itsmemfr

3.9K posts

itsmemfr

itsmemfr

@itsmemfr

Katılım Mart 2013
668 Takip Edilen59 Takipçiler
itsmemfr
itsmemfr@itsmemfr·
@iamWokephilly @amyknowsball You can pay $43 and eat or you can go hungry for an hour or two. Not a big deal. Eat quality food and 3 hours isn't a problem.
English
2
0
3
72
Woke
Woke@iamWokephilly·
@amyknowsball And What if I get hungry again when im out? You know, because moving around, and social interaction takes up energy Not everyone can live off a 12 year old boy diet like you.
English
3
0
10
529
Ryan Mullaney
Ryan Mullaney@mullaneyR3·
@rickjeff78 Rory was voted one of the most liked guys on tour… or do you just read celeb gossip
English
1
0
4
7K
Rick J
Rick J@rickjeff78·
There's no wider gap in sports for an athlete who is nearly universally adored by the public vs what a piece of shit they are privately than Rory McIlroy. Bad guy. Very bad guy. Peyton Manning is a close second.
English
106
11
527
297K
NostraThomas
NostraThomas@Tomplicated·
@sircalebhammer Not his best jokes but I think even you are trying to make it a bigger deal than it is. Not every joke has to have the room laughing and falling out of their chairs.
English
3
0
0
1.9K
Mark R. Levin
Mark R. Levin@marklevinshow·
The public is clear.  Any Republican who wishes to win an election better renounce immediately and publicly Tucker Carlson and several in his podcast cabal or they will likely be rejected by the voters.  He and they are hemorrhaging support and they are neither conservatives nor Republicans, but the media portray them that way to do maximum damage to the movement and party.  The president has renounced them and exiled them from MAGA. Don’t think the manipulation of comments and ratios on this site are the real world. They are not.
William A. Jacobson@wajacobson

The Dems and media are going to wrap Tucker around the neck of all Republican candidates, particularly Vance, and squeeze. We will all pay the price for his ongoing manic episode.

