Arrathal

@FiadhBaikal @fatebringerzw The people with bad reading comprehension left tumblr fir twitter and make it our problem every day

@fatebringerzw @thricethethal It was a joke omfg Dx

Sorry I think you mean "Men mental health awareness month" ^^

@TemiXo_1 Men would be so much happier if that was true

Convinced 90% of modern men are into men.

@Zarish5062 Goomba theory is strong with this one

Men: “She trapped me with a baby.” Also men: “Don’t you dare get an abortion.” Pick a lane. You can’t be both the victim and the one holding the gun.

@Leonard18_08 He is actually jealous that Nolan isn't with him

Without context this looks like a jealous Thragg attacking Nolan over Debbie

@Daisy_660 He's queer. If he sleeps with 10 men he is queer

Be honest.!!! he’s?🤔

@iam_nellyb "handbag gays" are both pitiable victims of the psyop of gay beat friends and homophobic women, and also the worst part of the gay male community.

What opinion do you have about gay culture that will have you like this?😈

@urmetallicgyal They better be the second with those DSLs

cheaters, gay, homophobic, and sometimes all three…

@human8175 @FiadhBaikal Release the virus that makes the Muslims go gay. They already kiss their homies when they say goodbye and wrestle half naked covered in olive oil.

@thricethethal @FiadhBaikal no all that does is invoke sodom and gamora at one angle and islam wanting to kill gays on the other.

@java_warrior @JZeilan @PhilosopherJoeC Thing is, biological systems evolve and gain more function. Sexuality and sex has too, as I have provided examples of it, thus homosexuality does not violate this natural law, which isn't a real criteria by the way. By your logic evolution itself is evil.

@thricethethal @JZeilan @PhilosopherJoeC , my argument is a form of natural law. The internal or natural tendencies of biological systems should be recognised and engaged respectfully 4/4

It is OK if you don't want to have gay sex. I don't want to have gay sex either. But if you think gay sex has to do with morality any more than straight sex, I worry about you, morally speaking. What else might you think if it is on the right list? [*This is just an opinion.]

@java_warrior @JZeilan @PhilosopherJoeC Both master and slave morality have evil and good sides. Master morality can be sexual liberation, meritocracy but also conquest and law of power Slave morality can be empathy, charity, but also repression, envy, elimination of intellectuals.

@thricethethal @JZeilan @PhilosopherJoeC the general ethical guidelines for how we behave but there are situations that are evaluated by other moral metrics (for example, are you impeding the will or the final goal of an entity? Do you consider them as ends in themselves?).

@java_warrior @JZeilan @PhilosopherJoeC Morality often ping pongs between master and slave morality. Early christian morals were created as opposition to Roman master morality, just like modern social justice movements arose against the conservatives. The morals of the bible are a result of the cyclical nature of it

@java_warrior @JZeilan @PhilosopherJoeC After all even most clergy admits that holy books have been interpretations of the will of the "designer" altered by human biases and time. Homosexuality is more sparsely condemned in abrahamic religions than and tattoos and early abrahamic morality is based on slave morality

@java_warrior @JZeilan @PhilosopherJoeC I have provided many reasons why for a social species gay people are not unnatural or immoral. Here is another: Gay men are the least violent subset of humanity per capita,less violent than women. Can you actually provide any reason they are immoral beside argument from disgust

@thricethethal @JZeilan @PhilosopherJoeC Yes, I agree that delivering harm in certain situations is morally permissible. I understand the harm reduction thesis but I'm saying harm reduction as the sole or only way we evaluate moral situations does not work. Harm reduction certainly factors into 1/

@java_warrior @JZeilan @PhilosopherJoeC Because forcibly erasing behaviour that is neither unnatural in the biological sense and not inherently harmful IS causing harm.

@thricethethal @JZeilan @PhilosopherJoeC Why isn't "therapy" or a similar treatment advised for homosexuals? What is wrong with aligning their sexual behaviours or instincts with their anatomy?

@java_warrior @JZeilan @PhilosopherJoeC Also you misunderstand harn reduction thesis. Murdering someone who tries to murder your family is okay, because the total harm is reduced. An "unsatisfied pedophile" is less harmful than a molested child. Same sex couples arent harmful by default thus not comparable situation.

@thricethethal @JZeilan @PhilosopherJoeC Harm reduction as a maxim could awry. If it does not work for all interactions, then the chips fall into a matter of selective moral bias. For example, how would one concurrently reduce distress for a pedophile while separating them from the objects/subjects of their 1/

@java_warrior @JZeilan @PhilosopherJoeC There is no real argument about homosexuality being disordered. Social sexual behaviours are common. There is no harm caused, and there are mechanisms for the body to experience beneficial effects of sex. Your argument is really just "bad cuz icky"

@java_warrior @JZeilan @PhilosopherJoeC Because two adult men having consensual sex isn't hurting them past like... IBS for a day or STD if not protection. Not inherently harmful. Pedophilia has a victim and always causes harm. Also there is no "intended telos".

@kiara7829 Legally speaking, female rapists aren't counted almost at all, which is deceptive. The numbers are closer than they look

Why do men rape sooooo much more than women do?