Liam

I was living in hopeful delusion that the U.S. entered this war with intent of weakening not just Iran's nuclear capabilities but indirectly weakens Israel's power. All while stealing Iran's commodities. Not that I was hopeful for any of this, it was more so how could they do what would be best for the long-term interest of the U.S. if they were to stay in this mess.

Why is the US at war with Iran? I cannot wait to see the comments here, just don't be hateful and get blocked

I wonder what is your stance on their birth rate crises and working age demographic shrinking rapidly? I understand they are automating like crazy and doing a great job at replacing workers with AI, but do you think that they will be able to replace fast enough to continue their rise toward the new leading world power without an interruption that could completely de-rail them?

We’ve moved from the “denial” to “anger” stage of grief on China. Earlier in my career, as I watched China de-industrialize the US, I was told my warnings of China eventually outcompeting the US were “dumb” (a major hedge fund PM literally told me this) = Denial. Now that it is obvious, I’m called a “China shill” = Anger. Bargaining, Depression, and Acceptance stages yet to come. #FourthTurning

@daniel_koss We are not on the spectrum… we are the spectrum!!

Pure beauty. If this visual doesn’t arouse you mentally, spiritually, and sexually, you might not be autistic enough to make it as an AI infrastructure investor. Or you simply don’t own enough $NBIS.

@AverageCouchInv @larojima @NoLimitGains agreed.

@i_am_liam @larojima @NoLimitGains He was down 35% MTDwith 1.4 leverage. Probably still up hugely YTD. Also, Nolimit's post mathematically makes no sense - you'll be generally be hugely down in a long term position if you absorb a short term drawdown. Nolimit is doing what he does best - attention farming.

Real investors do not lose 49% in a month. I will say it again. Real investors do not lose 49% in a month. Gamblers do.

@SelfRelianceOS @NoLimitGains @garyvee I was originally going to just let it be for the very reason @NoLimitGains wants the engagement. But slandering someone is never okay. Especially when they have actually made an enormous positive impact on youth, and continue to do so.

@i_am_liam @NoLimitGains @garyvee All this projecting their own nonsense arguments onto someone popular for engagement is dumb AF.

This is the most damaging advice you can give a young person. They read it, decide they have time, and do nothing for a decade. That decade of nothing costs more than the next three combined.

@ddddjust8888 @NoLimitGains What point are you trying to make? I was not defending the users portfolio, I was pointing toward the statement tha was made regarding great investors.

@i_am_liam @NoLimitGains 你这是扯淡，他是总损益表-49.4%。而不是单只DCA，相当于已经失败了。

@grok69_o @NoLimitGains I’m not defending the person @NoLimitGains included in his post. I’m denying the statement that was made about great investors.

@i_am_liam @NoLimitGains Nah homie quit dancing on it. Dude is straight up gambling with absolutely no diversification or downside protection. He’s chasing 1000% monthly returns and destroying retarded retail investors who follow him

@larojima @NoLimitGains I would like to add that yes -49% would be extremely rare, but not impossible especially with major macro-events taking place, affecting markets in a way we have not seen since 2008. Just wanted to be sure I am not insinuating they would be down 49% in a stable bull market.

That is simply not true. The S&P500 is being held up by the top-10 biggest companies, many don't realize how concentrated it really is. Great investors don't just invest in the biggest companies, they have openly invested in small-caps with great potential. That is where 10x+ returns are delivered. Majority of these are down.

@Coachjv_ I like to think of it like this: it won’t be a 1-player based system, it will an ecosystem of great players

