jbsloan

531 posts

jbsloan

jbsloan

@jbsloan

Head of Product for @NuarcaLabs.

Boston, Ma Katılım Kasım 2007
642 Takip Edilen263 Takipçiler
luca
luca@waynesfury·
i need them to play sisters in a movie at some point
luca tweet medialuca tweet media
English
31
495
14.5K
162.2K
jbsloan retweetledi
Joni Askola
Joni Askola@joni_askola·
1/6 Look at the absolute disaster unfolding right now, and remember exactly who told you to vote for Trump in 2024. The people who sold you this catastrophe should be discredited forever, and you should never listen to their political advice again🧵
Joni Askola tweet media
English
166
3.7K
15.5K
485.9K
Ian Francis
Ian Francis@IanFrancisrocks·
@jonathanbfine But isn't that exactly the point ! ... that LLMs are actually much closer to the way we think than we care to admit. As EM Forster said " how do I know what I think till I hear what i say"
English
1
0
9
1.8K
Jonathan Fine
Jonathan Fine@jonathanbfine·
There’s an essay by the German author Heinrich von Kleist that I think about whenever someone rhapsodizes about artificial intelligence. The title of the essay is “On the gradual completion of thoughts while speaking” (Über die allmähliche Verfertigung der Gedanken beim Reden).
English
23
74
1.3K
75.9K
jbsloan
jbsloan@jbsloan·
@kevinroose But unlike COVID it is completely unclear what to do to prepare. Toilet paper isn’t going to be helpful.
English
0
0
2
721
cinesthetic.
cinesthetic.@TheCinesthetic·
A movie that's in your top 25 list but unlikely to be in anyone else's?
English
4.5K
58
1.1K
2.2M
jbsloan retweetledi
Philip Leventhal
Philip Leventhal@PhilipLeventhal·
Listen to a very entertaining Recall This Book podcast w/ Peter Coviello, author of VINELAND REREAD, & Ethan Warren, author of THE CINEMA OF PAUL THOMAS ANDERSON on *One Battle After Another* hosted at West Newton Cinema bit.ly/3Md248P @pcoviell @marisa_pag @ColumbiaUP
English
0
3
5
871
jbsloan
jbsloan@jbsloan·
@emollick Guessing without the original post: Arxiv
English
0
0
0
26
Ethan Mollick
Ethan Mollick@emollick·
Great analogy
Rachel Blum@groby

@emollick ... but as a result, it's the most *useful* thing. No SaaS garbage promotions, no "shiny animations", no UX design struggling to be "luxe" and "have a spacious feel", just info. It's the Bloomberg Terminal of AI.

English
2
0
13
23.1K
jbsloan
jbsloan@jbsloan·
@atareh What debate are you watching?
English
1
0
2
75
jbsloan
jbsloan@jbsloan·
Are we living in a Sorkin scripted political drama? Well, it seems episodes are dropped every eight days: June 27 debate, eight days later George Stephanopoulos interview, eight days: assassination attempt, eight days: Biden drops out. Expect something on Monday.
English
0
0
0
53
Tom Edwards AI
Tom Edwards AI@tomedwards·
Have to say… it doesn’t *feel* that groundbreaking so far #OpenAI
Tom Edwards AI tweet media
English
11
4
61
17.5K
jbsloan retweetledi
Osage News
Osage News@OsageNews·
Osage Dancers on the red carpet of the 96th Academy Awards on March 10, 2024. Photos by Osage News
Osage News tweet mediaOsage News tweet media
English
11
553
3.7K
73.1K
Anthropic
Anthropic@AnthropicAI·
Today, we're announcing Claude 3, our next generation of AI models. The three state-of-the-art models—Claude 3 Opus, Claude 3 Sonnet, and Claude 3 Haiku—set new industry benchmarks across reasoning, math, coding, multilingual understanding, and vision.
Anthropic tweet media
English
540
2K
9.3K
3.8M
jbsloan retweetledi
Jameson Lopp
Jameson Lopp@lopp·
Russia has been pulling the equivalent of the "3 kids in a trenchcoat" trick on us for centuries.
Jameson Lopp tweet media
English
18
26
284
39K
jbsloan
jbsloan@jbsloan·
@balajis You are literally defining the party through victimization: "First, the Republicans are no longer the party of “white men”, but anti-anti-white men."
English
0
0
1
12
Balaji
Balaji@balajis·
THE MEN’S PARTY Republicans are becoming the men’s party. The party of strong men and the women that love them. This is both obvious and non-obvious. Obvious because the Republicans have been attacked for decades as the party of “rich straight white men”, so of course they’re the men’s party! Non-obvious because this actually means a distinct shift in emphasis relative to the recent past. Let us count the ways. 1) First, the Republicans are no longer the party of “white men”, but anti-anti-white men. It’s a big tent; you just need to extend the common courtesy of not attacking white conservatives and libertarians on the basis of race. 2) Second, it’s not *just* the party of men. Because married men, married women, and single men all vote Republican. As of 2022, only single women vote Democrat[1]; the state is their surrogate provider and protector. 3) Third, it’s now the party of strength. That could be actual physical strength in its Bryan Johnsonian or BAPian variations. It could be financial strength like Thiel or technological strength like Elon. It could be prowess with arms like Erik Prince or prowess with words like Vivek. Or it could simply be the moral strength to assert that the X and Y chromosomes exist. 4) Fourth, it’s not really the “multiracial working class party” that Sohrab Ahmari has been talking about. The Republicans certainly are more multiracial and arguably more working class than the past…but that’s because they’ve pulled in men from those groups who respect strength and are repelled by victimology. A Republican today could well be a working class carpenter, but wants to get wealthier some day, and maybe run their own business. And they might be nonwhite, but they don’t *define* themselves by their race nor make a habit of attacking white people as white. In other words, they don’t define themselves by their victimization but by their aspiration. Democrats are the party of victims, Republicans are the party of men. 5) Fifth, modern Republicans are ultra-libertarian. It’s about individual ownership of firearms, redecentralization of power to the states, deregulation, Bitcoin, and anti-institutionalism. There is some continuity with Reaganism, but far less emphasis on military service and far less trust in centralized authority. Much more sigma male than company man. 6) Perhaps the single biggest thing about redefining the Republicans as primarily the men’s party is that it ensures they are always competitive. No matter what happens demographically, the percentage of men is flat at roughly 50% — and everyone has strong men they admire and respect. That gives all-weather traction and global appeal. So, that draws the political battle lines. On one side, strong men of many ethnicities and the women that love them. On the other side…the opposite of that. [1]: washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/178717…
Balaji tweet media
Derek Thompson@DKThomp

For a few years, I've said education polarization is the most powerful force in politics. I might need to amend that. Gender polarization in Gen-Z is seismic and global. And these are sensitive years for political ideology, where ppl's views harden. via @jburnmurdoch

English
473
950
6.7K
2.8M
jbsloan retweetledi
Charlie Holtz
Charlie Holtz@charlieholtz·
David Attenborough is now narrating my life Here's a GPT-4-vision + @elevenlabs python script so you can star in your own Planet Earth:
English
693
4.4K
25.8K
4M
jbsloan
jbsloan@jbsloan·
Mind blown. You can now create glb 3d files using text prompts using @LumaLabsAI genie.
GIF
English
0
0
0
38