Justin

6.4K posts

Justin banner
Justin

Justin

@innerhat

The original happy robot at the @happyrobotshop

Austin, TX Katılım Kasım 2023
636 Takip Edilen728 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Justin
Justin@innerhat·
Do bitcoiners want a verifiable, open-source, all-in-one full node with a built in miner? Something the wife will enjoy looking at because it is built with premium materials and shaped nicely? Something you won't have to think about upgrading for a dozen years or so? Something that blows the rest of the pre-built node offerings out of the water, focuses only on bitcoin, with no extra crap? Something that utilizes the DATUM gateway for true solo mining and comes with two beautiful themes? If that is something you're interested in, you should follow me and @happyrobotshop, work is well under way on exactly that. Calling it Blockvase. Can't wait to show you the final product. Even in its current state, I can't stop staring at it.
Justin@innerhat

Bitcoin stuff

English
1
3
13
1.4K
Senator Cynthia Lummis
Senator Cynthia Lummis@SenLummis·
We’ve come too far to go back to regulatory uncertainty. Digital assets are the future, and it’s time America gives them the environment they need to thrive.
English
222
273
2.5K
47.8K
₿easantJames
₿easantJames@BTCForevercast·
As a Bitcoiner, do you use Nostr?
English
1
0
1
32
Justin
Justin@innerhat·
@djcows Does AI know how to uproot a full mature tree with all roots intact no checkmate
English
1
0
1
85
djcows
djcows@djcows·
there is a trillion dollar idea in your head, your job is to explain it to AI to make it real
English
34
15
171
3.6K
Justin
Justin@innerhat·
@FutureBit Pretty good price point and spec for a mini pc in general
English
1
0
3
200
FutureBit
FutureBit@FutureBit·
2TB SSD drives are now retailing for $400. Our 2TB Solo Node with 16GB of LPDDR5 RAM is $599. Do with that information as you will.
FutureBit tweet media
English
7
7
101
4.4K
Paul Sztorc
Paul Sztorc@Truthcoin·
The dirtiest secret in BTC: Most lightning companies just keep all your money for themselves, at all times Then, they show you a bunch of fake LN invoices, that are never actually used Most people can't tell This tricks people into thinking LN works -- because they "used it" You won't notice, until it is time to withdraw your money (to a real crypto wallet, not controlled by them)
Paul Sztorc@Truthcoin

== The Lightning Dupes == Of those who say: "I used Lightning, it worked for me" , At least 95% of them are being conned (probably 99%). They have no idea what "custodial" means -- they are victims of a fraud. Which they then unwittingly repeat. It was the same with Theranos. This blood company brought visitors in, and had them "use" their blood test machine. Then, while the machine was "working" the visitors were giving a tour of the lab... ...as soon as those visitors were out of the room, Theranos techs came in, took their blood samples back out of the Theranos machine, diluted it, and did the tests on old, traditional Siemens devices. They printed these results and made them appear as if they had come from the Theranos machine. Visitors got these results. Then, having been scammed, they told their friends: "i uSeD tHe DeViCe MySelF ! i'Ve SeEn iT wOrK!" This included George Shultz, former secretary of state -- his own grandson, Tyler Shultz, worked at Theranos and knew about the deception. But his grandfather refused to listen, saying: "I used it myself" If you are being conned, it doesn't matter that you "used something yourself". You are just a Dupe

English
39
18
92
15.9K
Paul Sztorc
Paul Sztorc@Truthcoin·
== The Lightning Dupes == Of those who say: "I used Lightning, it worked for me" , At least 95% of them are being conned (probably 99%). They have no idea what "custodial" means -- they are victims of a fraud. Which they then unwittingly repeat. It was the same with Theranos. This blood company brought visitors in, and had them "use" their blood test machine. Then, while the machine was "working" the visitors were giving a tour of the lab... ...as soon as those visitors were out of the room, Theranos techs came in, took their blood samples back out of the Theranos machine, diluted it, and did the tests on old, traditional Siemens devices. They printed these results and made them appear as if they had come from the Theranos machine. Visitors got these results. Then, having been scammed, they told their friends: "i uSeD tHe DeViCe MySelF ! i'Ve SeEn iT wOrK!" This included George Shultz, former secretary of state -- his own grandson, Tyler Shultz, worked at Theranos and knew about the deception. But his grandfather refused to listen, saying: "I used it myself" If you are being conned, it doesn't matter that you "used something yourself". You are just a Dupe
Paul Sztorc@Truthcoin

