Spilt Tea

@MASKTHING @cinnamontoastk Red doesn't only need 100% for everyone to live, it needs between 1% and 49% or 100%. There are more possible percentages within picking Red where everyone lives then within blue. And every single one of them have you living.

@itgoteverywhere @cinnamontoastk Red needs 100% for everyone to live, blue needs 51% for everyone to live. The question asks whether you prioritise self or group preservation. Can we please look at the implied question and discuss the merits of the different preservations rather than whether we are killing

This red button/blue button discourse is wild. 100% red saves everyone no consequence 51% of blue saves everyone no consequence 51% red kills all of blue but they frame it like its blues fault they had to kill them even though red is the only choice that causes anyone to die.

@best_clips__ ,nmm.m.m Mm... . ....mm.. .,m. M M.m Mmmmmmmmmmmm. Mmm..mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ..m Mm.mmmmmmmmmmmm.mm..j.,mmm.m..mmmm . Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmj mm mm mm Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.mm.,m...?.mmmmm.mjm.mmbmmmmmmmmm.,mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Mmmmmmmmmmm

The fact that the cameraman almost showed us as well

@engineers_feed 36

What's the missing number?

@chess_feed Rook G7 to B7

White to move, mate in 2!

@CodeByNZ Layout 1 hands down

layout 1 or layout 2 ?

@cerpow @UiSavior Took the thoughts right out of my head lol. Hard agree with you here. My only extra point would be that both A and B still feel, incomplete, like iterations towards what will eventually be the perfect share icon but they are not there yet

@UiSavior A and B: take something out of a place or box and move it to another place or ‘share’ it with someone else. C: connected balls read more as ‘connect’ than ‘share’ and are also the ugliest. D: a paper plane you throw to fly, which reads more like “send” than “share”. So A or B.

UI/UX Designers, which icon best captures the essence of sharing? 🤔

Wheee Whooo

@Rae_Aveline Hate to break it to you but this does replace jobs. Not just the engineers creating the $5000 tech that other are pointing out. But riggers, animators, etc...

This is a perfect example of ‘good AI’ It does not replace an artists job, it replaces a $5000 piece of hardware.

@byrdman I like it. If and only if we follow through. We cannot wait until BL5. We need her and the coming war to be relevant in all or most of the coming DLCs and we need to get to that war in BL4. I really like BL4 but if they dilly dally and do irrelevant silly things then ehhhh...

Okay it’s been long enough…. At first I was kinda meh about Lilith returning. She did her part to save Pandora in BL3 and it felt like a solid pseudo-send off. Then we got the little teasers that it might not be the end in the credits. Going into BL4 all the talk about it being something new really intrigued me since Elpis was involved with it all. Like clearly that was going to bridge the last 3 games story with this one. Then we saw the “find Lilith” story objective in the first gameplay reveal. At first I was kinda upset, but now I think they nailed it. Having Lilith back powerful as she’s ever been is great. Shows we’re likely getting to that big climax moment soon. The final scene of BL4 with what’s likely Lilith who’s transcended time/space was great. Still don’t understand what she gave us (maybe we’ll get a juicy EruptionFang video on it) but it has me excited for a potential BL5. I truly hope we get a big moment where all our former Vault Hunters return with Lilith at the helm!

@engineers_feed Many people are getting the correct answer: 1, for the wrong reasons: PEMDAS multiplication being higher priority than division. If you try to plug this into several different calculators, you will see what is happening. The denominator is 2(1+2) not just 2.

World of Engineering Quiz: Can you solve 6÷2(1+2)=?

@cremieuxrecueil Without even checking the sources and methods of the studies that lead to this graph. It still basically proves the point. 25% chance they leave, 25% they suicide, 50% chance they are stopped by a good guy. And something like 90% of that 50% is with a gun.

After the Uvalde school shooting, the New York Times produced this graphic:

@Xwing_45 The Green Lantern movie should be about a seasoned Hal Jordan (mid to late 40s) playing mentor to his new hot shot rookie partner, Jon Stewart (late 20s-early 30s). It should feel like a mix of Men In Black and Lethal Weapon in space! Tom Cruise and JD Washington.

@_6signxxx Many young guys will learn right away the messed up things their fathers did. Most of those same young guys will only find out/figure out what their mother messed up later. When they do, that's one of the big crossroad moments.

