Igor Soarez

Didn't like the answer? Just keep prompting. Sad reality: sycophancy isn't a marketing play, it's the feature you want even if you say otherwise. We may get less polarized but increasingly delusional.

@davicorn @Fastmail Thanks for sharing. What’s the lifetime on that cookie? Defeats the point of automation if every/most time I use it I end up having to open the browser and click around to extract credentials. Not to mention the reliance on private (i.e. unstable) APIs here.

@Fastmail @igorsoarez I just vibecoded a CLI to do this the other day. Using it with Claude/Codex to manage my sieve rules for me A bit rough around the edges because it needs a sudo token to write sieve rules, but hey it works github.com/dvcrn/fastmail…

Dear @Fastmail , when can we get support for programmatic management of Sieve rules?

@igorsoarez Hello Igor! Thanks for reaching out. A feature request has been filed for this on your behalf. Feel free to let us know if you have any additional comments you'd like to add on to the request.

@louismosley @_BoldPolitics @ZackPolanski Thanks for sharing. Best case I’ve read so far for voting Green

@ZackPolanski - this is magnificent. Three things I can’t deny: 1. It is a video. 2. You are wearing a jacket. 3. Then you aren’t. 4. Then you are again. Unfortunately that’s where the accuracy ends. A few corrections for you: Peter Thiel is not our CEO. Alex Karp is — and has been for 20+ years. (A lifelong Democrat, for anyone keeping score.) We are not a “spyware company.” Spyware is malware. Malware is illegal. Calling a software company spyware is, technically, defamatory (don’t worry, we are not suing). We don’t build surveillance technology. We build software that helps organisations make sense of data they already hold. Not the same thing. There was no “private tour” of our HQ. There was a public photocall to which the media came. Hence, why there are so many pictures of the event. Our MOD contract is not “the biggest defence contract in UK history.” Ajax armoured vehicles = £5.5bn. Dreadnought submarines = £31bn. We’re grateful for the work, but let’s keep a sense of scale. We have no more access to NHS data than Microsoft has to the contents of your Word documents. I think you know this by now. We don’t have access to patient medical records. Same story. I agree that “nothing matters more than our health.” Which makes it worth reminding you of what Palantir’s software is actually doing in the NHS right now: ->110,000 additional operations ->15% fewer delayed hospital discharges ->7% more patients finding out within 28 days whether they have cancer Respect again for what you did with that jacket.

Time to take the fight to Palantir.

old: closing browser tabs new: throwing away agent context

@cpinto I still remember when Uber drivers in Lisbon all wore suits and opened your door

@cpinto Inference is set to be the biggest rug pull in history

if true, isn’t this illegal? Surely worthy of a class action suit

@levelsio @X America is on a downward spiral. Europe needs its own X, friendly to international content

My worst fear is @X will start to lock our content to the countries we are staying in There was that announcement revenue sharing would be tied to your own country's views more As a person that's lived all over the world, my content was always for a global audience and there's just no logic locking that to for ex Portugal where I live or Brazil and Thailand where I travel (and everywhere else) I want to talk to everyone around the world! 🌎 🌍 🌏

@fchollet @Pokee_AI Shouldn’t this post be disclosed?

OpenClaw has proven that local AI assistants have product-market fit. But the big issue with them has been security. The team at @Pokee_AI is fixing it with PokeeClaw: works like OpenClaw, but with in a secure sandbox architecture with isolated environments, approval workflows, role-based access control, and audit trails built in. Also lower token usage, which is always nice.

@pgte @GraphyHQ Congratulations Pedro! 🚀

Personal news: I just joined @GraphyHQ as a Software Engineer! 🎉 Super excited to get to work with the team.

@jasager029 @Barthazian What was the proprietary chain on those 7 million pirated books they downloaded?

@Barthazian They use proprietary data science chains. The data is not what's being stolen through the distillation process, it's those chains that are.

We’ve identified industrial-scale distillation attacks on our models by DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax. These labs created over 24,000 fraudulent accounts and generated over 16 million exchanges with Claude, extracting its capabilities to train and improve their own models.

@kshaughnessy2 @DarioCpx The mistake: Shorting silver in the current outlook

@DarioCpx “.. but they simply don’t want to pay the price for their mistakes…” Mistakes??

