anon

90 posts

anon

anon

@heart_2243

Katılım Ocak 2013
0 Takip Edilen0 Takipçiler
anon
anon@heart_2243·
@himtopia Alright, disable your LSPs, code snippets, IntelliSense, and stop using debuggers. This take makes 0 sense; code is not an artistic medium. Code is to a product what a pencil is to art.
English
1
0
1
127
Utopian
Utopian@himtopia·
AI code is equally as bad as AI art. Both are trained on stolen work and are used as creative forms by people be it in Games, programs ect... Either both is bad or both is good but there shouldnt be double standards. 🤷‍♂️
English
47
39
261
5.7K
anon
anon@heart_2243·
@oguzerkan CRWV has triple the debt of NBIS and a negative eps
English
0
0
0
320
Oguz Erkan
Oguz Erkan@oguzerkan·
I am seriously considering shifting some of my $NBIS position to $CRWV. I love $NBIS and it's now a 10x position for me, but the current valuation gap with $CRWV is hard to justify. $CRWV ARR target for this year and backlog are double those of $NBIS. $NBIS has a 5 GW capacity target by 2030 while $CRWV is targeting +8GW. Yes, $CRWV has $25 billion in financial debt and $10 billion in operating lease liabilities, bringing $600–$700 million in interest expense per quarter. However, its funding structure is improving. It recently secured an $8.5 billion investment-grade term loan, non-recourse and tied to customer contracts. It has raised more than $20 billion in debt and equity this year with no major maturities until 2029. So, if demand holds up, $CRWV won't have any problems servicing debt. If demand doesn't hold up, $NBIS isn't holding anyway. There is really nothing that justifies the gap here. This means either $NBIS or $CRWV is gravely mispriced here. I bet it’s the latter.
Oguz Erkan tweet mediaOguz Erkan tweet media
English
94
74
807
152K
anon
anon@heart_2243·
@mind1nvestor @ThinkAppraiser They both have a comparable market cap but CoreWeave, has a negative eps. I don’t understand why you would be bullish on one but not the other.
English
0
0
0
87
Mind Investor
Mind Investor@mind1nvestor·
I've been invested in $NBIS since $21. That's a 10X. But if you're buying it here and now, you are out of your mind. Knowing when not to buy is just as valuable as knowing when to buy.
English
53
10
557
94.3K
anon
anon@heart_2243·
@theo @WebDevCaptain You’re confusing “engineering” with “coding”. A coding challenge proves nothing as it relates to showcasing your engineering capabilities. You are a larper.
English
1
0
4
894
Theo - t3.gg
Theo - t3.gg@theo·
@WebDevCaptain Reality check: I’m a better influencer and engineer than you. 1v1 me in a coding challenge of your choice. If you win, I’ll pay you $20k. If you lose, donate $20k to a charity of your choice and publicly apologize to me for going after my engineering experience. Deal?
English
38
2
136
25.9K
anon
anon@heart_2243·
@theo @WebDevCaptain you are the most arrogant engineer I see on this app for someone who capped out at L5 at Twitch (mind you this was 2017 when they were hiring anyone with a pulse). Jfc, nobody gives a shit about t3.chat or t3code. No serious engineer uses your garbage.
English
1
0
18
951
anon
anon@heart_2243·
@exitnode_ @VentureCoinist It is a code fork of the bitcoin protocol, it quite literally is a private bitcoin.
English
0
0
1
24
Exitnode_
Exitnode_@exitnode_·
@VentureCoinist "Private bitcoin" Cringe AF . can't even get your own motion?
GIF
English
1
0
0
309
Luke Martin
Luke Martin@VentureCoinist·
The best performing top20 coin for the last month is $ZEC and it's not even close 1) Zcash +66% 2) Monero +21% 3) Bitcoin +18% Someone is buying a lot of private Bitcoin right now
Luke Martin tweet media
English
37
47
511
44.9K
Paul Grewal
Paul Grewal@iampaulgrewal·
After months in rooms at the WH and Senate, this much is clear: a lot of the public debate overstated the risks and ignored the substance. This outcome preserves activity-based rewards tied to real participation on crypto platforms and networks, which is what the bank lobby said they wanted. We've long believed that this issue did not warrant legislative changes. But whatever-- we’re focused on getting a bill done and are satisifed that this language should not be the basis of any objection. Onward.
Faryar Shirzad 🛡️@faryarshirzad

The final rewards text in the CLARITY Act is now public. We’ve been clear throughout this process: much of this debate was based on imagined risks, not real evidence, nor was it based on a real understanding of how crypto actually works. Nevertheless, the crypto industry showed up to engage. Through months of meetings, the @WhiteHouse, @USTreasury, @BankingGOP, @SenThomTillis and @Sen_Alsobrooks finally arrived at a compromise. In the end, the banks were able to get more restrictions on rewards, but we protected what matters – the ability for Americans to earn rewards, based on real usage of crypto platforms and networks. We also ensured the US can be at the forefront of the financial system – which in this competitive geopolitical era is paramount. That’s important for innovation, consumers and America's national security. Now that this issue is behind us, it’s time to focus on the broader bill. While this debate has been underway, lots of progress has been made on other areas like token classification, defi, and tokenization. We’re excited to review the full, final text, and for the bill to move forward. It’s time to get CLARITY done.

