volmaru

20.1K posts

volmaru banner
volmaru

volmaru

@jace48

Computo Ergo Sum. (Capital market is my hobby). BG image courtesy https://t.co/WxJPT6qqxZ

Katılım Ekim 2009
553 Takip Edilen3.3K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
volmaru
volmaru@jace48·
Show off time..
volmaru tweet media
English
22
9
159
0
volmaru retweetledi
Nashtafarian
Nashtafarian@Subhash_ati9·
Was there no state celebration of the 1st anniversary of Operation Sindoor? I mean that's the playbook, right? We normally have a grand celebration of such events.
English
2
0
5
236
Artful Dodger
Artful Dodger@RahulChels·
Finally visited Mumbai-Pune Missing Link today 😍
English
4
15
250
8.6K
volmaru retweetledi
NO CONTEXT HUMANS
NO CONTEXT HUMANS@HumansNoContext·
Life nowadays
NO CONTEXT HUMANS tweet media
English
30
363
4.1K
59.6K
volmaru
volmaru@jace48·
@nitin_twit @dbytesmith Hybrid. Most in city usage works on battery so effective Mileage you get is around 35+ ish. Regular Highway use you get same as Petrol vehicle.
English
0
0
1
38
Tintin
Tintin@nitin_twit·
@dbytesmith EV in india abhi mature nahi hai..so no EV. Petrol mein ganna juice milake sab barbad kar diye hain...so only option left is Diesel. Isme I will rate Kia Seltos good for its interior and overall vfm.
English
2
0
1
178
ByteSmith 𓂆
ByteSmith 𓂆@dbytesmith·
Bhai log, ek genuine sawaal 😄 Liya kya jaye Kia Seltos Top Variant 🚗 Ya phir Creta 2027 ka wait kiya jaaye? 👀 Specially long-term owners, highway runners, family guys, and petrolheads, drop your brutally honest takes. No fanboyism. Real ownership experience only. 🤝 P.S.: urgency zero hai.
English
20
0
8
3.3K
Gurjot Ahluwalia
Gurjot Ahluwalia@gurjota·
You want ₹ to stabilize. You want $ to come to India. • Remove STT • Remove LTCG • Reduce STCG And watch billions of $ flow into India.
English
284
820
6.9K
213K
Rohan 🦆
Rohan 🦆@G3ni3sWish·
Not at all anon. Just my childlike bs desire to keep following count distributed around the hallowed meme (sorry mean) of 420 But I'll stop if it's bothersome :P
Rohan 🦆 tweet media
English
3
0
32
16.8K
volmaru
volmaru@jace48·
@darpunn @LeverageAlpha_ it will hold up in bootstrap , not because bootstrap is faulty but it cannot see input outside of what is provided . So input == Biased bootstrap will confirm this as biased.
English
1
0
3
71
darpan
darpan@darpunn·
@LeverageAlpha_ ngl a lot of these look like overfitting the backtest It's choosing very specific decision boundaries based on only historical data you can ask it to bootstrap data or run monte carlo sims to see if these really hold up
English
1
0
3
281
L.P.
L.P.@LeverageAlpha_·
Kind of ideas I am getting while using Claude Code for trading are insane. The key is using different context windows for the same BT/live frameworks. Claude keeps throwing multiple insights that are really useful and give me ideas to think from different angles.
L.P. tweet media
English
6
3
26
2.8K
Rohan 🦆
Rohan 🦆@G3ni3sWish·
@jace48 Just finished writing a post on this :)
English
1
0
0
79
Nitish = Shukla()
Nitish = Shukla()@initishshukla·
@VivekVRao1 What do you think about developing a sense for fundamental factors first, and only then using quant models to then trade using algorithms?
English
1
0
0
374
Vivek V Rao
Vivek V Rao@VivekVRao1·
I've known stock analysts who are always digging into the details of the companies and industries they cover. They plug those details into a spreadsheet or even just a mental model of how much their stocks should be worth. So the mathematical methods and software they use is simple, but for the good ones, the range of inputs they use is vast and often changing. Quants look at a broader range of companies or at trading at a higher frequency, so the inputs they use are more standardized, and they focus on the details of execution, data quality, and algorithms. What kind of analyst to be, fundamental or quantitative, depends on what details you find more interesting and are talented at handling.
experquisite@experquisite

