Jake Hower

A few Easter eggs on desktop and landscape mobile. jakehower.com

@LIVGolfBuff @jerichsen66 @grok should you tell him or should I?

@jakehower @jerichsen66 Not by partnering with the agronomy arms of the sport lol

Nice

@LIVGolfBuff @jerichsen66 They are literally changing the golf landscape.

@jerichsen66 Uhhh yeah? Idk how anyone could say LIV Golf partnering with the R&A Sustainable Agronomy Service and USGA Green Section is a significant change in the golf landscape. It’s good that LIV’s agronomy will be better now, but by no means does this change the golf landscape lol

@ArtistGolferJon @603_brown @livgolf_league Two years in a row. Last year's was such a downgrade in UX from prior and this year is worse.

@603_brown @livgolf_league They broke what was working before just to rebuild an inferior version.

cant believe @livgolf_league went to all the trouble to re-do their web leaderboard and still failed to include the ability to sort by round (ie, to see who are top performers within individual round.).

@StephenRoche100 @AaronSchiro @GolfloverUK @flushingitgolf @ProGolfCritic Yep. The swap to 72 was a big miss for me too. Their name is 54! Will be interesting to see how it goes but I think it'll fall flat with the extra day.

@AaronSchiro @GolfloverUK @flushingitgolf @ProGolfCritic I think they’re in trouble, but not because of Brooks/Reed. Going to 72 holes was a big mistake. They need to be different, not try to match PGAT pound-for-pound. If/when the OWGR declines (which I’m sure it will), that’s them cooked IMO.

Noticed everyone’s thinking about Reed/Brooks departures from a Rahm/Bryson/LIV perspective. What about PGAT players who were tempted but reluctant due to there being no path back? Could this open things up in both directions? @flushingitgolf @ProGolfCritic @GolfloverUK

@jessethanley @openclaw Nice.

who knows if clawd/@openclaw is the future but we have at least one customer who asked for this and the people i see most hyped are like marketers/non-technical so let's see if it gets used!

@thekitze The only answer to your call for help should be Clawdbot.

who wants to help me organize a clawdbot conference + hackathon in february? 🤚 sponsors etc welcome, dms open

Built auto-approve for Claude Code, instead of --dangerously-skip-permissions. Checks local rules, lets you add patterns, sends the rest to Haiku to approve or leave for you. Caches decisions. ~80% fewer prompts. It's good. github.com/jakehower/agen…

@Shpigford @openclaw Isn't this fixed by letting clawd use a headful browser?

first "oh this would be LEGIT if this worked" task that i gave @openclaw was to update billing info for an expired credit card. captcha killed it. 😭 back to not having a clue what to use this thing for.

@Shpigford @initialcommitco I think there's also something to be said for some cold outreach to potential buyers who for each site. For example, Clear Terms would probably have been valuable to a legal practice.

thinking of how to make @initialcommitco more impactful (i.e. more profitable). what if i partnered with a marketing jack-of-all-trades (who's a lot like me in that they want to work tons of projects) who could get each site up to ~$1000 MRR. THEN we dutch auction them. 🤔

@Shpigford I use it to build an AI focus group of experts + ICP personas that I run feature ideas past. I've found that pretty handy. Agent deploys subagents and then they all interact via the agent.

what are ways you use claude code for non-coding tasks?

Agreed. They aren't stopping people from using it just limiting access in third party apps to the API. It's how most platforms work. I was surprised a subscription worked in a third party tool already. If OpenCode is so good, use the Claude API or another model.

@NoodleHairCR7 No one. This is AI generated, just prompt it to have Ronaldinho sitting too.

Who needs to leave for Ronaldinho to sit

Without signing a replacement of similar calibre to BK (top 10 in world at least), this likely signals the beginning of the end for LIV as a competitor the PGAT. They'll become another feeder/second rung tour. As the big names contracts expire they'll migrate away.

I take back my last post. This is the elite troll 😂

@LIVGolfBuff I did right after posting this 😂

@jakehower Peep Bob harig

This is sad. I love Brooks Koepka and have really enjoyed watching him play. This falls 100% on the new leadership for not being able to keep one of the biggest stars. Leaving during a contract year is a huge black on eye on what Scott O’Neil is trying to accomplish.

This feels like a troll post. Next will be an announcement he's recommitted.

@helloitsolly If paid monthly I refund the previous charge and that's it. If paid yearly, I prorate against the monthly price up until the prior month and refund any remaining balance.

Customer hasn't used your product in 8 months Asks for a refund for the whole period What do you do?

@im_toly @jasonfried Dark mode exists. You can adjust in the "My Profile" setting.

@jasonfried i just started using Fizzy. one thing that jumps out is when i add a card, i can't tab straight to the content from the title, i have to tab trough all the edit buttons. another is dark mode but i guess it's coming eventually

Here's an early 3-column layout idea and concept we had for Fizzy. This sketch was from September. Left column would be called Dump. That's where you add new cards. Like a triage section. Like today's "Maybe?" column. At center you'd have a series of boxes. These boxes are essentially collapsed kanban columns. But they'd be stacked. Each would be named and the number would pertain to the number of cards inside that box/column. You'd drag a card from Dump to one of the boxes in the File column to file it. Clicking a box in the File column would display the cards in the View column on the right. Still like this concept a lot. There's a real simplicity to it. Dump > File > View. Always three columns. The File column holds all the expansion vertically rather than horizontally with additional columns. The biggest downside was it didn't feel like progress. You weren't moving something through from left to right. We didn't have the idea of Not Not or Done in here either, although they could have been the top most and bottom most box. But still... Moving up + down didn't feel as good as moving left to right. Still might be something here! Just because we moved on doesn't mean it's lost forever. We often revisit previous, earlier ideas.