English
70
151
1.3K
355.2K
Brian Armstrong
Brian Armstrong@brian_armstrong·
Mark it up
Faryar Shirzad 🛡️@faryarshirzad

The final rewards text in the CLARITY Act is now public. We’ve been clear throughout this process: much of this debate was based on imagined risks, not real evidence, nor was it based on a real understanding of how crypto actually works. Nevertheless, the crypto industry showed up to engage. Through months of meetings, the @WhiteHouse, @USTreasury, @BankingGOP, @SenThomTillis and @Sen_Alsobrooks finally arrived at a compromise. In the end, the banks were able to get more restrictions on rewards, but we protected what matters – the ability for Americans to earn rewards, based on real usage of crypto platforms and networks. We also ensured the US can be at the forefront of the financial system – which in this competitive geopolitical era is paramount. That’s important for innovation, consumers and America's national security. Now that this issue is behind us, it’s time to focus on the broader bill. While this debate has been underway, lots of progress has been made on other areas like token classification, defi, and tokenization. We’re excited to review the full, final text, and for the bill to move forward. It’s time to get CLARITY done.

English
372
789
6.2K
775.6K
Faryar Shirzad 🛡️
Faryar Shirzad 🛡️@faryarshirzad·
The final rewards text in the CLARITY Act is now public. We’ve been clear throughout this process: much of this debate was based on imagined risks, not real evidence, nor was it based on a real understanding of how crypto actually works. Nevertheless, the crypto industry showed up to engage. Through months of meetings, the @WhiteHouse, @USTreasury, @BankingGOP, @SenThomTillis and @Sen_Alsobrooks finally arrived at a compromise. In the end, the banks were able to get more restrictions on rewards, but we protected what matters – the ability for Americans to earn rewards, based on real usage of crypto platforms and networks. We also ensured the US can be at the forefront of the financial system – which in this competitive geopolitical era is paramount. That’s important for innovation, consumers and America's national security. Now that this issue is behind us, it’s time to focus on the broader bill. While this debate has been underway, lots of progress has been made on other areas like token classification, defi, and tokenization. We’re excited to review the full, final text, and for the bill to move forward. It’s time to get CLARITY done.
Brendan Pedersen@BrendanPedersen

SCOOP: Sens. Tillis and Alsobrooks have finalized a compromise on stablecoin yield. Punchbowl News has the text - bans rewards that are “economically or functionally equivalent” to deposit interest - balances *can* be used for rewards if companies clear the “equivalent” test

English
171
496
2.5K
1.4M
anon
anon@heart_2243·
@BullseyetK @GefullteT @my_2cents__ I want you to challenge yourself with this thought. In this scenario, do you think 100% of voters will choose red?
English
1
0
2
61
bullseye 🔪
bullseye 🔪@BullseyetK·
@heart_2243 @GefullteT @my_2cents__ In my analogy, abstaining also actively contributes to the distribution of responses. They are identical. You just want to put a moral emphasis on red to help you justify pressing blue. Your logic is flawed. Go press your blue button, I'm routing for you.
English
1
0
1
80
AdamW³
AdamW³@OptimizerAdam·
Blue = NPC Why do these fake bot accounts always go hard against me on here. Is this fake engagement to keep me on the platform? idk? Weird.
AdamW³ tweet media
English
1
0
0
34
anon
anon@heart_2243·
@OptimizerAdam @AskJoshy @kaileyinCA buddy, you don’t think probability is a concept in statistical analysis. Idc if you think I am an NPC or not, but I am for sure certain that you are cognitively disabled to some extent.
English
0
0
0
8
AdamW³
AdamW³@OptimizerAdam·
@heart_2243 @AskJoshy @kaileyinCA Typical. But that is not true. I clearly said blue team are NPCs. So again, you are just making up your own reality because you can't accept truth. You are 100% an NPC. Zero logic. It's not your fault just how you were programmed.
English
1
0
0
22
kailey 🥀
kailey 🥀@kaileyinCA·
i don’t understand why anybody would choose the red button. asking genuinely, if you chose it - why? if 50%+ choose blue, everyone lives. if less than 50% choose red, only those who chose red live. why are you willing to sacrifice half of those people?
English
520
2
124
23.2K
AdamW³
AdamW³@OptimizerAdam·
@heart_2243 @AskJoshy @kaileyinCA Lol I appearto be? You blue people are NPCs I swear. You live in a make-believe world and want other people to save your life for you. I am not a xitian. Religion is for NPCs. If Jesus died for our sins he failed his mission. Look around. Smh
English
1
0
0
22
anon
anon@heart_2243·
@OptimizerAdam @AskJoshy @kaileyinCA You appear to be Christian or at least religious. do you think Jesus would press red or blue. Was Jesus suicidal by dying for our sins?
English
1
0
0
18