Mike Beuoy

10.3K posts

Mike Beuoy banner
Mike Beuoy

Mike Beuoy

@inpredict

actuary | creator of https://t.co/BTWJrSMjWY | co-creator of https://t.co/HNxUmLCtpq | you can also find me at bsky under the same handle

Los Angeles Katılım Temmuz 2013
515 Takip Edilen17.2K Takipçiler
Mike Beuoy retweetledi
Taylor Snarr
Taylor Snarr@taylor_snarr·
Wow what a finish 🎯
Taylor Snarr tweet media
English
1
1
8
1.6K
Mike Beuoy
Mike Beuoy@inpredict·
Hockey win probability charts are something else.
Mike Beuoy tweet media
English
2
8
1.9K
57.5K
Mike Beuoy
Mike Beuoy@inpredict·
@doganjr Sample size is 77 games. And the model also looks at leads by 0, 2, etc. and then does a best fit line.
English
0
0
1
23
doganjr
doganjr@doganjr·
@inpredict I believe that these sharp conditions would shrink the sample size and may cause some sort of overfitting issue that yields not highly credible estimations even with a 10 season data. I mean, toss a coin just 4 times, observe 3 heads. Could you surely say that P(Head)=3/4 ?
English
1
0
0
40
Mike Beuoy
Mike Beuoy@inpredict·
The Sixers were 360 basis points from elimination early in the 3rd quarter.
Mike Beuoy tweet media
English
2
0
13
1.8K
Mike Beuoy
Mike Beuoy@inpredict·
@doganjr This is based on actual game results. Over the past 10 seasons, when a favorite of 9 to 13 points had a 1 point lead at the end of the 3rd quarter, they won 75% of the time.
English
1
0
1
57
doganjr
doganjr@doganjr·
@inpredict I think the model relies on prior estimation more than it should. Celtics should not be that much favored at the end of the 3rd quarter since a heavily favored side before the game mostly does not finish the 3rd quarter with a margin like that and the reduced remaining time.
English
1
0
1
70
Mike Beuoy
Mike Beuoy@inpredict·
it's fun when your ggplots go off the rails in aesthetically interesting ways
Mike Beuoy tweet media
English
0
0
29
2.1K
keira
keira@thunderwarningg·
guess the artist from the release years of their albums and my opinion (hard) 1993: good 1995: PEAK 1997: EXCELLENT 2000: EXCELLENT 2001: good 2003: GREAT 2007: PEAK 2011: good 2016: GREAT
English
94
9
1.8K
198.5K
Mike Beuoy
Mike Beuoy@inpredict·
@BiddleeeW Songs that aren’t title tracks on their own but when combined say the name of the album: Lola Powerman The Moneygoround from “Lola Versus Powerman and the Moneygoround”
English
0
0
0
267
biddleee! 🍉
biddleee! 🍉@BiddleeeW·
Songs that aren't title tracks where they say the name of the album. Anyone got any more?
biddleee! 🍉 tweet media
English
763
58
2.7K
262.7K
Mike Beuoy
Mike Beuoy@inpredict·
@JacobsVegasLife At long last we have created the Torment Nexus, from the classic novel….
English
0
0
2
435
Jacob Orth
Jacob Orth@JacobsVegasLife·
Slot machines can now follow you across the casino floor😳
English
526
393
9.2K
17.7M
Mike Beuoy retweetledi
Michael Lopez
Michael Lopez@StatsbyLopez·
NBA 🤝 NFL
Michael Lopez tweet mediaMichael Lopez tweet mediaMichael Lopez tweet media
English
4
2
96
10.4K
jason
jason@onlyTrueJason·
@tangotiger @inpredict I understand the logic behind +2 (converting wins to losses) and +2.5 (games needed to lose to get to that win percent), but what's the logic behind +4?
English
2
0
0
579
Tangotiger 🍁
Tangotiger 🍁@tangotiger·
A team has 10 wins and 0 losses A. How many games above .500 is that team? B. How many games above .800 is that team? Glove slap: @inpredict
English
8
0
5
6.5K
Trav
Trav@HeHateMe2_0·
@inpredict @matsonj These are 2 different metrics. What hes describing is relative to a team. Thats "games up." .800 is just a baseline. There is no 4-1 or 8-2.
English
1
0
3
219
Mike Beuoy
Mike Beuoy@inpredict·
I’m legitimately curious: If you’re 10-0, how many games above 0.800 are you?
English
9
0
4
8.1K
David Hess
David Hess@AudacityOfHoops·
@inpredict You are 2 *wins* above an .800 baseline, and "games above .800" has no meaning.
English
1
0
2
687
Mike Beuoy
Mike Beuoy@inpredict·
@matsonj All you’ve been told is 0.800. What’s your answer.
English
1
0
0
714
Mike Beuoy
Mike Beuoy@inpredict·
@KentWeyrauch @_kaodi_ I think you’d pick 2.5 then. That’s the math answer for how many games you’d have to lose in a row to get to 0.800.
English
2
0
2
249
Kent Weyrauch
Kent Weyrauch@KentWeyrauch·
@inpredict @_kaodi_ Isn't "above a 8-2 team" and "above .800" two different questions? One is comparing to other current teams and the other is comparing your record to a benchmark. You need to lose 3 games to dip below .800 so I chose none of the above. I would've chose 2 if it was 8-2 instead.
English
1
0
1
256
Mike Beuoy
Mike Beuoy@inpredict·
@_kaodi_ I agree. And 5 games above a 5-5 team.
English
1
0
3
589