RealityMatters

@chrislittlewoo8 I'm pinning this one. Thank you Chris.

Free to read. Recommend reading the whole article. 'The Islamists are winning' 'Two decades later, it’s becoming ever clearer that the terrorists are indeed winning, that we are indeed intimidated, and that they have indeed succeeded in changing our country and our way of life. And if anyone doubts it, let me point out that we are about to pass the fifth anniversary of one of the most contemptible episodes in modern British history: the driving from public life of the Batley schoolteacher.' telegraph.co.uk/gift/0e64ebc6c…

Actions, my friend, speak louder than words - and the Muslim congregation is repleat with willing malevolent actors, other religions - not so much. If someone yells "Praise Jesus", I have no fear, if someone yells "Allahu Akbar" then I cower in fear. You cannot wish the risk away.

@seledka_vodka Meanwhile the bible says

Excellent article. Here are a few builds. First, it must be pointed out that Islam - not some extreme variant, but bog-standard orthodox Islam as preached and practised in Britain - rejects any notion of integration or ideological compromise with other religions or cultural norms that contradict its edicts. The doctrine of al-wala' wal-bara' commands loyalty to the faith and disavowal of non-Muslim ways. The Prophet's own hadith warns that "whoever imitates a people is one of them." Muslims are expected to reject man-made structures and "innovation," and to accept the barbarities of the Quran and the Hadith as divinely sanctioned prescriptions for how life must be lived. No radical fringe is required to reach these conclusions. The mainstream canon gets you there on its own. Second, when Muslims form a majority in a territory, they are divinely instructed to impose Islamic rule on everyone. If you belong to the "people of the book" - another Abrahamic faith - you may be permitted to live, provided you pay a poll tax (jizya) to the Muslim rulers in a state of, as the Quran specifies, humiliation. Ibn Kathir's commentary on this verse is unambiguous: the jizya exists to demonstrate the subjugation of non-Muslims to Islamic authority. If you are a Hindu, Islam considers you a pagan, and even under the most lenient schools of jurisprudence, your status under Islamic rule is one of codified subjugation - discriminatory taxation, legal inequality, prohibition on building temples, inability to testify against a Muslim in court, and periodic persecution. The "tolerant" version of Islam is tolerance in the sense of "we will permit you to exist under conditions we dictate," not tolerance in the sense of equal standing before the law. As for leaving Islam, the Prophet's instruction is plain: "whoever changes his religion, kill him." All four Sunni schools of jurisprudence agree. Abu Bakr's wars against apostates were fought within a year of the Prophet's death. The only reason we are not all living under these arrangements is that Muslims are - for now - a minority in Britain. Third, public Islamic prayer is, as Nick says, political - and has been since the Prophet's time. Islam does not recognise a distinction between religious and political life. The Friday sermon was historically the platform from which caliphs proclaimed authority and issued edicts. The call to prayer is prescribed to be heard by the community. The separation of church and state is a uniquely Reformation-driven Western achievement, and Islam explicitly repudiates it. Communal public prayer in a non-Muslim land is therefore an assertion of presence, of dominance, and of rejection of the norms of the host nation - whether every individual participant intends it as such or not. Fourth, we owe precisely zero explanations for why we resent this. Zero. We do not have to be rational about it. We do not have to draw comparisons with other religions. Any explanation we give is the right one, because it is our land, and we govern it as we see fit. But I will give you my reasons. While I am an atheist and regard all religion as a collection of mostly rubbish - and religious belief as a species of derangement - Britain's culture and values have been steeped in Christianity. This includes our laws, which are inseparable from our culture. We may not be as Christian as we were fifty years ago, but anyone born in this country who was not shielded from it (as a great many Muslims are, thanks to their parents) will have absorbed some of Christianity's gifts into their cultural DNA. Islam is the antithesis of all of this. Its canonical texts prescribe the striking of disobedient wives, value a woman's testimony at half a man's, mandate amputation for theft, flogging for fornication, and stoning for adultery. Its most authenticated hadith collections contain explicit antisemitism - including a prophecy that Muslims will hunt and kill Jews at the end of times, with even the stones and trees calling out to betray those in hiding. It is violently hostile to other faiths, to non-belief, and to apostasy. It rejects secular democratic rule as a matter of doctrine. It has resisted reformation for fourteen centuries. And it has produced decades of relentless terrorism - against us and, by an even greater margin, against fellow Muslims. From the Algerian civil war to the sectarian slaughter in Iraq, from Boko Haram to the Taliban, from the Peshawar school massacre to the Manchester Arena bombing, the body count is staggering, and the majority of the dead are Muslim. The violence is structural. It is doctrinal. Western foreign policy did not create it. Islam is foreign to us. It is completely and utterly repulsive as an ideology. And the reason I happen to have Muslim friends, and have got on exceptionally well with Muslim colleagues, is that they were never hugely religious.