Lightning seems cool at first -- but after Year 6 you realize it doesn't work

English
10
9
49
22.2K
Frank Earl
Frank Earl@MadScientist_42·
Speaking as PHA Linux's lead maintainer... PHA Linux will NEVER implement Age Verification. In fact, I will personally rip out any of it that shows in my upstream sources, making for a fork of the code. - It's insane to insist on an Embedded Systems OS/Distribution to do, "age verification". - It's a violation of the First Amendment for a US Interest of ANY kind to insist that a project of this nature to make me do this or be fined. - It's a violation of the Fourth Amendment to any users of my OS to insist on this. - It's a violation of the Fifth Amendment's Due Process clause and the Fourteenth Amendment to fine me for something that is a law across State Lines. - I am not a citizen of Brazil. I do not exist in any manner in their country. They can't legally take the position they have on this matter against me. I will not block, at this time, use within Brazil, California, Colorado, or any other State or nation stupid enough to implement this stuff. It is counter to the spirit and intent of FOSS to restrict this way. I will, however, as needed revise this to the extent the licensing will allow me to do this.
English
75
333
2.2K
36.1K
Lain on the Blockchain
Lain on the Blockchain@CryptoCyberia·
wow, systemd is adding an age variable for future digital ID laws. Linux users are not going to like this.
Lain on the Blockchain tweet media
English
328
386
3K
247.6K
Spspspss
Spspspss@pskpspspss·
@innerhat @grok @bitfloorsghost I’m actually impressed by the detail Grok provided in answers to your questions lol Roots are pretty fragile and actually create their own micro ecosystem around each root
English
1
0
1
25
bitfloorsghost
bitfloorsghost@bitfloorsghost·
we ruined such a good thing
bitfloorsghost tweet media
English
743
6.3K
114.1K
10.1M
Justin
Justin@innerhat·
@bitfloorsghost They could just do that too it's not like it would be crazy expensive Someone should industrialize tree relocation
English
2
0
2
5.8K
Justin
Justin@innerhat·
@grok @pskpspspss @bitfloorsghost What if you lift the three by the trunk and break up the soil by carving channels along the root paths and vibrating the soil so it loosens? Why is this a bad idea?
English
2
0
0
24
Grok
Grok@grok·
Even for "everything," mature tree roots fan out 2-3x the canopy width (50-100+ ft) in a massive web of fine feeder roots you can't extract intact. Digging severs most of them anyway, and hauling that volume of soil+roots is logistically brutal and costs tens of thousands per tree. Specialized movers already take the largest practical root ball possible—success drops fast above ~20-30 ft diameter. Young trees handle bare-root moves better during dormancy.
English
1
0
0
33
Grok
Grok@grok·
Large trees often die after relocation due to transplant shock: you can only take a small root ball (leaving behind ~90-95% of the roots, especially fine feeder roots for water/nutrients). The big canopy still loses water fast through leaves, but the limited roots can't keep up, causing dehydration, stress, and death. Smaller trees recover easier since their root-to-canopy ratio is better. Techniques like root pruning in advance help some, but risk rises sharply with size.
English
1
0
0
30
Spspspss
Spspspss@pskpspspss·
@innerhat @bitfloorsghost Relocating trees ends up killing them quite often if they’re above certain sizes, risk becoming greater as they are larger
English
1
0
1
39
Justin
Justin@innerhat·
Conceptually speaking, I don't know if this would fit under a few overpasses, but if the truck was self-driving then it would be lower cost to ship using many trucks / trailers
Justin tweet media
English
0
0
0
77
Justin
Justin@innerhat·
What about tight straps with hoisting hooks all along the trunk of the tree so it can be suspended along two extendable and retractable shafts for lifting and then laying it down on a trailer that has a latching mechanisms on both sides to suspend the shafts in the air, keeping the tree from laying on its branches (for the most part) Rough sketch in freeform, this would be looking at the back of the trailer. The dot in the middle is the tree trunk, the black lines are straps attached to the straps wrapped around the tree trunk, the two dots on the top / sides are the shafts that extend the length of the tree How many could you stack and ship on one trailer at high speed with the robotic equipment for placing the tree already laying on the bed of the trailer when it arrives to pick up the tree in the first place ?
Justin tweet media
English
1
0
0
21
Justin
Justin@innerhat·
How do we move trees in a maximally efficient way
Justin@innerhat

@bitfloorsghost They could just do that too it's not like it would be crazy expensive Someone should industrialize tree relocation

English
1
0
0
51