Philosophy and Sanity - George D

2K posts

Philosophy and Sanity - George D banner
Philosophy and Sanity - George D

Philosophy and Sanity - George D

@hebrews1031

Autodidact tackling modernity’s crisis. Philosophy, theology, and a Catholic lens for Christians seeking sanity. Writing at Philosophy & Sanity.

Katılım Temmuz 2022
375 Takip Edilen182 Takipçiler
Jordan Steffaniak
Jordan Steffaniak@JLSteffaniak·
I've got a few extras so giving one of each away to one person. To pick, lets go with anyone who comments. Tell me your favorite pickup truck or something fun. I'll just randomly select someone and DM them. 🤠
Jordan Steffaniak tweet media
English
81
8
75
7.3K
Philosophy and Sanity - George D
@jonharris1989 Sure, but liberalism also wants Christians to privatize their faith. Christianity is a totalizing religion. Jesus Christ must be king of your whole life, not part. That includes politics, and forgetting that is a major reason we are where we are
English
0
0
0
25
Philosophy and Sanity - George D
@RMConservative I’m rather curious if DeSantis or anyone around him has a plan to stay in politics. I think he’s one of the, if not singularly the, best politician we have. I realize politics is rough but it’d be a shame to see him just step away.
English
0
0
2
117
Philosophy and Sanity - George D
@paul_moog @RepMcCormick This is honestly still a great idea even if Dems make a state. It will make DC even bluer, sure, but no rw-er had a chance there anyhow. But it puts Va back on the possibility side for us
English
0
0
0
64
Paul Moog
Paul Moog@paul_moog·
@RepMcCormick Dumb idea - the Dems will make DC a state. Better to retrocede DC's residential areas to MD and shut down the DC federal courts - allow anyone charged with a crime in DC to be tried to their home state.
English
18
10
102
6.8K
Congressman Rich McCormick, MBA MD
DC Bureaucrats hijacked Virginia… but we will restore it. Arlington and Alexandria were always meant to be a part of DC. That’s why I introduced the Make DC Square Again Act, because it’s a simple concept: DC = 🟥
English
853
929
6K
1.1M
Philosophy and Sanity - George D
@TakeshiKovacs37 @RMConservative But he doesn’t. And true, they could hurt him, hurt his agenda. But seeing as how his agenda isn’t getting done anyways, and his priorities are getting stymied, it wouldn’t be too much of a risk to take out a bit of the swamp. But he cozies up (2/2)
English
0
0
1
23
Philosophy and Sanity - George D
@TakeshiKovacs37 @RMConservative True, and fair. But even that seems like it’s Trumps fault. Trump could win a war with any senator at least on an individual level and probably on a group level. Given the loyalty the base has to him, he could ensure any politician has no future in politics, on the GOP side. (1/)
English
2
0
1
33
Daniel Horowitz
Daniel Horowitz@RMConservative·
Rather than crafting a message, and more importantly, implementing policies federally and in the red states that redress the public grievances, Republicans continue to squander their power on things we don't even believe in. Rather than electing stalwarts in deep red states to build on the Florida model, we went backwards with insane endorsements. Then they went all in on trying to squeeze out a few districts (when they are slated to lose by a much large margin anyway), so Dems matched them in the game and beat them. It's that simple. Press 1 for Spanish, press 2 for a new party.
English
24
83
297
10.9K
André Béliveau
André Béliveau@TheRealBeliveau·
@ccpecknold What are you even talking about? You act as if Burke was unaware of revolutionary historical events and unacquainted with severe or existential threats to the established social order. Touch grass.
English
2
0
6
768
Philosophy and Sanity - George D
@cabsav456 @RMConservative 100% I did. And I agree with your post here. But why I’m pessimistic is not that I personally couldn’t see it coming, it’s how mind numbingly foolish the GOP is. As you mentioned, they started a fight they couldn’t win and it ended predictably.
English
0
0
0
19
Lauren
Lauren@cabsav456·
@hebrews1031 @RMConservative I do too but you must have seen this coming. I did my part by convincing my Dem friends to not vote on this and my Never Trump parents to vote no. This was wrong, but the crocodile tears are embarrassing. There's a lack of knowledge problem & a lack of principles problem.
Lauren@cabsav456

