Samurai Servo

2.7K posts

Samurai Servo banner
Samurai Servo

Samurai Servo

@gridmanservo

Selling dreams is the biggest business in the world!

$Earth Katılım Ocak 2009
1K Takip Edilen104 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Samurai Servo
Samurai Servo@gridmanservo·
So, which charts are showing this patter today?
Samurai Servo tweet media
English
4
0
1
675
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
Guys, I’m an idiot. All this time I’ve spent trying not to die, I had toxic turf in my backyard. Artificial turf contains crumb rubber infill made from recycled tires, which leaches chemicals including PFAS, heavy metals, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. These compounds are linked to hormone disruption, carcinogenicity, and systemic inflammation. I don’t know how I missed it. It makes me question my basic competence in life. What gets me is that I try so hard to survey the world of potential idiocy. Then I find out there’s a monument to idiocy sitting right in front of my face that I was blind to. I’m removing the turf, yet I’m still stuck with this seemingly unsolvable problem of how to not be an idiot.
English
3K
578
28.6K
3.4M
Alfred 🏄🏻‍♀️
Alfred 🏄🏻‍♀️@HealthyAlfred·
They clamped both carotid arteries in a rat’s neck shut. For 20 minutes. Zero blood to the brain. Brain damage. Hippocampal lesions. Memory wiped. Motor coordination destroyed. The untreated rats never recovered. The brain never even tried to repair itself. The only thing that reversed the damage — was BPC-157. Memory fully restored. Coordination fully restored. Hippocampal neurons recovered at both 24 AND 72 hours. Not compensated. Not retrained. Reversed. (PMID: 32558293) Stroke is the #1 cause of long-term disability in the US. 700,000 Americans every year. Most survivors never return to baseline. Ever. You survived. Everyone told you that’s what matters. But surviving a stroke and recovering from one are two completely different things. You relearned how to button your shirt at 58. You do speech therapy 3 times a week. You write lists for things you used to remember without thinking. You tell people you’re doing great because you’re tired of the look on their faces when you say you’re not. You stopped expecting to get better. You just adapted. And everyone around you called that recovery. Your neurologist prescribed rehab. Your PT retrains your muscles. Your speech therapist retrains your words. Every single one of them is teaching your brain to work around damage that nobody tried to repair. Your aspirin prevents the next clot. Your statin manages cholesterol. Your blood pressure medication adjusts the number. They’re protecting you from the NEXT stroke while nobody repairs the damage from the FIRST one. Researchers cut blood flow to a rat’s brain completely. 20 minutes. The exact model for human stroke. BPC-157 reversed both early and delayed brain damage and achieved full functional recovery. A rat had zero blood to its brain for 20 minutes and BPC-157 brought its memory back. Your post-stroke fog is a simpler ask. → Blood to brain cut off completely: reversed → Brain damage: repaired at 24h AND 72h​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ → Memory: fully restored → Motor coordination: fully restored → Side effects: zero Your rehab retrains the brain around what’s broken. Your medication prevents the next event. Neither repairs the damage from the one that already happened. That brain damage isn’t permanent. It’s unrepaired. Your rehab adapts to the damage. BPC-157 reversed it. Not FDA-approved. Preclinical evidence. Not medical advice.
Alfred 🏄🏻‍♀️ tweet mediaAlfred 🏄🏻‍♀️ tweet media
English
232
1.2K
8.2K
1.9M
Samurai Servo
Samurai Servo@gridmanservo·
@uxento Be careful what you wish for.. for someday your wish might come true!
English
0
0
1
914
uxento
uxento@uxento·
The trenches have spoken. As the #1 deployer platform, we know the damage we've done - so we're stepping up to help fix the issues we helped create. Tomorrow, we say goodbye to uDev.
English
41
7
105
22.7K
Samurai Servo
Samurai Servo@gridmanservo·
@toly Toly is acting like the new Donald Trump
English
0
0
0
41
toly 🇺🇸
toly 🇺🇸@toly·
EF’s new leadership, much less RADICALIZED and far more intelligent than the predecessors, has just asked Solana for a CEASEFIRE! We will consider when the L2 bridge is free and clear. Until then, we are wormholing Ethereum into oblivion, or as they say, pack to the Proof of Work days!!! THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER
English
60
13
271
28.6K
Samurai Servo
Samurai Servo@gridmanservo·
@cz_binance All are missing big point CZ. If Quantum can break Bitcoin, it can easily break the current Bank account numbers, IBAN. That is bigger than crypto
English
0
0
1
18
CZ 🔶 BNB
CZ 🔶 BNB@cz_binance·
Saw some people panicking or asking about quantum computing's impact on crypto. At a high level, all crypto has to do is to upgrade to Quantum-Resistant (Post-Quantum) Algorithms. So, no need to panic. 😂 In practice, there are some execution considerations. It's hard to organize upgrades in a decentralized world. There will likely be many debates on which algorithm(s) to use, resulting in some forks. And some dead project may not upgrade at all. Might be a good to cleanse out those projects anyway. New code may introduce other bugs or security issues in the short term. People who self custody will have to migrate their coins to new wallets. This brings to the question of Satoshi's bitcoins. If those coins move, then it means he/she is still around, which is interesting to know. If they don't move (in a certain period of time), it might be better to lock (or effectively burn) those addresses so that they don't go to the first hacker who cracks it. There is also the difficulty of identifying all his addresses, and not confuse with some old hodlers. Anyway, it's a different topic for later. Fundamentally: It's always easier to encrypt than decrypt. More computing power is always good. Crypto will stay, post quantum.
English
2.4K
2.6K
16K
1.9M
Samurai Servo
Samurai Servo@gridmanservo·
@TradersConf I say, you are living & enjoying your youth. Being in nature and with your parents is the greatest life one could live.
English
0
0
0
69
Traders Confessions
Traders Confessions@TradersConf·
I am 23 years old and live in an Indian village with my parents. I earn 5k to 10k usd per month. I don’t want to leave this place for now and plan to stay here for the next 3 to 4 years. I love nature and slow living, which I couldn’t find in the city. Will I regret in the future that I didn’t enjoy my youth?
English
69
29
921
89.3K
Samurai Servo
Samurai Servo@gridmanservo·
To this day this hurts more than any other ICO or hack to many of EOS investors. Sadly i was one of those blind believers in $EOS the ETH killer, the next Ethereum. The chain itself was super smooth like Sol today and lots of apps, games, ponzis etc.. but it's dead now. DEAD
Farea@FareaNFts

