Gabriele Vernetti (GitGab19)

500 posts

Gabriele Vernetti (GitGab19) banner
Gabriele Vernetti (GitGab19)

Gabriele Vernetti (GitGab19)

@gitgab19

Maintainer @StratumV2 | Co-founder @bitpolito

Katılım Aralık 2020
358 Takip Edilen563 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Gabriele Vernetti (GitGab19)
Miners, take a look at this first case study, your profits might increase while using @StratumV2. Provide your feedback, and join us in the mission of innovating the Bitcoin mining space. We are a FOSS project, and we cannot make it without your help and support ⛏
Stratum V2@StratumV2

🚀New Case Study: How SV2 Increases Mining Profits by at least 7.4% improving: 📊Share Acceptance 🟩Block change latency 🧑‍🏭Job latency ⬛️Block propagation 🥷Hashrate hijacking A community research with many contributors led by @HashlabsMining @DEMAND_POOL and SRI. 🔗Link 👇

English
1
6
18
1.5K
Gabriele Vernetti (GitGab19) retweetledi
BitCare Forum
BitCare Forum@BitcareForum·
Minare bitcoin dal salotto di casa. Non è un meme. Gabriele Vernetti, co-founder di @bitpolito, contributor di @StratumV2 , salirà sul palco del BitCare Forum per parlare di home mining. Cosa serve, cosa no, e perché dovresti pensarci.
Italiano
0
4
16
1.1K
Gabriele Vernetti (GitGab19) retweetledi
bitcoin++
bitcoin++@btcplusplus·
Stratum V1 is straight up exploitable!😬 Hashrate theft, share hijacking, pool impersonation… it’s all happened. bit-aloo @shourya742 of @StratumV2 & @rustlang will show exactly how these attacks work & why Stratum V2’s encrypted & authenticated design kills them for good 🔥
bitcoin++ tweet media
English
2
10
34
1.2K
Gabriele Vernetti (GitGab19) retweetledi
Pavlenex
Pavlenex@pavlenex·
Running @StratumV2
Pavlenex tweet mediaPavlenex tweet media
English
0
4
17
672
Gabriele Vernetti (GitGab19) retweetledi
Bitshala Bitspace
Bitshala Bitspace@bitshala·
Shoutout to @shourya742 for previewing his @btcplusplus #Brazil talk before taking it to the big stage. Today, he walked us through how SV1 is exploited and how @StratumV2 fundamentally fixes mining protocol security while making more profit for miners. This is important work.
Bitshala Bitspace tweet mediaBitshala Bitspace tweet mediaBitshala Bitspace tweet mediaBitshala Bitspace tweet media
English
3
7
34
1.8K
Gabriele Vernetti (GitGab19) retweetledi
BitCare Forum
BitCare Forum@BitcareForum·
Antonio J. Di Scala, Matematico e Professore al Politecnico di Torino, è dei nostri. Il suo intervento esplorerà un profondo cambio di prospettiva: dallo studio tecnico-matematico del protocollo alla comprensione di Bitcoin come garante di privacy e diritti umani. Che onore.
Italiano
0
4
22
624
Gabriele Vernetti (GitGab19)
@oomahq Yeah unfortunately there are no other pools supporting JD out there, yet. But still, to have a proper overview about JD, TDP, and general Sv2 state, I recommend you to try it out by running the whole SRI stack, also for some minutes only. We'd welcome any kind of feedback!
English
0
0
1
9
Risk-Averse Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
@gitgab19 I'd be interested in testing Sv2+JD pooled mining in production with 1 Ph/s without pissing all the cost away. As far as I know it's not possible to do that on unless you lottery mine outside a pool. And DMND only has a signup form and never found a block, so I'm out of options.
English
1
0
0
26
Risk-Averse Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
I've been doing a bit of research on Stratum v2 lately. I think it's one part good (Mining Protocol) and two parts bad (Job Declaration and Template Distribution Protocols). The obvious next step for mining decentralization is that the DATUM gateway offers an Sv2 Mining port.
English
2
1
16
569
Gabriele Vernetti (GitGab19)
@oomahq If you don't want to point hashrate to DMND, you can still run JDC against SRI testing pool, or directly run the whole stack (pool server included) to fully test it. That's the best way to get a full picture of the current state of Sv2, and give constructive feedbacks.
English
1
0
0
22
Gabriele Vernetti (GitGab19)
@oomahq I was simply replying to your doubts about the need of the TDP, hope I clarified them. If you want to keep doing comparisons, the difference is push vs pull based approaches. That said, have you tried to run the Sv2 stack? What do you think is not simple or practical?
English
1
0
0
22
Risk-Averse Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
@gitgab19 I mean no disrespect, but as someone interested in sovereign home mining DATUM already solved these pain points in a simple practical way. Communicating with remote machines over the internet on a plaintext protocol is still an unsolved pain point, tho. x.com/oomahq/status/…
Risk-Averse Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻@oomahq

I've been mining at 1322.4 Th/s for over a week now, and even experienced a difficulty adjustment in the meantime. My hash bitches are a 2.4 Th/s QAxe+ I keep on the kitchen top at home, an S19k Pro leased from a friend that runs it from a barn, and 1.2 Ph/s rented at fair market price from the new @Braiins Haspower service. All these workers hash the block templates prepared by my node at home, with negligible rate of rejected shares, without incurring any CapEx, without noise, and without any need to hunt for cheap electricity rates. And the craziest thing is that while the Bitcoin subsidy doesn't run out doing what I'm doing is essentially "free" at any scale, as doing this is basically a break even. Mining centralization is solved, period. Most people just haven't realized it yet.

English
1
0
0
34
Gabriele Vernetti (GitGab19)
@oomahq While if you have a node implementation which doesn't want to get IPC interface in, and doesn't want to implement TDP in the node software, we can develop a bridge between RPC methods (getblocktemplate mainly) and TDP to add compatibility with that node.
English
1
0
0
26
Gabriele Vernetti (GitGab19)
@oomahq Or if you have a node implementation who wants to support Template Distribution Protocol at the node level (best thing in terms of latency), it can fully implement TDP in the node by following its protocol specifications.
English
1
0
0
48