Quant trading is just digging into the details of every little god damned thing, every day, until you die

English
2
8
151
19.9K
Rohan 🦆
Rohan 🦆@G3ni3sWish·
Yep I was thinking of writing a thread on this. But the whole thing is quite hairy It is easier to code than to write about
Rohan 🦆 tweet media
English
3
1
12
1.7K
volmaru
volmaru@jace48·
@TanmayKurtkoti The vantage point of study is different from actual expectation/experience of investor, case in point Peter lynch who had lot of a stocks in his holding. Although it fair to accept that mindless diversification and/or concentration do not help.
English
0
0
0
59
Tanmay Kurtkoti | Quant Trading
Tanmay Kurtkoti | Quant Trading@TanmayKurtkoti·
Evans and Archer ran the foundational study in 1968. Statman refreshed it in 1987. The curve has held up across markets and decades Five stocks gets you to roughly 50 percent of the diversification benefit available in equities. Fifteen gets you to 85. Thirty gets you to 95. Eighty gets you to 99. The curve climbs steeply up to about 20 stocks then bends flat Past 30 names, every additional stock buys you a fraction of a percent of variance reduction. Past 80 you are essentially flat. The math does not care how the names got into the portfolio. Direct stock, mutual fund, ETF, doesn't matter.
English
2
0
6
490
Tanmay Kurtkoti | Quant Trading
Tanmay Kurtkoti | Quant Trading@TanmayKurtkoti·
Friend showed me his portfolio over coffee last weekend. Seven mutual funds. He had been adding one a year for seven years. Said he was "well diversified." I asked him how many stocks he actually owned. He did not know We pulled the latest holdings page for each fund. Counted unique tickers across all seven. Ninety two names. He looked relieved. Then we ran the math behind diversification and his face changed.
Tanmay Kurtkoti | Quant Trading tweet mediaTanmay Kurtkoti | Quant Trading tweet mediaTanmay Kurtkoti | Quant Trading tweet media
English
1
3
13
1.8K
Indraneal
Indraneal@omnilogist·
@jace48 I don't mean to imply it ever did - I've always been wary.
English
1
0
0
23
Indraneal
Indraneal@omnilogist·
I don't like adventure sports in general (the downside risk is too high) but I would especially avoid them in India with the kind of safety standards prevalent. It's just not worth risking death or serious injury for a few minutes of adrenaline
English
1
0
0
200
Tanmay Kurtkoti | Quant Trading
Tanmay Kurtkoti | Quant Trading@TanmayKurtkoti·
Pulled the 5-year backtests for three RupeeCase strategies last night. Same window. Same Nifty 50 benchmark. Five stocks. Twenty stocks. Fifty stocks 👇🏻 Wanted to see what concentration actually buys you The CAGR row says one thing. The Sharpe row says the opposite.
Tanmay Kurtkoti | Quant Trading tweet mediaTanmay Kurtkoti | Quant Trading tweet mediaTanmay Kurtkoti | Quant Trading tweet media
English
2
2
12
1.8K
volmaru retweetledi
Papers With Backtest
Papers With Backtest@paperswbacktest·
AI makes backtests trivially easy to produce. The bottleneck was never mechanical. It was always: why does this edge exist? Who is on the other side, and why do they keep losing? More backtests does not mean more alpha.
English
0
1
2
346
सौरभ 
सौरभ @saurabh_gunjal_·
Soch raha hu ek Pune ka chakkar laga lu Missing Link se
Eesti
4
0
17
1.6K
volmaru
volmaru@jace48·
@san1suresh @pranavvk So why is OMC, including Shell holding out on its own? Shell has hiked price but it online with dollar depreciation.
English
1
0
1
30
Sandeep Agarwal
Sandeep Agarwal@san1suresh·
@pranavvk true... i missed this completely that it is deregulated, and OMC's can decide on its own.
English
1
0
0
25
Sandeep Agarwal
Sandeep Agarwal@san1suresh·
🤣🤣🤣🤣 PS : Yes, there is no proposal today for petrol (may be already there for diesel). But It will come on 30th morning and implemented in 1 hour.
CNBC-TV18@CNBCTV18Live

#JustIn | Ministry Of Oil And Petroleum Gases Says, There Has Been No Proposal To Increase #Petrol Prices

English
1
0
0
154