English
913
274
1.3K
104.1K
Westside L.A. Guy
Westside L.A. Guy@WestsideLAGuy·
Bros, if you’re not feeling it, just be honest & cancel the date. Sometimes you gotta send the HR text yourself.
Westside L.A. Guy tweet media
English
97
16
1.6K
170.7K
PMiller
PMiller@fatlilweinerdog·
@zerohedge A 12 pack of canned Mt Dew is 11.49 at Krogers. It was 2.49 just a few years ago.
English
2
0
3
477
mo
mo@Motweets123·
Over under? 3-4 months since last txt
mo tweet media
English
75
17
5.4K
1.4M
Rich O'Toole
Rich O'Toole@RichOToole·
Drop your favorite Texas Country songs below. Going to create a Spotify playlist. 👇🏽🎶
English
285
6
101
19.7K
jojo
jojo@rockstarnoguitr·
had a bad date with this girl but at the end of the day we’re all human beings out here trying…we all should be more kind and accepting to one another
jojo tweet media
English
1.8K
146
11.9K
22M
Derek Devicemanager
Derek Devicemanager@IT_unhinged·
An employee just asked for a second monitor. Standard request. Usually takes 3 clicks to approve. But they submitted the ticket under Software Procurement instead of Hardware Request. If I process it, my internal audit metric takes a hit for cross-category resolution. So I rejected it and told them to submit it correctly. They submitted it under Network Outage. I rejected it again. They emailed me directly, CCing their director, asking why I am blocking their productivity. I replied all with a link to our KB article on How to Select the Correct Dropdown Menu. The director replied to me privately to just give them the monitor. I said I would, pending a properly categorized ticket. Eventually, the ticket arrived in the right queue. I approved it in four seconds. Time to resolution: four seconds. Process is a beautiful thing.
English
228
322
17.8K
1.2M
Kenny 🐗🇺🇸
Kenny 🐗🇺🇸@merica_man84·
You don’t think that if it was faked that at least ONE person out of thousands that worked on the project would have leaked that it was fake? Also, how do you explain the laser reflectors that are currently on the moon that anyone (not just NASA) with the right equipment can bounce a laser off of?
English
2
0
0
89
Zachary Hall
Zachary Hall@WxZachary·
Genuinely did not know until the Artemis launch that so many adults don’t believe in the moon landing. I suppose I understand the skepticism, a little, but it just wasn’t that deep to me. Some people are SUPER passionate about this disbelief.
English
26
2
121
6K
itsmemfr
itsmemfr@itsmemfr·
@StumpGuyTy Have you tried Brunt Ohman Steel Toe? They come off and on much easier than a traditional workboot, if that's the main gripe. It was mine.
English
0
0
0
120
War Monitor
War Monitor@WarMonitors·
Your iq is automatically capped at double digits if you think the moon landings were fake.
English
507
336
6.2K
256.2K
itsmemfr
itsmemfr@itsmemfr·
@pbeisel First three points could have been done unmanned. Fourth point - compartmentalization.
English
2
0
1
63
phil beisel
phil beisel@pbeisel·
For all you highly moronic moon conspiracy theorists... The moon landings happened. Here are four bulletproof reasons why the hoax theory collapses under its own weight. 1. We brought back 842 pounds of moon rocks and geologists worldwide have been slicing them open for 55 years Apollo 11–17 crews hauled back samples that scream "lunar origin" in every isotope, crystal structure, and chemical signature. These rocks have zero water content (Earth rocks almost always have some), solar wind particles embedded from billions of years of unfiltered space exposure, and microscopic glass beads formed by ancient meteorite impacts— stuff impossible to replicate with 1960s tech. Independent labs in the Soviet Union, Europe, Japan, and China analyzed them and confirmed: same age (3.7–4.5 billion years), same exotic minerals like armalcolite, same lack of oxidation. If NASA faked it, they'd have needed a secret lunar rock factory decades ahead of its time. Conspiracy theorists never explain how we pulled that off while simultaneously "faking" the tech to get there. These samples are still studied today in museums and universities— you can touch (protected) pieces yourself. 2. Laser reflectors are still on the Moon, and anyone with the right equipment can ping them right now Apollo 11, 14, and 15 crews placed corner-cube retroreflectors on the lunar surface. These are passive mirrors (no batteries, no moving parts) that bounce laser beams straight back to Earth. Observatories like McDonald in Texas, Apache Point in New Mexico, and facilities in France, Italy, and Australia have been firing lasers at them daily since 1969 and measuring the round-trip time to millimeter precision. The data proves the distance to the Moon (about 384,400 km) and how it's slowly receding (3.8 cm/year). China’s Chang’e missions and India’s Chandrayaan have imaged the exact landing sites, including the hardware and tracks. If it was faked, the hoaxers would have needed to secretly land mirrors on the Moon— or convince every laser-ranging scientist on Earth to lie for half a century. Spoiler: they didn’t. 3. Modern orbiters from multiple countries have photographed the landing sites in high resolution—footprints and all NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has snapped razor-sharp images of every Apollo site since 2009. You can see the descent stages, rover tracks, astronaut footprints, and even the exact paths they walked. Japan’s SELENE, India’s Chandrayaan-2, and China’s Chang’e-2 and Chang’e-3 orbiters independently confirmed the same shadows, hardware, and disturbance patterns. These aren’t blurry NASA photos from 1969, they’re crisp, multi-spectral images taken decades later by rival space agencies. The geometry matches perfectly: the flag is still there (Apollo 11’s fell over during liftoff), the rover is parked where they left it, and the blast craters under the landers are exactly as predicted. A studio set on Earth couldn’t survive that level of global scrutiny from space. 4. The conspiracy would have been bigger, dumber, and leakier than the actual mission Over 400,000 people worked on Apollo. That’s engineers, technicians, contractors, secretaries, and janitors across dozens of companies and universities. Not one deathbed confession, not one leaked memo, not one whistleblower with hard proof in 55+ years? That’s statistically insane. The Soviets were tracking every second of the missions in real time with their own radar and radio telescopes— they hated America’s guts and would have screamed "fake" at the first glitch if they could. Instead, they congratulated the U.S. and kept quiet. Faking it would have required inventing better special effects, vacuum chambers, and propulsion tech than what actually existed while hiding it from the very people who built the real rockets. Occam’s razor doesn’t just cut here; it eviscerates the hoax. The footage, the rocks, the reflectors, the photos, the tracking data— they all line up perfectly because the landings were real. The moon is still up there, waiting for the next crew. The evidence isn’t "believable", it’s undeniable. If you’re still on the fence, go look at an LRO image of Tranquility Base or bounce a laser off those reflectors yourself. Remember: conspiracy theory is the sophistication of the ignorant.
English
521
545
3.3K
302.1K
itsmemfr
itsmemfr@itsmemfr·
@SenWarren You retards would have money to spare if you didn't send it out of country to launder. It's never enough for you.
English
0
0
0
2
Elizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Warren@SenWarren·
Jeff Bezos has $222 billion. If he paid my wealth tax this year, we could fund insulin in America for everyone who needs it plus free school lunch for every kid in Texas—and have plenty of money left over. And Bezos would still have $215 billion dollars to spare.
English
31.2K
5.7K
26.9K
9.5M
Andy Boenau
Andy Boenau@Boenau·
Driving 35 in a 25 is dangerous behavior, even if some call it "creeping over the limit." Slow down.
WM1972@justme1972xt

@Boenau If only that were true. Reality is cameras catch safer drivers creeping over the speed limit. The dangerous lunatics aren’t caught due to lack of policing.

English
7
5
87
3.3K
Dave Portnoy
Dave Portnoy@stoolpresidente·
Somebody please tell this fool my mother was a high school typing teacher and it’s grammatically correct to use 2 spaces. Take a seat clown
Strypes@FXStrypes

@stoolpresidente You know youre only supposed to use 1 space between sentences?

English
2.2K
403
14.5K
2.3M