Nancy Lee

498 posts

Nancy Lee

Nancy Lee

@imrtlee

Vice Chair, Member, Mskcc Director of Head and Neck Cancer; Director of proton therapy

New York, NY Katılım Ekim 2016
390 Takip Edilen2.9K Takipçiler
Nancy Lee retweetledi
nature
nature@Nature·
Researchers have published the recipe for an artificial-intelligence model that reviews the scientific literature better than some major LLMs are able to, and gets the citations correct as often as human experts do go.nature.com/4r3fiEC
English
8
79
243
25.8K
Nancy Lee retweetledi
Nature Rev Immunol
Nature Rev Immunol@NatRevImmunol·
RNA-binding proteins and ribonucleoproteins as determinants of immunity dlvr.it/TQMKKq
Català
0
46
182
10.5K
Nancy Lee retweetledi
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery@NatRevDrugDisc·
RNA modification systems as therapeutic targets nature.com/articles/s4157… rdcu.be/eZdRG This Review in the January issue discusses the disease associations of proteins that regulate RNA modifications and advances in the development of therapeutic inhibitors
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery tweet media
English
2
29
111
8K
Nancy Lee retweetledi
Cancer Cell
Cancer Cell@Cancer_Cell·
Decoding the spatial dynamics of tumor and immune cell interactions in solid cancers dlvr.it/TQN5M3
Cancer Cell tweet media
English
0
54
208
13.3K
Nancy Lee retweetledi
Nancy Lee retweetledi
Steven Salzberg 💙💛
Steven Salzberg 💙💛@StevenSalzberg1·
@DavidSherMD I'm deeply skeptical that any of the microbes were really in the tumors, with the exception of HPV. The sequencing techniques (RNA-seq and exome) shouldn't have captured bacteria at all, so I suspect it's just contamination. Sorry to see Nature publishing this stuff
English
1
2
25
2K
Nancy Lee retweetledi
Steven Salzberg 💙💛
Steven Salzberg 💙💛@StevenSalzberg1·
@DavidSherMD modifying this comment: these were throat-related tumors, so it's quite plausible that oral microbes were found on the tumors. A more difficult question is whether they were just transitory or were actually growing in/on the tumors
English
0
1
2
593
Nancy Lee retweetledi
David Sher
David Sher@DavidSherMD·
Both of these papers are a must-read. Well-written (so even non-scientists like myself can follow reasonably well), clear scientific method, and remarkable results. Bottom-line: high tumor bacterial burden (TBB) is strongly related to response to immune checkpoint blockade, with similar/complementary results in different trials and datasets. Higher TBB seems to drive a neutrophil/myeloid-heavy microenvironment that is immunosuppressive. The field has long posited that elective nodal irradiation and RT in general have been the key immune suppressors in non-metastatic trials, but these data are very compelling that the tumor microbiome is the (or one of the) critical drivers of response (as an example, check out the survival curves below). Amazing work. Bravo! (1/2)
David Sher tweet mediaDavid Sher tweet media
Anirban Maitra@Aiims1742

Two papers in @NatureCancer highlighting the role of intratumoral bacteria & associated immune architecture (e.g., neutrophil influx) in mediating resistance to immunotherapy in head & neck cancer. nature.com/articles/s4301… nature.com/articles/s4301… @GeneCollector @xrtGenomics

English
7
18
89
19.6K
Nancy Lee retweetledi
David Sher
David Sher@DavidSherMD·
Totally agree. There wasn't any hint of late grade 5 toxicity in the Supplementary Table (S3), nor was there *any* dosimetric information provided in the paper to hypothesize about late aspiration events (such as DARS dose... and in fact the only aspiration event was in a proton patient). In principle, worse performance status at recurrence could prevent attempts at curative-intent therapy, but (a) we don't have information about salvage, (b) locoregional recurrence has in-field challenges regardless of modality, and (c) distant disease management isn't usually hindered by locoregional symptoms from prior CRT.
English
0
4
9
921
Nancy Lee retweetledi
Nadeem Riaz
Nadeem Riaz@xrtGenomics·
Now I would be remiss to say the skeptics (or haters? :-P )) cant be wrong. They famously were with the Al Sarraf study in NPC. IF the OS effect is real, we should have replication soon enough -- and this would be a gigantic win for our patients. I hope for their sake, I'm wrong , and we see this widely reproduced soon -- unfortunately though I think this is unlikely.
English
1
1
10
974