

Helen Joyce
32.8K posts

@HJoyceGender
Author of book about gender-ID ideology. Show me the 3rd gamete & then we can talk.Shame needs to change sides. No, you be kind. Newsletter: Joyce Activated 🥂





We were in the High Court today for the hearing in our judicial review against National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) abusive searching guidance. This guidance permits a detainee to be strip-searched by an officer of the opposite sex on the basis that both the detainee and officer “consent” to this. We think this is unlawful. Under “PACE” – the main law governing police conduct – strip searches MUST be carried out by an officer of the same sex. This protects officers as well as detainees. Our argument is simple: PACE is the only lawful basis for police searching, and it doesn’t permit opposite-sex searches that go beyond outer wear. Opposite-sex searches are unsafe and unlawful treatment of vulnerable detainees. We also think the guidance is discrimination against and harassment of female officers. Judgment was reserved, meaning it will be handed down at a later date. Pictured (from left to right): Cathy Larkman (@JackMerched), retired superintendent and policing lead for @WomensRightsNetwork; Sex Matters’ @hjoycegender, @mforstater and @derrybanshee; and Rachel Fletcher, Chair of Police SEEN (@PoliceSEENUK, a network of serving police officers).


Congratulations to Ben Cooper KC of @OldSqChambers for winning the Barrister of the year award from @TheLawyermag for his role in representing Sex Matters in the landmark Supreme Court case For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers. The Supreme Court specifically thanked Cooper in the judgment for his written and oral submissions on behalf of Sex Matters, “which gave focus and structure to the argument that ‘sex’, ‘man’ and ‘woman’ should be given a biological meaning”. 🔗 thelawyer.com/the-lawyer-awa…





We were in the High Court today for the hearing in our judicial review against National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) abusive searching guidance. This guidance permits a detainee to be strip-searched by an officer of the opposite sex on the basis that both the detainee and officer “consent” to this. We think this is unlawful. Under “PACE” – the main law governing police conduct – strip searches MUST be carried out by an officer of the same sex. This protects officers as well as detainees. Our argument is simple: PACE is the only lawful basis for police searching, and it doesn’t permit opposite-sex searches that go beyond outer wear. Opposite-sex searches are unsafe and unlawful treatment of vulnerable detainees. We also think the guidance is discrimination against and harassment of female officers. Judgment was reserved, meaning it will be handed down at a later date. Pictured (from left to right): Cathy Larkman (@JackMerched), retired superintendent and policing lead for @WomensRightsNetwork; Sex Matters’ @hjoycegender, @mforstater and @derrybanshee; and Rachel Fletcher, Chair of Police SEEN (@PoliceSEENUK, a network of serving police officers).





Dr Joyce is to speak at the Durham Union Society (DUS). According to @theTab, Durham Student Union (DSU), the DSU Community Officer, DSU Trans Association, and QueerSphere have "asked DUS to account for itself.” Contains a great quote from @Docstockk thetab.com/2026/06/15/con…