Today, the Islamic Republic hanged multiple Iranian civilians, some of whom were just teenagers. Amnesty International? Silent. The UN? Silent. Human Rights Council? Silent. The Red Cross? Silent.

What a manipulator he is. He’s defending angrily and in an emotionally manipulative fashion because he was caught out encouraging a display of religious dominance he didn’t think people not devoted to Islam still had the will/bravery to object to. He thought the “Islamophobia” slur was well-entrenched and sufficiently silencing. He is going over the top with excuses because he was wrong. No one criticised the right to practise any faith. They criticised the taking over of a large public space (at your encouragement/bragging) Mayor Khan to perform a prayer which in its very nature is in favour of the expansionist aim of devotion to Islam. It also makes statement that other religions and those of no religion are lesser citizens. It is not “inclusive” and a big friendly bunny rabbit version of a display. It excluded women. This is unacceptable in such a space and using such a prayer and in the presence of women of the city who do not adhere to such overt sex-segregationist practise. Lots of men who are gathered together in a public space and excluding women deliberately is ENOUGH for women to object. I do. Now piss off asserting you are discussing “British Values” because British Values don’t exclude women from public spaces.

This is what a 34 week old baby looks like outside the womb. The UK just voted in favor of killing an unborn child at this age. For no reason, just because someone wants to. They call it “reproductive rights” because they refuse to call it what it is: murder.

If you want to see a town being invaded watch this clip. This was filmed today, a warm spring day and the town is full of illegal unvetted men. Our team went out and documented what was happening, we spoke to women who were scared and men who have had enough. Well over 100 bussed into Braintree today, big video coming tonight from @bb_media_uk Join us this Saturday for our protest in Braintree town 11-1pm BRAINTREE SAYS NO.

Stella's missing the point. Nick Timothy isn't criticising Islam's claim of there being only one God (the same one as in the other Abrahamic religions), but of Islam's rejection (expressed in the prayer, the Adhan) of the validity of any other, but especially those, religions.

What an evil woman you are. Christianity does not teach paedophilia, nor endorse it. Christianity does not say "kill every infidel unbeliever" and take their daughters as sex slaves. Christianity does not say women are cattle just for breeding. You are a traitor to this nation!

How is the Batley teacher?

The Government will collect £331bn in income tax this year, and spend £333bn on welfare. In other words, we now spend more on people not working than we raise from those who do. And the cost? Debt per person has risen from £11.5k in 2000 (inflation adjusted) to over £41k today.

Starmer: the new definition of anti-Muslim hostility will not restrict the right to criticise Islam. Also Starmer:

You don’t need a Muslim majority in order for Islam to dominate policy. All you need is key Muslims in official roles placed strategically around a country to influence local laws. Once the local laws all around a country favor Muslim culture then add to that the influence of the Muslim electorate on highly corruptible non-Muslim politicians and the result is a de facto Muslim government. That’s what we’re seeing in the UK with Muslim city councils, council leaders, and mayors who possess executive power and it’s exactly the plan they want to replicate in America. That’s what the men in this video are talking about. They’re openly telling us how they plan to take over Christian countries.

The muslim speaker says it: it's a take over - a dishonest deliberate colonisation. I do not want to live in an Islamic country or anything closely resembling one. We must stop Islam's pernicious invasion of the West. We must be able to call it out. More than ever we need bravery in power.

@NJ_Timothy x.com/RealDonKeith/s…

This Labour MP wants me investigated and silenced. He makes my case for me. Labour’s rebranded “Islamophobia” definition is designed to censor us. So Mr Khan, here’s my reply: Get lost.

@NJ_Timothy @sirwg202110 As a British Jew, please show me any time that Jews have openly prayed in public during Yom Kippur or Rosh Hashanah. You won’t be able to, because we understand that’s what synagogues are for.

@NJ_Timothy @AllyPally519008 Well said Nick! Those Muslims should have been meeting in a mosque or in a stadium. Where were the women? It was an act of power and dominance by the medieval Muslim religion. Disgraceful!

@NJ_Timothy @MInthenow70635 Labour: "Free speech is not under attack " Also Labour: "Sack Nick for what he said."

The constant whining and accusations from Muslims is ridiculous. They are hypersensitive to any opinion, any comment about their behaviour. The idea that not appreciating a passive agressive power gathering in Trafalgar Sq led by KHAN who made it a snub to Trump as well, is Islamaphobic? Who do they think they are? Time they grew up. We need ro ignore all this attention seeking. You are correct. Get lost. We are bored. We are not interested in Islam. They cant understand that. We don't care about the ideology of Islam. Take it back to the Mosque.