TK

Like high risk, ULTRA high reward? Like privacy thesis? $Zephyr is your CURRENT best bet; potential long term bottom formation. x150 to previous high, above that and x200-x300 is possible. DYOR. $ZEPH

@TheBlockRunner 100% on the wrong side of his own opinion and being completely unaware of being there. It's not an amazing place to be, in hindsight.

Every single one of these transactions within the block paid the market price to be in the block. Those fees went to miners as an incentive to continue securing the network. You're essentially arguing for miners to make less money. The equation that matters to real bitcoiners is the following: Miner revenue = network security = network value Currently miner revenue is declining which means the cost to attack the network is declining. Fees will never be enough to underpin the security of the network because fees can not scale as the value of the network increases. If fees go up less people use the network. You're advocating for the wrong thing. You should be advocating for more miner revenue because the security will always be the ceiling for the value of Bitcoin. If miner revenue ceases to increase, the market cap of Bitcoin will no longer rise. study @natgmi ethereum:0x249130f5e2dd4cf278180c0df8273f3592ad1247

@Kalshibacktest AI agents will demand privacy. Just like companies do. Bitcoin is tracable. No transaction privacy, no wealth privacy, no relationship privacy, etc, equals open bookkeeping. Not what companies like today, not what AI agents will choose tomorrow.

PALANTIR CO-FOUNDER: "There’s one buyer that will be important in Bitcoin…AI Agents." Joe Lonsdale, Palantir co-founder, predicted last year that AI Agents could be one of the biggest users of Bitcoin & crypto. NOW: AI Agents make up 19% of all on-chain activity.

@TomLeeTracker This guy had almost every forecast WRONG. Keep repeating loser's forecasts. Great to help your audience getting broke.

TOM LEE: BITCOIN OVER $100,000 AND ETHEREUM BACK OVER $5,000 BY YEAR END He sets a clear test for whether the crypto thesis still holds: - He sees Bitcoin above $100,000 and Ethereum back over $5,000 by the end of the year - Bitcoin has been down three quarters in a row but never four, so a June-to-September bounce is the test, and no bounce would mean something's broken - The real floor is production cost: Bitcoin sits about 5% below it now, and falling to half of production cost would mean the network itself can't be supported

@natssats All measured in usd. 😉 Very, very few will gain any advantage to compete by performing the same kind TA. You will have to look further. The amount of BS TA on X is amazing. Many will never find a way to benefit from it.

@het_tk Time determines my bias. Bearish below weekly/monthly/yearly open. Bullish above the open.

This NOOB account compares a gold/usd pattern with a BTC/usd pattern while timespans are completely off and the circumstances in which both patterns formed are completely different. Apples with oranges. Don't buy this crap TA! ❌️

@natssats Yeah! And get burned by it. How to have TA suit your bias?

@het_tk Whatever they find for engagement bait, but the crazy thing is people still buy it

So cute you spent your time worrying about blockspace, while the security budget is the area you should focus your worry on. In that same essence, one would want more blockspace sold at any profit, since fees don't come even clise to compensate for the BTC/USD falling block rewards. If you still can't see this growing problem, you will go into the historybooks as one of the maxi's who just were too blind (or dumb) to see the obvious. Good luck defending your biased concerns.

34% of the entire Bitcoin block space is being used for worthless "inscriptions". Houston, we have a problem. wtfhappenedinfeb2023.com

The reply arsenal, check it out👇 nat-explorable.pages.dev/cards/

Bitcoin is dead without $NAT

People are waking up to Bitcoin's fee-replacement structure. 'A tivking time-bomb'.

This tactic is usefull, though has it's limits in a secular bearmarket in the relative Bitcoin/energy price ratio. If you think this through, there is only one uncontroversal solution: extend and grow Bitcoin's security budget. 1. Blockfees (fixed and exponentially declining) 2. TX-fees (of no significance currently) 3. A new miner reward: a subsidy token. Number 3 is where $NAT is created for. Miningpools have the substance, know-how and business-relations to support the growth of the NAT ecosystem. Use that advantage, innovate, create and save Bitcoin's security budget to uphold miners when a relative BTC/energy secular bearmarket hits.

The best operators aren't mining harder. They're mining intelligently. Hashprice is near all-time lows. The ones pulling ahead aren't the ones with more machines. 🧵

The goal is getting creators onto @natdotfun. The bigger point is making crypto reward them properly for once.