How do men grow up with single moms & don’t have respect for women

Celsius is simply inferior for weather

stop. in your mind’s eye, think of the video game DOOM. imagine playing it, moving through a level. DOOM is now running on you

new ring ship iterations

I'm so glad circumstances allowed this to hit as hard as it has. Comics are pretty gunshy to new or innovative publishing ideas. And an honest to God promotion for it? 👊

@Devon_Eriksen_ I am very torn on this, I love Mr.Carmack, he is a personal Idol of mine and I both respect and understand his sentiment. But I cannot deny the power of your words here. The pendulum is swinging, the times are changing, however slowly, how we handle that, will define everything.

Once again, I'm forced by my conscience to disagree. How you contend depends on the terrain. In the late 1980s, when I was 15 years old, getting someone fired for a political statement would have been completely beyond the pale. But so would cheering for an assassin. The world, however, has moved on, and it was not republican voters who were behind it, pushing. These kinds of nuclear tactics are the new normal which Obama's careful study of Saul Alinsky brought us to. No one wants to live a world characterized by (metaphorical) nuclear exchanges, but nuclear exchanges, once they become part of the universe of discourse, and held off only by deterrence, not decency. If relying on the decency of the left worked, we never would have gotten this far. The only feasible strategy for walking this back now is precisely what the right is doing... striking back with the same tactics and creating an environment of mutually assured destruction. When the phenomenon of "cancellation" hurts the left as much as the right, only then will we hear the news talking about how it's a bad idea. Then they will pretend they were against it all along, and it's an entirely new and horrible thing that the right came up with all on its own. They will attempt to memory-hole all the people they put in prison for defacing pride flags, all the people who lost their jobs for refusing to participate in a medical experiment, who lost advertising sponsorships for wearing a red hat. You cannot recreate the genteel debating environment of a more civilized age simply by unilaterally pretending that it exists, and attempting to debate the radioactive cannibal zombies roaming the post-apocalyptic wasteland, instead of fighting them off with a sharpened piece of rebar. They'll just eat your brain. That metaphor may seem... colorful... but anyone who has been paying attention for the past few decades knows that the left's recent ascendancy, and its vicious treatment of its fellow Americans, is precisely due to its realization that it could take advantage of the fact that the right wants to play by Queensbury rules. But a set of rules can only exist by mutual agreement, and there is no mutual agreement. Unilateral agreement isn't good enough... if it were, we would not be here. I utterly reject any argument that we are "sinking to their level". We are not. There is no moral equivalence between an aggressor and a defender, even if they use the same weapons and tactics. The right remembers this principle when it speaks of the right to bear arms. It understands the principle of a justified response, and of deterrence, and of provocation, and justified use of deadly force. I am gratified to see that, at long last, some people on the right are starting to understand these same concepts as they relate to psychological, social, and political conflicts. It is easy to say that the left are "not our enemies". In fact, the left themselves said this for about five hours after attempting to kill our candidate, before going right back to calling us an apocalyptic fascist threat to democracy. In my book, the enemy is anyone who is trying to hurt you, especially if they salivate gleefully at the prospect. Do I really need to post dozens of pages of receipts, screenshots of leftists salivating at the idea of hurting anyone who voted republican, wore a red hat, refused to take experimental drugs? Or can we just agree to pretend that we have memories that are longer than the current MSNBC news cycle? Both my wives lost their jobs in that "papers, please" moment. Both of them were remote workers who posed no threat of exposing anyone else to illness even if the vaccine had worked instead of randomly causing people to drop dead of heart failure. I'm not a rich A-list author. I'm a working middle class dude. My parents grew up on farms in Minnesota. That year hurt my family, badly. It set back all of our plans, put our dreams on hold. Specifically, my writing career, such as it is. The last round of "fire the republicans" delayed my first novel by two years. If we get hit by another, there will be no sequel. I simply won't be able to afford to sit at home and write. I'll have to start taking calls from Indian tech recruitment sweatshops. I don't have the luxury of turning the other cheek and hoping they don't do that shit again out of the entire hypothetical goodness of their hearts. Maybe if I was wealthy, and could afford luxury belief systems, but I'm not and I can't. I have to strike back and encourage others to strike back with me, and to make sure it hurts, so they will think twice before trying this again. Being principled is nice, but it's also easy when you have no skin in the game. None of us are utterly immune to the consequences of politics, but some of us are a lot less immune than others.

@nadadocta @INERTDK2106 @Bweefi @brokenbrds 🤦‍♂️

@INERTDK2106 @Bweefi @brokenbrds Why

theres a right answer btw