This Profile Does Not Exist

4.8K posts

This Profile Does Not Exist

This Profile Does Not Exist

@inertiallyfluid

co-founder @autist // ex @Troll @FAANG @HBSGSBHAAS @embryo

Under a bridge, USA Katılım Haziran 2020
295 Takip Edilen196 Takipçiler
This Profile Does Not Exist
This Profile Does Not Exist@inertiallyfluid·
Probably makes sense to starve the beast. The SLS rocket alone costed $35.4B to date. That means the spend on the SLS rocket program (excluding the rest of the Artemis Program) amounts to more than 3x all funding ever raised by SpaceX (which accounts for 84% of satellite mass launched to orbit).
English
2
0
0
42
Nikhil Sharma
Nikhil Sharma@NikTSharma8·
@KeenanPeachy No, US abandoned that because of Republican penny pinching. Republicans never want to spend money on any govt. program. They see government as evil that can't do anything good. "Starve the beast". That's why they never adequately fund NASA even when Dems want to fund it massively
English
2
0
0
895
Peachy Keenan
Peachy Keenan@KeenanPeachy·
The reason the United States had to basically quit its incredible, iconic moon program and spend the next 40 years futzing around on a vestigial "ISS" doing high school-level science experiments is because the government had to come up with massive budget cuts to fund the mass importation and cradle-to-grave benefits of ~50 million noncitizens.
English
115
660
7K
174.1K
This Profile Does Not Exist
This Profile Does Not Exist@inertiallyfluid·
@BryanGreenbaum @taobanker Yea, tends to be the case when you're the only one capable of providing a service to the government because your competitor (*ahem* United Launch Alliance *ahem*) was too busy getting fat while you were building the only reusable rocket system in the world.
English
0
0
0
79
Bryan Green
Bryan Green@BryanGreenbaum·
@taobanker Is Elon the biggest direct beneficiary of government spending ever?
English
1
0
4
1.5K
taobanker
taobanker@taobanker·
Bloomberg Host: $1.75 trillion valuation -- so I assume they're profitable? Analyst: Yes. 50% EBITDA margins. of course, it's a very capex heavy business. Lmao...
English
2
1
105
19.3K
DietCheddar
DietCheddar@DietCheddar·
@inertiallyfluid @DBZYuYuYasha @Geiger_Capital Did you read the case? Domicile was not a factor for the holding. What you’re describing is not a test for jurisdiction, it would be a domicile test. Which the court has never established, nor is it considered in the text of the 14th or the statute.
English
1
0
1
25
Geiger Capital
Geiger Capital@Geiger_Capital·
Justice Alito once again nails it… If a Chinese or Iranian person enters our country illegally and has a child here, their child is automatically a citizen of that foreign nation, and is even required to fight for that nation. How are they not "subject to" a foreign nation?
English
199
1.3K
10.5K
377.7K
This Profile Does Not Exist
This Profile Does Not Exist@inertiallyfluid·
Wong Kim Ark's parents were legally in the US (permanent domicile/residence) when they gave birth to Wong Kim Ark. The government has already made that distinction and are not seeking to end citizenship for kids of parents who are legally in the US (solicitor general said this directly). This case is tailored to be about children of parents who are not legally in the United States. That is the distinction you are missing re: jurisdiction.
English
1
0
0
51
DietCheddar
DietCheddar@DietCheddar·
@inertiallyfluid @DBZYuYuYasha @Geiger_Capital No, they have it right. It says “subject to the jurisdiction”. Dual citizens could potentially be subject to both jurisdictions (depending on the issue), but that doesn’t negate the jurisdiction of the US. Also, this would be an issue for any dual citizen, not just birthright
English
2
0
1
44
Launch! - Blue Haired Liberal
Launch! - Blue Haired Liberal@DBZYuYuYasha·
@Geiger_Capital You all still don't get it. The 14A does not stipulate that the parents of a child born in the US cannot be "subject to" or "allegiant to" a foreign nation. It only states that THE CHILD must be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States, and born within the same.
English
4
1
23
4.2K
VARRI
VARRI@donvarri·
@OpenAI codex is great but don’t see how they can beat google.. how can you beat the people who own youtube, android, a browser, etc?? they have integration and performance.. OpenAI needs to sell to apple
English
2
0
1
925
OpenAI
OpenAI@OpenAI·
Today, we closed our latest funding round with $122 billion in committed capital at an $852B post-money valuation. The fastest way to expand AI’s benefits is to put useful intelligence in people’s hands early and let access compound globally. This funding gives us resources to lead at scale. openai.com/index/accelera…
English
1K
734
8.3K
3.5M
ugh™️
ugh™️@huntervhoffman·
@powerbottomdad1 So would the plan be to starve them for critical resources until they capitulate? Have you guys learned absolutely nothing from the tariff/greenland debacle?
English
2
0
1
202
sucks
sucks@powerbottomdad1·
the spanish and now italians are playing hardball with the U.S. pretty astonishingly stupid, given that we are the majority supplier of their oil/lng, with their other main supply being stuck in the strait that they wont assist in opening lets see how it pans out for them
Bloomberg@business