CME silver futures resume trading in ~10hours when stars and planets are all perfectly aligned for something “unthinkable” brewing in the silver market 🚩 More than 26,800 Mar26 futures OI have to be shredded before Thursday 6pm EST, otherwise there won’t be enough silver left at the Comex to clear all Mar26 settlements (assuming 100% of the contracts receiving delivery notices continue to be physically settled) that begin on Friday 27th. Keeping the status quo till Friday and expect the Comex to pull out a rabbit from its hat, or even worse declare “force majeure”, to avoid a stream of settlement failures isn’t realistic. Any action of that sort will be outright in favour of the naked shorts (hence making the exchange the immediate target of lawsuits) that in this case do have the possibility to close their positions without causing settlement chaos at the Comex, but they simply don’t want to pay the price for their mistakes. ⚠️ Scenario 1 The trend observed so far of buyers standing for physical settlements 2x to 4x higher than the previous years doesn’t replicate in March. However assuming the same amount of physical settlements of Mar25 reoccur, ~80m oz Mar26 will settle and only ~88m oz Registered are so far left at the Comex (likely this amount will continue dropping next week ahead of the 27th). How do you think the price will react with virtually no Registered silver left at the Comex after Mar26 settled and already ~50k futures OI for May26? ⚠️ Scenario 2 Mar26 holders stand for a larger physical settlement amount than Mar25. Unless the Comex can summon in its vaults a large amount of physical in just 4 days, regular settlements will fail. Similar to October and November, it cannot be excluded that the bullion banks manage to cut OTC deals to delay the physical delivery in the future. However, not only that won’t solve the problem to still source the physical silver in the future, but will create even more supply scarcity. How do you think the price will react? ⚠️ Scenario 3 On Tuesday China demand will be back online, hence the pressure on the silver price will resume. Liquidity is already razor thin and in this kind of situation the scenario that bullion banks can start turning on eachother shouldn’t be ignored. What does this mean? That one bank decides to break the ranks, be the first to start covering its shorts and at least be assured that will limit its losses. This will push up the price and increase the pressure on the others dragging their feet with the risk that margin calls are triggered. What would you do in their situation in that case? Pledge more collateral or pull the plug? The domino effect in this scenario is pretty intuitive, I already warned about a potential “2022 Nickel” or even “2008 VW” scenarios before; so no need to provide further details. Is there a scenario where the price of silver can go down on Monday? Sure, if more naked shorts are opened and/or illegal techniques like spoofing or wash trading are deployed again. However there is no doubt anymore about demand for physical, with the consequent drain on exchanges vaults, rising with lower prices, not the opposite. Why? Because demand is structural, rising and much less price sensitive due to industrial demand for the physical commodity. If the price is slammed hard again on Monday, the problems in the paper market will compound as we saw after the events of Jan 30th because this time price suppression shenanigans have no impact to the silver fundamentals anymore. I hope this whole explanation helps to understand why I haven’t been shy to keep posting the chart below even without considering the potential impact on silver price from other exogenous events like, for example, the official beginning all of a sudden of an armed conflict between the US and Iran or the US supreme court declaring the special US tariffs illegal ultimately leading to higher debt and QE in the long run.

@grok @fs_tech_ @JesseCohenInv What did @chamath say about Burry in @theallinpod ?

@fs_tech_ @JesseCohenInv Yes, approximately. Burry's fund disclosed ~$912M short on PLTR (part of ~$1.1B total AI bets) in early Nov 2025. PLTR closed at $207.18 on Nov 3, 2025, and $135.68 today (Feb 11, 2026), down ~34.5%.

🚨 Palantir $PLTR is now down -35% since Michael Burry entered his $1B short

@LMontenegro_PT @NATO Primeiro labrego

Em conjunto com os seus parceiros europeus Portugal subscreve a seguinte declaração sobre a Gronelândia: A segurança no Ártico continua a ser uma prioridade fundamental para a Europa e é crucial para a segurança internacional e transatlântica. A @NATO deixou claro que a região do Ártico é uma prioridade, e os Aliados europeus estão a reforçar a sua presença, atividades e investimentos para manter a segurança do Ártico e dissuadir adversários. O Reino da Dinamarca – incluindo a Gronelândia – faz parte da NATO. A segurança no Ártico deve, portanto, ser alcançada de forma coletiva, em articulação com os aliados da NATO, incluindo os Estados Unidos, respeitando os princípios da Carta das Nações Unidas, nomeadamente a soberania, a integridade territorial e a inviolabilidade das fronteiras. Estes são princípios universais e não deixaremos de os defender. Os Estados Unidos são um parceiro essencial neste esforço, enquanto aliado da NATO e através do acordo de defesa entre o Reino da Dinamarca e os Estados Unidos de 1951. A Gronelândia pertence ao seu povo. Cabe à Dinamarca e à Gronelândia, e apenas a elas, decidir sobre questões relativas à Dinamarca e à Gronelândia.

