413 @InformedMama209 “You are way in life your head here.” Careful, your anger is bringing out your inner Indian BOT Hindi to English translations. 😂😆🤣😂😆🤣😂😆
English
1
0
0
12
Kyle
Kyle@khyland413·
@framebrkr @InformedMama209 This is boiler plate initiative language you fucking inbred dipshit. If they tried to do what you claim they are going to do it would be thrown out in court in 2 seconds since they can’t subvert Prop 13 this way. You are way in life your head here. Yikes.
English
2
0
0
19
X-Rocket Man
X-Rocket Man@framebrkr·
@khyland413 @InformedMama209 “Boiler plate” that’s the new communist euphemism for “it’s not important, just ignore it” Fuck you BOT, you failed on all aspects of this argument. Iv’e and others have called out your lies for what they are, propaganda. Lies lies lies, that’s all you communists have.
English
1
0
0
12
X-Rocket Man
X-Rocket Man@framebrkr·
@khyland413 @InformedMama209 They can’t retard, read what I just sent you. Here is a clue “new ad valorem” Your communist asset seizure AKA Billionaires Tax will apply to all CA taxpayers via a provision to allow for the legislature to do whatever the hell they want. It eliminates “new ad valorem” reqt.
X-Rocket Man tweet media
English
1
0
0
21
Kyle
Kyle@khyland413·
@framebrkr @InformedMama209 Christ you’re dumb. The entire premise of my argument is that that Legislature can levy taxes similar to the billionaires initiative with a 2/3 vote and do not need a voter approved initiative to do so. I showed you the language in the constitution and you still don’t get it 🤦‍♂️
English
1
0
0
23
X-Rocket Man
X-Rocket Man@framebrkr·
@khyland413 @InformedMama209 You just fucked yourself with your own post you stupid BOT. Talk about big words, seems like you don’t know how to read retard.
X-Rocket Man tweet media
English
1
0
0
21
Kyle
Kyle@khyland413·
@framebrkr @InformedMama209 Here’s the language of the California Constitution that resulted directly from Prop 13 in 1978. Let me know if the words are too big to understand.
Kyle tweet media
English
1
0
0
27
Kyle
Kyle@khyland413·
@framebrkr @InformedMama209 Oh no, I can’t heat the facts, it will destroy all the bullshit propaganda I’ve been fed
GIF
English
1
0
0
26
Kyle
Kyle@khyland413·
@framebrkr @InformedMama209 How am I back peddling? Prop 13 (1978) enshrined the 2/3 requirement for the Legislature to raise taxes into the CA Constitution. The document you keep sending is for the voter initiative process. Everything I’ve written still stands. I’m sorry you can’t understand how this works
English
1
0
0
17
X-Rocket Man
X-Rocket Man@framebrkr·
@khyland413 @InformedMama209 Keep repeating your lies BOT. It’s not going to work. EVERYTHING you write is complete bullshit. Are you an Indian or Pakistani BOT?
English
1
0
0
12
Kyle
Kyle@khyland413·
@framebrkr @InformedMama209 The purpose of the “2026 Billionaire’s Tax” is to raise revenue via a one-time tax on billionaire wealth for healthcare, foods assistance, and public education. Amending the measure to apply annually to all Californians wouldn’t survive a legal challenge nor would they even try.
English
1
0
0
12