@pete_rizzo_ LOL. He, and everybody on the same page, is going to be SO WRONG. Nobody sees the loss of relative oitperformance. NO-BO-DY. Dream on while you can still dream. After you wake up you will understand what happened. Clue: June 2022. 💀🤗

MEXICAN BILLIONAIRE RICARDO SALINAS SENT A MASSIVE WARNING TO EVERYONE WHO IS NOT BUYING #BITCOIN RIGHT NOW "I DON'T OWN A SINGLE STOCK" "I ONLY INVEST IN #BITCOIN AND GOLD" HE IS PUTTING 100% OF HIS PORTFOLIO IN BTC YOU'VE BEEN WARNED 🚀

@pete_rizzo_ Where do you need CAPITAL letters for all the time? Who do you try to convince?

JUST IN: JACK MALLERS JUST COMPLETELY CHANGED #BITCOIN LENDING FOREVER STRIKE INTRODUCED BTC LOANS THAT CAN NEVER LIQUIDATE NO MATTER HOW VOLATILE THE PRICE "IF BTC FALLS, YOUR BTC DOESN'T MOVE" "IF YOU ARE ON VACATION AND IF YOU ARE SLEEPING YOU WILL NOT GET LIQUIDATED" THIS MAY BE THE BEST WAY EVER INVENTED TO BORROW DOLLARS ON YOUR BTC WHAT A LEGEND 🔥

@danheld What fees? 🤣🫣

Fees are the filter. Welcome to basic Bitcoin education.

🇪🇺 MiCA WAS BUILT TO REGULATE CRYPTO. USERS ARE ESCAPING IT INSTEAD. MiCA was built to bring crypto activity into regulated, supervised platforms. Instead, most users are choosing to hold their own keys. Binance itself withdrew its Greek MiCA license days before the deadline and paused EU deposits, trading, and sign-ups on July 1. Withdrawals stayed open. Teng’s warning: self-custody means less oversight, not more. This is the opposite of what MiCA was designed to achieve. Heavy regulation seems to be pushing EU crypto users toward decentralization, not consolidation. Europe is falling behind on crypto. Massively.

@fvdemocratie @PvanHouwelingen Wie gaat dit tegenhouden? En hoe? Dit is toch bizar. Wat een doordrukkerij, weg privacy. En iedereen slaapt.

Brussel heeft vandaag ingestemd met het controversiële Chat Control-voorstel van de Christendemocraten (CDA). Al uw berichten zullen met AI worden gecontroleerd op schadelijk materiaal. Deze ontwikkeling is een achterdeurtje naar massasurveillance waar FVD zich altijd tegen zal blijven verzetten. Steun ons via fvd.nl/wordlid!

@svnee This is criminal. This can't be true.

The European Parliament voted AGAINST Chat Control. 314 to 276. And it passed anyway. Let me tell you how: they needed 361 votes to say no. On the last day before vacation. Every empty seat counted as a yes. They lost the vote. They won the law. That’s not democracy. That’s a trick. #ChatControl

@VincentVandep8 WHAT THE FUCK! Dit is toch gewoon compleet onacceptabel? Welkom in het nieuwe communistische westen. Het is KLAAR met de privacy. En de meeste mensen hebben geen flauw benul wat deze controle gaat brengen.

Ik ben niet zeker of iedereen mee is in het smerige spel dat vandaag is gespeeld om dat gedrocht erdoor te krijgen, vandaar korte uitleg: Een meerderheid van de aanwezige Europarlementsleden stemde vandaag tégen Chat Control. Normaal zou dat volstaan om zo’n voorstel weg te stemmen. Maar de EU-top besliste eerst om via een uitzonderlijke spoedprocedure de spelregels te veranderen. —> Daardoor volstond een gewone meerderheid van de aanwezigen plots NIET meer. Er was ineens een ABSOLUTE meerderheid van 361 stemmen nodig, berekend over het volledige Europees Parlement. En laat die stemming nu net midden in het zomerreces plaatsvinden, wanneer een groot deel van de parlementsleden afwezig is. Het resultaat? Een aanwezige meerderheid kon Chat Control niet meer tegenhouden. Zo slaagde de EU erin om, via een procedurele kunstgreep, een democratische meerderheid buitenspel te zetten.

@Lagarde @Europarl_EN Who are you convincing? We, the people, don't want a payment rails that can be abused when the time comes, to control people and hurt their privacy. No!

I welcome today's vote by the @Europarl_EN to make sure that the euro, both in cash and digital form, is accepted everywhere in the euro area.