a man raised $4.2B from crypto investors, bought 164,000 Bitcoin at $6,000 with their money, and IPO'd a $10B company and investors got nothing be @BrendanBlumer - CEO of Block(dot)one - the company behind EOS - ran the biggest ICO in crypto history June 2017 to June 2018 - Block(dot)one ran a year long ICO for EOS tokens - raised $4.1 billion in ETH from retail investors - biggest ICO ever at the time - money went straight to Blockone not the EOS chain - Cayman Islands company everyone thought they were funding the next Ethereum killer they were funding Brendan's Bitcoin bag heres what he actually did with the money - crypto winter hit in 2018 - BTC crashed to $3,200 - while everyone was panicking Brendan was buying - converted a massive chunk of the $4.1B into Bitcoin - bought around the $6,000 level - accumulated 164,000 BTC - at $6K thats roughly $1 billion spent on BTC - put the rest in US government bonds by 2021 that 164,000 BTC was worth $10,000,000,000 read that again. he turned investor money into a $10B Bitcoin treasury. the SEC came knocking - fined Blockone $24 million for unregistered securities - thats 0.6% of what they raised - nobody had to give money back - Brendan paid it like a parking ticket then he built Bullish - a crypto exchange seeded with his Bitcoin stash - put in 164,000 BTC - put in $100M cash - put in 20M EOS tokens - got Peter Thiel, Mike Novogratz, and Nomura to invest $300M more - hired Tom Farley the former NYSE president as CEO - total starting balance sheet: over $10 billion August 2025 - Bullish IPO'd on the NYSE - ticker: BLSH - raised $1.1 billion at $37 per share - shares surged 84-160% on day one - closed around $68-70 - market cap instantly hit $10 billion+ Brendan owns 26-30% of Bullish after the IPO he is now a billionaire meanwhile EOS investors - Block(dot)one promised to invest $1B back into the EOS ecosystem - most of the money went to BTC, bonds, and Bullish instead - EOS the token massively underperformed - Blockone quietly stepped away from the project - the community felt completely betrayed - lawsuits and class action settlements are still ongoing this is the greatest finesse in crypto history and its not even close bookmark this to read it twice

