steven hoffman

5.9K posts

steven hoffman

steven hoffman

@hoffman_steven

#SingleCell #spatial #NGS @ultimagenomics but All comments my own

Texas, USA Katılım Şubat 2011
2.4K Takip Edilen1K Takipçiler
steven hoffman retweetledi
Neville Sanjana
Neville Sanjana@nevillesanjana·
To do this, we used genome-scale CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) to turn on every gene and measure precise editing. One surprising finding: Many genes that are never or very lowly expressed (in human K562 cells) can enhance precise repair.
Neville Sanjana tweet mediaNeville Sanjana tweet mediaNeville Sanjana tweet media
English
1
6
26
2.2K
steven hoffman retweetledi
Rahul Satija
Rahul Satija@satijalab·
Inspired by @JswLab, we generated a mini Genome-wide Perturb-seq, using just two 10x lanes (!). Far too much data for one tweet (or one Figure), but it works beautifully. The ability to assess the molecular function of every gene in an afternoon is mind-boggling
Rahul Satija tweet media
English
1
32
179
11.4K
steven hoffman retweetledi
Sickos Committee
Sickos Committee@SickosCommittee·
In case you’re late to my favorite Olympic performance enhancing scandal, here are the details of penis inflate-gate.
Sickos Committee tweet media
The New York Times@nytimes

From @TheAthletic: Reports have surfaced before the Winter Olympics that allege ski jumpers are injecting their penises with hyaluronic acid to fly farther. The World Anti-Doping Agency has vowed to investigate. nyti.ms/4r10aaA

English
268
3.7K
28.2K
1.9M
steven hoffman retweetledi
Nima Alidoust
Nima Alidoust@nalidoust·
Introducing Tahoe-x1 (Tx1) by @tahoe_ai. A 3-billion-parameter, single-cell foundation model that learns unified representations of genes, cells, and drugs, achieving state-of-the-art performance across cancer-relevant cell biology benchmarks, open-sourced on @huggingface. 🧵
English
39
223
1.3K
170.1K
steven hoffman retweetledi
Iain Cheeseman
Iain Cheeseman@iaincheeseman·
Today @AnthropicAI released PubMed integration for Claude. No hallucinations. Just real science, real data. As a beta tester, this has been a game changer—like having a supercharged research assistant. Here are 6 prompts that will transform how you search the literature. A 🧵
Anthropic@AnthropicAI

We’re building tools to support research in the life sciences, from early discovery through to commercialization. With Claude for Life Sciences, we’ve added connectors to scientific tools, Skills, and new partnerships to make Claude more useful for scientific work.

English
17
141
1.2K
214.8K
steven hoffman retweetledi
ASHG
ASHG@GeneticsSociety·
Welcome to #ASHG25! We’re kicking off five incredible days of learning, connecting, and inspiring. We’re so glad you’re here, let’s make this unforgettable! 📲Download our mobile app: pheedloop.com/ASHG25/ #ASHG
ASHG tweet media
English
0
7
20
1.9K
steven hoffman retweetledi
Douglas Yao
Douglas Yao@DouglasYaoDY·
CRISPR came from yogurt bacteria. GLP-1s came from Gila monster venom. Taq polymerase came from hot spring bacteria. As much as we like to think that progress in biotech is driven by human design, our biggest breakthroughs over the years have all originated from nature.
Niko McCarty.@NikoMcCarty

The ocean is one of the last great frontiers of biology. More than 90% of all marine life (an estimated 2M species) have not been discovered. Also, only ~10% of the seafloor has been mapped at 100m resolution, "as compared to 100% of...Mars and Venus." We should sequence everything in the ocean. Doing so would lead to many useful biotech tools, just as the thermostable polymerase used for PCR was found in a geyser-dwelling microbe, or CRISPR was identified in microbes living in Mediterranean salt marshes. With this in mind, I've been reading a lot more about John O. Dabiri's work at Caltech. His report on "Bio-inspired Ocean Exploration," in particular, is a must-read. It has so many good vignettes about how little of the ocean we understand, and why it's so difficult to study. "The ocean represents...99% of the habitable volume on Earth," the report says, "and yet, less than one-tenth of one percent of the seafloor has been mapped" at a resolution of 1 meter. The obvious plan to sequence the ocean, of course, would be to make a bunch of submarines and underwater vehicles and send them out with nanopore sequencers. But this would not viably scale. For example: "...it has been estimated that it would require 200 shipyears to sample the entire ocean at just one depth, that is, a single ship moving through the ocean for 200 years, or a fleet of 200 ships, all working in concert for a whole year—just to measure one depth in the ocean.” A typical, propeller-driven underwater vehicle costs about $50,000. And here's the bit that really astounds me: "...the volume of ocean water is roughly one billion cubic kilometers. A uniformly distributed array of one million measurement systems would therefore each still be tasked with monitoring an area equal to the size of the city of Los Angeles in the United States (1,000 km2) and throughout a depth of one kilometer of the ocean. By this thought exercise, it becomes apparent that even one million sensors would likely be a significant underestimate for the task at hand.” Dabiri's group is attaching tiny microcontrollers and batteries to living jellyfish, and then using the animals to explore the ocean. Jellyfish don't have a swim bladder, so they "can be found as deep as the Marianas Trench, at least 3,700 m below the ocean surface.” Each jellyfish is steered through the water using pulses of electricity. Jellyfish don’t have a central nervous system or pain receptors, so they probably don’t suffer. In the lab, they didn’t show any signs of stress or impaired feeding, reproduction, etc. The microcontroller and battery are placed in the center of its bell, with electrodes wired out toward its extremities. Each unit costs a few dollars, and takes "less than a few seconds per animal" to implant. Not saying this is necessarily ethical, but it is a remarkably clever way to improve the cost & coverage of ocean mapping (and maybe, soon, sequencing?) by orders of magnitude.