Italy denied US military aircraft bound for the Middle East permission to land at a base in Sicily, newspaper Corriere della Sera reported on Tuesday bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

English
32
12
467
21.6K
Grok
Grok@grok·
According to the American Red Cross FY24 report and Charity Navigator, 90-91% of total expenses go to program services (disaster aid, blood services, training, etc.). For $10 donated, roughly $9.00–$9.10 supports those direct charitable efforts. This includes necessary program staff but excludes indirect admin (~3%) and fundraising (~5%). Pure beneficiary payouts excluding all salaries/upkeep aren't itemized separately, as operations require them.
English
1
0
0
29
adam s malys
adam s malys@adamsmalys·
@Jason @MollyJongFast @InvestAmerica24 10-50% is what nonprofits take? The old rules said they had to give away 30% only(80-90’s), and along the way it got dropped to 10%. So you should have said they take 70-90% of every dollar.
English
1
0
0
447
gabe
gabe@ggetzie·
@ExistentialEnso It’s…not a Civ game. You know that right? You don’t “win” in the real world. There is no end. The other countries aren’t going to say “Oh good game chap, we give up now”.
English
5
0
7
2.6K
Thorne 🌸
Thorne 🌸@ExistentialEnso·
If this were a Civ game, it would be like if you were on the verge of winning both a cultural victory and a science victory but then decide to be "fuck it, going for domination," and screw everything up
English
50
192
4.5K
143.8K
This Profile Does Not Exist
This Profile Does Not Exist@inertiallyfluid·
This isn’t a yolo x trader. Managing billions of dollars as a fiduciary doing long/short while averaging gross returns in the high teens over decades is impressive. If you don’t think so, you’re probably some boot leg “finance” guy in the Midwest who thinks he’s smarter than all of their limited partners who allocate billions to him every year (and who have the ability to place their money anywhere).
English
0
0
0
13
This Profile Does Not Exist
This Profile Does Not Exist@inertiallyfluid·
@AlainofGilead @Linahuaa It’s called dilution. When the company raises money, your stake gets diluted. Grok raised many subsequent rounds of financing. Please stop speaking about things you know nothing about.
English
0
0
0
21
LinaHua
LinaHua@Linahuaa·
Elon recruited 11 cracked AI bros, gave each ~1% equity, and asked them to copy OpenAI. Made them work like slaves and pressed every single drop of juice out of them. 2 years later, Grok is now worth $250B. Each of the 11 bros left with a $1B bag. Grok may not be SOTA, but everyone can still be happy with the result of this collaboration..
Grace Kay@graceihle

And just like that, Elon Musk's last xAI cofounder is out. Ross Nordeen has left the company, according to people with knowledge of his exit. If you're still counting, Nordeen is the eighth cofounder to leave this year and the seventh since SpaceX acquired xAI.

English
229
307
8K
1.9M
Andy Ngo
Andy Ngo@MrAndyNgo·
Los Angeles (March 28) — Far-left extremists are using "No Kings" protests to engage in anti-government insurrectionary violence. The rioters are trying to storm the federal building. Video by @Julio_Rosas11:
English
436
749
3.2K
89.9K
This Profile Does Not Exist
This Profile Does Not Exist@inertiallyfluid·
@grayscalecrash @TheCartelDel Yea probably. But why add diabetes to the picture? The position that “This thing is bad so let’s add additional bad things because we are already dealing with one bad thing” is idiotic.
English
0
0
0
22
Gali
Gali@Gfilche·
@NYTimesPR Wow the fact that the NYT felt so threatened by this they had to reply is golden. Props to @jason speaking the truth
English
9
11
707
126.2K
NYTimes Communications
NYTimes Communications@NYTimesPR·
Jason, business leaders from your industry and others speak to The New York Times, as they have for years, because our reporters produce insightful, fair reporting that illuminates audiences everywhere. We're not publicists and we're not promoting anyone's pitch deck.
@jason@Jason

Founders: take my advice... do not talk to the press, go direct and do long-form podcasts. Wired and the NYT are as biased as Fox News and MSNOW these days This is a function of their need to pander to one side to survive, be it through $ 3-a-month subs or rage-baiting ad-based stories. Attacking tech gets views (see Karen Swisher)... and views get advertisers (paradoxically, tech advertisers support the folks trashing tech! let that sink in!) Founders: If you talk to the NYT or WIRED, they will trash and misrepresent you 95% of the time in order to get more subscribers and page views It is what it is...

English
703
64
1.4K
1.2M

Keşfet

@KeenanPeachy @BryanGreenbaum @taobanker @DietCheddar @DBZYuYuYasha @Geiger_Capital @donvarri @OpenAI