English
0
0
0
28
Marcell
Marcell@MarcellxMarcell·
i wanna make 100k today who's with me?
English
192
20
348
57.7K
ALEX | ZK
ALEX | ZK@gluk64·
Canton founders claim ZK proofs are too risky for institutional finance. They have been making this argument to buyers and regulators, publicly and behind closed doors. It deserves a public answer. Let's see if the argument holds — and if Canton's infrastructure passes its own test. The argument Their case, stated fairly: ZKPs are complex. Bugs are inevitable in any sufficiently complex system. If a flaw exists in a proof system, it could go undetected because the underlying data is private. If it goes undetected, it spreads throughout the system. This creates systemic risk. Therefore, ZKPs cannot be used for critical financial infrastructure. This is a real concern. Let's take it seriously and follow the logic. The flaw in the logic Strip away the ZKP-specific language, here's the story: Technology X can have implementation flaws. Technology X serves a mission-critical function. If it fails, the consequences are catastrophic. Therefore, Technology X can never be used. Read it again. There is a hidden assumption doing all the work: that Technology X is your only line of defense. If this logic held, we would not have aviation. Fly-by-wire, engine controllers, autopilot — every one of these systems has bugs, is mission-critical, and can fail catastrophically. Nuclear reactor control systems, robotic surgery, radiation therapy dosing, implantable cardiac devices, and many other systems all run on software that can fail catastrophically. But they are somehow still in use. How? Redundancy and containment The foundation for these mission-critical systems is the explicit assumption in their architectures that every component will eventually fail. They all rely on two things: redundancy and containment. Redundancy = multiple independent systems, each capable of catching a failure in the others. Containment = when failure occurs, limit the blast radius so it cannot become systemic. This is the only question that matters for any mission-critical system: does your architecture have more than one line of defense? Canton's architecture Let's apply this test to Canton. Canton's privacy and integrity model relies on a single mechanism: trusted operators segregating data between participants. There is no cryptographic verification layer and no independent check. If a few keys of the operators in a validation domain are compromised, manipulated state propagates silently inside opaque chains of UTXOs with nothing watching. This is a real systemic risk, accelerated by the rise of AI-assisted cyberattacks. By Canton's own logic — a single point of failure with catastrophic consequences — this is the architecture that should concern regulators. Prividium's architecture Now look at how Prividium is built. Redundancy. Prividium has three independent lines of defense. First, institutional partners operate Prividium nodes within their own security environments, the same infrastructure banks already trust and regulate. Second, zero-knowledge proofs provide cryptographic integrity verification as an independent layer on top, verifying operational security rather than replacing it. Third, as ZK proof systems standardize, multiple independent provers can verify the same computation. A flaw in one implementation gets caught by another. Containment. Each Prividium instance is an individual chain operated by an individual institution. When institutions interact across chains, Prividium's interop layer implements inter-chain accounting mechanisms that are independently enforced by the participating institutions, asset issuers, or on-chain. Even an attacker who compromises a single institution's internal IT infrastructure and simultaneously finds a ZKP bug could only affect that one Prividium instance. The damage cannot propagate to the broader network. The net balance: Canton has a single mechanism, no fallback, silent failure propagation across the network. Prividium has layered defenses, independent verification, blast radius contained by design. Importance of open standards Multiple lines of defense only matter if each line is itself