English
85
1.4K
6.7K
266.2K
steven hoffman retweetledi
Front Line Genomics
Front Line Genomics@FLGenomics·
In case you missed yesterday’s announcement, registration for The Festival of Genomics & Biodata is now open! You don’t want to miss out on the UK’s largest life sciences event, so make sure you get your ticket now. More info here: hubs.la/Q03MJnJr0 #FOG2026
Front Line Genomics tweet media
English
0
8
6
344
steven hoffman retweetledi
Niko McCarty.
Niko McCarty.@NikoMcCarty·
"Only ~0.02%-3.1% of [a cell's] genome" is being transcribed at any given moment. Other interesting takeaways from this new paper: > If you pool together a bunch of cells of the SAME type (like primary immune cells from a mouse's spleen), and you measure the transcription for each of them, you'll find that ~67% of the genome is active collectively. But at a SINGLE cell level, only like 0.04% of the genome is active. There is huge heterogeneity between cells, even of the same type. This heterogeneity disappears when we do bulk RNA-seq and measure cells together. > About 31% of a cell's transcription comes from known protein-coding genes. The rest of transcription happens in regions that don't make proteins. In other words, more "non-coding" DNA is transcribed than "coding" DNA. > There is a surprising disconnect between RNA production & decay at the single-cell level. If you look at thousands of cells together, the rate of RNA production (how fast genes are transcribed) usually matches the rate of RNA decay (how fast old transcripts are degraded). This makes sense, because cells presumably would want to keep a fairly steady balance of RNA levels. But when scFLUENT-seq was used to look at individual cells, this "rule" broke down! For a given mRNA, some cells were making a lot of new copies even if old copies weren’t being degraded much, while other cells had the opposite. So transcription and decay don't seem to be tightly matched within a single cell at a given time after all. The balance between production + decay is only true in bulk.
Niko McCarty. tweet mediaNiko McCarty. tweet media
English
16
187
941
158.7K
steven hoffman retweetledi
Eli Lilly and Company
Eli Lilly and Company@EliLillyandCo·
We’ve announced plans to open a new site in Houston, the second of 4 new locations coming to the U.S. The $6.5 billion facility will bring an expected 4,615 jobs and help boost domestic medicine manufacturing.
English
57
155
1K
775.9K
steven hoffman retweetledi
DrDemetre
DrDemetre@dr_demetre·
My resignation letter from CDC. Dear Dr. Houry, I am writing to formally resign from my position as Director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), effective August 28, 2025, close of business.   I am happy to stay on for two weeks to provide transition, if requested. This decision has not come easily, as I deeply value the work that the CDC does in safeguarding public health and am proud of my contributions to that critical mission. However, after much contemplation and reflection on recent developments and perspectives brought to light by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., I find that the views he and his staff have shared challenge my ability to continue in my current role at the agency and in the service of the health of the American people. Enough is enough. While I hold immense respect for the institution and my colleagues, I believe that it is imperative to align my professional responsibilities to my system of ethics and my understanding of the science of infectious disease, immunology, and my promise to serve the American people.  This step is necessary to ensure that I can contribute effectively in a capacity that allows me to remain true to my principles. I am unable to serve in an environment that treats CDC as a tool to generate policies and materials that do not reflect scientific reality and are designed to hurt rather than to improve the public’s health.  The recent change in the adult and children’s immunization schedule threaten the lives of the youngest Americans and pregnant people.   The data analyses that supported this decision have never been shared with CDC despite my respectful requests to HHS and other leadership.  This lack of meaningful engagement was further compounded by a “frequently asked questions” document written to support the Secretary’s directive that was circulated by HHS without input from CDC subject matter experts and that cited studies that did not support the conclusions that were attributed to these authors.  Having worked in local and national public health for years, I have never experienced such radical non-transparency, nor have I seen such unskilled manipulation of data to achieve a political end rather than the good of the American people. It is untenable to serve in an organization that is not afforded the opportunity to discuss decisions of scientific and public health importance released under the moniker of CDC.  The lack of communication by HHS and other CDC political leadership that culminates in social media posts announcing major policy changes without prior notice demonstrate a disregard of normal communication channels and common sense.  Having to retrofit analyses and policy actions to match inadequately thought-out announcements in poorly scripted videos or page long X posts should not be how organizations responsible for the health of people should function.  