Simon Elmer@SimonElmer2022
In the 2000s, the UK’s Intelligence Services, both MI5 (security service) and MI6 (secret intelligence service) began a recruitment campaign explictly targeted at gay men. Their argument was that, because gay men grow up lying about who they are, they are therefore suited to the double-life of a spy. This was a significant policy reversal, since until 1991 both services, as well as GCHQ, had a ban on gay staff, male or female, precisely because they are more suspectible to blackmail.
This policy was based on bitter experience. Of the Cambridge Five spy ring who passed information to Moscow for over two decades between the 1930s and 1950s, two (Guy Burgess and Anthony Blunt) were gay and one (Donald Maclean) was bisexual. So it’s reversal was based on more than changing social attitudes to homosexuality.
Today, looking at Barack Obama, the former President of the USA, Emmanuel Macron, the current President of France, Leo Varadkar, the former Taoiseach of Ireland, Rob Jetten, the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, and Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister of Britain — all of whom have been ruthless in enforcing the UN policy of replacement immigration on their countries — it would appear that the UK campaign of recruiting gay men was extended across the Western nations that are the exclusive targets of this policy.
In the 1990s, before ‘non-binary’ became de rigueur, gay men had a game they played spotting who was gay on the street. If you remember that far back, the UK television series, Queer as Folk, which ran from 2000 to 2005, popularised this game. There are a hundred different things that betray a gay man to those who know, and even after all his training by his minders and media managers, Starmer is quite clearly gay.
This is important, because all gay men are potentially compromised. The reason for this hasn’t changed, essentially, since the 1950s. For all our forced celebration of diversity, if the general public saw a video of what gay men get up to in a gay club they’d be disgusted and horrified, and the public career of that man, even in today’s climate of moral buggery and male transvestites masquerading as women, would be over.
It’s reasonable to assume, therefore, that the reason so many gay men occupy senior positions in the public life of Western nations (Peter Mandelson being the most glaring example in Britain), including being the nominal leaders of those nations, is because they are all compromised and therefore controlled: by MI5, by the CIA, by the SVR, by Mossad.
Unlike Macron and Obama, who appear to love their ladyboys, and notwithstanding English reserve, if Starmer’s relationship with his wife, Victoria née Alexander, is anything more than a professional and perhaps amicable relationship, then I’m a Muslim. This is more than simply the role of a ‘beard’ that certain women play for their gay friends, paying clients or agents. The fact that Victoria Starmer is Jewish, and that her children with Starmer are both being brought up Jewish, strongly suggests that she, and therefore the husband she ‘runs’, is controlled by Mossad, Israeli’s intelligence agency.
What’s the proof of this? Well, apart from three Ukrainian rent boys setting fire to Starmer’s North London home, there is his manner. In the secret parlance of the gay world, gay men are divided into Arthurs and Marthas, sexually and psychologically. A Martha takes, an Arthur gives. In the photograph of Starmer’s visit to France last year, look at Macron’s hands wrapped around and over Starmer’s hand (which is proffered like a woman’s, as if for a kiss) enveloping and assuring Starmer’s subservient gesture.
Have you ever, in your entire life, seen a heterosexual man do that to another heterosexual man? The reason Starmer, with his silvered hair and hint of lipstick, looks like a butch dyke on her day in court is because he’s a queen hiding in a suit. The reason Macron looks like a randy schoolboy with a taste for trannies is because he is. You can almost hear Starmer whisper through those pursed Dick Emery lips: ‘Oooh, you are awful, but I like you!’
In contrast, despite dancing in bondage gear for Ukrainian music videos, Volodymyr Zelensky isn’t gay, which is why, having comfortably hugged his way through the West’s leaders, male and female, he looks so awkward with Starmer, despite the latter’s attempt at a butch handshake. He knows his latest sugar daddy is a shirt lifter who buggers his fellow countrymen, and his Ukrainian machismo is uncomfortable with the intimacy of their hugs — nearly as uncomfortable as Starmer is with his wife — in case he is mistaken for another of Starmer’s Ukrainian rent boys.
There’s an old French film from the 1970s called La Cage aux folles (remade as The Birdcage in 1996), in which the son of a gay couple (his mother left her husband to his male lover) wants to introduce them to his fiancée and her father. So the tranny has to learn how to pass herself off as a man. I imagine Starmer’s five years of ‘voice lessons’ with the professional actress and communication coach, Leonie Mellinger, went something like this. But if you can show me a photograph of Starmer looking as relaxed with his wife as he is on London Pride, his glowing cheeks sprinkled with fairy glitter, I’m a Labourite. This is not how a straight man kisses a woman. This is not how a straight man holds his wife of 18 years, even if they haven’t had sex since they conceived their last child 17 years ago. In the words of the late, great Peter Cook, he’s a player of the pink oboe, and she’s his beard.
So if you’re wondering how and why it is that Starmer, despite being not only the most hated Prime Minister in British history but the most hated man in Britain, refuses to resign and continues, in the face of scandal, incompetence and corruption, to destroy Britain, this may have something to do with it.
Zionists have immense influence in the UK — as they do in the USA — on our financial sector, on our media and publishing industry and, of course, on our foreign policy; but Islamists have at least as much influence on our education and culture industries, on our Parliament, our municipal authorities, our councils, our courts and our police forces. Looking at what Starmer’s government is doing to Britain and the British people, I would guees that Zionists and Islamists, ostensibly sworn enemies, have made a pact around the UN policy of replacement immigration. This is to ethnically cleanse Israel of Palestinian Muslims, but, in return, to Islamise Britain and Europe with Muslim immigrants.
Muslims and Jews have a lot in common. Although both denounce any criticism of their barbaric beliefs as a form of racism, neither are a race. Rather, both are followers of eschatalogical ideologies obsessed with death, the end of the world, the final judgement and their own salvation as their God’s chosen people. They have, therefore, no allegiance to the nations in which they live or, more importantly, to the people that live in them, whom they call kuffar (non-believer) and goyim (non-Jew). These are binary terms designating an uncrossable void between them and us.
The evidence of that void for Muslims is everywhere around us in Britain today, in the rapes, the stabbings, the bombings, the sectarian ghettos, the infiltration of our politics, the call for Sharia law. But the same void is demonstrated by the otherwise liberal, LGBT+, woke, left-wing Jews (Stephen Fry, et al.) who unreservedly support every atrocity committed by the State of Israel. Whether it’s the Islamic Ummah or the Jewish Klal Yisrael, Muslims and Jews will see the country of their birth and, indeed, the whole world burn to see the realisation of their messianic beliefs.
Whether Starmer is a converted Jew and secret Zionist or a controlled asset of Mossad doesn’t really matter. His very public love affair with Britain’s Muslims, his government’s unrelenting promotion of Islam over Christianity and British values, and his outright refusal to punish Muslims for any crime against the British people, no matter how abhorrent, is entirely consistent with the goals of both Islam and Zionism: the ethnic cleansing of the British people from our homeland and the Islamisation of Britain.