The XRP Army needs to slow down and think logically. Swift’s new blockchain-based ledger does not kill XRP. It validates the entire thesis behind XRP and blockchain-based settlement. swift announced that its blockchain-based shared ledger is ready for initial use, with major banks preparing to pilot 24/7 tokenized cross-border payments. The banks listed include ANZ, BNP Paribas, BNY, Citi, DBS, HSBC, Lloyds, MUFG, Standard Chartered, UOB, Wells Fargo, and others. The purpose is to improve liquidity efficiency, cash flow visibility, and tokenized money movement across borders. That is not bearish for XRP. That is the traditional financial system admitting the current rails are not built for a 24/7 tokenized world. but here is the important distinction: Swift’s ledger appears to be an orchestration layer for bank-issued tokenized deposits. Swift has said the ledger helps banks coordinate payment commitments, validate workflows, and move tokenized deposits, while final settlement can still happen through RTGS systems, correspondent banking relationships, or other agreed settlement mechanisms. That means Swift may help banks message, coordinate, and validate transactions faster. But it does not automatically solve the global liquidity problem. The real question is not, “Can Swift build a blockchain ledger?” The real question is: What becomes the neutral bridge asset between fragmented tokenized deposits, stablecoins, CBDCs, commercial bank ledgers, private blockchains, public blockchains, and currencies across hundreds of jurisdictions? That is where XRP still has a massive role. Swift itself has acknowledged that the industry needs interoperability across existing and emerging systems, including private and public networks. Swift also said the types of tokens exchanged on the ledger are the territory of commercial and central banks, not Swift alone. That matters because the future is not one ledger. The future is many ledgers. Every bank will not use the same token. Every country will not use the same CBDC. Every institution will not trust one private bank’s deposit token. Every corridor will not have deep liquidity on day one. That creates fragmentation. Fragmentation creates the need for bridges. Bridges require neutral liquidity. XRP was designed for that exact problem. Ripple’s payment model uses XRP as a bridge asset to move value across borders without requiring institutions to pre-fund accounts in every destination market. Ripple describes this as a way to improve speed, cost, reliability, and liquidity for cross-border payments. The XRP Ledger is also not just a “crypto speculation chain.” It has been built around payments, tokenization, stablecoin movement, cross-border remittance, B2B payment rails, and merchant settlement. XRPL documentation describes the payments suite as supporting stablecoin payments, cross-border remittance, B2B rails, and merchant settlement. So the real narrative is simple: Swift is modernizing the old banking system. Ripple and XRP are building liquidity infrastructure for the new tokenized system. Those are not automatically the same thing, and they are not automatically enemies. Swift can provide trusted connectivity, standards, messaging, and orchestration for banks. XRP can still serve as a neutral bridge asset where liquidity, interoperability, settlement speed, and cross-ledger movement matter. The panic comes from thinking there will be one winner. That is not how global finance works. The future will likely include Swift, tokenized deposits, stablecoins, CBDCs, private bank ledgers, public blockchains, and neutral bridge assets. The larger the tokenized financial system becomes, the more important interoperability and liquidity become. And that is the XRP thesis. Not that every bank must use XRP for every payment. The stronger thesis is that as the world moves to tokenized money, 24/7 settlement, programmable finance, and cross-border digital value, the need for neutral liquidity rails increases dramatically. Swift’s announcement does not disprove XRP. It proves the world is moving in XRP’s direction. Warriors rise!

@glocalinvestor @daniel_koss Exactly why the research is so important; great research leads to a great thesis which should lead to high conviction in your trades.

@i_am_liam @daniel_koss It’s impossible to time the market 😅

🚨New Burry Trade alert : $MSFT leaps Hope its going to be a $PLTR and not $ADBE or $PYPL

@daniel_koss @glocalinvestor I could see a deeper pullback or at least back to $350 as we get closer to October, at that point I would probably enter something similar if I still see fit. If not a similar position, maybe a 4 month with a strike of somewhere around 400 could be a lil dinger.

@glocalinvestor That is SO WEIRD becuase it requires enterprise AI ROI to be good to work out. In other words it's bullish AI. I hope so. At the same time, isn't it a top signal if the biggest bear turns bullish?

How much you want to bet he bought $GME during the short squeeze in 2021, held through the ATH and ended up selling at $12 for a near 50% loss. When asked why he held onto his shares, he most likely told people he was “fucking the whales” when in reality he has not a damn clue on how to invest and just follows whatever he reads online?

Wait, RJC who wanted to sell $NBIS at $125 is calling me a retard for selling at $284? @RJCcapital, I hope you aren’t mad because I blocked you. I do think you make some funny posts. And congrats on getting into $SNDK early! You did want to sell all your $NBIS shares on October 15, 2025 and go all-in on $FLNC, though. Since then: $NBIS: +120% $FLNC: +10% And if you had read past the headline, you’d know my $284 sale is just a short-term trade, and I reiterated a $500 to $700 price target for end of 2027 in the same post. I've traded Nebius many times and overall outperformed just holding by a wide margin. But yeah, some trades don't work out, maybe you're new to this. In October you asked me via DM: “Doesn’t Nebius have 1/10th the power of IREN?” And you said you thought CoreWeave had more upside than Nebius. You also told me you're uncertain if Nebius has a moat at all. It's weird that you now act like you're the one who always had high conviction in public, but the DMs you sent me tell a different story. P.S. If your YTD is ~160% and I’m at ~340%, does that mean you have less than half the performance of a retard? 🤔

@NVIDIAGeForce #RTXPowersPlay

To celebrate #SummerGameFest... We have a GeForce RTX 5090 up for grabs👀 Want it? Comment #RTXPowersPlay to enter.

@daniel_koss Sold but my conviction hasn’t changed, been DCA as it drops.

I sold all my bitcoin:native at $116.7k on 8/8/2025 Seems like I pretty much sold at the top. Was ultra bullish on bitcoin:native for years and was actually convinced it would hit $200k+ that year. What made me change my mind was the simple idea that a majority of Bitcoin investors would sell their Bitcoin to go all-in on AI. I can't prove it, but I feel like that's exactly what happened. I assume many of you are also former big time Bitcoin bulls. If you sold Bitcoin, what did you buy? Let me guess... AI stocks?

@NVIDIAGeForce #RTXOn blessed to have a 5080

Over 1,000 RTX games and apps are available now with ray tracing and DLSS. To celebrate, we're dropping Steam cash in the replies to upgrade your library with a #RTXOn title... Comment #RTXOn to enter 💸