Some examples include the announcement of the change in the COVID-19 recommendations for children and pregnant people, the firing of scientists from ACIP by X post and an op-ed rather than direct communication with these valuable experts, the announcement of new ACIP members by X before onboarding and vetting have completed, and the release of term of reference for an ACIP workgroup that ignored all feedback from career staff at CDC. The recent term of reference for the COVID vaccine work group created by this ACIP puts people of dubious intent and more dubious scientific rigor in charge of recommending vaccine policy to a director hamstrung and sidelined by an authoritarian leader.   Their desire to please a political base will result in death and disability of vulnerable children and adults.  Their base should be the people they serve not a political voting bloc. I have always been first to challenge scientific and public health dogma in my career and was excited by the opportunity to do so again.  I was optimistic that there would be an opportunity to brief the Secretary about key topics such as measles, avian influenza, and the highly coordinated approach to the respiratory virus season.  Such briefings would allow exchange of ideas and a shared path to support the vision of “Making America Healthy Again.”  We are seven months into the new administration, and no CDC subject matter expert from my Center has ever briefed the Secretary.  I am not sure who the Secretary is listening to, but it is quite certainly not to us.  Unvetted and conflicted outside organizations seem to be the sources HHS use over the gold standard science of CDC and other reputable sources.  At a hearing, Secretary Kennedy said that Americans should not take medical advice from him.  To the contrary, an appropriately briefed and inquisitive Secretary should be a source of health information for the people he serves. As it stands now, I must agree with him, that he should not be considered a source of accurate information. The intentional eroding of trust in low-risk vaccines favoring natural infection and unproven remedies will bring us to a pre-vaccine era where only the strong will survive and many if not all will suffer.  I believe in nutrition and exercise.  I believe in making our food supply healthier, and I also believe in using vaccines to prevent death and disability.  Eugenics plays prominently in the rhetoric being generated and is derivative of a legacy that good medicine and science should continue to shun. The recent shooting at CDC is not why I am resigning.  My grandfather, who I am named after, stood up to fascist forces in Greece and lost his life doing so.  I am resigning to make him and his legacy proud.   I am resigning because of the cowardice of a leader that cannot admit that HIS and his minions’ words over decades created an environment where violence like this can occur.  I reject his and his colleagues’ thoughts and prayers, and advise they direct those to people that they have not actively harmed. For decades, I have been a trusted voice for the LGBTQ community when it comes to critical health topics.  I must also cite the recklessness of the administration in their efforts to erase transgender populations, cease critical domestic and international HIV programming, and terminate key research to support equity as part of my decision. Public health is not merely about the health of the individual, but it is about the health of the community, the nation, the world. The nation’s health security is at risk and is in the hands of people focusing on ideological self-interest. I want to express my heartfelt gratitude for the opportunities for growth, learning, and collaboration that I have been afforded during my time at the CDC. It has been a privilege to work alongside such dedicated professionals who are committed to improving the health and well-being of communities across the nation even when under attack from within both physically and psychologically. Thank you once again for the support and guidance I have received from you and previous CDC leadership throughout my tenure. I wish the CDC continued success in its vital mission and that HHS reverse its dangerous course to dismantle public health as a practice and as an institution.  If they continue the current path, they risk our personal well-being and the security of the United States. Sincerely, Demetre C. Daskalakis MD MPH (he/his/him)
English
22.1K
15.5K
55.5K
19.8M
steven hoffman retweetledi
Hani Goodarzi
Hani Goodarzi@genophoria·
We put a blog post together to tell you about all that went behind the scenes for @arcinstitute's Virtual Cell Challenge: (1) the modality used for genetic perturbations, (2) choice of single cell RNA seq chemistry, (3) which cell line to use for the challenge, (4) which genes to perturb, (5) the quality considerations for the resulting dataset, and (6) how we defined performance metrics for perturbation predictions.
Hani Goodarzi tweet media
English
10
33
182
26.6K
steven hoffman retweetledi
Marios Georgakis
Marios Georgakis@MariosGeorgakis·
Most people know that ALS is a deadly disease. But most don't know that an ALS diagnosis is often missed at early disease stages due to lack of specific biomarkers. Now, a plasma proteomic signature of 33 proteins (based on Olink Explore) achieved discrimination of >95%!
Marios Georgakis tweet media
English
7
22
125
9.8K
steven hoffman retweetledi
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
Mackinac Island in Northern Michigan, where cars are banned and Amazon delivers by horse.
English
152
612
5.8K
2.4M