Kingsley Victor
17.5K posts
Kingsley Victor
@java_warrior
Software Engineer | Theistic Philosopher | Introvert | My opinions are not my employer's https://t.co/N573SkL13C
Lagos, Nigeria Katılım Ekim 2017
1.7K Takip Edilen556 Takipçiler
Nickname: Kay or KC (for some reason)
Sex: Male
Height: ...
Sexuality: The same as a ruler
Smokes: No
Drinks: Sometimes
Piercings: No
Tattoos: No
Fave color: 🔵
Fave food: Jollof rice and fried turkey
Fave drink: Fruity cocktail
Fave animal: Dog
Fave music: R'nB/Jazzy Blues
𝕮𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖎𝖆𝖓.𝕿@_theomakhia
Nickname: Sixtra, Tillis etc Sex: Male HEIGHT: 174 cm Sexuality: Straight Smokes: No Drinks: Yes Piercings: 2, both ears Tattoos: 2 sleeves and a handfull others Fave Color: ♦️ Fave drink: Beer 🍺 Fave Food: BBQ Fave Animal: Whales * Fave Music: Hard Rock/Heavy Metal
English
@GodstimeAtas So, how did you ascertain her IQ? Did you conduct a special test or you're working based on a bias (which ironically counts as a sign of a low IQ in certain circles)?
English
There is a difference between academic brilliance and intellectual excellence. This young lady despite her academic achievement, has very low intelligence quotient.
Nigeria Stories@NigeriaStories
Video of Overall Best Candidate Of The 2026 UTME, Owoeye Daniella Shares Her Testimony In Church After Scoring 372
English
Those are called "theophany", a sense-accommodating manifestation of God. God never appears as "God core", which would be overwhelming for the human senses (Exodus 33:20); He uses forms that are easy to sense without overload.
Ihunanya Chi ❤️@Ihunanya_chi
As a Christian, how would you explain this: the Bible says no one has ever seen God, yet many people in the Old Testament say they saw God, how is that possible?
English
What does it mean for something to be "objective"?
A. Its source must be void of personhood or subjective experience (or anything bearing semblance to the same).
B. Its source could be third-person or third-object relative to the general human experience or opinion.
English
@Machi1Nne You're not a Christian but your dumbness leaves my jaw dropped.
English
Tomorrow now, they'll chant that their useless mantra "atheists make no claims, we just don't believe the theist claim" when they're cornered.
Ranting Atheist 🎙️🇳🇬@RantingAtheist_
Nigeria IS proof that God does not exist.
English
@MarcusFidelicus You don't know more about any holy book than Christians. Go sit your fucking ass down.
English
Another one bites the dust
Christians get so mad when atheists know more about their holy book than they do🤣
"the 500 witnesses" claims another victim
English
@_Ochiedike Even theologians who are well trained in hermeneutics and the perspectives of antiquity still struggle to understand it. You, with your IQ of 60, think you fully understand it. Lol. Thank you for making my day.
English
We understand their theology perfectly and that’s why we need valid evidence.
Timø@Purrymann113
Religious people think irreligious people do not understand their theology, but in reality we actually reject religion precisely because we fully understood it and came to see it as a coping mechanism, not divine revelation.
English
@Purrymann113 Even theologians who are well trained in hermeneutics and the perspectives of antiquity still struggle to understand it. You, with your IQ of 60, think you fully understand it. Lol. Thank you for making my day.
English
@bootyclap69k @PrayPuffPlay Lmao! So your reasoning comes from personal incredulity and tiresome pub-style arguments?
Okay, let me up the ante; What would constitute evidence for a contingent world to you? Don't just say "why would it be". Personal incredulity is not an argument.
English
@java_warrior @PrayPuffPlay Because why would it be? There’s no evidence for this world being contingent on any type of being’s existence, and even if it was, where did that being come from?
English
Yes, because you don’t understand the difference between a contingent and necessary being. 🤷♂️
么 ꜱ ᴀ ᴍ ꪜ,@___TheGOOdWitch
English
@PhilosopherJoeC @thricethethal @JZeilan moral course but we can persuade them. Homosexual instinct is within such as we might call disordered.
2/2
English
@PhilosopherJoeC @thricethethal @JZeilan As Christians, we are against evil inclinations not mere wills. A killer wills to hurt but we regard it not as a respectable will. The will of a necrophile, while not dispensing any valid harm, is technically disordered. Of course we cannot force anyone on a particular
1/
English
It is OK if you don't want to have gay sex. I don't want to have gay sex either.
But if you think gay sex has to do with morality any more than straight sex, I worry about you, morally speaking.
What else might you think if it is on the right list?
[*This is just an opinion.]
English
@thricethethal @JZeilan @PhilosopherJoeC , my argument is a form of natural law. The internal or natural tendencies of biological systems should be recognised and engaged respectfully
4/4
English
@thricethethal @JZeilan @PhilosopherJoeC this skill does not grant the license to lie. Likewise, being gay or engaging in homosexual relations might make you proximal to a certain beneficial dynamic but it wouldn't make it a good thing.
I am not making an argument from disgust (you have assumed that for me)
3/
English
@thricethethal @JZeilan @PhilosopherJoeC the general ethical guidelines for how we behave but there are situations that are evaluated by other moral metrics (for example, are you impeding the will or the final goal of an entity? Do you consider them as ends in themselves?).
English
@thricethethal @JZeilan @PhilosopherJoeC Yes, I agree that delivering harm in certain situations is morally permissible. I understand the harm reduction thesis but I'm saying harm reduction as the sole or only way we evaluate moral situations does not work. Harm reduction certainly factors into
1/
English