strong. What makes a technology strong? The depth of adversarial testing it has survived. Shaul points to a compiler bug example in his post, and it actually illustrates this well. ZKsync embraced full EVM equivalence over a year ago. This was shaped precisely by the understanding that the more you deviate from an open standard, the larger your attack surface becomes. And Ethereum is not battle-tested in some polite, academic sense. For over a decade, its smart contract infrastructure has been completely open to scrutiny by the most sophisticated adversarial actors in the world, with hundreds of billions of dollars at stake. Vulnerabilities and exploits fed directly back into the ecosystem: new audit standards, formal verification tools, compiler safeguards, and hardened design patterns. The EVM that exists today is the product of a decade of continuous adversarial stress testing at a scale no other smart contract platform has experienced. Canton went the opposite direction. DAML is a proprietary smart contract language with a closed ecosystem and a fraction of the developer and security community. Every growing pain that Ethereum went through over the last ten years still lies ahead for DAML, except DAML will face them with orders of magnitude fewer eyes watching. Every maturity concern Canton raises about ZKPs applies to their own technology stack with far less mitigation available. The safest technology is the one that has survived the longest under the harshest conditions. For smart contract infrastructure, that is Ethereum. It's not close. So to answer the question directly: everyone agrees bugs exist. The question is whether your architecture has redundancy to catch them and containment to limit the damage when they slip through. Cryptographic verification provides both. Trust in operators provides neither.
English
96
118
758
223.7K
WF
WF@WhaleFUD·
These videos just keep getting crazier.
English
48
243
811
71.6K
Samurai Servo
Samurai Servo@gridmanservo·
@Henry_VuQuangDu I liked the last line - "Severus Snape is Half blood prince, not Black skin prince!"
English
0
0
0
41
HenryVu
HenryVu@Henry_VuQuangDu·
The race swapping of characters from the original source material is an absolute disaster! Instead of creating a fresh, original story with a Black lead from the very beginning, they just lazily paint a white character black. It’s simple: If the original character is Black -> cast a Black actor. If the character is White -> cast a White actor. This forced race-swapping isn’t “representation.” It’s lazy, insulting, and deliberately designed to stir up racial conflict and division. HBO has turned into a sick, deranged propaganda machine. Almost every recent HBO show is drenched in the same toxic woke agenda: race-swapping, forced transgender storylines, aggressive LGBT propaganda, and blatant anti-white racism. They’re not making entertainment anymore. They’re manufacturing division. Severus Snape is Half blood prince, not Black skin prince!
HenryVu tweet mediaHenryVu tweet media
English
3
0
4
592
Marcell
Marcell@MarcellxMarcell·
Bought 100k into @intodotspace 's prediction markets ICO. Space is the Solana's first leveraged prediction market. Think Polymarket and hyperliquid combined. Built by the original UFO Gaming team — previously $1.5B+ peak market cap, Top 100 on CoinMarketCap, Top 3 GameFi on CoinGecko. Partnered with @Kalshi @moonpay @kamino @PythNetwork @heliuslabs They raised 3m from very very notable VS's and they have done something that all of the other ICO launches didn't and that is max VEST the VC supply which no one else does and thats the biggest mistake ICO's usually do. The Public sale is 550% over commitment, But i pulled some strings with the team and got in and told them i need my community in too so you can use my ref code to get in and get a 10% top up: Type "MARCELL" in ref code area : public.into.space TGE is end of this month, i expect a slam dunk Prediction markets are the hottest thing in the world right now, interms of politics , sports, IRL events , Everything basically just look at @LoganPaul 's Pikachu sale , Everyone is doing predictions and now they can do it on steroids.
Marcell tweet media
English
168
17
278
73.5K