INRI Goods Actual

@extradeadjcb Dang, I could kill for some Pyrodoxine Hydrochloride right now.

Everything baby needs

@GGadsen32150 Han shot first. Be like Han.

Shoot First Like A Pro.

@owroot Because they trained these models only on Ron Burgundy warming up his vocal chords before a broadcast. "The Human Torch was denied a bank loan..."

One of the easiest ways to tell AI is the mouth when speaking. The mouth is never right. It’s not just that it’s too smooth, it’s something else. It’s just very easy to tell.

We are nearing the end now, we've almost used up all the sentences.

America cannot be great again until the epidemic of men in suits wearing white-soled casual shoes is extirpated.

Kino.

Regardless of how loose moral standards become I will not lower mine Regardless of how much the culture around me degenerates and crumbles I will hold firm Regardless of how vile and sloppy my generation behaves I will be a gentleman

@oddhanfoo @TravisSCouture A frighteningly plausible scenario.

@TravisSCouture I won’t be terribly surprised if my grandchildren end up fighting to dislodge the PLA and its vassal army from the west coast.

Millionaires leaving WA is “super overblown”? It’s already happening! And if they do leave then she says “bye”? 1. Probably not wise to villainize the successful people who pay an extraordinary amount of taxes for your wasteful and even fraudulent utopian schemes. 2. This is a shadow attack on the poor, who will be left holding the bag to pay for all of Mayor Wilson’s actions and words when all those ‘nasty’ rich folks exit. Personally I think this is the lowest ratio between smallest amount of incredibly dumb things said to the most economically illiterate and harmful notions that I’ve seen in a long while. Only an entitled socialist with complete lack of real world experience can pull that off. We have a pack of economic arsonists running our economy. It’s like they want to send us backwards to 1980s Poland. It’s not progress, it’s suicide.

I have lost all respect for War Doll and will not be following him/it anymore. There might be other areas of agreement, but this take is so utterly wrong I cannot in good conscience condone interaction anymore. This isn’t some clever “hidden truth.” It’s a grab bag of half-understood verses, selective quotes, and a layer of conspiratorial nonsense holding it together. It drifts into anti-Semitism rhetoric while pretending to be spiritually insightful. On the Antichrist point, yes, First Epistle of John says there is a “spirit of the antichrist” already in the world. That’s not controversial. There quite literally is an actual Antichrist as a man (“the man of lawlessness”). To say otherwise completely disregards the entirety of scripture, particularly the Book of Daniel. Yes, the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 is relevant. It clearly fulfills parts of Jesus’ warnings in Gospel of Matthew 24. No serious Christian denies that. But saying “the end times already happened” ignores everything else in the same discourse: the visible return of Christ, the gathering of the elect, cosmic signs. Those didn’t happen in AD 70. They aren't symbolic, they are literal and we aren't living in the promised paradise. The “what must soon take place” argument is shallow word-parsing dressed up as insight. In prophetic literature, “soon” signals imminence from God’s perspective and certainty of fulfillment, not a strict human timetable. The same Bible that says “soon” also says with the Lord a thousand years is like a day. You can’t build an entire doctrine on one English adverb and ignore the rest of Scripture. On the Third Temple, War Doll tries to be clever, the scriptures do not logically prove there can never be a future physical temple. Revelation quite literally describes a physical third temple. You might argue about that, but you can’t dismiss it with a one-line quote ripped from context. It’s a shallow reading that strips Christianity of its central hope and replaces it with a hybrid of preterist theology and internet contrarianism, wrapped in conspiratorial framing. War Doll has adopted a niche interpretive system, rejects common understandings of scripture as naïve, and then frames his position as intellectually superior. It’s wrong because it cuts out the very thing the New Testament keeps pointing toward: a future, visible, global return of Jesus and a real kingdom on the earth. You don’t get to compress everything into AD 70 and call it “fulfilled” when the centerpiece events never happened. Yes, some of Jesus’ warnings in Gospel of Matthew 24 relate to the fall of Jerusalem. But the same passage goes on to describe the Son of Man coming on the clouds, seen by all, followed by the gathering of the elect. That didn’t happen in AD 70. That’s future. And Revelation doesn’t end in the first century. Book of Revelation culminates in the return of Jesus, the defeat of the Beast, the resurrection, judgment, and a restored creation. Those are global, unmistakable events. They didn’t happen in Nero’s Rome. They didn’t happen in AD 70. If they had, you wouldn’t have to argue about it. So what’s happening here is selective reading. Take a few verses, ignore the rest, collapse everything into the first century, and then claim everyone else has been duped because you (probably) have issues with Israel/Jews and the rapture.

Is a chicken’s head more stable than a $5,000 camera gimbal?

@rookisaacman @John_Hudson

@John_Hudson We all have our superpowers. Mine are just easier to spot than others.

can't believe that just happened: Trump got a NASA question and deferred to NASA administrator Jared Isaacman, saying "the best man to tell you that is the man sitting right over here. You heard that question with those beautiful ears of yours ... He's got super hearing"

@alphafox E) Walk off the end of the dock where my boat is moored.

The answer is always C

@DonShift3 E) Walk off the end of the dock where my boat is moored.

Do unspeakable shit with A, have a couple wild nights with B, have a couple different type of wild nights with C (and her big titties), marry D and get a PVS-31.

@Rebels_Raiders Everything is becoming slop because most "creators" (not just guntube) are creating content solely to satisfy the algorithms. Every time the algos change they whine "what are we even supposed to be posting?" and it's like "MFer, how about something you actually care about?!"

Is it really just optics? I’ll admit optics are more interesting than barrel length debates, but is that all we’re going to talk about? The same five optics on repeat? Do I just churn out “LPVO vs Red Dot Part 9: The Reckoning” forever? Buy 15 different uppers, slap the same optics on them, and feed the infinite slop loop? Because that’s how the audience grows? One video: “You don’t need a bunch of rifles.” Next video: “Actually you kinda do.” Then: “It doesn’t matter what you have, just train.” Followed by: “Actually only buy approved brands… but also consuming is bad.” Do I have to wrap anti-consumerist messages inside pure consumer content just to stay safe? Spend nine hours talking about optics so I don’t get REEEEE’d at for saying you’re mostly fine with one solid rifle? Is that really what everyone wants?

@EODHappyCaptain Spicy meadow muffin.

So like… This is a really bad idea. Don’t do this.

Alright. Fine. FINE. I'll go to the hotel parking lot and meet Michael Tracy.

@FightWithMemes Not sure I would assign any virtue to his actions, he sounds like he's barely sentient.

This guy exercised... an unnecessary level of restraint. Definitely more than she deserved. An aggressive response would've been perfectly justifiable. Side Note: her showing up dressed like that makes it seem like she had something else in mind? 🤨