Yep. This is absurd and deeply disappointing. As a Virginia resident, I'm pissed off. I also recognize the full picture of WHY this is happening. This is direct retaliation in the mid-decade redistricting war that started last year. Prior to 2025, the last time a state just willy nilly decided to redraw congressional maps outside the normal 10-year census cycle was 2003. For decades, this was a widely accepted norm: you don't do mid-cycle redistricting. It was frowned upon by both parties because everyone understood what it was — a partisan power grab designed to rig upcoming elections. That norm was completely obliterated when Donald Trump publicly pressured red states to redraw their maps mid-decade, claiming he was "entitled" to more seats because he "won big" in those states. Again: this was 100% unprecedented and was absurd. Texas complied, enacting a map explicitly designed to flip five seats from blue to red. This is the move that lit the fuse. California then responded by passing Proposition 50 in November — an "emergency" measure to implement its own partisan maps temporarily to counter those gains. This MESS should have ended there. But it didn't. The pressure from the highest levels of our government continued. States like North Carolina & Missouri also decided to redraw their maps with ZERO new census data, purely to influence the midterms. Now Virginia — despite currently having some of the fairest maps in the country — is jumping into the mud too. The VA General Assembly just fast-tracked a constitutional amendment to allow mid-decade redistricting here. Virginians will now be asked to vote on it. I will be voting NO, on principle. Not because I’m naïve about the political consequences, but because this is exactly what it is: breaking the rules once fairness becomes inconvenient. Don’t get me wrong — I'm very angry that we're sacrificing a fair & stable process. But I'm also looking at the bigger picture. We are watching a national arms race where fairness itself is being treated as a liability. People need to stop viewing this (and everything else) through a purely partisan lens and recognize the precedent being set. It's corrosive, it's destabilizing, and it's a disaster for everyone.

English
1
0
2
82
Philosophy and Sanity - George D
@RowanWi03189957 @ChristianHeiens What I am referencing was the question of fairness. Far too many people on the right miss where that arises from. It’s not the left just being corrupt or sneaky, though both might be true. But it’s a specific part of the current leftist worldview
English
0
0
0
20
Christian Heiens 🏛
Christian Heiens 🏛@ChristianHeiens·
When Republicans were in power, they had a ballot referendum to enshrine Right to Work in the Virginia constitution. They worded the ballot question like a piece of legislation, with multiple sub-sections specifying what part of the Constitution would be amended under what circumstances. The entire thing looked like it was written by lawyers, for lawyers. No one understood what it was or meant, so even the GOP's own voters voted NO. When Democrats took power, they literally said on the ballot question that their 10-1 gerrymander plan would "restore fairness". There should be a lesson for you here. One side is serious about winning at all costs, and the other side honestly doesn't care if they win or lose. They just want to make sure that they lose "legally".
English
79
746
6.6K
125K
Philosophy and Sanity - George D
@GreatLakesProg @ChristianHeiens Far too many conservatives are really liberals (philosophically) and think in this abstract, neutral, fair-in-a-procedural sense way. I disagree strongly with Progressives but at least you all believe your talking points and have a sense of doing the right thing as you see it
English
0
0
0
23
Philosophy and Sanity - George D
@GreatLakesProg @ChristianHeiens I think I can take this as a compliment? If you’re saying u understand progressive thinking I’m somewhat flattered. If you’re commenting on my calling you good guys, I meant that far more that you view yourself as the good guys, not that you are. (1/)
English
1
0
0
31
Philosophy and Sanity - George D
@JulianWaller Love all of these! I was actually thinking of PR within states but I could have been clearer. I do think the other way to keep more local representation is to massively expand the house but I think that might cause more problems then statewide PR
English
0
0
0
13
Julian Waller 📖
Julian Waller 📖@JulianWaller·
@hebrews1031 My personal view is we should 1) expand the House to ~550 members, 2) have PR with each state a multi-member district (*not* national PR!) with an effective threshold of 5%, and 3) keep the Senate unchanged (FPTP, 2x per state).
English
1
0
4
62
Philosophy and Sanity - George D
@aReformedGuy @JoshuaBarzon In addition, disagreements might come down to soteriology to an extent here. I think alot of Protestants define Christian soteriologically first, but I think there’s other ways to define the term, some of which lead to different results
English
1
0
0
14
Philosophy and Sanity - George D
@aReformedGuy @JoshuaBarzon There’s also the matter that both Church of Christ and Adventist groups use Prot. Language. They speak of sola fide, sola scriptura, etc. That doesn’t make a Protestant, since high church Anglicans might not, but it’s a sign (1/)
English
1
0
0
19
Josh Barzon
Josh Barzon@JoshuaBarzon·
Very helpful chart
Josh Barzon tweet media
English
42
40
224
25.2K