for years, industry reports have shown that brands spend billions of dollars annually on creator marketing. yet despite this massive investment, the creator ecosystem remains flooded with fake engagement, bot followers, recycled narratives, and shill-heavy accounts. at the same time, real creators also struggle to get discovered by the brands that actually fit their content and community. deals often go to whoever looks loudest and not who truly moves people. this broken system has persisted for years, quietly draining time, energy, and resources from both sides. @mad__app is built to solve this permanently not with more noise, but with structure, data, and accountability. stay with me 🧵↡

MAD is a creator-first platform built for people who take their content seriously. If you’re a creator you should hop on @mad__app now that its early It's Day 5 of 365 Still locked in

𝐖𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬 𝐛𝐲 𝐟𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐬, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐧𝐨 𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐞. That imbalance is the problem. Creators show up every day. Brands spend budgets every month. Yet trust keeps thinning, payouts feel random, and influence has started to sound hollow. Posts go live, and numbers go up. But no one can clearly say what mattered, who it worked for, or why it worked at all. 𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐠𝐚𝐩 𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐌𝐀𝐃 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐛𝐨𝐫𝐧. {@mad__app} starts from a different question: What if creator value was built on meaning, trust, and data, not algorithms you can’t see? In building {@mad__app}, three patterns kept appearing at the same time: ⪼ Brands couldn’t tell who actually influenced people versus who just looked big. ⪼ Creators were doing real work, but getting paid inconsistently, late, or not at all. ⪼ Audiences stopped trusting promotions they could spot from a mile away. On a podcast with {@miaferrariii}, {@ysiu} summed it up simply: YouTube takes forever. Traditional platforms reward patience, not leverage. But in finance and crypto, value moves 24/7. Assets work while you sleep. MAD applies that same thinking to creators. At it's core, {@mad__app} is a creator–brand intelligence platform. It connects creators and marketers through data you can verify, not metrics you have to believe. 𝐎𝐧 𝐌𝐀𝐃, 𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐜𝐚𝐧: ⪼ Register and verify their profiles ⪼ Join relevant brand campaigns ⪼ Track payments and engagement data ⪼ See performance analytics in real time And creators don’t join MAD by filling endless forms or begging for deals. {@mad__app} leverages real-time public engagement data, data that's more transparent than what most social platforms offer. It’s not just how many people saw the content. It’s who engaged, how they engaged, and whether it actually mattered. For me, 𝐌𝐀𝐃 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞: ⪼ 𝐌 ~ 𝐌𝐞𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐟𝐮𝐥 Because influence isn’t about reach alone. It’s about whether people actually care, click, respond, and remember. ⪼ 𝐀 ~ 𝐀𝐮𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐜 Because trust can’t be faked forever. Audiences feel when content is real, and when it’s just another paid line. ⪼ 𝐃 ~ 𝐃𝐚𝐭𝐚-𝐝𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐧 Because creators deserve proof, not promises. And brands deserve clarity, not hope. 𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐌𝐀𝐃 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐞𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐞𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐭𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐟 ⪼ 𝐒𝐭𝐞𝐩 𝟏: 𝐁𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐨𝐚𝐥 Awareness, engagement, conversions. ⪼ 𝐒𝐭𝐞𝐩 𝟐: 𝐂𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 MAD’s intelligence engine scans its network of verified creators on X and matches campaigns based on niche relevance, audience quality, and past performance. ⪼ 𝐒𝐭𝐞𝐩 𝟑: 𝐂𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐩𝐫𝐞-𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐤 Creators can submit content for pre-check before posting. Brands get safety, and creators keep their voice. ⪼ 𝐒𝐭𝐞𝐩 𝟒: 𝐏𝐚𝐲𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐲𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐬 Once content is live and verified, creators get paid. Brands see real performance data. MAD provides the 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐫𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐥𝐮𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐥𝐮𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐬. If you believe creator value should be earned, visible, and fairly rewarded. Then explore {@mad__app}, build with meaning, and get rewarded. {Check comment section for the link}

Someone explain to me the logic behind rate limiting ACCEPTING dm requests. I'd like to understand this so I can say thanks to big brains (heads?) keeping us safe from all the bots and spammers savagely accepting dm requests en mass. I can't even fathom the consequences. 🙄

@AptosSlade make sure you use the same google account for the tester user group and for the play store

@igorsoarez Same issue, item can't be found

first (and short) year of MAD in the books. quick recap 👇